Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXII | Pages 31 - 31
1 May 2012
Kulkarni A Soomro T Siddique M
Full Access

TMTJ fusion is performed for arthritis or painful deformity. K-wire and trans-articular screws are usually used to stabilize the joints. We present our experience with LP for TMTJ fusion in first 100 joints.

Patients and methods

100 TMTJ in 74 patients were fused and stabilised with LP between January 2007 and December 2010. The indication was Lisfranc arthritis and hallux valgus. Iliac crest bone autograft was used in 64 joints. Auto graft was used in 22/53 first TMT fusions. All patients post-operatively had below knee plaster immobilization and protected weight bearing walking for first 6 weeks. Clinical and radiological surveillance continued until bone. AOFAS midfoot scale was used as outcome measure.

Results

There were 18 male and 56 female patients with average age of 51 (14 -68). AOFAS midfoot scale improved 42% for pain, 30% for function and 53% for alignment. Average AOFAS overall score improved from 30 pre-op to 67 post op.

95 joints had clinical and radiological fusion. 1 patient needed removal of metalwork and 3 had delayed wound healing and 4 had radiological non- . All non- s were in 1st TMTJ where bone graft failed and were revised. None of the lesser ray TMTJ had non- . Average satisfaction score was 7 out of 10. 86% said they would recommend it to a friend and 91% would have it again.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1094 - 1098
1 Oct 2023
Jennison T Ukoumunne OC Lamb S Sharpe I Goldberg AJ

Aims

When a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) fails, it can be converted to a fusion or a revision arthroplasty. Despite the increasing numbers of TAAs being undertaken, there is little information in the literature about the management of patients undergoing fusion following a failed TAA. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the survival of fusions following a failed TAA using a large dataset from the National Joint Registry (NJR).

Methods

A data linkage study combined NJR and NHS Digital data. Failure of a TAA was defined as a fusion, revision to a further TAA, or amputation. Life tables and Kaplan-Meier graphs were used to record survival. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to compare the rates of failure.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 5 | Pages 668 - 674
1 May 2015
Röhm J Zwicky L Horn Lang T Salentiny Y Hintermann B Knupp M

Talonavicular and subtalar joint fusion through a medial incision (modified triple arthrodesis) has become an increasingly popular technique for treating symptomatic flatfoot deformity caused by posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to look at its clinical and radiological mid- to long-term outcomes, including the rates of recurrent flatfoot deformity, nonunion and avascular necrosis of the dome of the talus. A total of 84 patients (96 feet) with a symptomatic rigid flatfoot deformity caused by posterior tibial tendon dysfunction were treated using a modified triple arthrodesis. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (35 to 85) and the mean follow-up was 4.7 years (1 to 8.3). Both clinical and radiological outcomes were analysed retrospectively. In 86 of the 95 feet (90.5%) for which radiographs were available, there was no loss of correction at final follow-up. In all, 14 feet (14.7%) needed secondary surgery, six for nonunion, two for avascular necrosis, five for progression of the flatfoot deformity and tibiotalar arthritis and one because of symptomatic overcorrection. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hindfoot score (AOFAS score) at final follow-up was 67 (between 16 and 100) and the mean visual analogue score for pain 2.4 points (between 0 and 10). In conclusion, modified triple arthrodesis provides reliable correction of deformity and a good clinical outcome at mid- to long-term follow-up, with nonunion as the most frequent complication. Avascular necrosis of the talus is a rare but serious complication of this technique. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:668–74


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 4 | Pages 696 - 703
1 Apr 2021
Clough TM Ring J

Aims

We report the medium-term outcomes of a consecutive series of 118 Zenith total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) from a single, non-designer centre.

Methods

Between December 2010 and May 2016, 118 consecutive Zenith prostheses were implanted in 114 patients. Demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data were collected. The endpoint of the study was failure of the implant requiring revision of one or all of the components. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and the rate of failure calculated for each year.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1222 - 1226
1 Sep 2013
Faber FWM van Kampen PM Bloembergen MW

As it remains unproven that hypermobility of the first tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ-1) is a significant factor in hallux valgus deformity, the necessity for including arthrodesis of TMTJ-1 as part of a surgical correction of a hallux valgus is questionable. In order to evaluate the role of this arthrodesis on the long-term outcome of hallux valgus surgery, a prospective, blinded, randomised study with long-term follow-up was performed, comparing the Lapidus procedure (which includes such an arthrodesis) with a simple Hohmann distal closing wedge metatarsal osteotomy. The study cohort comprised 101 feet in 87 patients: 50 feet were treated with a Hohmann procedure and 51 with a Lapidus procedure. Hypermobility of TMTJ-1 was assessed pre-operatively by clinical examination. After a mean of 9.25 years (7.25 to 11.42), 91 feet in 77 patients were available for follow-up. There was no difference in clinical or radiological outcome between the two procedures. Also, there was no difference in outcome between the two procedures in the subgroup clinically assessed as hypermobile. This study does not support the theory that a hallux valgus deformity in a patient with a clinically assessed hypermobile TMTJ-1 joint requires fusion of the first tarso-metatarsal joint. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1222–6


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_21 | Pages 33 - 33
1 Apr 2013
Eyre J Gudipati S Chami G Monkhouse R
Full Access

Background. Lisfranc/midfoot injuries are complex injuries with a reported incidence of 1 in 55000 in literature and frequently overlooked. But, recently they are becoming more commonly diagnosed with advent of CT scan and examination under anaesthesias (EUA) for suspicion fractures. Here we present a case series results of a single surgeons experience over the last 6 years. Methods. Retrospective review of 68 patients treated by a single surgeon over the last 6 years. Injuries were diagnosed on plain Xrays, clinic examination. Any suspicious injury were further assessed by a CT scan, all injuries were confirmed by EUA and treated with open reduction and internal fixation within 4 weeks of injury. Post-operative immobilisation in full cast for 6 weeks then a removal boot with non-weight bearing for a total of 3months. They were followed up regularly initially at 3, 6 and 12months. At final review the following data was collected: clinical examination, plain x-ray looking for: late deformity, signs of OA in Lisfranc joint, Auto fusion rate, rate of metal work failure. The x-rays findings were correlated with: (1) type of fixation. (2) The following scores: FAOS, AOFAS-M, specially designed new foot and ankle score. Results. 43 males: 25 females. 37 right: 31 left sided injuries. 90% were fully weight bearing with minimal discomfort after 6months. In 12 months all of them returned to their normal daily life activities. Wound complications: 2 of them had initial wound complications which were treated successfully with 2 weeks of oral antibiotics, 2 had lateral scar tenderness. One had loosened metal work, revised to fusion. Conclusion. Early operative intervention with good anatomical reduction can minimise the potential chronic disability associated with these injuries. This is a largest series of Lis-franc injuries of a single surgeon with good clinical outcome following surgical fixation


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXII | Pages 24 - 24
1 May 2012
Saltzman C
Full Access

Technique, inducations, complications and early outcomes with posterior ankle and subtalar arthroscopy. A. ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY: Tips and Pearls on Avoiding Complications. a. Introduction. i. understanding of the anatomy of the foot and ankle is critical to safe performance of arthroscopic procedures and prevention of complications. ii. understanding of the surface and intra-articular anatomy of the ankle/subtalaar region is essential. iii. topographical anatomy serves as a guide to the successful placement of arthroscopic portals in the ankle. iv. neurovascular and tendinous structures are most at risk. b. Indications for Posterior/Subtalar Arthroscopy. i. Posterior ankle/ST Impingement. ii. OLT Ankle (usually posteromedial). iii. Assist operative reduction of calc or post mal fractures. iv. Arthrodesis ankle/ST or both. c. Portals. i. Know the anatomy, use blunt dissection, minimize re-entry. ii. Preoperative plan for access, pathology, visualization. d. Prone Position. a. Posteromedial. b. Posterolateral. c. Accessory posterolateral. e. Set-up/instrumentation. i. Positioning -. ii. posterior, prone. iii. Distraction- non-invasive vs invasive (trans-calcaneal thin wire). iv. Equipment - general set-up/instruments. - scopes (4.0 for outside joint or fusions; 2.7 otherwise). - irrigation/pump (run at lowest flow possible). f. Tips on Avoiding Complications. i. Patient selection and education. ii. Careful preoperative planning, evaluation. iii. Know/respect your anatomy. iv. Meticulous portal placement/care. v. Limit operative time/distension/tissue damage. vi. Use mini C-arm to monitor. vii. Plan, plan and plan, if you are prepared, all will work out. viii. Rehabilitation protocol and follow up


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 2 | Pages 190 - 196
1 Feb 2018
Chraim M Krenn S Alrabai HM Trnka H Bock P

Aims

Hindfoot arthrodesis with retrograde intramedullary nailing has been described as a surgical strategy to reconstruct deformities of the ankle and hindfoot in patients with Charcot arthropathy. This study presents case series of Charcot arthropathy patients treated with two different retrograde intramedullary straight compression nails in order to reconstruct the hindfoot and assess the results over a mid-term follow-up.

Patients and Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 18 consecutive patients and 19 operated feet with Charcot arthropathy who underwent a hindfoot arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary compression nail. Patients were ten men and eight women with a mean age of 63.43 years (38.5 to 79.8). We report the rate of limb salvage, complications requiring additional surgery, and fusion rate in both groups. The mean duration of follow-up was 46.36 months (37 to 70).


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 5 | Pages 612 - 615
1 May 2009
Knupp M Schuh R Stufkens SAS Bolliger L Hintermann B

We describe a retrospective review of the clinical and radiological parameters of 32 feet in 30 patients (10 men and 20 women) who underwent correction for malalignment of the hindfoot with a modified double arthrodesis through a medial approach. The mean follow-up was 21 months (13 to 37). Fusion was achieved in all feet at a mean of 13 weeks (6 to 30). Apart from the calcaneal pitch angle, all angular measurements improved significantly after surgery. Primary wound healing occurred without complications.

The isolated medial approach to the subtalar and talonavicular joints allows good visualisation which facilitated the reduction and positioning of the joints. It was also associated with fewer problems with wound healing than the standard lateral approach.