Pain and disability following wrist trauma are highly prevalent, however the mechanisms underlying painare highly unknown. Recent studies in the knee have demonstrated that altered joint contact may induce changes to the subchondral bone density and associated pain following trauma, due to the vascularity of the subchondral bone. In order to examine these changes, a depth-specific imaging technique using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) has been used. We've demonstrated the utility of QCT in measuring vBMD according to static jointcontact and found differences invBMD between healthy and previously injured wrists. However, analyzing a static joint in a neutral position is not necessarily indicative of higher or lower vBMD. Therefore, the purposeof this study is to explore the relationship between subchondral vBMDand kinematic joint contact using the same imaging technique. To demonstrate the relationship between kinematic joint contact and subchondral vBMDusing QCT, we analyzed the wrists of n = 10 participants (n = 5 healthy and n = 5 with previous wrist trauma). Participantsunderwent 4DCT scans while performing flexion to extension to estimate radiocarpal (specifically the radiolunate (RL) and radioscaphoid (RS)) joint contact area (JCa) between the articulating surfaces. The participantsalso underwent a static CT scan accompanied by a calibration phantom with known material densities that was used to estimate subchondral vBMDof the distal radius. Joint contact is measured by calculatinginter-bone distances (mm2) using a previously validated algorithm. Subchondral vBMD is presented using mean vBMD (mg/K2HPO4) at three normalized depths from the subchondral surface (0 to 2.5, 2.5 to 5 and 5 to 7.5 mm) of the distal radius. The participants in the healthy cohort demonstrated a larger JCa in the RS joint during both extension and flexion, while the trauma cohort demonstrated a larger JCa in the RL during extension and flexion. With regards to vBMD, the healthy cohort demonstrated a higher vBMD for all three normalized depths from the subchondral surface when compared to the trauma cohort. Results from our preliminary analysis demonstrate that in the RL joint specifically, a larger JCa throughout flexion and extension was associated with an overall lower vBMD across all three normalized layers. Potential reasoning behind this association could be that following wrist trauma, altered joint contact mechanics due to pathological changes (for example, musculoskeletal trauma), has led to overloading in the RL region. The overloading on this specific region may have led to a decrease in the underlying vBMD when compared to a healthy wrist. However, we are unable to conclude if this is a momentary decrease in vBMD that could be associated with the acute healing phase following trauma given that our analysis is cross-sectional. Therefore, future work should aim to analyze kinematic JCa and vBMD longitudinally to better understand how changes in kinematic JCa over time, and how the healing process following wrist trauma, impacts the underlying subchondral bone in the acute and longitudinal phases of recovery

Background. The anatomy of the human knee is very different than the tibiofemoral surface geometry of most modern total knee replacements (TKRs). Many TKRs are designed with simplified articulating surfaces that are mediolaterally symmetrical, resulting in non-natural patterns of motion of the knee joint [1]. Recent orthopaedic trends portray a shift away from basic tibiofemoral geometry towards designs which better replicate natural knee kinematics by adding constraint to the medial condyle and decreasing constraint on the lateral condyle [2]. A recent design concept has paired this theory with the concept of guided kinematic motion throughout the flexion range [3]. The purpose of this study was to validate the kinematic pattern of motion of the surface-guided knee concept through in vitro, mechanical testing. Methods. Prototypes of the surface-guided knee implant were manufactured using cobalt chromium alloy (femoral component) and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (tibial component). The prototypes were installed in a force-controlled knee wear simulator (AMTI, Watertown, MA) to assess kinematic behavior of the tibiofemoral articulation (Figure 1). Axial joint load and knee flexion experienced during lunging and squatting exercises were extracted from literature and used as the primary inputs for the test. Anteroposterior and internal-external rotation of the implant components were left unconstrained so as to be passively driven by the tibiofemoral surface geometry. One hundred cycles of each exercise were performed on the simulator at 0.33 Hz using diluted bovine calf serum as the articular surface lubricant. Component motion and reaction force outputs were collected from the knee simulator and compared against the kinematic targets of the design in order to validate the surface-guided knee concept. Results. Under deep flexion conditions of up to 140° of squatting the surface-guided knee implants were found to undergo a maximum of 22.2° of tibial internal rotation and 20.4 mm of posterior rollback on the lateral condyle. Pivoting of the knee joint was centered about the highly congruent medial condyle which experienced only 1.6 mm of posterior rollback. Experimental results were within 2° (internal-external rotation) and 1 mm (anteroposterior translation) agreement with the design target throughout the applied exercises (Figure 2). Conclusion. The results of this test confirm that by combining a constrained medial condyle with guiding geometry on the lateral condyle, deep knee flexion activities of up to 140° can be performed while maintaining near-natural kinematics of the knee joint. The authors believe that the tested surface-guided implant concept is a significant step toward the development of novel TKR which allows a greater range of motion and could improve the quality of life for active patients undergoing knee replacement. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

To assess long and short term kinematic gait outcomes after rectus femoris transfers (RFT) in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP). A retrospective review was conducted of ambulatory children with spastic diplegic CP, who had RFT plus motion analysis preoperatively and 1 year post-operatively. Those with 5 and 10 year post-operative motion analysis were also included. The primary variables were: peak knee flexion range of motion in swing (PKFSW), timing of peak knee flexion in swing as a percent of the gait cycle (PKF%GC), and knee range of motion from peak to terminal swing (KROM). Responders and non-responders were identified. Descriptive, kinematic and kinetic variables were evaluated as predictors of response. 119 ambulatory children (237 limbs) with spastic diplegic CP who had RFT were included. Mean age at surgery was 10.2 years (range 5.5 to 17.5). Sixty-seven participants were classified at GMFCS Level II and 52 at GMFCS Level III. All participants (237 limbs) had a preoperative and 1 year postoperative motion analysis. Motion analysis at 5 and 10 years post-operatively included 82 limbs and 28 limbs, respectively. Ninety-three (39%) limbs improved in both PKFSW and PKF%GC. PKFSW improved in 59% of limbs. Responders started 1.2 SD below the mean PKFSW preoperatively, and improved by an average of 1.9 SD to reach a normal range at 1 year post-operatively (p < 0.05). Improvement was maintained at 5 and 10 years postoperatively. Those at GMFCS level II were more likely [OR 1.71, CI 1.02, 2.89] to have improved PKFSW at 1 year postoperatively than those at GMFCS level III. PKF%GC improved in 70% of limbs. Responders had delayed PKF%GC, starting 10 SD above the mean (later in the gait cycle) preoperatively. Their timing improved towards normal values: 5 SD, 5.9 SD, 3.5 SD from the mean, (earlier in the gait cycle) at 1, 5 and 10 years postoperatively, respectively (p<0.05). KROM improved in only 24% of limbs. For all variables, there was a significant difference in mean preoperative values between responders and non-responders (p<0.05). RFT improves short and long-term kinematic gait outcomes. The majority of children responded to RFT with improvements in PKFSW or PKF%GC at 1, 5, and 10 years post RFT. GMFCS level is a predictor of improved PKFSW, with children at GMFCS Level II having an increased likelihood of improvement at 1 year post surgery. Children who have worse preoperative values of PKFSW, PKF%GC, and KROM have a greater potential for benefit from RFT. Characteristics associated with responders who maintain long term positive outcomes need to be identified

Introduction. Partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) has demonstrated the potential to improve patient satisfaction over total knee arthroplasty. It is however perceived as a more challenging procedure that requires precise adaptation to the complex mechanics of the knee. A recently developed PKA system aims to address these challenges by anatomical, compartment specific shapes and fine-tuned mechanical instrumentation. We investigated how closely this PKA system replicates the balance and kinematics of the intact knee. Materials and Methods. Eight post-mortem human knee specimens (age: 55±11 years, BMI: 23±5, 4 male, 4 female) underwent full leg CT scanning and comprehensive robotic (KUKA KR140 comp) assessments of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics. Specimens were tested in the intact state and after fixed bearing medial PKA. Implantations were performed by two experienced surgeons. Assessments included laxity testing (anterior-posterior: ±100 N, medial-lateral: ±100 N, internal-external: ±3 Nm, varus- valgus: ±12 Nm) under 2 compressive loads (44 N, 500 N) at 7 flexion angles and simulations of level walking, lunge and stair descent based on in-vivo loading profiles. Kinematics were tracked robotically and optically (OptiTrack) and represented by the femoral flexion facet center (FFC) motions. Similarity between intact and operated curves was expressed by the root mean square of deviations (RMSD) along the curves. Group data were summarized by average and standard deviation and compared using the paired Student's T-test (α = 0.05). Results. During the varus-valgus balancing assessment the medial and lateral opening of the PKAs closely resembled the intact openings across the full arch of flexion, with RMSD values of 1.0±0.5 mm and 0.4±0.2 mm respectively. The medial opening was nearly constant across flexion, its average was not statistically different between intact (3.8±1.0 mm) and PKA (4.0±1.1 mm) (p=0.49). Antero-posterior envelope of motion assessments revealed a close match between the intact and PKA group for both compression levels. Net rollback was not statistically different, either under low compression (intact: 10.9±1.5 mm, PKA: 10.7±1.2, p=0.64) or under high compression (intact: 13.2±2.3 mm, PKA: 13.0±1.6 mm, p=0.77). Similarly, average laxity was not statistically different, either under low (intact: 7.7±3.2 mm, PKA: 8.6±2.5 mm, p=0.09) or under high (intact: 7.2±2.6 mm, PKA: 7.8±2.2 mm, p=0.08) compression. Activities of daily living exhibited a close match in the anterior-posterior motion profile of the medial condyle (RMSD: lunge: 2.2±1.0 mm, level walking: 2.4±0.9 mm, stair descent: 2.2±0.6 mm) and lateral condyle (RMSD: lunge: 2.4±1.4 mm, level walking: 2.2±1.4 mm, stair descent: 2.7±2.0 mm). Patellar medial-lateral tilt (RMSD: 3.4±3.8°) and medial-lateral shift (RMDS: 1.5±0.6 mm) during knee flexion matched closely between groups. Conclusion. Throughout the comprehensive functional assessments the investigated PKA system behaved nearly identical to the intact knee. The small residuals are unlikely to have a clinical effect; further studies are necessary as cadaveric studies are not necessarily indicative of clinical results. We conclude that PKA with anatomical, compartment specific shapes and fine-tuned mechanical instrumentation can be adapted precisely to the complex mechanics of the knee and replicates intact knee balance and kinematics very closely

Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a largely successful procedure to treat end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA), some studies have shown postoperative abnormal knee kinematics. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) technology has been used to understand preoperative knee kinematics with an open joint (arthrotomy). However, limited information is available on the impact of arthrotomy on the knee kinematics. This study compared knee kinematics before and after arthrotomy to the native knee using a CAOS system. Kinematics of a healthy knee from a fresh frozen cadaver with presumably intact PCL were evaluated using a custom software application in an image-free CAOS system (ExactechGPS, Blue-Ortho, Grenoble, FR). At the beginning of the test, four metal hooks were inserted into the knee away from the joint line (one on each side of the proximal tibia and the distal femur) for the application of 50N compressive load to simulate natural knee joint. Prior to incision, one tracker was attached to each tibia and femur on the diaphysis. Intact knee kinematics were recorded using the CAOS system by performing passive range of motion 3 times. Next, a computer-assisted TKA procedure was initiated with acquisition of the anatomical landmarks. The system calculated the previously recorded kinematics within the coordinate system defined by the landmarks. The test was then repeated with closed arthrotomy, and again with open arthrotomy with patella maintained in the trochlea groove. The average femorotibial AP displacement and rotation, and HKA angle before and after knee arthrotomy were compared over the range of knee flexion. Statistical analysis (ANOVA) was performed on the data at ∼0° (5°), 30°, 60°, 90° and 120° flexion. The intact knee kinematics were found to be similar to the kinematics with closed and open arthrotomy. Differences between the three situations were found, in average, as less than 0.25° (±0.2) in HKA, 0.7mm (±0.4) in femorotibial AP displacement and 2.3° (±1.4) in femorotibial rotation. Although some statistically significant differences were found, especially in the rotation of the tibia for low and high knee flexion angles, the majority is less than 1°/mm, and therefore clinically irrelevant. This study suggested that open and closed arthrotomy do not significantly alter the kinematics compared to the native intact knee (low RMS). Maintaining the patella in the trochlea groove with an open arthrotomy allows accurate assessment of the intact knee kinematics

Introduction. Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty(TKA) relies on restoring the hip-knee-ankle angle of the limb to neutral or as close to a straight line as possible. This principle is based on studies that suggest limb and knee alignment is related long term survival and wear. For that cause, there has been recent attention concerning computer-assisted TKA and robot is also one of the most helpful instruments for restoring neutral alignment as known. But many reported data have shown that 20% to 25% of patients with mechanically aligned TKA are dissatisfied. Accordingly, kinematically aligned TKA was implemented as an alternative alignment strategy with the goal of reducing prevalence of unexplained pain, stiffness, and instability and improving the rate of recovery, kinematics, and contact forces. So, we want to report our extremely early experience of robot-assisted TKA planned by kinematic method. Materials and Methods. This study evaluated the very short term results (6 weeks follow up) after robot-assisted TKA aligned kinematically. 50 knees in 36 patients, who could be followed up more than 6 weeks after surgery from December 2014 to January 2015, were evaluated prospectively. The diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis in all cases. The operation was performed with ROBODOC (ISS Inc., CA, USA) along with the ORTHODOC (ISS Inc., CA, USA) planning computer. The cutting plan was made by single radius femoral component concept, each femoral condyles shape-matched method along the transverse axis using multi-channel CT and MRI to place the implant along the patient's premorbid joint line. Radiographic measurements were made from long bone scanograms. Clinical outcomes and motion were measured preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively. Results. The range of motion increased from preoperative mean 113.4 (±5.4, 85 to 130) to postoperative mean 127.3 (±7.4, 90 to 140) at last follow up. The mean knee score and functional score improved from 35.4 (±10.3, 10 to 55) and 30.1 (±7.7, 10 to 60) before surgery to 88.6 (±5.8, 60 to 100) and 90.7 (±9.6, 60 to 100) at last follow up. The WOMAC score was improved from 52(±15.5) to 20(±14.8) at last follow up. The postoperative Hip-knee-ankle alignment was −1.3±2.8. The femoral component was 2.1 valgus and tibial component was 2.8 varus along the mechanical axis in coronal plane. There were no complications and failures. Conclusion. On the basis of our results, we are cautiously optimistic about robot-assisted TKA by kinematically alignment. More anatomic alignment of the implant can be associated with better flexion and better clinical outcomes scores in the kinematically aligned method in our thinking. But, at this starting point, more comparative studies with mechanical aligned group are needed and we must explore about implant survivalship issues and implant loading issues in dynamic and static condition that someone is worrying about. If the problem can be solved, there is no use worrying about it in our thinking. And what is more, the robot-assisted surgery will be very useful especially in those cases of severely deformed knees and distorted anatomy to be aligned kinematically

Purpose. Recently, kinematic aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has gained interest for achieving better clinical outcomes over mechanical aligned TKA. The primary goal of kinematic aligned TKA is to position the femoral and tibial components so that the angles and levels of the distal and posterior femoral joint lines and the tibial joint line are each restored to the patient's natural alignment, and not to a neutral limb alignment that is unnatural for most patients. Despite good clinical outcomes reported at short to mid-term follow-up, surgeons should know reasons why this method is useful and safe surgery and carefully assess the long-term outcomes until this new technique is settled as standardized procedure for TKA. The main purpose of the present study was to compare postoperative radiography and clinical scores following kinematic and mechanical aligned TKA. Methods. Sixty TKAs—30 kinematic and 30 mechanical aligned—were performed in patients with varus-type osteoarthritis using a navigation system. Using postoperative double-leg and single-leg standing long leg radiographs, joint line orientation angle to the floor, conventional mechanical axis (cMA), and true mechanical axis (tMA; line from hip center to the lowest point of calcaneus) were compared between the two groups. One-year after surgeries, range of motion and the patient-derived score of the 2011 Knee Society Score (2011 KSS), which includes four categories: symptoms, patient satisfaction, patient expectations, and functional activities, e.g., walking/standing, standard activities, advanced activities, and discretionary activities, were compared between the two groups. Results. Joint line orientation angles were 1.3 ±1.8 ° varus in the kinematic and 3.2 ± 2.7° valgus in the mechanical group with double-leg standing condition (p<0.05), which were shifted to 0.7 ± 1.7° valgus and 4.3 ± 1.9° valgus with single-leg standing condition, respectively. In double-leg standing condition, cMAs passed through 43.8 ± 10.2 % in the kinematic and 48.7 ± 7.6 % in the mechanical group (p<0.05), which were shifted to 49.2 ± 12.2 % and 53.7 ± 7.5 % in tMA assessment, respectively. Postoperative flexion angle was significantly better in kinematic aligned TKA compared with mechanical aligned TKA (121.7±9.1 vs. 117.3±14.8, p<0.05). Among 4 contents of 2011 KSS, only functional activity score showed better results in the kinematic group compared with the mechanical group (p<0.05). Conclusions. Kinematic aligned TKA exhibited parallel joint line to the floor during single and double-leg standing and neutral weight-bearing in tMA when compared with mechanical aligned TKA, which might result in better functional score

Knee kinematics are altered by total knee arthroplasty (TKA) both intentionally and unintentionally. Knowledge of how and why kinematics change may improve patient outcome and satisfaction through improved implant design, implant placement or through rehabilitation. In the present study we imaged and compared the 6 degree-of-freedom (DOF) patellofemoral (PF) and tibiofemoral (TF) kinematics of 9 pre-TKA subjects to the kinematics of 15 post-TKA subjects (Zimmer NexGen LPS implants) using a novel sequential-biplanar radiographic protocol that allowed imaging the postoperative patellofemoral joint under weightbearing throughout the range of motion, which has not been done previously to our knowledge. There were clear, statistically significant differences between the pre-TKA and post-TKA kinematics: for the TF joint, the tibia was more posterior and inferior (max 20 mm and 15 mm, respectively) in the post-TKA group compared to the pre-TKA group (p<0.001), and had neutral alignment in the post-TKA group compared to varus alignment (max 9°) in the pre-TKA group (p<0.001). For the PF joint, the patella was shifted more posteriorly and medially, and tilted more medially in the post-TKA group compared to the pre-TKA group (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in PF superior/inferior translation and flexion/extension (p>0.5). Both groups showed differences from normal kinematics, based on the literature. The kinematic differences are likely due to a combination of surgical, implant and patient factors. To investigate this further, we imaged the 9 pre-TKA subjects a minimum one year after their surgery; analysis of these data is in progress. Computed tomography (CT) scans and quality of life surveys were also taken before and after surgery. By comparing the preoperative and postoperative kinematics and shape for the same subjects, and analysing the interrelationships amongst these, we aim to determine if a different implant shape or different component positioning could create more normal kinematics, resulting in a better clinical outcome

BACKGROUND. UKA is functionally superior to TKA, with kinematics similar to native knees, nevertheless, UKA implants are used in less than 10% of cases. While advantages of UKA are recognized, ACL-deficiency is generally considered a contraindication. The hypothesis of this study was that fix bearing UKA in ACL-deficient knees, with appropriate adaptation of implant placement, would result in similar kinematic trends to conventional UKA with an intact ACL. METHODS. Ten conventional UKA patients were compared to eight patients with the same implant but a deficient ACL. A 50% tibial slope reduction was applied to compensate for instability resulting from the deficient ACL. Knee kinematics were evaluated using a moving fluoroscope allowing to track the knee joint during deep knee bend, level walking, ramp descent and stair descent. The results were further compared to six TKA patients. RESULTS. During standing, a posterior shift of the femur was observed for the ACL-deficient UKA patients compared to conventional UKA patients. This posterior shift was also present during the first 25% of deep knee bend. Most parameters revealed no difference in range of motion across all activities between the two UKA groups. This is in contrast to TKA patients showing different motion trends and decreased range of motion. CONCLUSIONS. Despite the posterior femoral shift due to ACL-deficiency, both UKA groups showed similar kinematic trends, indicating that posterior tibial slope reduction can partially compensate for ACL function. This confirmed our hypothesis that fix bearing UKA can be a viable treatment option for selected ACL-deficient patients

Inverse Kinematic Alignment (iKA) and Gap Balancing (GB) aim to achieve a balanced TKA via component alignment. However, iKA aims to recreate the native joint line versus resecting the tibia perpendicular to the mechanical axis. This study aims to compare how two alignment methods impact 1) gap balance and laxity throughout flexion and 2) the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK). Two surgeons performed 75 robotic assisted iKA TKA's using a cruciate retaining implant. An anatomic tibial resection restored the native joint line. A digital joint tensioner measured laxity throughout flexion prior to femoral resection. Femoral component position was adjusted using predictive planning to optimize balance. After femoral resection, final joint laxity was collected. Planned GB (pGB) was simulated for all cases posthoc using a neutral tibial resection and adjusting femoral position to optimize balance. Differences in ML balance, laxity, and CPAK were compared between planned iKA (piKA) and pGB. ML balance and laxity were also compared between piKA and final (fiKA). piKA and pGB had similar ML balance and laxity, with mean differences <0.4mm. piKA more closely replicated native MPTA (Native=86.9±2.8°, piKA=87.8±1.8°, pGB=90±0°) and native LDFA (Native=87.5±2.7°, piKA=88.9±3°, pGB=90.8±3.5°). piKA planned for a more native CPAK distribution, with the most common types being II (22.7%), I (20%), III (18.7%), IV (18.7%) and V (18.7%). Most pGB knees were type V (28.4%), VII (37.8%), and III (16.2). fiKA and piKA had similar ML balance and laxity, however fiKA was more variable in midflexion and flexion (p<0.01). Although ML balance and laxity were similar between piKA and pGB, piKA better restored native joint line and CPAK type. The bulk of pGB knees were moved into types V, VII, and III due to the neutral tibial cut. Surgeons should be cognizant of how these differing alignment strategies affect knee phenotype

Background. Defining optimal coronal alignment in Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is a controversial and poorly understood subject. Tibial bone density may affect implant stability and functional outcomes following TKR. Our aim was to compare the bone density profile at the implant-tibia interface following TKR in mechanical versus kinematic alignment. Methods. Pre-operative CT scans for 10 patients undergoing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were obtained. Using surgical planning software, tibial cuts were made for TKR with 7 degrees posterior slope and either neutral (mechanical) or 3 degrees varus (kinematic) alignment. Signal intensity, in Hounsfield Units (HU), was measured at 25,600 points throughout an axial slice at the implant-tibia interface and density profiles compared along defined radial axes from the centre of the tibia towards the cortices (Hotelling's t-squared and paired t-test). Results. From the tibial centre towards the lateral cortex, trabecular bone density for kinematic and mechanical TKR are similar in the inner 50% but differ significantly beyond this (p= 0.012). There were two distinct density peaks, with peak trabecular bone density being higher in kinematic TKR (p<0.001) and peak cortical bone density being higher in mechanical TKR (p<0.01). The difference in peak cortical to peak trabecular signal was 43 HU and 185 HU respectively (p<0.001). On the medial side there was no significant difference in density profile and a linear increase from centre to cortex. Conclusions. In the lateral proximal tibia, there is significantly less difference between peak cortical and peak trabecular bone densities in kinematic TKR compared to mechanical TKR. Laterally, mechanical TKR may be more dependent upon cortical bone for support compared to kinematic TKR, where trabecular bone density is higher. This may have implications for surgical planning and implant design

INTRODUCTION. There is strong current interest to provide reliable treatments for one- and two-compartment arthritis in the cruciate-ligament intact knee. An alternative to total knee arthroplasty is to resurface only the diseased compartments with discrete compartmental components. Placing multiple small implants into the knee presents a greater surgical challenge than total knee arthroplasty, and it is not certain natural knee mechanics can be maintained. The goal of this study was to compare functional kinematics in cruciate-intact knees with either medial unicondylar (mUKA), mUKA plus patellofemoral (mUKA+PF), or bi-unicondylar (biUNI) arthroplasty using discrete compartmental implants with preparation and placement assisted by haptic robotic technology. METHODS. Nineteen patients with 21 knee arthroplasties consented to participate in an I.R.B. approved study of knee kinematics with a cruciate-retaining multicompartmental knee arthroplasty system. All subjects presented with knee OA, intact cruciate ligaments, and coronal deformity ranging from 7° varus to 4° valgus. All subjects received multicompartmental knee arthroplasty using haptic robotic-assisted bone preparation an average of 13 months (6–29 months) before the study. Eleven subjects received mUKA, five subjects received mUKA+PF, and five subjects received biUKA. Subjects averaged 62 years of age and had an average body mass index of 31. Combined Knee Society Pain/Function scores averaged 102 ± 28 preoperatively and 169 ± 26 at the time of study. Knee range of motion averaged −3° to 120° preoperatively and −1° to 129° at the time of the study. Knee motions were recorded using video-fluoroscopy while subjects performed step-up/down, kneeling and lunging activities. The three-dimensional position and orientation of the implant components were determined using model-image registration techniques (Fig. 1). The AP locations of the medial and lateral condyles were determined by computing a distance map between the femoral condyles and the tibial articular surfaces. RESULTS. Knee kinematics during maximum flexion kneeling and lunging showed tibial internal rotation, and posterior lateral condylar translation for all three treatments (Fig. 2). All knees showed femoral external rotation and posterior condylar translation with flexion during the step activity (Fig. 3). In all three activities, knees with mUKA and mUKA+PF arthroplasty showed the most femoral external rotation and posterior translation, and knees with biUKA showed the least. DISCUSSION. Knees with tricompartmental arthroplasty usually sacrifice one or both cruciate ligaments and also exhibit kinematics which differ from the normal knee. In particular, tibiofemoral rotations are almost always significantly less than the normal knee, and often the femur translates forward with flexion over some portion of the motion arc. In contrast, knees with accurately-placed uni- or bi-compartmental arthroplasty exhibited stable knee kinematics consistent with intact and functioning cruciate ligaments. The patterns and magnitudes of tibiofemoral motion were more similar to natural knees in the mUKA and mUKA+PF groups than commonly has been observed in knees with total knee arthroplasty. These results demonstrate the potential to restore or maintain closer-to-normal knee kinematics by retaining intact structures and compartments. Knees with an intact lateral compartment had kinematics closer to normal than those where both tibiofemoral compartments were diseased/replaced

Objective. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is of increasing interest because this method may improve patient satisfaction. However, the biomechanics of kinematically aligned TKA remain largely unknown. Therefore, we analyzed whether the kinematic alignment method cause to increase the contact force on patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints. Methods. A musculoskeletal computer simulation was used to determine the effects of kinematically or mechanically aligned TKA. Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral contact forces were examined for a mechanically aligned model and a kinematically aligned model using finite element analysis. Results. The peak contact stress on the patellofemoral joint in the kinematically aligned model was greater than that in the mechanically aligned model at 30° and 60°. Maximum peak contact stress was found at 30° flexion in the kinematically aligned model (73 MPa) and this was 221% higher than the stress in the mechanically aligned model (33 MPa). Similarly, peak contact stress of 33.0 MPa at 60° flexion occurred in the kinematically aligned model and this was 114% higher than that in the mechanically aligned model (29 MPa). The peak contact stress on the tibiofemoral joint in the kinematically aligned model was greater than that in the mechanically aligned model at 30°, 60° and 90° flexion. Maximum peak contact stress was found at 30° flexion in the kinematically aligned model (22 MPa) and this was 200% higher than the stress in the mechanically aligned model (11 MPa). Conclusions. Kinematically aligned TKA may have increased risks for implant longevity. Therefore, a strict surgical indication, including age and implant design, is needed to achieve excellent longevity after kinematically aligned TKA

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to analyze rotational kinematic patterns in knees treated with either cruciate-retaining (CR) or posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), using an intra-operative navigation technique, and to clarify the factors that affect of the rotational kinematics and the difference rotational kinematics patterns between CR- and PS- TKA. Methods. A total of 35 knees (35 patients) were included in this study, deformed valgus, sever flexion contractures, and highly unstable knees were excluded. These knees were allocated to CR (NexGen CR-Flex) or PS (NexGen PS-Flex) implants and underwent TKA with a computer navigation technique (precision N Knee Navigation Software v4.0; Stryker). There was no significant difference in pre-operative parameters between CR- and PS-TKA group: age, femorotibial angle (FTA), and chondylar twist angle (CTA). We measured two points during surgery. First, the skin incision was made and subcutaneous tissue was exposed. The joint capsule was temporality closed by three or four strand suture. Second, after the surgery was completed with satisfactory alignment and soft tissue balance, immediately following wound closure the measurement procedure was repeated. The surgeon gently applied a manual range of motion from full extension to flexion. The angle of internal rotation in tibia to the functional plane of tibia and femur was measured automatically at max extension, 0, 30, 45, 60, 90 degrees, and max flexion throughout the passive knee motion. Result. We categorized the post-operative rotational kinematics patterns to five types. Type A was increasing with the internal rotation angle in tibia with knee flexion. Type B was decreasing the internal rotation with knee flexion. Type C was decreasing the internal rotation from 0 to 45 or 60 degrees, Then graduated increasing until full flexion. Type D was the opposite type of type C. Type E was not able to categorize any pattern. (Figure 1) The individual kinematic pattern was variable in pre- and post-operative knee motion. Both CR- and PS-TKA had a tendency to remain the preoperative kinematic pattern (CR-TKA 66% and PS-TKA 59%) by comparing the pre- and post-operative kinematic pattern. But, type A was increased in post-operative PS-TKA. (Figure 2) We analyzed factors (age, pre-operative FTA, CTA, pre-operative knee extension, and post-operative FTA) that affect the change of rotational kinematics patterns before and after TKA. In CR-TKR, there were not any factors that influence with the changes of kinematic pattern. In PS-TKR, pre-operative knee extension angle affected accompanied by significant difference in the change of rotational kinematics patterns. Discussion & Conclusion. We analyzed the rotational kinematics patterns in knees treated with either CR- or PS-TKR, using an intra-operative navigation. Pre- and post-operative knee kinematics of TKA patients had a variety of rotational kinematics patterns. Both CR- and PS-TKA had a tendency to remain the preoperative kinematic pattern by comparing the pre- and post-operative kinematic pattern Pre-operative knee extension affected to the change of rotational kinematics pattern in PS-TKR

Even though primary total knee arthroplasty involves resurfacing the joint with metal and plastic it is much more of a soft tissue operation than it is a bony procedure. The idea that altering the planned bony resection by a few degrees on either the tibial or femoral side of the joint might somehow eliminate the multifactorial pain complaints and reduced patient satisfaction seen in some 20% or more of cases in reported clinical series is clearly overly optimistic. Axial alignment is important, but no more so than the level of distal femoral resection, tibial and femoral rotation, tibial resection level and downslope and femoral sagittal plane alignment. The real problem is that errors in component positioning are common, rarely made one at a time, and are made more common by greater procedural complexity. No matter the resection method (let alone the resection target!) errors are commonly linked and iterative. For example: femoral malrotation on an under-resected distal femur (in a knee with minimal arthritic wear to begin with) can contribute to corresponding tibial malrotation helped by a “floated” tibial trial on an all too often overly resected and downsloped tibial surface that has been recut to allow full extension with the under-resected femur (and now also results in AP laxity in flexion). Small changes in the alignment target will not fix this!. On the other hand: Kinematic alignment individualised to the patient's anatomy as a means of reducing soft tissue imbalance and minimizing ligamentous releases is actually a reasonable objective and a laudable goal on the surface. The problem with operationalizing this widely relates to what is currently required to try and reliably achieve this goal using currently available implants and technology. In the early 1980's the proponents of “anatomic” alignment with a residual 2- to 3-degree varus tibial resection and corresponding joint obliquity were Hungerford and Krackow. This concept was widely adopted but proved to be fraught with difficulty in the hands of community based surgeons in that era due to common excessive varus tibial resection errors and resulting premature implant failures. Recent reports on kinematic alignment involve a plethora of technology combinations including pre-operative CT (or MRI) for 3D reconstruction and planning, custom jig fabrication, and navigated bony preparation or individualised bony cuts off of patient specific jigs. The goal is to allow customised resections that “estimate” original cartilage thickness and bone erosion and seek to replicate the original however native anatomy and provide better precision for bone resection. Even when successful this is often followed by placement of a standard implant not too different from those in the 80's and 90's which may well have one femoral articular “J curve” for all patents, a single patellofemoral groove design and anatomic shape for all, and that makes use of a central keel on a nonanatomic tibial design with limited sizing increments, all implanted into a patient without an ACL and not infrequently PCL deficient as well. And all of this is done with the hope of restoring the normal original knee kinematics!. The frequent combination of several of the above factors clinically in a single knee may help explain some of the variability in results of kinematic alignment reported by some authors even after excluding certain pre-operative deformities (excess valgus or varus). For now mechanical alignment methods and instrumentation should remain the standard of care for routine TKA practice for most, and in complex primary cases for all

Introduction. Acquiring adaptive soft-tissue balance is one of the most important factors in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there have been few reports regarding to alteration of tolerability of varus/valgus stress between before and after TKA. In particular, there is no enough data about mid-flexion stability. Based on these backgrounds, it is hypothesized that alteration of varus/valgus tolerance may influence post-operative results in TKA. The purpose of this study is an investigation of in vivo kinematic analyses of tolerability of varus/valgus stress before and after TKA, comparing to clinical results. Materials and Methods. A hundred knees of 88 consecutive patients who had knees of osteoarthritis with varus deformity were investigated in this study. All TKAs (Triathlon, Stryker) were performed using computer assisted navigation system. The kinematic parameters of the soft-tissue balance, and amount of coronal relative movement between femur and tibia were obtained by interpreting kinematics, which display graphs throughout the range of motion (ROM) in the navigation system. Femoro-tibial alignments were recorded under the stress of varus and valgus before the procedure and after implantation of all components. In each ROM (0, 30, 60, 90, 120 degrees), the data of coronal relative movement between femur and tibia (tolerability) were analyzed before and after implantation. Furthermore, correlations between tolerability of varus/valgus and clinical improvement revealed by ROM and Knee society score (KSS) were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Results. Evaluation of soft tissue balance with navigation system revealed that the tolerance of coronal relative movement between femur and tibia (varus/valgus) after implantation was significantly decreased compared with before implantation even in mid-flexion range. There were no significant correlations between tolerability of coronal relative movement and improvement of extension range and KSS. However, mid-flexion tolerability showed negative correlation with flexion range. Discussion. One of the most important principles for ligament balancing in TKA for varus knees is involved that the medial extension gap should be within 1–3mm to avoid flexion contracture and a feeling of instability, the medial flexion gap should be equal or 1–2mm larger to the medial extension gap, and lateral extension laxity up to 5 degrees is acceptable. However, there have been few reports measuring laxity from 30 to 60 degrees. In this study, the tolerance of coronal relative movement was significantly limited even in mid-flexion. However, mid-flexion tightness was not significantly correlated with clinical results except for flexion range. This result might be suggested that high tolerability of coronal relative movement in mid-flexion range may lead to widening of flexion range of motion of the knee after TKA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Mechanical alignment (MA) techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) introduces significant anatomic modifications and secondary ligament imbalances. A restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) protocol was proposed to minimise these issues and improve TKA clinical results. A total of 1000 knee CT-Scans were analyzed from a database of patients undergoing TKA. rKA tibial and femoral bone resections were simulated. rKA is defined by the following criteria: Independent tibial and femoral cuts within ± 5° of the bone neutral mechanical axis and, a resulting HKA within ± 3° of neutral. Medial-lateral (ΔML) and flexion-extension (ΔFE) gap differences were calculated and compared with MA results. With the MA technique, femoral rotation was aligned with either the trans-epicondylar axis (TEA) or with 3° of external rotation to the posterior condyles (PC). Extension space ML imbalances (>/=3mm) occurred in 33% of TKA with MA technique versus 8% of the knees with rKA (p /=5mm) were present in up to 11% of MA knees versus 1% rKA (p < 0 .001). Using the MA technique, for the flexion space ΔML, higher imbalance rates were created by the TEA technique (p < 0 .001). rKA again performed better than both MA techniques using TEA of 3 degrees PC techniques (p < 0 .001). When all the differences between ΔML and ΔFE are considered together: using TEA there were 40.8% of the knees with < 3 mm imbalances throughout, using PC this was 55.3% and using rKA it was 91.5% of the knees (p < 0 .001). Significantly less anatomic modifications with related ML or FE gap imbalances are created using rKA versus MA for TKA. Using rKA may help the surgeon to balance a TKA, whilst keeping the alignment within a safe range

Introduction. Most surgeons that have performed kinematically aligned TKA have noticed an overall better clinical outcome, better motion, better patient satisfaction, and a quicker recovery than their patients treated with mechanically aligned TKA. Materials and Methods. We prospectively followed all 128 knees who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty. The Lysholm knee score and VAS scale was recorded initially and 12months after the surgery. Independent T-test was used for statistical analysis at probability level of 95%. SPSS for Windows (Version 12, Chicago, Illinois) was used. Results. VAS score and passive ROM; Not significant difference statistically. But improved compared the preoperative and postoperative data. WOMAC score and HSS score; Significantly improved statistically. Discussion. Our data suggest that kinematic alignment may lessen the surgical stress experienced by the patient, reduce the pain, and increase function of knee. There is a need for more studies to clarify benefits of kinematic alignment technique. Kinematically aligned TKA restores function by aligning the femoral and tibial components to the normal or prearthritic joint lines of the knee. We prospectively followed all 128 knees who underwent total knee arthroplasty. We assessed postoperative function using the VAS, WOMAC, HSS score and passive ROM. HSS score and WOMAC score were significantly improved statistically

Purpose. Various alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described, all striving to achieve excellent long-term implant survival and good functional outcomes. In recent years, in search of higher functionality and patient satisfaction, a shift towards more patient-specific alignment is seen. Robotics is the perfect technology to tailor alignment. The purpose of this study was to describe ‘inverse kinematic alignment’ (iKA) technique, and to compare clinical outcomes of patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA performed by iKA versus adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Methods. The authors analysed the records of a consecutive series of patients that received robotic assisted TKA with iKA (n=40) and with aMA (n=40). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected at a follow-up of 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds, and uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations of OKS and satisfaction with 6 variables (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hip knee ankle (HKA) angle, preoperative OKS, alignment technique). Results. The iKA and aMA techniques yielded comparable outcome scores (p=0.069), with OKS respectively 44.6±3.5 and 42.2±6.3. VAS Satisfaction was better (p=0.012) with iKA (9.2±0.8) compared to aMA (8.5±1.3). The number of patients that achieved OKS and satisfaction PASS thresholds was significantly higher (p=0.049 and p=0.003, respectively) using iKA (98% and 80%) compared to aMA (85% and 48%). Knees with preoperative varus deformity, achieved significantly (p=0.025) better OKS using iKA (45.4±2.0) compared to aMA (41.4±6.8). Multivariable analyses confirmed better OKS (β=3.1; p=0.007) and satisfaction (β=0.73; p=0.005) with iKA. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that iKA and aMA grant comparable clinical outcomes at 12-months follow-up, though a greater proportion of knees operated by iKA achieved the PASS thresholds for OKS and satisfaction. Notably. in knees with preoperative varus deformity, iKA yielded significantly better OKS and satisfaction than aMA

Total knee arthroplasty aims at restoring the function of the native knee. An important aspect at this point are the knee kinematics, as it can be assumed that following TKA surgery these should resemble the native conditions. The use of cadaveric testing is since long an important step in the development and validation of implant designs and surgical techniques. However, this cadaveric testing has primarily focused on squatting under load bearing conditions. The main research question of this paper is therefore to evaluate the impact of TKA surgery on the knee kinematics under a range of boundary conditions. A set of five cadaveric knees have been tested in a newly developed and validated knee simulator at Ghent University. In contrast to other simulators, this simulator allows simulating a wide range of conditions as it facilitates a controlled movement of the ankle in the sagittal plane under continuously variable hamstring and quadriceps loading. In the framework of this study, two different motion patterns have been studied. First, the knees were subjected to a traditional squatting motion maintaining constant quadriceps loading. Second, the knees were tested while performing a cycling movement with a highly variable quadriceps load during the extension phase. For both cases, the studied motion patterns have been repeated five times. Following the evaluation of the native knee kinematics, TKA surgery was performed using a single radius implant. During surgery, the implant alignment has been controlled using computer navigation. Subsequently, the same boundary conditions have been applied and the kinematics again recorded. Focusing on the native knee, the measured kinematic patterns for the squatting motion significantly differ from the ones observed for the cycling movement for similar flexion angles. This is attributed to a difference in quadriceps loading. However, following TKA surgery, the kinematic patterns are remarkably comparable between the squatting and cycling experiments. These observations suggest that the TKA design considered in this study displays a highly constrained behavior. More specifically, the design appears to favor the squatting behavior. Further study is however required to thoroughly evaluate this observation for other implant designs and a wider range of motion patterns