Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective treatment for end-stage glenohumeral arthritis. The use of high modulus uncemented stems causes stress shielding and induces bone resorption of up to 63% of patients following TSA. Shorter length stems with smaller overall dimensions have been studied to reduce stress shielding, however the effect of humeral short stem varus-valgus positioning on bone stress is not known. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of humeral short stem varus-valgus angulation on bone stresses after TSA. Three dimensional models of eight male cadaveric humeri (mean±SD age:68±6 years) were created from computed tomography data using MIMICS (Materialise, Belgium). Separate cortical and trabecular bone sections were created, and the resulting bone models were virtually reconstructed three times by an orthopaedic surgeon using an optimally sized short stem humeral implant (Exactech Preserve) that was placed directly in the center of the humeral canal (STD), as well as rotated varus (VAR) or valgus (VAL) until it was contacting the cortex. Bone was meshed using a custom technique which produced identical bone meshes permitting the direct element-to-element comparison of bone stress. Cortical bone was assigned an elastic modulus of 20 GPa and a Poisson's ratio of 0.3. Trabecular bone was assigned varying stiffness based on CT attenuation. A joint reaction force was then applied to the intact and reconstructed humeri representing 45˚ and 75˚ of abduction. Changes in bone stress, as well as the expected bone response based on change in strain energy density was then compared between the intact and reconstructed states for all implant positions. Both varus and valgus positioning of the humeral stem altered both the cortical and trabecular bone stresses from the intact states. Valgus positioning had the greatest negative effect in the lateral quadrant for both cortical and trabecular bone, producing greater stress shielding than both the standard and varus positioned implant. Overall, the varus and standard positions produced values that most closely mimicked the intact state. Surprisingly, valgus positioning produced large amounts of stress shielding in the lateral cortex at both 45˚ and 75˚ of abduction but resulted in a slight decrease in stress shielding in the medial quadrant directly beneath the humeral resection plane. This might have been a result of direct contact between the distal end of the implant and the medial cortex under loading which permitted load transfer, and therefore load-reduction of the lateral cortex during abduction. Conversely, when the implant was placed in the varus angulation, noticeable departures in stress shielding and changes in bones stress were not observed when compared to the optimal STD position. Interestingly, for the varus positioned implant, the deflection of the humerus under load eliminated the distal stem-cortex contact, hence preventing distal load transfer thus precluding the transfer of load

Aims. Optimal glenoid positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is crucial to provide impingement-free range of motion (ROM). Lateralization and inclination correction are not yet systematically used. Using planning software, we simulated the most used glenoid implant positions. The primary goal was to determine the configuration that delivers the best theoretical impingement-free ROM. Methods. With the use of a 3D planning software (Blueprint) for RSA, 41 shoulders in 41 consecutive patients (17 males and 24 females; means age 73 years (SD 7)) undergoing RSA were planned. For the same anteroposterior positioning and retroversion of the glenoid implant, four different glenoid baseplate configurations were used on each shoulder to compare ROM: 1) no correction of the RSA angle and no lateralization (C-L-); 2) correction of the RSA angle with medialization by inferior reaming (C+M+); 3) correction of the RSA angle without lateralization by superior compensation (C+L-); and 4) correction of the RSA angle and additional lateralization (C+L+). The same humeral inlay implant and positioning were used on the humeral side for the four different glenoid configurations with a 3 mm symmetric 135° inclined polyethylene liner. Results. The configuration with lateralization and correction of the RSA angle (C+L+) led to better ROM in flexion, extension, adduction, and external rotation (p ≤ 0.001). Only internal rotation was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.388). The configuration where correction of the inclination was done by medialization (C+M+) led to the worst ROM in adduction, extension, abduction, flexion, and external rotation of the shoulder. Conclusion. Our software study shows that, when using a 135° inlay reversed humeral implant, correcting glenoid inclination (RSA angle 0°) and lateralizing the glenoid component by using an angled bony or metallic augment of 8 to 10 mm provides optimal impingement-free ROM. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(10):851–857

Total shoulder arthroplasty results in excellent outcomes for most patients who suffer from osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Current trends within the field reflect a desire to minimise stem lengths in contemporary prosthetic designs. The movement towards short-stem humeral implants proffers several advantages including the ease of revision and ‘less invasive’ surgery. But, is there data to support these claims? This talk will focus on the proposed advantages of short-stem implants, variations in the current designs, the data on their outcomes and other current concepts with these implants

Shoulder arthroplasty humeral stem design has evolved to accommodate patient anatomy characteristics. As a result, stems are available in numerous shapes, coatings, lengths, sizes, and vary by fixation method. This abundance of stem options creates a surgical paradox of choice. Metrics describing stem stability, including a stem's resistance to subsidence and micromotion, are important factors that should influence stem selection, but have yet to be assessed in response to the diametral (i.e., thickness) sizing of short stem humeral implants. Eight paired cadaveric humeri (age = 75±15 years) were reconstructed with surgeon selected ‘standard’ sized short-stemmed humeral implants, as well as 2mm ‘oversized’ implants. Stem sizing conditions were randomized to left and right humeral pairs. Following implantation, an anteroposterior radiograph was taken of each stem and the metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were quantified. Each humerus was then potted in polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and subjected to 2000 cycles of 90º forward flexion loading. At regular intervals during loading, stem subsidence and micromotion were assessed using a validated system of two optical markers attached to the stem and humeral pot (accuracy of <15µm). The metaphyseal fill ratio did not differ significantly between the oversized and standard stems (0.50±0.06 vs 0.50±0.10; P = 0.997, Power = 0.05); however, the diaphyseal fill ratio did (0.52±0.06 vs 0.45±0.07; P < 0.001, Power = 1.0). Neither fill ratio correlated significantly with stem subsidence or micromotion. Stem subsidence and micromotion were found to plateau following 400 cycles of loading. Oversizing stem thickness prevented implant head-back contact in all but one specimen with the least dense metaphyseal bone, while standard sizing only yielded incomplete head-back contact in the two subjects with the densest bone. Oversized stems subsided significantly less than their standard counterparts (standard: 1.4±0.6mm, oversized: 0.5±0.5mm; P = 0.018, Power = 0.748;), and resulted in slightly more micromotion (standard: 169±59µm, oversized: 187±52µm, P = 0.506, Power = 0.094,). Short stem diametral sizing (i.e., thickness) has an impact on stem subsidence and micromotion following humeral arthroplasty. In both cases, the resulting three-dimensional stem micromotion exceeded, the 150µm limit suggested for bone ingrowth, although that limit was derived from a uniaxial assessment. Though not statistically significant, the increased stem micromotion associated with stem oversizing may in-part be attributed to over-compacting the cancellous bed during broaching, which creates a denser, potentially smoother, interface, though this influence requires further assessment. The findings of the present investigation highlight the importance of proper short stem diametral sizing, as even a relatively small, 2mm, increase can negatively impact the subsidence and micromotion of the stem-bone construct. Future work should focus on developing tools and methods to support surgeons in what is currently a subjective process of stem selection

Aims. Stemless humeral implants have been developed to overcome stem-related complications in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, stemless implant designs may hypothetically result in less stable initial fixation, potentially affecting long-term survival. The aim of this study is to investigate early fixation and migration patterns of the stemless humeral component of the Simpliciti Shoulder System and to evaluate clinical outcomes. Methods. In this prospective cohort study, radiostereometric analysis (RSA) radiographs were obtained in 24 patients at one day, six weeks, six months, one year, and two years postoperatively. Migration was calculated using model-based RSA. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Results. At two years, median translation along the x-, y-, and z-axis was -0.12 mm (interquartile range (IQR) -0.18 to 0.02), -0.17 mm (IQR -0.27 to -0.09), and 0.09 mm (IQR 0.02 to 0.31). Median rotation around the x-, y-, and z-axis was 0.12° (IQR -0.50 to 0.57), -0.98° (IQR -1.83 to 1.23), and 0.09° (IQR -0.76 to 0.30). Overall, 20 prostheses stabilized within 12 months postoperatively. Four prostheses showed continuous migration between 12 and 24 months. At two-year follow-up, with the exception of one revised prosthesis, all clinical scores improved significantly (median VAS difference at rest: -3.0 (IQR -1.5 to -6.0); OSS 22.0 (IQR 15.0 to 25.0); CMS 29.5 (IQR 15.0 to 35.75); and DASH -30.0 (IQR -20.6 to -41.67) (all p < 0.001)) with the exception of one revised prosthesis. Conclusion. In conclusion, we found that 20 out of 24 implants stabilized within 12 months postoperatively. The significance of continuous migration in four implants is unclear and future research on the predictive value of early migration for future loosening in TSA is required. Clinical results revealed a clinically relevant improvement. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):76–82

Aims. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results, long-term survival, and complication rates of stemless shoulder prosthesis with stemmed anatomical shoulder prostheses for treatment of osteoarthritis and to analyze radiological bone changes around the implants during follow-up. Methods. A total of 161 patients treated with either a stemmed or a stemless shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 118 months (102 to 158). The Constant score (CS), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and active range of motion (ROM) were recorded. Radiological analysis for bone adaptations was performed by plain radiographs. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was calculated and complications were noted. Results. The ROM (p < 0.001), CS (p < 0.001), and DASH score (p < 0.001) showed significant improvements after shoulder arthroplasty for both implants. There were no differences between the groups treated with stemmed or stemless shoulder prosthesis with respect to the mean CS (79.2 (35 to 118) vs 74.4 (31 to 99); p = 0.519) and DASH scores (11.4 (8 to 29) vs 13.2 (7 to 23); p = 0.210). The ten-year unadjusted cumulative survival rate was 95.3% for the stemmed anatomical shoulder prosthesis and 91.5% for the stemless shoulder prosthesis and did not differ between the treatment groups (p = 0.251). The radiological evaluation of the humeral components in both groups did not show loosening of the humeral implant. The main reason for revision for each type of arthroplasties were complications related to the glenoid. Conclusion. The use of anatomical stemless shoulder prosthesis yielded good and reliable results and did not differ from anatomical stemmed shoulder prosthesis over a mean period of ten years. The differences in periprosthetic humeral bone adaptations between both implants have no clinical impact during the follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1292–1300

The reverse total shoulder replacement (rTSR) has excellent clinical outcomes and prosthesis longevity, and thus, the indications have expanded to a younger age group. The use of a stemless humeral implant has been established in the anatomic TSR; and it is postulated to be safe to use in rTSR, whilst saving humeral bone stock for younger patients. The Lima stemless rTSR is a relatively new implant, with only one paper published on its outcomes. This is a single-surgeon retrospective matched case control study to assess short term outcomes of primary stemless Lima SMR rTSR with 3D planning and Image Derived Instrumentation (IDI), in comparison to a matched case group with a primary stemmed Lima SMR rTSR with 3D planning and IDI. Outcomes assessed: ROM, satisfaction score, PROMs, pain scores; and plain radiographs for loosening, loss of position, notching. Complications will be collated. Patients with at least 1 year of follow-up will be assessed. With comparing the early radiographic and clinical outcomes of the stemless rTSR to a similar patient the standard rTSR, we can assess emerging trends or complications of this new device. 41 pairs of stemless and standard rTSRs have been matched, with 1- and 2-year follow up data. Data is currently being collated. Our hypothesis is that there is no clinical or radiographical difference between the Lima stemless rTSR and the traditional Lima stemmed rTSR

Aims. A number of methods have been described to remove a well-fixed humeral implant as part of revision shoulder arthroplasty. These include the use of cortical windows and humeral osteotomies. The router bit extraction technique uses a high-speed router bit to disrupt the bone-implant interface. The implant is then struck in a retrograde fashion with a square-tip impactor and mallet. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and frequency of the different techniques needed for the removal of a well-fixed humeral stem in revision shoulder arthroplasty. Patients and Methods. Between 2010 and 2018, 288 revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures requiring removal of a well-fixed humeral component were carried out at a tertiary referral centre by a single surgeon. The patient demographics, indications for surgery, and method of extraction were collected. Results. Of the 288 revisions, 284 humeral stems (98.6%) were removed using the router bit extraction technique alone. Four humeral stems (1.39%) required an additional cortical window. Humeral osteotomy was not necessary in any procedure. Most of the humeral stems removed (78.8%) were cementless. Of the four humeral stems that required a cortical window, three involved removal of a hemiarthroplasty. Two were cemented and two were cementless. Conclusion. The router bit extraction technique removed a well-fixed humeral component in a very high proportion of patients (98.6%). This method allows surgeons to avoid more invasive approaches involving a cortical window or humeral osteotomy, and their associated complications. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1280–1284

Introduction. Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective treatment to restore shoulder function and alleviate pain in the case of glenohumeral arthritis [1]. Stress shielding, which occurs when bone stress is reduced due to the replacement of bone with a stiffer metallic implant, causes bone resorption of up to 9% of the humeral cortical thickness following TSA [2]. Shorter length stems and smaller overall geometries may reduce stress shielding [3], however the effect of humeral head backside contact with the resection plane has not yet been fully investigated on bone stress. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of humeral head contact conditions on bone stresses following TSA. Methods. 3D models of eight male left cadaveric humeri (68±6 years) were generated from CT data using MIMICS. These were then virtually prepared for reconstruction by an orthopaedic surgeon to accept a short-stem humeral implant (Exactech Equinoxe® Preserve) that was optimally sized and placed centrally in the humeral canal. The humeral head was positioned in the inferior-medial position such that contact was achieved on the medial cortex, and no contact existed on the lateral cortex. Three different humeral head backside contact conditions were investigated (Figure 1); full backside contact (FULL), contact with only the inferior-medial half of the resection (INF), and contact with only the superior-lateral half of the resection (SUP). Cortical bone was assigned an elastic modulus of 20 GPa and a Poisson's ratio of 0.3. Trabecular bone was assigned varying stiffness based on CT attenuation [4]. A joint reaction force was then applied representing 45˚ and 75˚ of abduction [5]. Changes in bone stress, as well as the expected bone response based on change in strain energy density [6] was then compared between the intact and reconstructed states. Results. For cortical bone, the full backside contact altered bone stress by 28.9±5.5% compared to intact, which was significantly less than the superior (37.0±3.9%, P=0.022) and inferior (53.4±3.9%, P<0.001) backside contact conditions. Similar trends were observed for changes in trabecular bone stress relative to the intact state, where the full backside contact altered bone stress by 86.3±27.9% compared to intact, compared to the superior and inferior contact conditions, which altered bone stress by 115.2±45.0% (P=0.309) and 197.4±80.2% (P=0.024), respectively. In terms of expected bone response, both the superior and inferior contact resulted in an increase in bone volume with resorbing potential compared to the full contact (Figure 2). Discussion and Conclusions. The results of this study show that full humeral head backside contact with the humeral resection plane is preferable for short stem humeral TSA implants with the head in the inferior-medial position. As expected, the superior contact typically increased resorption potential in the medial quadrant due to the lack of load transfer, however interestingly the inferior contact increased resorption potential in both the lateral and medial quadrants. Analysis of implant micromotion showed that medial liftoff of the implant occurred, which resulted in a lack of load transfer in the most medial aspect of the resection plane. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Background. Scapular notching is a complication after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a high incidence up to 100%. Its clinical relevance remains uncertain; however, some studies have reported that scapular notching is associated with an inferior clinical outcome. There have been no published articles that studied positional relationship between the scapular neck and polyethylene insert in vivo. The purpose of this study was to measure the distance between the scapular neck and polyethylene insert in shoulders with Grammont type reverse shoulder arthroplasty during active external rotation at the side. Methods. Eighteen shoulders with Grammont type prosthesis (Aequalis Reverse, Tornier) were enrolled in this study. There were 13 males and 5 female, and the mean age at surgery was 74 years (range, 63–91). All shoulders used a glenosphere with 36mm diameter, and retroversion of the humeral implant was 10°in 4 shoulders, 15°in 3 shoulders, and 20°in 11 shoulders. Fluoroscopic images were recorded during active external rotation at the side from maximum internal to external rotation at the mean of 14 months (range, 7–24) after surgery. The patients also underwent CT scans, and three-dimensional glenosphere models with screws and scapula neck models were created from CT images. CT-derived models of the glenosphere and computer-aided design humeral implant models were matched with the silhouette of the implants in the fluoroscopic images using model-image registration techniques (Figure 1). Based on the calculated kinematics of the implants, the closest distance between the scapular neck and polyethylene insert was computed using the scapular model and computer-aided design insert models (Figure 2). The distance was computed at each 5° increment of glenohumeral internal/external rotation, and the data from 20°internal rotation to 40°external rotation were used for analyses. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to examine the change of the distance during the activity, and the level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results. The mean glenohumeral abduction during the activity was 17°-22°. The mean distance between the neck and insert was approximately 1mm throughout the activity (Figure 3). The distance tended to become smaller with the arm externally rotated, but the change was not significant. Discussion. The reported incidence of scapular notching after Grammont type reverse shoulder arthroplasty is generally higher than the newer design prosthesis with the lateralized center of rotation. This may be associated with the design of the prosthesis, and the results of this study that the distance between the neck and insert was approximately 1mm throughout active external rotation at the side will support the high incidence of notching. We may need to analyze the distance with the newer design reverse shoulder prosthesis to prove the architectural advantage of the newer systems. Conclusion. The distance between the scapular neck and polyethylene insert was approximately 1mm throughout active external rotation activity in shoulders with Grammont type prosthesis

The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing primary or revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using custom 3D printed components to manage severe glenoid bone loss with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. After ethical approval (reference: 17/YH/0318), patients were identified and invited to participate in this observational study. Inclusion criteria included: 1) severe glenoid bone loss necessitating the need for custom implants; 2) patients with definitive glenoid and humeral components implanted more than 2 years prior; 3) ability to comply with patient reported outcome questionnaires. After seeking consent, included patients underwent clinical assessment utilising the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Society Score (ASES), and quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score (quickDASH). Radiographic assessment included AP and axial projections. Patients were invited to attend a CT scan to confirm osseointegration. Statistical analysis utilised included descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and paired t test for parametric data. 3 patients had revision surgery prior to the 2-year follow-up. Of these, 2/3 retained their custom glenoid components. 4 patients declined to participate. 5 patients were deceased at the time of commencement of the study. 21 patients were included in this analysis. The mean follow-up was 36.1 months from surgery (range 22–60.2 months). OSS improved from a mean 16 (SD 9.1) to 36 (SD 11.5) (p < 0.001). Constant-Murley score improved from mean 9 (SD 9.2) to 50 (SD 16.4) (p < 0.001). QuickDASH improved from mean 67 (SD 24) to 26 (SD 27.2) (p = 0.004). ASES improved from mean 28 (SD 24.8) to 70 (SD 23.9) (p = 0.007). Radiographic evaluation demonstrated good osseointegration in all 21 included patients. The utility of custom 3D-printed components for managing severe glenoid bone loss in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty yields significant clinical improvements in this complex patient cohort

Total shoulder arthroplasty implants have evolved to include more anatomically shaped components that replicate the native state. The geometry of the humeral head is non-spherical, with the sagittal diameter of the base of the head being up to 6% (or 2.1-3.9 mm) larger than the frontal diameter. Despite this, many TSA humeral head implants are spherical, meaning that the diameter must be oversized to achieve complete coverage, resulting in articular overhang, or portions of the resection plane will remain uncovered. It is suspected that implant-bone load transfer between the backside of the humeral head and the cortex on the resection plane may yield better load-transfer characteristics if resection coverage was properly matched without overhang, thereby mitigating proximal stress shielding. Eight paired cadaveric humeri were prepared for reconstruction with a short stem total shoulder arthroplasty by an orthopaedic surgeon who selected and prepared the anatomic humeral resection plane using a cutting guide and a reciprocating sagittal saw. The humeral head was resected, and the resulting cortical boundary of the resection plane was digitized using a stylus and an optical tracking system with a submillimeter accuracy (Optotrak,NDI,Waterloo,ON). A plane was fit to the trace and the viewpoint was transformed to be perpendicular to the plane. To simulate optimal sizing of both circular and elliptical humeral heads, both circles and ellipses were fit to the filtered traces using the sum of least squares error method. Two extreme scenarios were also investigated: upsizing until 100% total coverage and downsizing until 0% overhang. Total resection plane coverage for the fitted ellipses was found to be 98.2±0.6% and fitted circles was 95.9±0.9%Cortical coverage was found to be 79.8 ±8.2% and 60.4±6.9% for ellipses and circles respectively. By switching to an ellipsoid humeral head, a small 2.3±0.3% (P < 0.001) increase in total coverage led to a 19.5±1.3%(P < 0.001) increase in cortical coverage. The overhang for fitted ellipses and circles was 1.7 ±0.7% and 3.8 ±0.8% respectively, defined as a percentage of the total enclosed area that exceeded the bounds of the humerus resections. Using circular heads results in 2.0 ±0.1% (P < 0.001) greater overhang. Upsizing until 100% resection coverage, the ellipse produced 5.4 ±3.5% (P < 0.001) less overhang than the circle. When upsizing the overhang increases less rapidly for the ellipsoid humeral head that the circular one (Figure 1). Full coverage for the head is achieved more rapidly when up-sizing with an ellipsoid head as well. Downsizing until 0% overhang, total coverage and cortical coverage were 7.5 ±2.8% (P < 0.001) and 7.9 ±8.2% (P = 0.01) greater for the ellipse, respectively. Cortical coverage exhibits a crossover point at −2.25% downsizing, where further downsizing led to the circular head providing more cortical coverage. Reconstruction with ellipsoids can provide greater total resection and cortical coverage than circular humeral heads while avoiding excessive overhang. Elliptical head cortical coverage can be inferior when undersized. These initial findings suggest resection-matched humeral heads may yield benefits worth pursuing in the next generation of TSA implant design. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Patient Specific Instruments (PSIs) are becoming increasingly common in arthroplasty but have only been used with highly invasive surgical approaches that can result in significant complications. We have previously described a novel PSI for minimally invasive total shoulder arthroplasty and shown that it can accurately guide the creation of guide holes in the humerus and scapula. However, conducting shoulder replacement in a minimally invasive environment precludes the use of traditional instruments. In this work, we describe and evaluate the efficacy of a set of novel instruments that, in conjunction with our PSIs, enable accurate minimally invasive total shoulder arthroplasty to be achieved for the first time. The key components of this surgical procedure are: 1) a new minimally invasive posterior surgical approach that avoids the need for muscle transection; 2) a novel PSI that enables accurate guide tunnels to be simultaneously created in the humerus and scapula using a c- shaped drill guide that mates to the PSI; 3) a custom humeral head resection guide that uses the humeral guide tunnel; 4) a novel reamer and 3D metal printed gear mechanism for radial displaced drilling both powered by a central driver placed through the humeral head; and 5) custom impactors for glenoid and humeral implantation – the latter is achieved using a modular slap hammer that is guided by the central humeral drill hole. Accuracy of this system was assessed at each surgical step using an optical tracking camera and an iterative closest point registration method to map measurements to the pre-operative plan. The accuracy results for the physical PSI registration and guide hole drilling were found to be in line with our previously reported results: the intra-articular guide hole locations were 2.2mm and 3.9mm for the humerus and glenoid with angular errors of 2.8° and 8°, respectively. After humeral resection, the humeral cut plane had an angular error of 10.1°. The final humeral implant location had an error of 12.1° and 1.9mm. For the glenoid implant, the positional error was 3.8mm with angular errors of 3.3° ante-retroversion and 8.6° supero- inferior inclination. We believe that these initial results demonstrate that this minimally invasive PSI and instrumentation system can accurately guide total shoulder replacement while avoiding the complications of open surgery. A full cadaveric testing series is currently being completed

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) usage is increasing owing to expanded surgical indications, better implant designs, and improved long-term survival. Correct humeral implant positioning has been shown to diminish stem loading in vitro, and radiographic loosening in in the long-term. Replication of the native elbow centre of rotation is thought to restore normal muscle moment arms and has been suggested to improve elbow strength and function. While much of the focus has been on humeral component positioning, little is known about the effect of positioning of the ulnar stem on post-operative range of motion and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the sagittal alignment and positioning of the humeral and ulnar components on the functional outcomes after TEA. Between 2003 and 2016, 173 semi-constrained TEAs (Wright-Tornier Latitude/Latitude EV, Memphis, TN, USA) were performed at our institution, and our preliminary analysis includes 46 elbows in 41 patients (39 female, 7 male). Patients were excluded if they had severe elbow deformity precluding reliable measurement, experienced a major complication related to an ipsilateral upper limb procedure, or underwent revision TEA. For each elbow, saggital alignment was compared pre- and post-operatively. A best fit circle of the trochlea and capitellum was drawn, with its centre representing the rotation axis. Ninety degree tangent lines from the intramedullary axes of the ulna and humerus, and from the olecranon tip to the centre of rotation were drawn and measured relative to the rotation axis, representing the ulna posterior offset, humerus offset, and ulna proximal offset, respectively. In addition, we measured the ulna stem angle (angle subtended by the implant and the intramedullary axis of the ulna), as well as radial neck offset (the length of a 90o tangent line from the intramedullary axis of the radial neck and the centre of rotation) in patients with retained or replaced radial heads. Our primary outcome measure was the quickDASH score recorded at the latest follow-up for each patient. Our secondary outcome measures were postoperative flexion, extension, pronation and supination measured at the same timepoints. Each variable was tested for linear correlation with the primary and secondary outcome measures using the Pearson two-tailed test. At an average follow-up of 6.8 years (range 2–14 years), there was a strong positive correlation between anterior radial neck offset and the quickDASH (r=0.60, p=0.001). There was also a weak negative correlation between the posterior offset of the ulnar component and the qDASH (r=0.39, p=0.031), and a moderate positive correlation between the change in humeral offset and elbow supination (r=0.41, p=0.044). The ulna proximal offset and ulna stem angle were not correlated with either the primary, or secondary outcome measures. When performing primary TEA with radial head retention, or replacement, care should be taken to ensure that the ulnar component is correctly positioned such that intramedullary axis of the radial neck lines up with the centre of elbow rotation, as this strongly correlates with better function and less pain after surgery

Humeral implant design in shoulder arthroplasty has evolved over the years. The third generation shoulder prostheses have an anatomic humeral stem that replicates the 3-dimensional parameters of the proximal humerus. The overall complication rate has decreased as a result of these changes in implant design. In contrast, the rate of periprosthetic humeral fractures has increased. To avoid stem-related complications while retaining the advantages of the third generation of shoulder implants, the stemless total evolutive shoulder system has been developed. The indications, the surgical technique, and the complications of this humeral implant in shoulder arthroplasty will be described

Purpose: Loosening remains a problem with semi-constrained total elbow prostheses. The trend in recent years has been to improve prosthesis design to achieve stability of the humeral implant. We report a small series of nine Coonrad-Morrey total elbow prostheses where three early loosenings were observed in the ulnar implant. We attempt to analyse the causes and present a review of the recent literature. Material and methods: Nine patients, mean age 60 years, age range 57–63 years, underwent total elbow arthroplasty with a Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis for rheumatoid disease (n=5), stiff degenerative joints after trauma (n=3, flexion-extension 20°), floating joint after trauma (n=1). The posterolateral approach described by Bryan and Morrey was used for eight elbows and the posterior approach for one. Clinical and radiological results were assessed with the performance index and the Mayo clinic score respectively. Results: Mean follow-up was 3.6 years (1.5–4.7). Outcome was very good or good for seven elbows (score > 75 and > 50), fair for one (< 50) and poor for one (< 25). Three elbows were pain free, two presented pain during movement against force. Flexion was greater than 120° in four elbows (all four rheumatoid polyarthritis). Radiologically, we observed three cases of ulnar implant loosening with two type IV lucent lines, and one type III line. There was one humeral implant with a lucent line which did not change over time (type I). The two cases of type IV lines were associated with radial and anterior translation migration of the prosthetic stem with effraction or lysis of the ulnar cortical. The three ulnar loosenings appeared between the second and third postoperative year on two post-trauma stiff degenerative elbows (flexion-extension < 20°) and one rheumatoid elbow. At last follow-up, there was one poor result requiring revision surgery, one fair result, and one very good result (totally asymptomatic type 4 lucent line). Discussion: The causes of these loosenings were studied: difficult cementing technique in a tight canal, mediocre primary stability of the ulnar implant opposing the excellent fit of the humeral implant with an encased graft under the anterior wing, excessive constraint. Our results are similar to those reported by Hilebrand who had 30% evolving ulnar lucent lines and suggest that we should reserve this prosthesis for unstable elbows

Background. Medical advances and an ageing population mean that more people than ever rely on artificial joints. In the past years, shoulder joint replacement has developed rapidly and the numbers of shoulder prostheses implanted increased dramatically. Wear is one of the main contributors to the failure of shoulder implants. It is therefore important to measure the wear properties of the articulating surfaces within the joint in vitro. Investigation of wear characteristics through a comprehensive range of motion using a sophisticated shoulder simulator would reveal the durability of the material, the performance of component design and the safety analyses of prostheses. The purpose of the work was to develop and validate a multi-station shoulder simulator, which could accurately simulate physiological gleno-humeral forces and displacements during activities of daily living. Materials and Methods. Imperial shoulder simulator was designed with six articulating stations and one loaded soak control station for anatomical shoulder system wear simulation. It gives an adduction-abduction (AA) range of-15° to 55°, flexion-extension (FE) range of −90° to 90° and internal external rotation (IER) range of 15° to −90°. The rotations are applied simultaneously to the humeral implants by using stepper motors with integral position encoders. Axial and shear loadings to each glenoid implant were applied using pneumatic cylinders. Force controlled translations were recorded using load cells and LVDTs, and a data acquisition system. Pneumatic cylinders were also installed to work to counterbalance weights during the motion of adduction-abduction. All bearing pairs are within isolated and sealed test chambers to prevent loss of fluid through evaporation, and cross contamination of third body wear (as recommended in F1714-96). The simulator is controlled by LabVIEW program allowing to reproduce shoulder activities of daily living. Results. A commissioning trial was conducted when shoulder implants were subject to rotational and translational motions and loading to replicate the ‘combing’ activity of daily living. The motion ranges were typically 5° to 15° in AA, 15° to 80° in FE, and −30° to −20° in IER with applied loads from 60 to 440 N, principally along the medio-lateral direction. The waveform was at frequency of 1 Hz. The activity was loaded at 250,000 cycles around 3 full days, when test and control specimens should be cleaned, measured and then re-installed into the simulator. The results from kinematic and kinetic inputs and outputs were obtained from the trial study. Discussion. A multi-station shoulder simulator was successfully developed, which is capable of reproducing typical activities of daily living by applying physiological patterns of motion and load. The performance of the simulator was validated in the commissioning trial, which leads to evaluation of novel implant designs

Purpose: To measure any observed migration and rotation of humeral and ulnar components using radiostereometric analysis. Methods: From 2002–2004 in a prospective study, twelve elbows in patients treated with either a linked(3) or unlinked(9) Acclaim total elbow prosthesis were included in a radiostereometry study. Six tantalum markers were introduced into the humerus another 3 markers were located on a humeral component. Four markers were placed in to ulna and three markers located on the ulnar component. RSA radiographs were taken postoperatively, six, twelve and twenty-four months. The radiographs were digitised and analysed using UmRSA software. The relative movement of the humeral and ulnar implants with respect to the bone was measured. Results: At twelve months, the largest rotation of the humeral component was anteversion/retroversion with a mean of 20, anterior tilt had a mean of 1.10 and varus/valgus tilt was minimal mean 0.60. Mean difference between twelve and 24 months segment rotation was no more than 0.50. Rotation in unlinked humeral implants reached a plateau at 12 months this did not occur in linked implants. Paired t-tests between twelve and 24 months segment translation data showed the mean differences to be no more than 0.04mm. In contrast, humeral tip motion produced a mean of 1.3mm at 12 months dominated by movement in the horizontal plane with a mean difference at 24 months of 0.2mm. Mean micro-motion of the ulna implant tip was 0.32mm at 12 months with a mean difference at 24 months of 0.1mm. Conclusions: Early micromotion of the Acclaim humeral implant occurs mostly by rotation about the vertical axis accompanied by anterior tilt. In unlinked implants this motion reaches a plateau at 12 months after operation but does occur in linked implants

Aims

Proximal humeral fractures are the third most common fracture among the elderly. Complications associated with fixation include screw perforation, varus collapse, and avascular necrosis of the humeral head. To address these challenges, various augmentation techniques to increase medial column support have been developed. There are currently no recent studies that definitively establish the superiority of augmented fixation over non-augmented implants in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation or bone-graft augmentation versus those who underwent locking-plate fixation without augmentation for proximal humeral fractures.

Aims

Both anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA and rTSA) provide functional improvements. A reported benefit of aTSA is better range of motion (ROM). However, it is not clear which procedure provides better outcomes in patients with limited foward elevation (FE). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of aTSA and rTSA in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), an intact rotator cuff, and limited FE.