Aims. The aim of this study was to estimate time to arthroplasty among patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA), and to identify factors at enrolment to first-line intervention that are prognostic for progression to surgery. Methods. In this longitudinal register-based observational study, we identified 72,069 patients with hip and knee OA in the Better Management of Patients with Osteoarthritis Register (BOA), who were referred for first-line OA intervention, between May 2008 and December 2016. Patients were followed until the first primary arthroplasty surgery before 31 December 2016, stratified into a hip and a knee OA cohort. Data were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable-adjusted Cox regression. Results. At five years, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that 46% (95% confidence interval (CI) 44.6 to 46.9) of those with hip OA, and 20% (95% CI 19.7 to 21.0) of those with knee OA, had progressed to arthroplasty. The strongest prognostic factors were desire for surgery (hazard ratio (HR) hip 3.12 (95% CI 2.95 to 3.31), HR knee 2.72 (95% CI 2.55 to 2.90)), walking difficulties (HR hip 2.20 (95% CI 1.97 to 2.46), HR knee 1.95 (95% CI 1.73 to 2.20)), and frequent pain (HR hip 1.56 (95% CI 1.40 to 1.73), HR knee 1.77 (95% CI 1.58 to 2.00)). In hip OA, the probability of progression to surgery was lower among those with comorbidities (e.g. ≥ four conditions; HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.69)), with no detectable effects in the knee OA cohort. Instead, being overweight or obese increased the probability of OA progress in the knee cohort (HR 1.25 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.37)), but not among those with hip OA. Conclusion. Patients with hip OA progressed faster and to a greater extent to arthroplasty than patients with knee OA. Progression was strongly influenced by patients’ desire for surgery and by factors related to severity of OA symptoms, but factors not directly related to OA symptoms are also of importance. However, a large proportion of patients with OA do not seem to require surgery within five years, especially among those with knee OA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):792–800

Introduction. The mortality and serious side effects risk of both medical and surgical management of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been widely published. To date however, there are no studies comparing safety between the two treatment modalities. We aimed to systematically review the published evidence on the mortality and serious complications risk of the various treatments for hip and knee OA. Methods. We searched for studies investigating the safety of arthroplasty, arthroscopy, opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), and paracetamol using PubMed, Score, Cochrane, PEDRO, and Google Scholar. The phrase “osteoarthritis treatment” was searched and then combined using Boolean connectors (“OR and “AND) with “serious complications” or “serious adverse events” or “mortality”. The quality of included studies was assessed based on the approach used by the AAOS in judging the quality of treatment studies. Results. 19 studies were included in the review. Mortality risk was highest for Naproxen HR = 3 (1.9; 4.6) and lowest for total hip replacement RR = 0.7 (0.7; 0.7). Highest serious gastrointestinal complication risk was reported for diclofenac OR = 4.77 (3.94; 5.76) and lowest for total knee replacement HR = 0.6 (0.49; 0.75). Ibuprofen had the highest renal complications risk OR=2.32 (1.45; 3.71) whereas celecoxib had the lowest RR = 0.61 (0.4; 0.94). Celecoxib users had the highest cardiovascular (CV) complication risk OR=2.26 (1; 5.1) and the lowest was for tramadol RR = 1.1 (0.87; 1.4). Discussion. Long term medical management of hip and knee OA particularly with NSAIDS may carry a higher mortality risk compared to surgery. Conclusion. The practitioner and patient should carefully consider the risks of medications as well as surgery prior to commencing treatment. Treatment choice should also be tailored to the patient taking into account known GI, CVS, and renal co-morbidities

To design osteoarthritis (OA) care based on prognosis, we need to identify individuals who are most likely of disease progression. We estimated survival time of the native hip and knee joint and evaluated what patient-related and OA disease-related factors associated with progression to joint replacement surgery.

We included 72,069 patients referred to first-line OA intervention (patient education and exercise) during 2008 and 2016 and registered in the Swedish quality register Better Management of Patients with Osteoarthritis (BOA). Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used to estimate joint survival time. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval [CI] were calculated using multiple Cox regression.

The 5-year survival time of the native joint was 56% for hip OA and 80% for knee OA. Disease-related factors were more strongly associated with progression to joint replacement (e.g. willingness for surgery HR; hip 2.9 [95% CI, 2.7–3.1], knee 2.7 [2.6–2.9] and walking difficulties (HR; hip 2.2 [2.0–2.5], knee 1.9 [1.7–2.2]), than patient-related factors such socioeconomic factors (e.g. highest income quartile HR; hip 1.3 [1.2–1.3], knee 1.3 [1.2–1.4]) and comorbidities (e.g. ≥6 conditions HR; hip: 0.7 [0.6–0.7], knee; 1.1 [1.0–1.2]).

Patients with hip OA were more likely to undergo surgery and at an earlier time compared with those with knee OA. Progression was strongly influenced by factors associated with the OA disease, but other patient-related factors are important. However, a large proportion of patients with OA do not seem to require surgery, especially among those with knee OA.

Introduction. This analysis determined whether the type and level of physical activity changes during the initial 24 months post-total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) compared to pre-operative levels, and how this change compares to people without arthroplasty or osteoarthritis. Patients/Materials & Methods. Data from a prospective cohort dataset (Osteoarthritis Initiative dataset) of community-dwelling individuals who had undergone a primary THR or TKR were identified. These were compared to people who had not undergone an arthroplasty and who did not have a diagnosis of hip or knee osteoarthritis during the follow-up period (control). Data were analysed comparing between-group and within-group differences for physical activity (gardening, domestic activities, sports, employment, walking) within the first 24 months post-arthroplasty. Results. In total, 116 participants were analysed in the TKR group, 105 in the THR group. These cohorts were compared to 3441 (control) participants. Whilst physical activity largely increased from pre-operative levels during the first 12 months post-operatively, this change reverted at the 24 month assessment to pre-operative levels in people who underwent THR. There appeared limited change (increase nor decrease) in physical activity at 12 or 24 months post-operatively compared to pre-operative levels in people who underwent TKR. Compared to the non-arthroplasty cohorts, physical activity was consistently greater in the non-arthroplasty group at 12 and 24 months post-pre-operative/baseline measures. Discussion. There is limited change in the level or type of physical activity undertaken between people before or after THR or TKR in the first 24 post-operative months. Physical activity levels are lower in people following THR and TKR compared to people with similar characteristics who have not undergone arthroplasty or have osteoarthritis. Conclusion. Health strategies are warranted to address the limited increase in post-operative physical activity, to encourage this post-arthroplasty population to engage and maintain physical activity pursuits for wider health benefits

Objectives

Sagittal alignment of the lumbosacral spine, and specifically pelvic incidence (PI), has been implicated in the development of spine pathology, but generally ignored with regards to diseases of the hip. We aimed to determine if increased PI is correlated with higher rates of hip osteoarthritis (HOA). The effect of PI on the development of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) was used as a negative control.