Introduction. Treatment pathways of 5. th. metatarsal fractures are commonly directed based on fracture classification, with Jones types for example, requiring closer observation and possibly more aggressive management. Primary objective. To investigate the reliability of assessment of subtypes of 5. th. metatarsal fractures by different observers. Methods. Patients were identified from our prospectively collected database. We included all patient referred to our virtual fracture clinic with a suspected or confirmed 5. th. metatarsal fracture. Plain AP radiographs were reviewed by two observers, who were initially trained on the 5. th. metatarsal classification identification. Zones were defined as Zone 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2, 3, diaphyseal shaft (DS), distal metaphysis (DM) and head. An inter-observer reliability analysis using Cohen's Kappa coefficient was carried out, and degree of observer agreement described using Landis & Koch's description. All data was analysed using IBM SPSS v.27. Results. 878 patients were identified. The two observers had moderate agreement when identifying fractures in all zones, apart from metatarsal head fractures, which scored substantial agreement (K=.614). Zones 1.1 (K=.582), 2 (K=.536), 3 (K=.601) and DS (K=.544) all tended towards but did not achieve substantial agreement. Whilst DS fractures achieved moderate agreement, there was an apparent difficulty with distal DS, resulting in a lot of cross over with DM (DS 210 vs 109; DM 76 vs 161). Slight agreement with the next highest adjacent zone was found when injuries were thought to be in zones 1.2, 1.3 and 2 (K=0.17, 0.115 and 0.152 respectively). Conclusions. Reliability of sub-categorising 5. th. metatarsal fractures using standardised instructions conveys moderate to substantial agreement in most cases. If the region of the fracture is going to be used in an algorithm to guide a management plan and clinical follow up during a virtual clinic review, defining fractures of zones 1–3 needs careful consideration

Introduction:. Inadequate reduction and fixation of ankle fractures leads to poor clinical outcomes although there are no well-established criteria to evaluate the quality of surgical fracture fixation of the ankle. The aim of our study was to validate Pettrone's criteria that can be used in the radiological assessment of the quality of ankle fracture fixation that predict the functional outcome. Methods:. A retrospective study was completed following the operative management of ankle fractures at a University teaching hospital between 1. st. January 2009 and 31. st. December 2009 were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were paediatric fractures, polytrauma, and fractures involving the tibial plafond. The fracture pattern was classified using the AO classification system. Three independent Foot and Ankle Consultants assessed the quality of surgical ankle fracture fixation using Pettrone's criteria. Approximately one year following the surgery, functional outcome was obtained using Lower Extremity Function Score (LEFS) and a modified American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS). The Mann-Whitney test was used for the LEFS and AOFAS functional scores. Logistic regression was performed upon age and gender with regards to functional outcome. Given that the Kappa coefficient is a pair wise statistic, the average pair wise agreement for each category of the Pettrone criteria was also determined. Results:. Sixty-one consecutive patients were included in the study with a mean age of 51 years (17–74 years) and a mean follow-up of 17.41 months (13–24 months). Using Pettrone's criterias, mean interobserver agreement was 90.0% (89.4–92.6%) with inadequate reduction in 20 cases (32.5%). Mean LEFS following inadequate reduction was 47.5 (1–79) and following satisfactory reduction was 55.9 (9–80) p=0.03. Conclusion:. Pettrone's criteria has high interobserver agreement for the quality of surgical fracture fixation of the ankle which correlates with functional outcome

Aims

The purposes of this study were to clarify first, the incidence of peroneal tendon dislocation in patients with a fracture of the talus and second the factors associated with peroneal tendon dislocation.