Orthopaedics has been earmarked as one of the specialties that could make significant savings in the National Health Service. A large number of young adults are receiving total hip replacements and there has been a trend towards using uncemented implants. We describe the clinical and functional results at minimum 19 year follow up of cemented total hip replacements in patients under the age of fifty-five in our health region between 1990 and 1997. 104 cemented THRs performed in 100 patients under 55 years were included in this study. The follow-up data had been collected prospectively in the University database. 88.46% hips showed good to excellent results at final follow-up with a mean Harris hip score of 87.9±8.64. Revision was performed in 2 hips (1.92%), one for aseptic acetabular loosening and the other for late haematogenous infection. Probable radiological loosening was seen in 14 acetabular components (14.89%) and 4 femoral components (4.25%) at final follow-up. The mean rate of acetabular wear was 0.12mm/year and was not influenced by gender or diagnosis. The mean follow-up was 21.68±2.11 years (range 19 to 26 years) and the survivorship at 19 years was 98.07%. The GIRFT report looked at the economic aspect of implant selection and found that the cost of uncemented implants was almost double that of the cemented implants. Savings of atleast £10 million a year can be made if cemented implants were used. We recommend that in a publically funded health system like the NHS, cemented implants can be used in patients under 55 with good long term functional outcomes and large savings in the healthcare costs

Background. We present the results of cementless total hip arthroplasty using anatomically adapted stem and hemispherical cup with a fully coated Spongiosa metal surface, first introduced in 1982, which aims to achieve a surface structure approaching that of human cancellous bone. This implant is still being used in clinical practice with minor modifications. Aim. The aim of the study is to determine the long-term outcomes of spongiosa-I metal surface hip arthroplasty over minimum of twenty years follow-up. Material and Methods. Between 1983 and 1985, 209 consecutive total hip arthroplasty procedures were performed using the Spongiosa-I metal surface chrome-cobalt total hip arthroplasty. We reported clinical and radiological outcomes, frequencies and reasons of revision, influence of gender and age on the outcome and complications. Results. The outcomes of 159 patients were reviewed. We lost the follow-up of 40 patients none of whom had revision surgery. The mean follow-up time was 262 months. There were 19 hips revisions, including 14 stem revisions, two cup revisions and three revisions of both components. The mean Harris hip score for patients who didn't have revision surgery was 81.9 points. According to the criteria of Engh et al., all implants were graded as stable bone in growth. The probability of survival of both components at twenty years, with any revision as the end point, was 97%. The probability of survival of the acetabular component was 98% and that of the stem component only was 86%. Component durability was significantly increased in the older group of patients. Conclusion. The results of Spongiosa -I hip arthroplasty were excellent at a minimum of twenty years of follow-up. The outcomes of the femoral stem components were very good, while the survival rates of the acetabular component were better than any reported results in the English literature

This study utilised NJR primary hip data from the 6. th. Annual Report to determine the rate and indication for revision between cemented, uncemented, hybrid and resurfacing prosthetic groups. Regression analysis was performed to identify the influence of gender and ASA grade on these revision rates. Validity of the data was interrogated by exploring for episodes of misclassification. Results. We identified 2,264 misclassified episodes within the four groups (Misclassification rate 2.7% primary, 4.3% revision procedures). Analysis was performed using the “reclassified dataset”. The Kaplan-Meier revision rates at 3 years were 0.9% (95%CI: 0.8%-1.0%) for cemented prostheses, 1.9% (95%CI: 1.8%-2.0%) for uncemented hips, 1.2% (95%CI: 1.0%-1.4%) for hybrids and 3.0%, (95%CI: 2.7%-3.3%) in the resurfacing group. The trends in revision rates were comparable to those published in the NJR (6. th. Ed. n. ) with significant differences across all groups (p< 0.0001). Revision rates in the under 55 year age group showed an identical hierarchy with cemented and hybrid arthroplasty having the lowest revision rates. Cox Regression analysis indicated that both the prosthesis group in isolation and the interaction between prosthesis group and ASA grade significantly influenced the rate of failure (p< 0.001). Indications for revision showed significant differences in rates for, pain, aseptic loosening, dislocation and malalignment between prosthesis types (p< 0.001). The indications including Aseptic loosening, pain, malalignment and dislocation all demonstrated similar trends in revision rates between prosthetic groups with cemented hips having the lowest rates followed by ascending rates for hybrid, uncemented and resurfacing groups. The exception being dislocation with resurfacings having the lowest revision rates. Discussion. This study provides important baseline revision rates by indication for each prosthetic group from which future comparisons can be made. Areas of misclassification within the NJR dataset have been reported back for future annual analysis