Aims

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is the preferred treatment for anterior medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) owing to the rapid postoperative recovery. However, the risk factors for UKA failure remain controversial.

Aims

The Oswestry-Bristol Classification (OBC) is an MRI-specific assessment tool to grade trochlear dysplasia. The aim of this study is to validate clinically the OBC by demonstrating its use in selecting treatments that are safe and effective.

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) during the first six weeks and at one year postoperatively.

Introduction. Infection remains as one of the major challenges of total joint surgery. One-stage irrigation, debridement and reimplantation, or two-stage revision surgery with a temporary implantation of antibiotic eluting bone cement spacer followed by reimplantation are two methods often used to treat infected patients with mixed outcomes. Like bone cement, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) can also be used as a carrier for antibiotics. Recently, we demonstrated that vancomycin and rifampin can be delivered from UHMWPE implants at therapeutic levels to eradicate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in a lupine animal model. There are regulatory challenges in translating these types of combination devices to clinical use. Last year, at this meeting, we presented the preliminary pre-clinical testing for a temporary UHMWPE spacer containing gentamicin sulfate as a first step towards clinical use. Since then, we carried out a survey among the Knee Society membership about their preference for spacer use in two-stage revision surgery and found that 43% prefer to use a CoCr femoral component on an all-poly cemented tibial insert, 22% prefer bone cement spacers molded in the OR, 20% prefer static bone cement spacers, and 14% prefer pre-formed bone cement spacers. We modified our implant design based on the majority's preference for a total knee system, rather than bone cement spacers, in the temporary two-stage approach. In this study, we explored the effect of gentamicin sulfate (GS) elution from UHMWPE/GS tibial inserts on bacterial colonization on CoCr surfaces. Methods. We characterized the gentamicin sulfate (GS) particles with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). We molded UHMWPE/GS powder blends and characterized the morphology using SEM and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS). We submerged samples of molded UHMWPE/GS in buffered phosphate solution (PBS) at 37°C and quantified the extent of GS elution into PBS with a method described by Gubernator et al. using o-phthaladehyde (OPA) [1]. Under basic conditions, OPA reacts with primary amino groups to form fluorescent complexes. Since gentamicin is the only source of such amino acids in our elution samples, the number of fluorescent complexes formed is directly proportional to the amount of gentamicin in the sample. Using this method, we could quantify gentamicin elution by measuring sample fluorescence post OPA-reaction. We used a plate reader to excite the fluorescent complexes formed in the OPA reaction and measured the resulting emission at wavelengths of 340 nm and 455 nm, respectively. We also quantified the effect of the standard cleaning protocol (heated sonication in alkaline water and alcohol) used to clean UHMWPE implants on subsequent GS elution from UHMWPE/GS samples using the OPA method. We used agar diffusion tests to characterize antibacterial properties of UHMWPE/GS samples after cleaning. For these tests, we collected eluents collected from UHMWPE/GS and gentamicin-impregnated bone cement (BC/GS) following 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of elution, and tested against S. aureus (ATCC 12600). We used the “daughter cells” method developed by Bechert et al. to assess anticolonizing properties of UHMWPE/GS [2,3]. We also characterized the colonization of bacteria on CoCr surfaces in the presence of GS eluting from UHMWPE/GS test samples. For this we modified a Pin-on-Disc (PoD) wear tester: An UHMWPE/GS pin and UHMWPE pin (control) articulated against an implant-finish CoCr disc with Tryptic Soy Broth containing S. Aureus as the lubricant. After 18 hrs, we rinsed the articular surfaces of the pin and disc and stamped them onto Agar gel to transfer any adherent bacteria. We incubated the Agar plate overnight such that adherent bacteria proliferated and became visible. Results. SEM characterized the GS particles as hollow spheres (Fig 1a). These formed small groups of agglomerated domains at the virgin resin boundaries of UHMWPE after molding (Fig 1b). Sulfur signature from the EDS analysis identified the agglomerated domains as GS particles (Fig 2). Elution of GS started with an initial burst and was followed by steady elution up to 12 weeks (Fig 3). Cleaning reduced the initial burst GS elution; and the elution remained unchanged after 2 days (Fig 4). The agar diffusion test showed simmilar inhibition zones for the eluents collected from UHMWPE/GS and BC/GS, suggesting that these samples yield similar antibacterial activity against S. aureus (Fig 5). UHMWPE/GS demonstrated pronounced anticolonizing properties, effectively mitigating the proliferation of S. aureus “daughter” cells. Anticolonizing activity of Palacos R+G was not significantly different when compared with UHMWPE/GS. The PoD test showed little-to-no colonization of CoCr surfaces in the presence of UHMWPE/GS pins, indicative of excellent antibacterial properties of UHMWPE/GS against S. aureus. Conclusion. SEM and EDS has allowed us to visualize domains of gentamicin sulfate particles in UHMWPE. Our OPA method has greater precision than traditional agar-well diffusion methods of measuring gentamicin concentration and showed that gentamicin sulfate-loaded UHMWPE elutes at the same rate as Palacos R+G. Pin-on-disc experiments and the daughter cell method both confirmed that these two materials have similar anticolonization abilities. We also found that using the standard cleaning protocol for UHMWPE orthopedic implants decreased the burst of gentamicin eluting from UHMWPE, but after 2 days, it had no effect compared to uncleaned UHMWPE/GS. Finally, we found that UHMWPE/GS can reduce the colonization of bacteria on CoCr. UHMWPE/GS continues to be a promising material for treating PJI. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Infection remains as one of the major challenges of total joint surgery. One-stage irrigation, debridement and reimplantation or two-stage revision surgery with a temporary implantation of antibiotic eluting bone cement spacer followed by reimplantation are two methods often used to treat infected patients with mixed outcomes. Like bone cement, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) can also be used as a carrier for antibiotics. Recently, we demonstrated that vancomycin and rifampin can be successfully delivered from UHMWPE implants at therapeutic levels to eradicate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in a lupine animal model. There are regulatory challenges in translating these types of combination devices in to clinical use. One approach is to follow a stepwise strategy, with the first step of seeking clearance for a temporary UHMWPE spacer containing gentamicin sulfate. In this study, we explored the effect of gentamicin sulfate (GS) content in UHMWPE on GS elution rate and antimicrobial activity against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus(MSSA). We also assessed the effect of spacer fabrication on the activity of gentamicin sulfate. We prepared and consolidated UHMWPE/GS blends in varying concentrations. After consolidation, we fabricated test samples with surface area (350mm2) to volume (300mm3) ratio of 1.2 for elution in 1.5ml phosphate buffered saline at body temperature for up to six months and quantified eluted GS content using liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry (LCMS). We assessed the antibacterial activity of the obtained samples in vitro against various concentrations of MSSA (103–106 CFU/ml). Furthermore, we quantified the probability of bacterial colonization of UHMWPE impregnated with GS compared to GS containing bone cement. We assessed any detectable changes in activity of eluted GS caused by spacer fabrication by screening m/z peaks of GS isomers in mass spectra obtained from LC-MS. Gentamicin sulfate activity was not compromised by the elevated temperature and pressure used during spacer fabrication. Elution rate of GS increased with increasing GS content in the blends studied. At comparable elution rates, the GS-loaded UHMWPE was either equivalent or better in terms of antibacterial and anticolonization properties when compared with gentamicin containing bone cement. GS-impregnated UHMWPE is a promising material for temporary spacers

Cartilage repair in terms of replacement, or regeneration of damaged or diseased articular cartilage with functional tissue, is the ‘holy grail’ of joint surgery. A wide spectrum of strategies for cartilage repair currently exists and several of these techniques have been reported to be associated with successful clinical outcomes for appropriately selected indications. However, based on respective advantages, disadvantages, and limitations, no single strategy, or even combination of strategies, provides surgeons with viable options for attaining successful long-term outcomes in the majority of patients. As such, development of novel techniques and optimisation of current techniques need to be, and are, the focus of a great deal of research from the basic science level to clinical trials. Translational research that bridges scientific discoveries to clinical application involves the use of animal models in order to assess safety and efficacy for regulatory approval for human use. This review article provides an overview of animal models for cartilage repair. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;4:89–94

Aims

To date, no study has demonstrated an improvement in postoperative outcomes following elective joint arthroplasty with a focus on nutritional intervention for patients with preoperative hypoalbuminaemia. In this prospective study, we evaluated differences in the hospital length of stay (LOS), rate of re-admission, and total patient charges for a malnourished patient study population who received a specific nutrition protocol before surgery.

Aims. An evidence-based radiographic Decision Aid for meniscal-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been developed and this study investigates its performance at an independent centre. Patients and Methods. Pre-operative radiographs, including stress views, from a consecutive cohort of 550 knees undergoing arthroplasty (UKA or total knee arthroplasty; TKA) by a single-surgeon were assessed. Suitability for UKA was determined using the Decision Aid, with the assessor blinded to treatment received, and compared with actual treatment received, which was determined by an experienced UKA surgeon based on history, examination, radiographic assessment including stress radiographs, and intra-operative assessment in line with the recommended indications as described in the literature. Results. The sensitivity and specificity of the Decision Aid was 92% and 88%, respectively. Excluding knees where a clear pre-operative plan was made to perform TKA, i.e. patient request, the sensitivity was 93% and specificity 96%. The false-positive rate was low (2.4%) with all affected patients readily identifiable during joint inspection at surgery. In patients meeting Decision Aid criteria and receiving UKA, the five-year survival was 99% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 97 to 100). The false negatives (3.5%), who received UKA but did not meet the criteria, had significantly worse functional outcomes (flexion p < 0.001, American Knee Society Score - Functional p < 0.001, University of California Los Angeles score p = 0.04), and lower implant survival of 93.1% (95% CI 77.6 to 100). Conclusion. The radiographic Decision Aid safely and reliably identifies appropriate patients for meniscal-bearing UKA and achieves good results in this population. The widespread use of the Decision Aid should improve the results of UKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(10 Suppl B):3–10

Purpose. To review the Five year survivorship of Kinnemax TKA performed at the NHS Treatment Cantre, Weston-Super-Mare (WSM), and compare it to a similar cohort from our institution. Introduction. As part of the government's initiative to reduce waiting times for major joint surgery in Wales, the Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust (CAVOC) sent 224 patients (258 knees) to the NHS Treatment Centre in Weston-Super-Mare (WSM) for total knee arthroplasty. Controversy remains as to the unexpectedly high revision rates previously seen. Method. Between April 2004 and January 2006, 224 patients (258 TKAs) were performed at WSM. 90% have been followed up to five years. The WSM Cohort was compared to a similar cohort of 260 consecutive TKAs from CAVOC over a similar time period (2004/5) performed by a number of surgeons. Oxford Knee Score, EQ5D, VAS for pain, re-operation and overall satisfaction were obtained. Statistical testing was performed with chi-squared tests using SPSS v16.0 (a=0.05). Results. Mean age in years at date of operation was 68 (36-85) from WSM and 70 (41 to 87) fromCAVOC. The 5 year cumulative survival rate using ‘revision any cause’ as the endpoint, was 79.9% (95% CI 72.46 to 85.9) in the WSM cohort and 96.4% (95%CI 94.1 to 99.1) in the CAVOC cohort. The relative risk for revision at the ISTC as opposed to the referring centre was 3.76 (p<0.001). The mean Oxford Knee Score was 27.5 (range 2-48) for the WSM cohort. The average, non-revised, oxford knee score for the WSM cohort lower than expected at 29. This is lower than other published series of primary TKA. Conclusion. This is the first published five year survivorship for total knee arthroplasty performed at a first generation ISTC in the UK. Revision rates, functional outcomes, and overall health status results are below expected when compared to a similar cohort from a standard NHS Orthopaedic Unit

The outcome of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) deteriorates with time, and additional procedures may be required. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and total knee replacement (TKR) after HTO as well as after primary UKR. A total of 63 patients (63 knees) were studied retrospectively and divided into three groups: UKR after HTO (group A; n = 22), TKR after HTO (group B; n = 18) and primary UKR (group C; n = 22). The Oxford knee score (OKS), Knee Society score (KSS), hip–knee–ankle angles, mechanical axis and patellar height were evaluated pre- and post-operatively. At a mean of 64 months (19 to 180) post-operatively the mean OKS was 43.8 (33 to 49), 43.3 (30 to 48) and 42.5 (29 to 48) for groups A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.73). The mean KSS knee score was 88.8 (54 to 100), 88.11 (51 to 100) and 85.3 (45 to 100) for groups A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.65), and the mean KSS function score was 85.0 (50 to 100) in group A, 85.8 (20 to 100) in group B and 79.3 (50 to 100) in group C (p = 0.48). Radiologically the results were comparable for all groups except for patellar height, with a higher incidence of patella infra following a previous HTO (p = 0.02).

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1348–53.

We identified 148 patients who had undergone a revision total knee replacement using a single implant system between 1990 and 2000. Of these 18 patients had died, six had developed a peri-prosthetic fracture and ten had incomplete records or radiographs. This left 114 with prospectively-collected radiographs and Bristol knee scores available for study. The height of the joint line before and after revision total knee replacement was measured and classified as either restored to within 5 mm of the pre-operative height or elevated if it was positioned more than 5 mm above the pre-operative height. The joint line was elevated in 41 knees (36%) and restored in 73 (64%).

Revision surgery significantly improved the mean Bristol knee score from 41.1 (sd 15.9) pre-operatively to 80.5 (sd 15) post-operatively (p < 0.001). At one year post-operatively both the total Bristol knee score and its functional component were significantly better in the restored group than in the elevated group (p < 0.01). Overall, revision from a unicondylar knee replacement required less use of bone graft, fewer component augments, restored the joint line more often and gave a significantly better total Bristol knee score (p < 0.02) and functional score (p < 0.01) than revision from total knee replacement.

Our findings show that restoration of the joint line at revision total knee replacement gives a significantly better result than leaving it unrestored by more than 5 mm. We recommend the greater use of distal femoral augments to help to achieve this goal.

Between July 1986 and August 1996, we performed 32 total knee arthroplasties (TKA) on 32 patients with partially or completely ankylosed knees secondary to infection. Their mean age at surgery was 40 years (20 to 63) and the mean follow-up was ten years (5 to 13). The mean post-operative range of movement was 75.3° (30 to 115) in those with complete and 98.7° (60 to 130) in those with partial ankylosis. The mean Hospital for Special Surgery knee score increased from 57 to 86 points post-operatively. There were complications in four knees (12.5%), which included superficial infection (one), deep infection (one), supracondylar femoral fracture (one) and transient palsy of the common peroneal nerve (one). Although TKA in the ankylosed knee is technically demanding and has a considerable rate of complications, reasonable restoration of function can be obtained by careful selection of patients, meticulous surgical technique, and aggressive rehabilitation.