Aim. A large body of evidence is emerging to implicate that dysregulation of the gut microbiome (dysbiosis) increases the risk of surgical site infections. Gut dysbiosis is known to occur in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), allowing for translocation of bacteria across the inflamed and highly permeable intestinal mucosal wall. The null hypothesis was that IBD was not associated with increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Our aim was to investigate whether a prior diagnosis of IBD was associated with a higher risk of PJI following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Method. A matched cohort study was designed. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of PJI at 2-year. Secondary endpoints were aseptic revisions, as well as discharge to rehab facility, complications up to 30 days, and readmission up to 90 days after TJA. ICD-9 and −10 codes were used to identify patients with IBD and the control cohort. A chart review was performed to confirm diagnosis of IBD. Using our institutional database, 154 patients with IBD were identified and matched (3 to 1) for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), year of surgery, and joint affected with 462 individuals without IBD undergoing TJA. Results. The cumulative incidence of PJI was 4.55% among patients with IBD versus 1.32% among the control cohort (p=0.024). When bivariate logistic regression was performed, a diagnosis of IBD was found to be an independent risk factor for PJI (OR 3.56 95% C.I. 1.17 – 11.23; p=0.024) and aseptic revisions (OR 3.47, 95% C.I. 1.30 – 3.47; p=0.012). The rate of postoperative complications was also higher in patients with IBD. Conclusions. Based on the findings of this study, it appears that patients with IBD are at higher risk for failure due to PJI or aseptic loosening after TJA. The exact reason for this finding is not known but could be related to the bacterial translocation from the inflamed intestinal mucosa, the dysregulated inflammatory status of these patients, malnutrition, and potentially other factors. Some of the so-called aseptic failures maybe also as a result of infection that may have escaped detection and/or recognition

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) should be individualised in order to maximise the efficacy of prophylactic measures while avoiding the adverse events associated with the use of anticoagulants. At our institution, we have developed a scoring model using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, which is validated against our institutional data, to stratify patients into low- and high-risk groups for VTE. Low-risk patients are placed on aspirin 81 mg twice daily for four weeks post-operatively, and high-risk patients are placed on either a Vitamin K antagonist (warfarin), low molecular weight heparin, or other oral anticoagulants for four weeks post-operatively. All patients receive sequential pneumatic compression devices post-operatively, and patients are mobilised with physical therapy on the day of surgery. Patients who have a history of peptic ulcer disease or allergy to aspirin are also considered for other types of anticoagulation following surgery. Risk Stratification Criteria. Major comorbid risk factors utilised in our risk stratification model include history of hypercoagulability or previous VTE, active cancer or history of non-cutaneous malignancy, history of stroke, and pulmonary hypertension. We consider patients with any of these risk factors at elevated risk of VTE and therefore candidates for formal anticoagulation. Other minor risk factors include older age, bilateral surgery compared with unilateral, inflammatory bowel disease, varicose veins, obstructive sleep apnea, and history of myocardial infarction, myeloproliferative disorders, and congestive heart failure. Each minor criterion is associated with a score. The cumulative score is compared with a defined threshold and the score that surpasses the threshold indicates that the patient should receive post-operative anticoagulation. To facilitate the use of this scoring system, an iOS mobile application (VTEstimator) has been developed and can be downloaded from the app store

Introduction. In the last couple of years, several synovial biomarkers have been introduced in the diagnostic algorithm for a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Alpha defensin-1 proved to be one of the most promising, with a high sensitivity and specificity. However, a major disadvantage of this biomarker is the high costs. Calprotectin is a protein that is present in the cytoplasm of neutrophils, and is released upon neutrophil activation. Its value has been established for decades as a (fecal) marker for inflammatory bowel disease. Aim. To determine the efficacy of synovial calprotectin in the diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection. Methods. We prospectively collected synovial fluid (from hip, knee and shoulder) from patients with a proven PJI (n=15) and from patients that underwent a revision surgery without signs of a PJI (n=19). Patients with an active rheumatoid arthritis and/or gout were excluded from the study. Synovial fluid was centrifuged and the supernatant was used to measure calprotectin, by using a rapid, point of care test. This test was validated for synovial fluid analysis of calprotectin using an ELISA. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to calculate the difference between both patient groups. Results. The median calprotectin level was 899 mg/L (range 28–2120) for PJI versus 22 mg/L (range 0–202) for controls (p < 0.0001). With a cut-off value of 50 mg/L, synovial calprotectin has a high sensitivity of 93%, and a specificity of 84%. The positive and negative predictive values are 82% and 94%, respectively. Conclusions. Synovial calprotectin is a potentially valuable biomarker in the diagnosis of a PJI. With a point of care test, a rapid quantative diagnosis can be made within the operating room (results are obtained within 20 minutes), and could help in the decision making process to re-implant a prosthesis in a one stage procedure. In comparison to the currently available test (to measure alpha defensin-1), the measurement of calprotectin test is much cheaper (500 euro versus 20 euro per sample) and easily to implement in hospitals where this test is already available. Its diagnostic efficacy for exclusively low-grade PJI should be further elaborated