Introduction. Most of patients with unilateral hip disease shows muscle volume atrophy of pelvis and thigh in the affected side because of pain and disuse, resulting in reduced muscle weakness and limping. However, it is unclear how the muscle atrophy correlated with muscle strength in the patient with hip disorders. A previous study have demonstrated that the volume of the gluteus medius correlated with the muscle strength by volumetric measurement using 3 dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) data, however, muscles influence each other during motions and there is no reports focusing on the relationship between some major muscles of pelvis and thigh including gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, iliopsoas and quadriceps and muscle strength in several hip and knee motions. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between muscle volumetric atrophy of major muscles of pelvis and thigh and muscle strength in flexion, extension and abduction of hip joints and extension of knee joint before surgery in patients with unilateral hip disease. Material and Methods. The subjects were 38 patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis, who underwent hip joint surgery. They all underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT) for preoperative planning. There were 6 males and 32 females with average age 59.5 years old. Before surgery, isometric muscle strength in hip flexion, hip extension, hip abduction and knee extension were measured using a hand held dynamometer (µTas F-1, ANIMA Japan). Major muscles including gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, iliopsoas and quadriceps were automatically extracted from the preoperative CT using convolutional neural networks (CNN) and were corrected manually by the experienced surgeon. The muscle volumetric atrophy ratio was defined as the ratio of muscle volume of the affected side to that of the unaffected side. The muscle weakness ratio was defined as the ratio of muscle strength of the affected side to that of the unaffected side. The correlation coefficient between the muscle atrophy ratio and the muscle weakness ratio of each muscle were calculated. Results. The average muscle atrophy ratio was 84.5% (63.5%–108.2%) in gluteus maximus, 86.6% (65.5%–112.1%) in gluteus medius, 81.0% (22.1%–130.8%) in psoas major, and 91.0% (63.8%–127.0%) in quadriceps. The average muscle strength ratio was 71.5% (0%–137.5%) in hip flexion, 88.1% (18.8%–169.6%) in hip abduction, 78.6% (21.9%–130.1%) in hip extension and 84.3% (13.1%–122.8%) in knee extension. The correlation coefficient between the muscle atrophy and the ratio of each muscle strength between the affected and unaffected side were shown in Table 1. Conclusion. In conclusion, the muscle atrophy of gluteus medius muscle, psoas major muscle and quadriceps muscle significantly correlated with the muscle weakness in hip flexion. The muscle atrophy of psoas major muscle and quadriceps muscle also significantly correlated with the muscle weakness in knee extension. There were no significant correlation between the muscle atrophy and the muscle weakness in hip extension and abduction

Complete or nearly complete disruption of the attachment of the gluteus is seen in 10–20% of cases at the time of THA. Special attention is needed to identify the lesion at the time of surgery because the avulsion often is visible only after a thickened hypertrophic trochanteric bursa is removed. From 1/1/09 to 12/31/13, 525 primary hip replacements were performed by a single surgeon. After all total hip components were implanted, the greater trochanteric bursa was removed, and the gluteus medius and minimus attachments to the greater trochanter were visualised and palpated. Ninety-five hips (95 patients) were found to have damage to the muscle attachments to bone. Fifty-four hips had mild damage consisting of splits in the tendon, but no frank avulsion of abductor tendon from their bone attachments. None of these cases had severe atrophy of the abductor muscles, but all had partial fatty infiltration. All hips with this mild lesion had repair of the tendons with #5 Ticron sutures to repair the tendon bundles together, and drill holes through bone to anchor the repair to the greater trochanter. Forty-one hips had severe damage with complete or nearly complete avulsion of the gluteus medius and minimus muscles from their attachments to the greater trochanter. Thirty-five of these hips had partial fatty infiltration of the abductor muscles, but all responded to electrical stimulation. The surface of the greater trochanter was denuded of soft tissue with a rongeur, the muscles were repaired with five-seven #5 Ticron mattress sutures passed through drill holes in the greater trochanter, and a gluteus maximus flap was transferred to the posterior third of the greater trochanter and sutured under the vastus lateralis. Six hips had complete detachment of the gluteus medius and minimus muscles, severe atrophy of the muscles, and poor response of the muscles to electrical stimulation. The gluteus medius and minimus muscles were sutured to the greater trochanter, and gluteus maximus flap was transferred as in the group with functioning gluteus medius and minimus muscles. Postoperatively, patients were instructed to protect the hip for 8 weeks, then abductor exercises were started. The normal hips all had negative Trendelenburg tests at 2 and 5 years postoperative with mild lateral hip pain reported by 11 patients at 2 years, and 12 patients at 5 years. In the group of 54 with mild abductor tendon damage that were treated with simple repair, positive Trendelenburg test was found in 5 hips at 2 years and in 8 hips at 5 years. Lateral hip pain was reported in 7 hips at 2 years, and in 22 at 5 years. In the group of 35 hips with severe avulsion but good muscle tissue, who underwent repair with gluteus maximus flap transfer, all had good abduction against gravity and negative Trendelenburg tests at 2 and 5 years postoperative, and none had lateral hip pain. Of the 6 hips with complete avulsion and poor muscle who underwent abductor muscle repair and gluteus maximus flap transfer, all had weak abduction against gravity, mildly positive Trendelenburg sign, and mild lateral hip pain at 2 and 5 years postoperative. Abductor avulsion is uncommon but not rare, and is detected during THA only by direct examination of the tendon and removal of the trochanteric bursa. Simple repair of mild abductor tendon damage did not prevent progressive abductor weakness in some hips; and the increase in number of patients with lateral hip pain from 2 to 5 years suggests progressive deterioration. Augmentation of the repair with a gluteus maximus flap appears to provide a stable reconstruction of the abductor muscles, and seemed to restore abductor function in the hips with functioning muscles

The direct lateral (or anterolateral) approaches to the hip for revision THA involve detachment of the anterior aspect of the gluteus medius from the trochanter along with a contiguous sleeve of the vastus lateralis. Anterior retraction of this flap of gluteus medius and vastus lateralis and simultaneous posterior retraction of the femur creates an interval for division of gluteus minimus and deeper capsular tissues and exposure of the joint. To enhance reattachment of this flap of the anterior portion of the gluteus medius and vastus lateralis back to the trochanter, an oblique wafer of bone can be elevated along with the muscle off of the anterolateral portion of the trochanter. This bony wafer prevents suture pull out when large nonabsorbable sutures are used around or through the fragment and passed into the bone of the trochanteric bed for reattachment during closure. To prevent excessive splitting proximally into the gluteus medius muscle (and resulting damage to the superior gluteal nerve), it is often helpful to extend the muscle split further distally down into the vastus lateralis. This combined with careful elevation of the gluteal muscles off of the ilium (instead of splitting them) helps provide excellent and safe exposure of the entire rim of the acetabulum and access to the supracetabular region for bone grafting, acetabular augment placement and even fixation of the flanges of a cage. A simple method for posterior column plating via the anterolateral approach involves contouring of the distal end of the plate around the base of the ischium at the inferior edge of the socket. When an extended osteotomy of the femur is needed to correct deformity, remove a well-fixed implant or cement, the “extensile” variation of this same surgical approach involves a Wagner style (lateral to medial) osteotomy of the greater trochanter and proximal femur. The anterior portion of the femur after it is osteotomised is elevated as a separate segment while maintaining the soft tissue attachments to the bone as much as possible to aid osteotomy healing. After implant or cement removal, this approach gives excellent direct access to the distal femur for placement of a long stem revision femoral component without bone-implant conflict proximally because of the bow of the femur. The anterolateral approach (and extensile variants detailed above) can be used routinely and safely in the full range of revision THA procedures, or it can be employed selectively, if desired, in cases at increased risk for dislocation

No animal model currently exists for hip abductor tendon tears. We aimed to 1. Develop a large animal model of delayed abductor tendon repair and 2. To compare the results of acute and delayed tendon repair using this model. Fourteen adult Romney ewes underwent detachment of gluteus medius tendon using diathermy. The detached tendons were protected using silicone tubing. Relook was performed at six and 16 weeks following detachment, histological analysis of the muscle and tendon were performed. We then attempted repair of the tendon in six animals in the six weeks group and compared the results to four acute repairs (tendon detachment and repair performed at the same time). At 12 weeks, all animals were culled and the tendon–bone block taken for histological and mechanical analysis. Histology grading using the modified Movin score confirmed similar tendon degenerative changes at both six and 16 weeks following detachment. Biomechanical testing demonstrated inferior mechanical properties in both the 6 and 16 weeks groups compared to healthy controls. At 12 weeks post repair, the acute repair group had a lower Movin's score (6.9 vs 9.4, p=0.064), and better muscle coverage (79.4% of normal vs 59.8%). On mechanical testing, the acute group had a significantly improved Young's Modulus compared to the delayed repair model (57.5MPa vs 39.4MPa, p=0.032). A six week delay between detachment and repair is sufficient to produce significant degenerative changes in the gluteus medius tendon. There are significant histological and mechanical differences in the acute and delayed repair groups at 12 weeks post op, suggesting that a delayed repair model should be used to study the clinical problem

Abstract. Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy (ETO) improves surgical exposure and aids femoral stem and bone cement removal in Revision Total Hip Replacement (RTHR) surgery. The aim of this study was to identify healing rates and complications of ETO in RTHR. Methods. From 2012 to 2019 we identified patients who underwent ETO for RTHR. Data collected demographics, BMI, diabetes, anticoagulants, indication for ETO, surgical approach, length of ETO and complications. Descriptive analysis of patient demographics, multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess ETO complications. Results. There were 63 patients with an average age of 69 years. Indications for ETO were aseptic loosening (30), infection (15), periprosthetic fracture (9), recurrent dislocation (5), broken implant (4). There were 44 cemented and 19 uncemented femoral stem that underwent ETO. Average time from index surgery was 12 years (less than a year to 38 years). All procedures were through posterolateral approach and all ETO were stabilised with cables. Average length of ETO was 12.5cm. BMI varied from 18 to 37. There were 5 diabetics and 16 on anticoagulants. All but one ETO went on to unite. Other complications included infection, dislocations, lateral thigh pain and significant limp. Discussion. Fixation of ETO can be with either wires or cables or plate with cables/screws. Advantages of cables are no irritation over greater trochanter, no disruption of gluteus medius/vastus lateralis continuity, reproducible tension in cables and use of torque limiter minimises loss of tension in cables

The musculoskeletal (MSK) profiles of water polo players and other overhead athletes has been shown to relate to injury and throwing performance (TP). There have been no robust studies conducted on the MSK profiles and the variables affecting TP amongst female, adolescent, elite water polo players. A prospective quantitative cohort design was conducted amongst eighty-three female adolescent, elite water polo players (range 14–19 years). All participants filled out the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic questionnaire, followed by a battery of screening tests aimed to identify possible MSK factors affecting TP. Pain provocation tests, range of motion (ROM), upward scapula rotation (USR), strength and pectoralis minor length measurements were all included. Participants also performed throwing speed (TS) and throwing accuracy (TA) tests. All the data collected were grouped together and analysed using SPSS 28.0. The condition for statistical significance was set as p <0.05. Multi-collinearity was tested for among variables to find out inter-variable correlations. Finally, a multiple regression analysis was performed. The mean KJOC score was 82.55 ± 14.96. 26.5% tested positive for at least one of the impingement tests. The MSK profile revealed decreased internal rotation ROM, increased external rotation ROM, a downwardly rotated scapula, weak external rotators, weak serratus anterior strength, strong lower trapezius and gluteus medius strength and a shorter pectoralis minor length all on the dominant side. Age, pectoralis minor length, upper trapezius and serratus anterior strength as well as upward scapula rotation were all positively correlated with TS, while sitting height, upper trapezius and serratus anterior strength and glenohumeral internal rotation ROM were positively correlated with TA. Multiple MSK parameters were found to be related to TS and TA in elite, adolescent water polo players

Avulsion of the abductor muscles of the hip may cause severe limp and pain. Limited literature is available on treatment approaches for this problem, and each has shortcomings. This study describes a muscle transfer technique to treat complete irreparable avulsion of the hip abductor muscles and tendons. Ten adult cadaver specimens were dissected to determine nerve and blood supply point of entry in the gluteus maximus and tensor fascia lata (TFL) and evaluate the feasibility and safety of transferring these muscles to substitute for the gluteus medius and minimus. In this technique, the anterior portion of the gluteus maximus and the entire TFL are mobilised and transferred to the greater trochanter such that the muscle fiber direction of the transferred muscles closely matches that of the gluteus medius and minimus. Five patients (five hips) were treated for primary irreparable disruption of the hip abductor muscles using this technique between January 2008 and April 2011. All patients had severe or moderate pain, severe abductor limp, and positive Trendelenburg sign. Patients were evaluated for pain and function at a mean of 28 months (range, 18–60 months) after surgery. All patients could actively abduct 3 months post-operatively. At 1 year post-operatively, three patients had no hip pain, two had mild pain that did not limit their activity, three had no limp, and one had mild limp. One patient fell, fractured his greater trochanter, and has persistent limp and abduction weakness. The anterior portion of the gluteus maximus and the TFL can be transferred to the greater trochanter to substitute for abductor deficiency. In this small series, the surgical procedure was reproducible and effective; further studies with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to confirm this

Revision hip approaches can be divided into posterior, anterior, transgluteal, and transtrochanteric. The approach chosen is dictated by what needs to be exposed and the approaches with which the surgeon is comfortable. The posterior approach remains posterior to the gluteus medius and protects the hip abductors. The disadvantage of a posterior approach is post-operative dislocation. The direct anterior approach is currently enjoying popularity as a primary technique. Surgeons experienced in the primary technique are applying it to revision surgery. The anterior approaches also protect the hip abductors. The disadvantage is poor access to the posterior acetabular column and mobilization of the femur to gain access to the femoral diaphysis. Transgluteal approaches split the gluteus medius typically keeping the anterior portion of the medius intact with the vastus lateralis. Proximal exposure is limited by the superior gluteal nerve, which is 4 cm above the tip of the trochanter. The disadvantage of the transgluteal approach is difficult access to the posterior acetabular column and occasional abductor weakness. The advantage of both the anterior and transgluteal approaches is a lower dislocation rate. All three approaches are acceptable for revisions that only require acetabular rim and proximal femoral exposure. More extensive exposure requires modifications to these approaches or the use of a transtrochanteric approach. Transtrochanteric approaches are defined by the length of the osteotomy (conventional or extended) and if the vastus lateralis remains attached to the trochanteric fragment (slide). Distally extended osteotomies improve access to the femur. Osteotomies without a distal attachment to the lateralis can be retracted proximally thus improving exposure of the ilium

Revision hip approaches can be divided into posterior, anterior, transgluteal, and transtrochanteric. The approach chosen is dictated by what needs to be exposed and the approaches with which the surgeon is comfortable. The posterior approach remains posterior to the gluteus medius and protects the hip abductors. The disadvantage of a posterior approach is post-operative dislocation. The direct anterior approach is currently enjoying popularity as a primary technique. Surgeons experienced in the primary technique are applying it to revision surgery. The anterior approaches also protect the hip abductors. The disadvantage is poor access to the posterior acetabular column and mobilisation of the femur to gain access to the femoral diaphysis. Transgluteal approaches split the gluteus medius typically keeping the anterior portion of the medius intact with the vastus lateralis. Proximal exposure is limited by the superior gluteal nerve, which is 4cm above the tip of the trochanter. The disadvantage of the transgluteal approach is difficult access to the posterior acetabular column and occasional abductor weakness. The advantage of both the anterior and transgluteal approaches is a lower dislocation rate. All three approaches are acceptable for revisions that only require acetabular rim and proximal femoral exposure. More extensive exposure requires modifications to these approaches or the use of a transtrochanteric approach. Transtrochanteric approaches are defined by the length of the osteotomy (conventional or extended) and if the vastus lateralis remains attached to the trochanteric fragment (slide). Distally extended osteotomies improve access to the femur. Osteotomies without a distal attachment to the lateralis can be retracted proximally thus improving exposure of the ileum

Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty seeks to eliminate some complications of traditional extensile exposure and also facilitates more rapid post-operative rehabilitation. Posterior approach has been associated with increased risk of posterior dislocation. Thus, a modified mini-incision lateral approach of Hardinge was described not only to overcome this problem by preserving the posterior capsule, but also allows adequate access for orientation of the implant. The author has modified the Hardinge approach by a V-shaped incision where the apex is centered over the tip of the greater trochanter with the one limb extending proximally along the fibers of the gluteus medius muscle and the distal limb extending across the proximal part of vastus lateralis. This innovative surgical approach is described in this article. Conclusion. Larger incisions and surgical approaches have been associated with larger blood loss, greater need for perioperative transfusion, use of more postoperative analgesics, a longer hospital stay, and a slower recovery. In this modified approach, the gluteus medius is left intact. The postoperative strength of the abductors of the operated side was the same as that on the non-operated side and functionally, the direct lateral approach was a safe alternative to other approaches in decreasing the trendelenburg gait and incidence of heterotrophic ossification

The authors modified the original minimally invasive (MI) two-incision total hip arthroplasty (THA) technique and used large-diameter (32mm, 36mm) ceramic-on-ceramic articulation. One hundred and seventy patients that underwent unilateral MI two-incision THA retrospectively reviewed, and surgical morbidities, functional recoveries, radiological implantation properties, and complications were assessed. The mean follow-up was 30.2 months (range, 24-42 months) and mean patient age was 50.4 years (range, 22-83 years). In the lateral position, an anterolateral approach between the gluteus medius and tensor fascia lata and a posterior approach between the piriformis and gluteus medius was used. Mean operation time was 71.2 minutes (range, 48-91 minutes). Mean Harris hip score improved from 41.8 (range, 10-59) to 96.1 (range, 73-100) at last follow-up, and mean WOMAC score from 66.2 (range, 49-96) to 26.9 (range, 24-39). The mean lateral opening angle of the acetabular component was 38.2° (range, 32.1°-47.7°) and the mean stem position was valgus 1.9° (range, varus 2.3° to valgus 4.8°). One patient suffered an intraoperative femur fracture and another underwent revision surgery due to stem subsidence. No patient experienced dislocation. Our data suggest the this modified technique is safe and reproducible in terms of achieving proper implant positioning and early functional recovery. In particular, the complication rates encountered, especially the dislocation rate, were low

Purpose. Hip arthroplasty is a good treatment option for displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. However, neuromuscular disease such as cerebral infarction or hemorrhage can be a concerning problem for THA since dislocation after operation can frequently occur. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the functional results of modified minimally invasive (MI) two-incision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of large-diameter (>38mm) metal-on-metal articulation in patients with muscle weakness. Patients and Methods. 19 consecutive patients (19 hips) with displaced femoral neck fracture with muscle weakness were enrolled. There were 11 patients with cerebral infarction, 4 patients with cerebral hemorrhage and 4 patients with Parkinson's disease. In the lateral position, an anterolateral approach between the gluteus medius and tensor fascia lata and a posterior approach between the piriformis and gluteus medius were used. Surgical morbidity, functional recovery, radiological implantation properties, range of motion (ROM) and complications were assessed. Results. The mean operation time was 73.5 minutes and the average perioperative blood loss was 725.9cc. The mean head diameter used was 44 mm (38–50). The mean lateral opening angle of the acetabular component was 38.4°, the mean anteversion of the acetabular component was 16.4°, and the mean stem position was 0.3° valgus. The average postoperative ambulation time was 2.4 days. The mean Harris hip score was 81.0 at final follow-up, and the mean WOMAC score was 42.9. At final follow-up, there was no case of dislocation. There was no hypersensitivity, no osteolysis, and no revision. Conclusions. Our study suggests that the functional results of modified MI two-incision THA with the use of large-diameter metal on metal articulation in patients with muscle weakness can produce satisfactory early functional recovery and can reduce the dislocation rate

The Superior Hip Approach allows for safe reconstruction of the hip while maximizing preservation of the surrounding soft tissues. The procedure involves an incision in the hip joint capsule posterior to the gluteus medius and minimus and anterior to the short external rotators. The technique involves preparation of the femur in-situ through the superior femoral neck and then excision of the femoral head, which avoids the attendant soft tissue dissection or injury associated with dislocation of the native hip. After component implantation, the capsule is closed anatomically. Two separate studies have demonstrated that over a 90-day period, patients whose hips were replaced using this technique consumed the least amount of cost of any patients treated by hip arthroplasty in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. One study assessed all hips replaced in patients insured by Medicare over a four-year period. In this study, patients treated by the Superior Hip Approach were less costly by an average of more than $7,000 over 90 days. A second study assessed all hips replaced in patients insured by a large private insurer. This study showed again that patients treated by the Superior Hip Approach were the lowest cost patients. Notable, the cost on average was $23,500 less per procedure compared to the most well-known medical care organization in the state or roughly half the cost. Lower cost was due to both lower inpatient cost and reduced utilization of post-acute care resources. Since reduced resource utilization is a direct measure of accelerated recovery, these economic data combine with clinical outcomes and anatomical studies that document that the Superior Hip Approach is a reliable technique for achieving optimal results following THA

The technique involves inserting the femoral and acetabular components anterior to the posterior capsule and short rotators and posterior to the gluteus medius and minimus through an incision in the superior capsule. The surgery is performed with the femoral component instrumented before femoral neck osteotomy and head removal. The femur remains steady during the femoral instrumentation. Leverage retractors around the neck are easy to hold and to maintain exposure. The integrity of the capsule is used to assess length and offset. During the procedure the hip is never disarticulated, and the leg is never placed outside of the range of motion envelope of the normal hip. The technique has found astonishingly few users over the past ten years. Many surgeons are not aware of this technique and clinical results are scarce. The purpose of this paper is recall it to memory, to compare it with other less invasive procedures, and to report on some remarkable clinical results including stability, leg length and offset equality, component positioning, muscle force generation and complications

Purpose. Minimally invasive anterolateral approach (ALA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity in recent years as better postoperative functional recovery and lower risk of postoperative dislocation are claimed. However, difficulties for femur exposure and intraoperative complications during femoral canal preparation and component placement have been reported. This study analyzes the anatomical factors likely to be related with intraoperative complications and the difficulties of access noted by the surgeons through a modified minimally invasive ALA. The aim is to define the profile for patient at risk of intraoperative complications during minimally invasive ALA. Methods. We retrospectively included 310 consecutive patients (100 males, 210 females) who had primary unilateral THA using the same technique in all cases. The approach was performed between the tensor fascia lata and the gluteus medius and minimus, without incising or detaching muscles and tendons. Posterior translation was combined to external rotation for proximal femur exposure (Fig. 1). All patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically. For the radiological evaluation, all patients underwent pre- and postoperative standing and sitting full-body EOS acquisitions. Pelvic [Sacral slope, Pelvic incidence (PI), Anterior pelvic plane angle] and femoral parameters were measured preoperatively. We assessed all intraoperative and postoperative complications for femoral preparation and implantation. Intraoperative complications included the femoral fractures and difficulties for femoral exposure (limitations for exposure and lateralization of the proximal femur). The patients were divided into two groups: patients with or without intraoperative complications. Results. Ten patients (3.2%) had intraoperative femoral fractures (greater trochanter: 2 cases, calcar: 8 cases). Five fractures required additional wiring. Difficult access to proximal femur was reported in the operative records for 10 other patients (3.2%). There was no difference in diagnosis, age, sex, BMI between the patients with or without intraoperative complications. No significant group differences were found for surgical time, and blood loss. Patients with intraoperative complication, presented a significantly lower pelvic incidence than patients without intraoperative complications (mean PI: 39.4° vs 56.9°, p<0.001). The relative risk of intraoperative complications in patients with low PI (PI<45°) was more than thirteen times (relative risk; 13.3, 95% CI= 8.2 to 21.5. p<0.001) the risk for patients with normal and high PI (PI>45°). Conclusions. Anterolateral approach for THA implantation in lateral decubitus is reported to have anatomical and functional advantages. Nevertheless, the exposure of the femur remains a limitation. This study highlights a significant increased risk in case of low PI less than 45°. This specific anatomical pattern reduces the local working space as the possibility for posterior translation and elevation of the proximal femur is less on a narrow pelvis. This limitation is due to the length and the orientation of the hip abductor and short external rotator muscles related to the relative positions of iliac wing and greater trochanter (Fig. 2). This study points out the importance of pelvic incidence for the detection of anatomically less favourable patients for THA implantation using ALA. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Anterior surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have increased popularity due to expected faster recovery and less pain. However, the direct anterior approach (Heuter approach which has been popularised by Matta) has been associated with a higher rate of early revisions than other approaches due to femoral component loosening and fractures. It is also noted to have a long learning curve and other unique complications like anterior femoral cutaneous and femoral nerve injuries. Most surgeons performing this approach will require the use of an expensive special operating table. An alternative to the direct anterior approach is the anterior-based muscle-sparing approach. It is also known as the modified Watson-Jones approach, anterolateral muscle-sparing approach, minimally invasive anterolateral approach and the Röttinger approach. With this technique, the hip joint is approached through the muscle interval between the tensor fascia lata and the gluteal muscles, as opposed to the direct anterior approach which is between the sartorius and rectus femoris and the tensor fascia lata. This approach places the femoral nerve at less risk for injury. I perform this technique in the lateral decubitus position, but it can also be performed in the supine position. An inexpensive home-made laminated L-shaped board is clamped on end of table allowing the ipsilateral leg to extend, adduct, and externally rotate during the femoral preparation. This approach for THA has been reported to produce excellent results. One study reports a complication rate of 0.6% femoral fracture rate and 0.4% revision rate for femoral stem loosening. In a prospective randomised trial looking at the learning curve with new approach, the anterior-based muscle-sparing anterior approach had lower complications than a direct anterior approach. The complications and mean operative time with this approach are reported to be no different than a direct lateral approach. Since this surgical approach is not through an internervous interval, a concern is that this may result in a permanent functional defect as result of injury to the superior gluteal nerve. At a median follow-up of 9.3 months, a MRI study showed 42% of patients with this approach had fat replacement of the tensor fascia lata, which is thought to be irreversible. The clinical significance remains unclear, and inconsequential in my experience. A comparison MRI study showed that there was more damage and atrophy to the gluteus medius muscle with a direct lateral approach at 3 and 12 months. My anecdotal experience is that there is faster recovery and less early pain with this approach. A study of the first 57 patients I performed showed significantly less pain and faster recovery in the first six weeks in patients performed with the anterior-based muscle-sparing approach when compared to a matched cohort of THA patients performed with a direct lateral approach. From 2004 to 2017, I have performed 1308 total hip replacements with the anterior-based muscle sparing approach. Alternatively, I will use the direct lateral approach for patients with stiff hips with significant flexion and/or external rotation contractures where I anticipate difficulty with femoral exposure, osteoporotic femurs due to increased risk of intraoperative trochanteric fractures, previously operated hips with scarring or retained hardware, and Crowe III-IV dysplastic hips when there may be a need for a femoral shortening or derotational osteotomy. Complications have been very infrequent. This approach is a viable alternative to the direct anterior approach for patients desiring a fast recovery. The anterior-based muscle-sparing approach is the approach that I currently use for all outpatient total hip surgeries

Traditional risk factors for post-operative neuropathy include learning curve of surgical approach, DDH, and significant leg lengthening (>1 inch). Despite these risk factors, the most common scenario of a neuropathy is in a routine THA, by an experienced surgeon, for osteoarthritis, with no leg lengthening. Post-operative hematoma can lead to nerve compression, albeit rarely. The usual clinical presentation is of an acute event, with a previously intact nerve, sometime within the first days of surgery. Once diagnosed, immediate surgical decompression should be performed. Sciatic neuropathy is the most common, regardless of surgical approach, but the posterior approach poses the highest risk. Routine gluteus maximus tendon release may help to reduce the risk. When seen in the PACU, our approach is to immediately perform CT imaging to evaluate nerve integrity or to check on acetabular screw position. If no underlying cause is identified, the patient will be managed conservatively with foot orthotics and monitored for recovery. Femoral nerve palsy (FNP) can result in significant initial disability. Fortunately most patients recover function (although it can take over 18 months). In the early post-operative period it is often diagnosed after a patient complains of the leg giving away while attempting to walk. A knee brace will assist the patient with mobilization while the nerve recovers. The highest incidence of FNP is described for the direct lateral approach. Superior gluteal nerve (SGN) palsy is related to the direct lateral approach and may be avoided if the gluteus medius split is made within the safe zone (<5 centimeters from the tip of the greater trochanter). While early post-operative limp is common after the direct lateral approach, the true reported incidence of SGN palsy is low. Few studies showed that the persistent positive Trendelenburg test and limp is not exclusively related to the SGN damage and therefore the clinical effect of the SGN damage remains controversial. Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve can be affected during the direct anterior hip approach. One study suggests the presence of peri-incisional numbness in over 80% of patients. This is akin to numbness seen lateral to the incision after TKA. The incidence of meralgia paresthetica is extremely low (<1%)

Loss of the abductor portions of the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus muscles due to total hip arthroplasty (THA) causes severe limp and often instability. To minimise the risk of limp and instability the anterior half of the gluteus maximus was transferred to the greater trochanter and sutured under the vastus lateralis. A separate posterior flap was transferred under the primary flap to substitute for the gluteus minimus and capsule. To ensure tight repair, the flaps were attached and tensioned in abduction. The technique was performed in 11 patients (11 hips) with complete loss of abductor attachment; the procedure was performed in 9 patients during THA and in 2 later as a secondary procedure. Pre-operatively, all patients had abductor lurch, positive Trendelenburg sign, and no abduction of the hip against gravity. The follow up ranged from 16 to 42 months. Post-operatively, 9 patients had strong abduction of the hip against gravity, no abductor lurch, and negative Trendelenburg sign. One patient had weak abduction against gravity, negative Trendelenburg sign, and slight abductor lurch. One patient failed to achieve strong abduction, had severe limp after 6 months of protection and physical therapy, and was lost to follow up. Gluteus maximus transfer can restore abductor function in THA, but it is technically demanding and requires careful, prolonged rehabilitation

The 3D interplay between femoral component placement on contact stresses and range of motion of hip resurfacing was investigated with a hip model. Pre- and post-operative contours of the bone geometry and the gluteus medius were obtained from grey-value CT-segmentations. The joint contact forces and stresses were simulated for variations in component placement during a normal gait. The effect of component placement on range of motion was determined with a collision model. The contact forces were not increased with optimal component placement due to the compensatory effect of the medialisation of the center of rotation. However, the total range of motion decreased by 33%. Accumulative displacements of the femoral and acetabular center of rotation could increase the contact stresses between 5–24%. Inclining and anteverting the socket further increased the contact stresses between 6–11%. Increased socket inclination and anteversion in combination with shortening of the neck were associated with extremely high contact stresses. The effect of femoral offset restoration on range of motion was significantly higher than the effect of socket positioning. In conclusion, displacement of the femoral center of rotation in the lateral direction is at least as important for failure of hip resurfacings as socket malpositioning

Management of recurrent instability of the hip requires careful assessment to determine any identifiable causative factors. While plain radiographs can give a general impression, CT is the best methodology for objective measurement. Variables that can be measured include: prosthetic femoral anteversion, comparison to contralateral native femoral anteversion, total offset from the medial wall of the pelvis to the lateral side of the greater trochanter, comparison to total offset on the contralateral side, acetabular inclination, & acetabular anteversion. Wera et al describe potential causes of instability. These are typed into I. Acetabular Component Malposition; II. Femoral Component Malposition; III. Abductor Deficiency; IV. Impingement; V. Late Wear; and VI. Unknown. Acetabular component malposition is the most common cause of instability and so measurement of cup orientation is essential. It is well known that excessive or inadequate anteversion can lead to anterior and posterior dislocation respectively but horizontal components are also associated with posterior dislocation due to deficient posterior/inferior acetabular surface. Similarly, excessive or inadequate femoral anteversion can be easily identified on CT as can insufficient total offset of the reconstructed joint compared to the contralateral side. This can be caused by medialization of the acetabular component. Abductor deficiency can be a soft-tissue cause of instability, but it certainly isn't the only one. Knowledge of the prior surgical exposure can be instructive. Anterior exposures can be prone to deficient anterior capsule just as posterior exposures can be prone to deficient posterior capsule and short rotators, while anterolateral and lateral exposures can be associated with gluteus minimus and gluteus medius compromise. Impingement, whether involving implants, bone, or soft tissue are primarily secondary to the above factors, if osteophytes were properly trimmed at the index procedure. Correction of the incorrect variables is the primary goal of revision for instability and greatly preferable to using salvage options such as dual-mobility or constrained articulations which invoke additional concerns. Ultimately though, such salvage options are necessary if the cause of the instability cannot be determined or can be determined but not corrected. Bracing, while highly inconvenient and sometimes impractical for certain patients, still has a role in specific circumstances. Formal analysis of the unstable prosthetic reconstruction is the key to successful treatment