The aim is to investigate if there is a relation between patellar height and knee flexion angle. For this purpose we retrospectively evaluated the radiographs of 500 knees presented for a variety of reasons. We measure knee flexion angle using a computer-generated goniometer. Patellar height was determined using computer generated measurement for the selected ratios, namely, the Insall–Salvati (I/S), Caton–Deschamps (C/D) and Blackburne–Peel (B/P) indices and Modified I/S Ratio. A search of an NHS hospital database was made to identify the knee x rays for patients who were below the age of forty. A senior knee surgeon (DC) supervised three trainee trauma and orthopaedics doctors (HA, JM, ES) working on this research. Measurements were made on the Insall–Salvati (I/S), Caton–Deschamps (C/D) and Blackburne–Peel (B/P) indices and Modified I/S Ratio. The team leader then categorised the experimental measurement of patients’ knee flexion angle into three groups. This categorisation was according to the extent of knee flexion. The angles were specifically, 10.1 to 20, 20.1 to 30, and 30.1 to 40 degrees of knee flexion. Out of the five-hundred at the start of the investigation, four hundred and eighteen patients were excluded because they had had either an operation on the knee or traumatic fracture that was treated conservatively

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a joint preserving alternative to knee replacement for medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in younger, more active patients. The procedure is technically challenging and limited also by ‘one size fits all’ plates which can result in patient discomfort necessitating plate removal. This clinical trial evaluated A novel custom-made HTO system – TOKA (3D Metal Printing LTD, Bath, UK) for accuracy of osteotomy correction and improvements in clinical outcome scores. The investigation was a single-arm single-centre prospective clinical trial (IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04574570), with recruitment of 25 patients (19M/6F; average age: 54.4 years; average BMI: 26.8), all of whom received the TOKA HTO 3D planning and surgery. All patients were predominantly diagnosed with isolated medial knee osteoarthritis and with a varus deformity under 20°. Patients were CT scanned pre- and post-operatively for 3D virtual planning and correctional assessment. All surgeries were performed by the lead clinical investigator – a consultant knee surgeon with a specialist interest in and clinical experience of HTO. On average, Knee Society Scores (KSS) improved significantly (p<0.001) by 27.6, 31.2 and 37.2 percentage points respectively by 3-, 6- and 12-months post-surgery respectively. Other measures assessed during the study (KOOS, EQ5D) produced similar increases. Our early experience using custom implants is extremely promising. We believe the reduced profile of the plate, as well as the reduced invasiveness and ease of surgery contributed to faster patient recovery, and improved outcome scores compared to conventional techniques. These clinical outcome results compare very favourably other case-series with published KOOS scores using different devices

Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a technically demanding procedure, reporting poorer outcomes compared to the primary procedure. Identification of the cause of primary failure and a thorough pre-operative evaluation is required to plan the most appropriate surgical approach. 3D printing technology has become increasingly commonplace in the surgical setting. In particular, patient-specific anatomical models can be used to aid pre-operative planning of complicated procedures. We have conducted a qualitative study to gauge the interest amongst orthopaedic knee surgeons in using a 3D-printed model to plan revision ACL reconstructions. A tibia and femur model was printed from one patient who is a candidate for the procedure. The binder jetting printing technique was performed, using Visijet PXL Core powder. 12 orthopaedic knee surgeons assessed the usefulness of the 3D-printed model compared to conventional CT images on a likert scale. 6 key steps of preoperative planning were assessed, including the size and location of the tunnel defects, the need for notchplasty, and whether a staged revision was required. We found that surgeons preferred the 3D-printed model to conventional CT images only, and 83% of them would use such a model for both pre-operative simulation, and as an intra-operative reference. However, there were some variation in the perceived usefulness of the model in several areas assessed. This may reflect differences in individual approach towards planning of the procedure. Our findings suggest that 3D-printed models could be a versatile pre-operative and intra-operative tool for complicated arthroscopic knee surgery. While 3D printing technology is becoming increasingly accessible and affordable, in-depth cost-effectiveness studies need to be conducted before it can be integrated into clinical. Further study would be needed to determine the clinical utility and economic cost-effectiveness of the 3D-printed model in revision ACL reconstruction

Aims and objectives. Our aim was to evaluate the indications for patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee prior to referral to an orthopaedic specialist, and ascertain whether these scans altered initial management. Materials and Method. We retrospectively reviewed all referrals received by a single specialist knee surgeon over a 1-year period. Patient demographics, relevant history, examination findings and past surgical procedures were documented. Patients having undergone MRI prior to referral were identified and indications for the scans recorded. These were reviewed against The NHS guidelines for Primary Care Physicians to identify if the imaging performed was appropriate in each case. Results. A total of 261 patients were referred between 1. st. July 2018 and 30. th. June 2019. 87/261 patients underwent MRI of the knee joint prior to referral. The mean patient age was 53 years with predominance of male patients (52 verses 35 females). 21/87 patients (24%) underwent the appropriate imaging prior to referral with only 13% of patients undergoing x-ray imaging before their MRI. In cases where MRI was not indicated, patients waited an average of 12 weeks between their scan and a referral being sent to the specialist knee surgeon. Conclusion. 76% of patients referred to orthopaedics had inappropriate MRI imaging arranged by their primary care physician. For a single consultant's referrals over 1 year these unnecessary MRI scans cost the NHS £13,200. Closer adherence to the guidelines by primary care physicians would result in a financial saving for the NHS, faster referral times and a more effective use of NHS resources

Adequate range of knee motion is critical for successful total knee arthroplasty. While aggressive physical therapy is an important component, manipulation may be a necessary supplement. There seems to be a lack of consensus with variable practices existing in managing stiff postoperative knees following arthroplasty. Hence we did a postal questionnaire survey to determine the current practice and trend among knee surgeons throughout the United Kingdom. A postal questionnaire was sent out to 100 knee surgeons registered with British Association of Knee Surgeons ensuring that the whole of United Kingdom was well represented. The questions among others included whether the surgeon used Manipulation Under Anaesthaesia (MUA) as an option for stiff postoperative knees; timing of MUA; use of Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) post-manipulation. We received 82 responses. 46.3% of the respondents performed MUA routinely, 42.6% sometimes, and 10.9% never. Majority (71.2%) performed MUA within 3 months of the index procedure. 67.5% routinely used CPM post-manipulation while 7.3% of the respondents applied splints or serial cast post MUA. 41.5% of the surgeons routinely used Patient Controlled Analgaesia +/− Regional blocks. Majority (54.8%) never performed open/arthroscopic debridement of fibrous tissue for adhesiolysis. Knee manipulation requires an additional anaesthetic and may result in complications such as: supracondylar femur fractures, wound dehiscence, patellar tendon avulsions, haemarthrosis, and heterotopic ossification. Moreover studies have shown that manipulation while being an important therapeutic adjunct does not increase the ultimate flexion that can be achieved which is determined by more dominant factors such as preoperative flexion and diagnosis. Manipulation should be reserved for the patient who has difficult and painful flexion in the early postoperative period

Patients with knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) frequently receive one- or two-stage revision. To explore the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing methods, we analysed a UK registry, interviewed patients and surgeons, systematically reviewed literature, held a consensus meeting, and assessed progress of an RCT in hip PJI. In 2014, in England and Wales, knee PJI was treated with one- or two-stage procedures in 19% and 71% of patients respectively. Between 2007 and 2014, use of one-stage procedures doubled and, in major centres, up to 42% of treatments were one-stage. We conducted in-depth interviews with 16 patients with knee PJI and 11 surgeons performing one- or two-stage revision. Patients considered randomisation acceptable with appropriate counselling and, depending on infecting organisms and health status, surgeons would randomise treatments. In meta-analysis, two-year re-infection rates in 10 one-stage series (423 patients) and 108 two-stage series (5,129 patients) were 7.6% (95%CI 3.4,13.1) and 8.8% (7.2,10.6) respectively. In a series of patients with knee PJI, surgeons from 2 major centres considered 6/15 patients eligible for either treatment, with 4 more potentially eligible after treatment of soft tissue infection. In an ongoing RCT of surgical treatment of hip PJI, 116 patients have been randomised at 14 centres in 3 years. Randomising patients with PJI is feasible but, as knee PJI is uncommon, a multicentre RCT would be required. Based on WOMAC score outcome and appropriate assumptions on eligibility and acceptability, 170 patients would need to be randomised over 4 years at 14 major centres

We aim to compare post-operative length of stay and cardiopulmonary morbidity in patients randomised to either navigated or conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients undergoing primary TKA for osteoarthritis were prospectively assigned randomly to either navigation-guided or control groups and blinded to this. All patients received a PFC implant (DePuy, Warsaw, IN). In the control group the standard femoral intramedullary and tibial extramedullary alignment rod was used. In the navigation group, the BrainLab (Munich, Germany) navigation system was used. All operations were carried out by one of two consultant orthopaedic knee surgeons. Length of post operative hospital stay and the development of cardiopulmonary complication were recorded and groups compared. 100 patients were recruited (55 control vs 45 navigated). Patient demographics were similar in both groups. Mean length of stay was 7 days in the control group (range 3-101), 5 days in the navigation group (range 3-10). The mode was 4 days in both groups. 7 patients (13%) stayed for >7 days in the control group, 3 patients (7%) stayed >7 days in the navigation group(p=0.339). 4 patients(7%) required >10 days inpatient stay in the control group, 0 patients required to stay in hospital for longer than 10 days in the navigation group(p=0.069). The causes for the length of stay exceeding 10 days were pulmonary embolus in 3 patients, and chest infection in 1 patient. Patients undergoing navigation-guided TKA required shorter post-operative inpatient stays than those undergoing arthroplasty using conventional techniques. Fewer patients in the navigation group required stays longer than 7 or 10 days. The difference in post-operative stay was associated with fewer respiratory complications in the navigated group

Objectives

This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group.