Introduction. It has been contentious whether an anatomic double-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)is superior to that of a single-bundle technique. It has been hypothesized in the literature that the double-bundle technique could provide function closer to that of the anatomical knee joint. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes after single-bundle ACLR versus double-bundle ACLR. We hypothesized that the double-bundle technique would not be superior to the single-bundle technique. Methods. A retrospective, non-randomized, matched-paired comparative study was performed. Patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either a double-bundle or single-bundle technique, between 2003 and 2008 were included and matched 1:1. Matching included age, sex, BMI, time from injury to surgery, side of injury and type of sport. Patients who underwent revision procedures, multiligament reconstruction or other ACLR techniques were excluded. Patients were subsequently followed up, noting occurrence of graft rupture and any other complications. Results. A total of 1377 ACLRs were performed during the study period. Seven hundred and fifty-six patients were excluded, leaving 396patients to be included in the matching (198 matched pairs). Mean follow-up time was 176.7 +/− 7.7 months (range, 166–211 months). Overall, 40 patients (10.1%) suffered from a graft rupture which consisted of 22 patients (11.1%) in the single-bundle group and 18patients (9.1%) in the double-bundle group. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox model and demonstrated that graft failure had no significant association with the surgical technique (hazard ratio (HR), 0.857(0.457;1.609), p=0.6313). (Figure 1) Five patients (2.5%) in the single-bundle group and 7 patients (3.5%) in the double-bundle group underwent secondary surgery for cyclops syndrome(p=0.5637). Three patients (1.5%) in the single-bundle group and 2 patients (1.0%) in the double-bundle group underwent arthrolysis(p=0.6547). Seven patients (3.5%) in the single-bundle group underwent secondary meniscectomy compared to 6 patients (3.0%) in the double-bundle group (p=0.7630). Conclusion. Double-bundle ACLR is not superior to single-bundle ACLR at long-term follow up. Therefore, orthopaedic surgeons do not need to use a double-bundle technique when performing ACL reconstruction. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

We reviewed all patients that suffered a deep infection following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair kept between January 2007 and April 2011 at our teaching hospital NHS trust, and the two local private hospitals. 18 patients were identified. All patients underwent at least 2 arthroscopic washouts, with limited synovectomy if required. Targeted antibiotics were commenced according to the culture results, and following microbiological advice. These patients were reviewed at a minimum of 1 year following eradication of infection (range 12–46 months). There were 7 surgeons performing the ACL reconstructions. The primary outcome measure was graft failure requiring revision. Our secondary outcome measures were a history of ongoing instability, KT 1000™ measurement, Tegner and Lysholm outcome scores. There were 18 patients identified as having suffered infection after ACL infection (mean age 24.3 years, range 15–38 years). Average C Reactive Protein (CRP) was 217 on admission (range 59–397). The most common organism isolated was coagulase negative staphylococcus in 47.3% of cases. There were 3 graft failures within the infection group. Of the remaining 15 patients there were no episodes of ongoing instability and mean pivot shift grade was 1.1, mean KT 1000™ side-to- side difference was +1.8mm. There was a reported drop on the Tegner activity score of 1.75 (range 0–6) and mean Lysholm score was 89 (range 56–100). The failure rate is slightly higher than that reported in the literature. Patient reported outcome measures in the patients are broadly consistent. We recommend an aggressive approach to the treatment of deep infection following ACL reconstruction, in order to achieve a satisfactory outcome

AIM. Failure of a primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is associated with poor functional outcomes even after revision surgery. The aim of this study is to identify early predictors for failure, so that it may aid in recognition of at-risk patients. METHOD. An observational study was conducted of 623 patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon over a 72 month period. Patient and procedure related parameters including age, gender, BMI, time to surgery, graft size, fixation methods, meniscal and chondral injuries, meniscal surgery, radiological parameters and post-operative IKDC scores. Logistic regression modeling was employed to identify those factors which were statistically significant for failure. RESULTS. We identified 14 patients who experienced failure of their ACL graft. The causes for failure included trauma (9), infection (2), arthrofibrosis (1), biological (1) and recurrent instability (1). Univariate analysis established a significant relationship between age at time of injury (p<0.001), BMI (p=0.001), time to index procedure (p<0.001), screw length (p=0.04) and early post-operative IKDC score (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated all factors stated except screw length to be important for predicting failure for ACL reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS. The rate of graft failure is lower than has been those quoted in the literature. We have identified those patients who are at high risk of rupturing a reconstructed primary ACL graft. Careful monitoring and functional modification of high-risk patients may be indicated to prevent failure. This study identifies predictive factors of failed ACL reconstruction. Age at time of injury, BMI, time to surgery, post-operative IKDC scores were found to be associated with failure

Gunshot injuries to the shoulder are rare and difficult to manage. We present a case series of seven patients who sustained a severe shoulder injury to the non-dominant side as a result of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. We describe the injury as ‘suicide shoulder’ caused by upward and outward movement of the gun barrel as the trigger is pulled. All patients were male, with a mean age of 32 years (21 to 48). All were treated at the time of injury with initial repeated debridement, and within four weeks either by hemiarthroplasty (four patients) or arthrodesis (three patients). The hemiarthroplasty failed in one patient after 20 years due to infection and an arthrodesis was attempted, which also failed due to infection. Overall follow-up was for a mean of 26 months (12 to 44). All four hemiarthroplasty implants were removed with no feasible reconstruction ultimately possible, resulting in a poor functional outcome and no return to work. In contrast, all three primary arthrodeses eventually united, with two patients requiring revision plating and grafting. These patients returned to work with a good functional outcome. We recommend arthrodesis rather than replacement as the treatment of choice for this challenging injury.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:820–4.