Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 47 - 47
1 Nov 2022
Saxena P Lakkol S Bommireddy R Zafar A Gakhar H Bateman A Calthorpe D Clamp J
Full Access

Abstract. Background. Elderly patients with degenerative lumbar disease are increasingly undergoing posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stabilisation. There is a paucity of studies examining clinical outcomes, morbidity & mortality associated with this procedure in this population. Methods. A retrospective analysis of aged 80–100 years who underwent posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stabilisation at University Hospitals of Derby &Burton between 2016–2020. Results. Total 167 eligible patients, 163 octogenarians & 4 nonagenarians. Mean age was 82.78 ± 3.07 years. Mean length of hospital stay 4.79 ± 10.92 days. 76% were pain free at 3months following decompression. The average Charleston co-morbidity index (CCI) was 4.87. No association found with CCI in predicting mortality (ODD ratio 0.916, CI95%). 17patients suffered complications; dural tear (0.017%), post-op paralysis (0.017%), SSI(0.01%), and 0.001% of hospital acquired pneumonia, delirium, TIA, urinary retention, ileus, anaemia. High BMI (35+) was associated with increased incidence of complication (CI 95%, p<0.002). There was significant social drift following discharge as 147 patients went home and 4 patients to rehabilitation facility (p<0.001FE test). The mean operative time was 91.408±41.17 mins and mean anaesthetic time was 36.8±16.06 mins. Prolonged operative time was not associated with increased mortality.2year revision decompression rate was 0.011%. Conclusion. Posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stablisation in elderly is safe & associated with low mortality with 99.5%survival at 1 year. It significantly improves PROMs & has extremely low revision rate. Incidence of post-op complication is <0.05% and 54% of patients get discharged within 72hours of surgery. Careful selection & optimising patients with high BMI would reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 54 - 54
1 Feb 2020
Ezaki A Sakata K Abe S Iwata H Nannno K Nakai T
Full Access

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective surgical intervention, which alleviates pain and improves function and health-related quality of life in patients with end-stage arthritis of the knee joint. With improvements in anesthesia, general health care, and surgical techniques, this procedure has become widely accepted for use in very elderly patients. However, many elderly patients tend to have compromised function and low reserve capabilities of organs and are therefore likely to develop various complications during the perioperative period. Thus, elderly patients often hesitate to undergo simultaneous bilateral TKA (SBTKA). Our purpose was to report the short-term results and clinical complications of octogenarians undergoing SBTKA. Materials and Methods. Between 2015 and 2016 all patients greater than 80years of age who underwent SBTKA by a single surgeon were retrospectively evaluated demographics, comorbidity, complications, and 30days mortality following SBTKA. Arthroplasty was performed sequentially under general anesthesia by one team led by primary surgeon. After the first knee, the patient's cardiopulmonary status was assessed by anesthesiology to determine whether or not to begin the second side. Cardiopulmonary decompensation, such as significant shifts in heart rate, oxygen saturation or blood pressure, was not showed. Then the second procedure was undertaken. Inclusion criteria of this study was underlying diseases were osteoarthritis. Exclusion criteria were (1) previous knee surgery; (2) underlying diseases were osteonecrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, fracture, and others. Fifty-seven patients with an average age of 82.7years were identified. The results of these procedures were retrospectively compared with those of patients greater than 80years of age of 89 patients unilateral TKA (UTKA) that had been performed by the same surgeon. Results. The study groups did not differ significantly with regard to age, gender, or body mass index. The mean age was 82.7years with a mean body mass index of 25.8 for the SBTKA group, compared with 84.0years with a mean body mass index of 24.9 for the UBTKA group. The length of hospital stay was longer in SBTKA groups. There was no serious complication. No deaths, no pulmonary embolisms and no nerve paralysis occurred within 30days in both groups. There was one wound problem in SBTKA group, compared 10 wound problem in UBTKA group; this difference was significant. Three deliriums occurred in SBTKA group, compared 13 deliriums in UBTKA group; this difference was significant. Minor complications included urinary tract infection, decubitus ulcer, transfusion reaction and ileus were noted seven in SBTKA group, compared in 11 UBTKA group; this difference was not significant. Conclusions. Complications and mortality are not higher for SBTKA compared to UTKA, SBTKA can be a safe and effective option for octogenarians


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 57 - 57
1 Nov 2015
Berend K
Full Access

To progress to a same day surgery program for arthroplasty, it is important that we examine and resolve the issues of why patients stay in the hospital. The number one reason is fear and anxiety for the unknown and for surgical pain. The need for hospital stay is also related to risk arising from comorbidities and medical complications. Patients also need an extended stay to manage the side effects of our treatment, including after-effects of narcotics and anesthesia, blood loss, and surgical trauma. The process begins pre-operatively with an appropriate orthopaedic assessment of the patient and determination of the need for surgery. The orthopaedic team must motivate the patient, and ensure that the expectations of the patient, family and surgeon are aligned. In conjunction with our affiliated hospitalist group that performs almost all pre-admission testing, we have established guidelines for patient selection for outpatient arthroplasty. The outpatient surgical candidate must have failed conservative measures, must have appropriate insurance coverage, and must be functionally independent. Previous or ongoing comorbidities that contraindicate the outpatient setting include: cardiac – prior revascularization, congestive heart failure, or valve disease; pulmonary – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or home use of supplemental oxygen; untreated obstructive sleep apnea – BMI >40 kg/m2; renal disease – hemodialysis or severely elevated serum creatinine; gastrointestinal – history or post-operative ileus or chronic hepatic disease; genitourinary – history of urinary retention or severe benign prostatic hyperplasia; hematologic – chronic Coumadin use, coagulopathy, anemia with hemoglobin <13.0 g/dl, or thrombophilia; neurological – history of cerebrovascular accident or history of delirium or dementia; solid organ transplant. Pre-arthroplasty rehabilitation prepares the patient for peri-operative protocols. Patients meet with a physical therapist and are provided with extensive educational materials before surgery to learn the exercises they will need for functional recovery. Enhancement of our peri-operative pain management protocols has resulted in accelerated rehabilitation. The operative intervention must be smooth and efficient, but not hurried. Less invasive approaches and techniques have been shown to decrease pain, reduce length of stay, and improve outcomes, especially in the short term. In 2014, 385 primary partial knee arthroplasty procedures (7 patellofemoral replacement, 13 lateral, and 365 medial) were performed by the author and his 3 associates at an outpatient surgery center. Of those, 348 (95%) went home the same day while 17 (5%) required an overnight stay, with 11 for convenience related to travel distance or later operative time and 6 for medical issues. Outpatient arthroplasty is safe, it's better for us and our patients, and it is here now. In an outpatient environment the surgeon actually spends more time with the patients and family in a friendly environment. Patients feel safe and well cared for, and are highly satisfied with their arthroplasty experience


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 244 - 244
1 Dec 2013
Bradley G
Full Access

Introduction. Dissemination of Total hip Arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach has, depending upon one's experience and perspective, benefitted from or been plagued by aggressive marketing. Although first developed over 60 years ago it was all but unknown until the past decade. This study exams one community surgeon's experience and thus sheds light on whether the ATHA is a viable operation for all orthopaedic surgeons. Methods. 332 hips having a THA through the direct anterior approach were prospectively studied. Side and sex distribution were approximately equal; primary OA was by far the most common diagnosis. 4 hips were converted from a previous operation for fracture. No hips were excluded; all hips were replaced through the direct anterior approach. All hips had the same HA coated, cementless triple-taper stem; a variety of cups were used. 92% of the bearings were ceramic on poly including 22% “dual mobility” design; 88% of the heads were 28 or 32 mm. A special orthopaedic table and intraoperative c-arm were used universally. Charnley Merle D'Aubigne, Harris, and WOMAC scores were obtained before surgery and annually thereafter. Anti-embolic prophylaxis was with intraop bilateral thigh high sequential pumps, early mobilization and aspirin for most. Those patients deemed at risk received lovenox, and those already on Coumadin continued – with bridging lovenox. Results. The mean time for surgery was 70 minutes (60 to 175); for c-arm use: 7 seconds (maximum 21). 78% went directly home after an average hospital stay of 2 days. Less than 10% required a blood transfusion. 80% had none or a leg length difference less than 5 mm. Acetabular abduction angle was within the safe zone for all hips; 1 hip was outside the anteversion safe zone. Hip scores improved significantly for all hips (p < 0.001). There were 5 (1.5%) intra-operative complications; all were recognized and none required further treatment or modification of the usual postop regimen. 3 dislocations occurred (0.9%). 3 reoperations (0.9%) were required: 1 early (a fall and fractured femur) and 2 late (1 fall with acetabular fracture and 1 recurrent dislocation). Another fracture occurred from a fall but additional surgery was not needed. There were 4 (1.2%) systemic complications: 1 PE, 1 UGI bleed, 1 ileus, 1 CVA. 2 patients died for reasons unrelated to the arthroplasty. Discussion/Conclusion:. These data suggest that satisfactory or better results with few complications can be achieved through the direct anterior approach utilizing a special orthopaedic table and intraop fluoroscopy. Using an HA coated triple-taper stem there was no atraumatic loosening in this short term follow-up. C-arm time was comparatively minimal and seems to contribute to good implant positioning. The dislocation rate was low even though large head sizes were rarely employed. There were no periprosthetic infections suggesting that claims for relative soft tissue sparing may be factual