Background. An increased incidence of periprosthetic osteolysis, resulting in loss of biologic fixation, has been recently reported in contemporary THAs with low-carbide metal-on-metal compared to metal-on-polyethylene couple bearings. A hypersensitivity reaction due to Co and Cr debris is reported as a potential cause for failure of THAs with high-carbide bearings, but there are no evidence-based data for this reaction in low-carbide metal-on-metal bearings. Questions/purposes. We investigated whether there were differences in immunologic hypersensitivity reactions in retrievals from revised THAs with COP versus MOM bearing couples. Patients and Methods. We compared newly formed capsule and periprosthetic interface membranes retrieved from revision surgery due to aseptic failure in 20 patients with low-carbide bearings and 13 patients with ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings. For control tissue we obtained samples from the hip capsule during the primary THA implantation in 13 patients with low-carbide bearings and seven with ceramic-on-polyethylene. We examined the tissues with conventional histologic and immunohistochemical methods. Results. Compared to the controls and the tissue from patients with ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings, the tissues from patients with low-carbide metal-on-metal bearings were associated with (1) extensive necrosis and fibrin exudation in the newly formed hip capsule and (2) diffuse and perivascular lymphocytic infiltration of a higher degree than in the ceramic-on-polyethylene hips in conventional histologic examination and (3) more T than B cells. Conclusions. The conventional histologic and immunohistochemical findings in tissues retrieved from failed THAs with low-carbide metal-on-metal bearings are consistent with a link between hypersensitivity and osteolysis with low-carbide bearing couple THA

Aims

Patients with A1 and A2 trochanteric hip fractures represent a substantial proportion of trauma caseload, and national guidelines recommend that sliding hip screws (SHS) should be used for these injuries. Despite this, intramedullary nails (IMNs) are routinely implanted in many hospitals, at extra cost and with unproven patient outcome benefit. We have used data from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) to examine the use of SHS and IMN for A1 and A2 hip fractures at a national level, and to define the cost implications of management decisions that run counter to national guidelines.

Introduction. Application of an external fixator for type B and C pelvic fractures can be life saving. Anteriorly the fixator half pins can be placed in the long and thick corridor of bone in the supra-acetabular region often referred to as the low anterior ex-fix. Pins in this location are favoured as they are more stable biomechanically. The bone tunnel for the low anterior ex-fix can be visualised with an iliac oblique projection intra-operatively. In some cases despite being outside the articular surface it may still be low enough to pass through the capsular attachment of the hip joint on the anterior inferior iliac spine. We aim to provide radiological markers for the most superior fibres of the capsule to help accurate extra-capsular pin placement within the supra-acetabular bone tunnel. Materials and Methods. Thirteen cadaveric pelves, embalmed with the method of Thiel, were used for this study. An image intensifier was positioned to acquire an iliac oblique outlet view, such that the supra acetabular bone tunnel was visualised. This was achieved by positioning the beam 30 degrees cephalad and 20 degrees medial. Both left and right hemipelves were examined in this way. A standard size metallic disc was included in all images with in the acetabulum to allow for image calibration. The proximal most fibres of the hip joint capsule were marked with a K-wire so that their relation to the bone tunnel could be clearly seen on the images. Once all images were acquired they were calibrated and analysed using ImageJ Software to estimate the height and maximum width of the bone tunnel as seen on the images and the vertical distance of the superior most fibres of the capsule from the dome of the acetabulum. Results. The mean height of the bone tunnel was 24.9 mm (SD 4.3 mm, Range 18.9–33.2 mm) and the maximum width of the tunnel was 11.7 mm (SD 2.6 mm, Range 7.6–16.3 mm). The inferior margin of the bone tunnel was on average 7.4 mm (SD 3.4 mm, Range 1.1–14.4 mm) superior to the acetabular dome and the most proximal fibres of the capsule were on average 9.2 mm (SD 2.4 mm, Range 4.7–16.1 mm) superior to the acetabular dome. This meant that on average 3.6 mm (SD 2.1 mm, Range 0.3–8.9 mm) of the inferior portion of the tunnel is within the joint. There was no statistically significant difference between the left and right sides. Conclusion. There is adequate space for two long external fixator pins within the described tunnel. These should be placed in the upper half of the anterior inferior iliac spine. Below this level there is risk of being intra-capsular which can lead to septic arthritis. For this reason we recommend that supra-acetabular pins should be placed at least 16 mm superior to the acetabular dome as visualised on the iliac oblique outlet view

Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur may be required to treat primary bone tumours or destructive metastases either with impending or established pathological fracture. Modular prostheses are available off the shelf and can be adapted to most reconstructive situations for this purpose. We have assessed the clinical and functional outcome of using the METS (Stanmore Implants Worldwide) modular tumour prosthesis to reconstruct the proximal femur in 100 consecutive patients between 2001 and 2006. We compared the results with the published series for patients managed with modular and custom-made endoprosthetic replacements for the same conditions.

There were 52 males and 48 females with a mean age of 56.3 years (16 to 84) and a mean follow-up of 24.6 months (0 to 60). In 65 patients the procedure was undertaken for metastases, in 25 for a primary bone tumour, and in ten for other malignant conditions. A total of 46 patients presented with a pathological fracture, and 19 presented with failed fixation of a previous pathological fracture. The overall patient survival was 63.6% at one year and 23.1% at five years, and was significantly better for patients with a primary bone tumour than for those with metastatic tumour (82.3% vs 53.3%, respectively at one year (p = 0.003)). There were six early dislocations of which five could be treated by closed reduction. No patient needed revision surgery for dislocation. Revision surgery was required by six (6%) patients, five for pain caused by acetabular wear and one for tumour progression. Amputation was needed in four patients for local recurrence or infection.

The estimated five-year implant survival with revision as the endpoint was 90.7%. The mean Toronto Extremity Salvage score was 61% (51% to 95%). The implant survival and complications resulting from the use of the modular system were comparable to the published series of both custom-made and other modular proximal femoral implants.

We conclude that at intermediate follow-up the modular tumour prosthesis for proximal femur replacement provides versatility, a low incidence of implant-related complications and acceptable function for patients with metastatic tumours, pathological fractures and failed fixation of the proximal femur. It also functions as well as a custom-made endoprosthetic replacement.

We describe a series of 20 patients with ununited fractures of the femoral neck following neglected trauma or failed primary internal fixation who were seen at a mean of 7.5 months (2 to 18) following injury. Open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture was performed in all patients, together with a myoperiosteal flap on the quadratus femoris muscle pedicle.

Union occurred at a mean of 4.9 months (2 to 10) in all patients. The mean follow-up was for 70 months (14 to 144). There was no further progression in six of seven patients with pre-operative radiological evidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. One patient had delayed collapse and flattening of the femoral head ten years after union of the fracture, but remained asymptomatic.

This study demonstrates the orthopaedic application of myoperiosteal grafting for inducing osteogenesis in a difficult clinical situation.

There remains uncertainty about the most effective surgical approach in the treatment of complex fractures of the acetabulum. We have reviewed the experience of a single surgeon using the extended iliofemoral approach, as described by Letournel.

A review of the database of such fractures identified 106 patients operated on using this approach with a minimum follow-up of two years. All data were collected prospectively. The fractures involved both columns in 64 (60%). Operation was undertaken in less than 21 days after injury in 71 patients (67%) and in 35 (33%) the procedure was carried out later than this. The reduction of the fracture was measured on plain radiographs taken after operation and defined as anatomical (0 to 1 mm of displacement); imperfect (2 to 3 mm) or poor (> 3 mm). The functional outcome was measured by the modified Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score. The mean follow-up was for 6.3 years (2 to 17).

All patients achieved union of the fractures. The reduction was graded as anatomical in 76 (72%) of the patients, imperfect in 23 (22%), and poor in six (6%). The mean Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score was 15 (5 to 18) with 68 patients (64%) showing good or excellent and 38 (36%) fair or poor results. Function correlated significantly with the accuracy of the reduction (p < 0.009). Significant heterotopic ossification developed in 32 patients (30%) and was associated with a worse mean Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score of 13.7.

The extended iliofemoral approach can be performed safely in selected complex acetabular fractures with an acceptable clinical outcome and rate of complications. Effective prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification should be strongly considered.