Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a common and disabling hip condition. Hypermobility has been suggested as a possible cause of GTPS. The purpose of this study was to report the prevalence of hypermobility and to investigate its impact on hip-related function and awareness in patients with GTPS. This cross-sectional study was based on a cohort of patients diagnosed with GTPS in the 2013–2015 period. Hypermobility was investigated with the Beighton Score and defined by a cut-off score ≥5. Data on patients' current hip function and awareness were collected with the questionnaires the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score and the Forgotten Joint Score. A total of 612 patients with GTPS were identified based on the diagnosis system; out of those, 390 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 145 (37%) were included. The prevalence of hypermobility within this cohort was estimated to be 11% (95% confidence interval (CI): 3–26%) for males and 25% (95% CI: 17–34%) for females. No significant association was found between hypermobility and self- reported hip function and awareness. We recommend that future studies of GTPS will include hypermobility and investigate the consequences of hypermobility among patients with GTPS

Various authors have linked hypermobility at the trapeziometacarpal joint to future development of arthritis. When examining hypermobility, the anterior oblique ligament (AOL) and ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) are the two most important supporting structures. Literature suggests that reconstructive techniques to correct the hypermobility can prevent subsequent development of osteoarthritis. Eaton and Littler proposed a surgical technique to reconstruct the ligamentous support of this joint in 1973. This cadaveric biomechanical study aimed to evaluate the resultant effect on the mobility of the thumb metacarpal following this reconstructive technique. Seventeen cadaveric hands were prepared and strategically placed on a jig. Movements at the trapeziometacarpal joint were created artificially. Static digital photographs were taken with intact AOL and UCL at trapeziometacarpal joint (controls), for later comparison with those after sectioning of these ligaments and following Eaton-Littler reconstructive technique. The photographic records were analyzed using Scion.Image. Statistical analysis was performed using Minitab. A paired T-test was used to establish statistical relevance. Results confirmed that the AOL and UCL had a major role in limiting excessive motion at the trapeziometacarpal joint, principally in extension. Division of these ligaments produced a significant degree of subluxation of the metacarpal at this joint with thumb in neutral position (p-value = 0.013). Reconstruction of the ligamentous support using the Eaton-Littler technique reduced the degree of extension available (p-value = 0.005). This study confirmed the important role of the AOL and UCL in maintaining trapeziometacarpal joint stability, and that the Eaton-Littler reconstructive technique reduces the degree of hyperextension at this joint

Abstract. OBJECTIVES. Although surgical periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for hip dysplasia aims to optimise acetabular coverage and restore hip function, it is unclear how surgery affects capsular mechanics and joint stability. The purpose was to examine how the reoriented acetabular coverage affects capsular mechanics and joint stability in dysplastic hips. METHODS. Twelve cadaveric dysplastic hips (n = 12) were denuded to the capsule and mounted onto a robotic tester. The robot positioned each hip in multiple flexion angles (Extension, Neutral 0°, Flexion 30°, Flexion 60°, Flexion 90°) and performed internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction to 5 Nm in each rotational or planar direction. Each hip underwent a PAO, preserving the capsule, and was retested postoperatively in the robot. Paired sample t-tests compared the range of motion before and after PAO surgery (CI = 95%). RESULTS. Pre-operatively, the dysplastic hips demonstrated large ranges of internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction motions throughout all flexion positions. Post-operatively, the PAO slackenend the anterosuperior capsule and tightened the inferior capsule. This increased external rotation in Flexion 60° and Flexion 90° (∆. ER. = +16 and +23%) but provided lateral coverage to decrease internal rotation at Flexion 90° (∆. IR. = –15%). The PAO also reduced abduction throughout, but increased adduction in Neutral 0°, Flexion 30°, and Flexion 60° (∆. ADD. = +34, +30%, +29% respectively). CONCLUSIONS. The PAO provided crucial osseous structural coverage to the femoral head, decreasing hypermobility and adverse loading at extreme hip flexion-extension. However, it also slackened the anterosuperior capsule and increased adduction and external rotation, which may lead to ischiofemoral impingement and adductor irritations. Capsular instability may be secondary to acetabular undercoverage, thus capsular alteration may be warranted for larger corrections or rotational osteotomies. To preserve native hip and delay joint degeneration, it is crucial to preserve capsule and elucidate amount of reorientation needed without causing iatrogenic instability. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The hip's capsular ligaments (CL) passively restrain extreme range of motion (ROM) by wrapping around the native femoral head/neck, and protect against impingement and instability. We compared how CL function was affected by device (hip resurfacing arthroplasty, HRA; dual mobility total hip arthroplasty, DM-THA; and conventional THA, C-THA), and surgical approach (anterior and posterior), with and without CL surgical-repair. We hypothesized that CL function would only be preserved when native head-size (HRA/DM-THA) was restored. CL function was quantified on sixteen cadaveric hips, by measuring ROM by internally (IR) and externally rotating (ER) the hip in six functional positions, ranging from full extension with abduction to full flexion with adduction (squatting). Native ROM was compared to ROM after posterior capsulotomy (right hips) or anterior capsulotomy (left hips), and HRA, and C-THA and DM-THA, before and after CL repair. Independent of approach, ROM increased most following C-THA (max 62°), then DM-THA (max 40°), then HRA (max 19°), indicating later CL engagement and reduced biomechanical function with smaller head-size. Dislocations also occurred in squatting after C-THA and DM-THA. CL-repair following HRA restored ROM to the native hip (max 8°). CL-repair following DM-THA reduced ROM hypermobility in flexed positions only and prevented dislocation (max 36°). CL-repair following C-THA did not reduce ROM or prevent dislocation. For HRA and repair, native anatomy was preserved and ligament function was restored. For DM-THA with repair, ligament function depended on the movement of the mobile-bearing, with increased ROM in positions when ligaments could not wrap around head/neck. For C-THA, the reduced head-size resulted in inferior capsular mechanics in all positions as the ligaments remained slack, irrespective of repair. Choosing devices with anatomic head-sizes (HRA/DM-THA) with capsular repair may have greater effect than surgical approach to protect against instability in the early postoperative period