Osteoarthritis (OA) is the fastest growing global health problem, with a total joint replacement being the only effective treatment for patients with end stage OA. Many groups are examining the use of bone marrow or adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to repair cartilage, or modulate inflammation to promote healing, however, little efficacy in promoting cartilage repair, or reducing patient symptoms over temporary treatments such as micro-fracture has been observed. There is a growing body of literature demonstrating that MSCs derived from the synovial lining of the joint are superior in terms of chondrogenic differentiation and while improvements in clinical outcome measures have been observed with synovial MSCs, results from clinical studies are still highly variable. Based on our results, we believe this variability in clinical studies with MSCs results in part from the isolation, expansion and re-injection of distinct MSCs subtypes in normal vs. OA tissues, each with differing regenerating potential. However, it remains unknown if this heterogeneity is natural (e.g. multiple MSC subtypes present) or if MSCs are influenced by factors in vivo (disease state/stage). Therefore, in this study, we undertook an ‘omics’ screening approach on MSCs from normal and OA knee synovial tissue. Specifically, we characterized their global proteome and genomic expression patterns to determine if multiple MSC from normal and OA joints are distinct at the protein/gene expression level and/if so, what proteins/genes are differentially expressed between MSCs derived from normal and OA synovial tissue. Synovium tissue was collected from OA patients undergoing joint replacement and normal cadaveric knees. The in vitro adipogenic, chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential of the MSCs was analyzed via qPCR and histology. Fully characterized MSC populations where then analyzed through an unbiased shotgun proteomics, and microarray analysis. Synovial MSCs isolated from both OA and normal knees demonstrated similar multipotent differentiation capacity. Likewise, both OA and normal MSCs display the typical MSCs cell surface marker profile in vitro (CD90+, CD44+, CD73+, CD105+). Using shotgun proteomics, 7720 unique peptides corresponding to 2183 proteins were identified and quantified between normal and OA MSCs. Of these 2183 proteins, 994 were equally expressed in normal and OA, MSCs, 324 were upregulated in OA MSCs (with 50 proteins exclusively expressed in OA MSCs), 630 proteins were upregulated in normal MSCs (with 16 proteins exclusively expressed in normal MSCs). Microarray analysis of normal and OA MSCs demonstrated a similar result in where, 967 genes were differentially expressed between normal and OA MSCs, with 423 genes upregulated in OA, and 544 genes upregulated in normal MSCs. In this project, we have demonstrated that although normal and OA synovial derived MSCs demonstrate similar multipotent differentiation potential and cell surface markers expression, these cells demonstrated significant differences at the molecular level (protein and gene expression). Further research is required to determine if these differences influence functional differences in vitro and/or in vivo and what drives this dramatic change in the regulatory pathways within normal vs. OA synovial MSCs

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recently identified musculoskeletal care as a major global health issue in the developing world. However, little is known about the quality and trends of orthopaedic research in resource-poor settings. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of orthopaedic research in low-income countries (LIC). The primary objective was to determine the quality and publication parameters of studies performed in LIC. Secondary objectives sought to provide recommendations for successful strategies to implement research endeavors in LIC. A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching MEDLINE (1966-November 2014), EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to identify peer-reviewed orthopaedic research conducted in LICs. The PRISMA guidelines for performing a systematic review were followed. LIC were defined by the WHO and by the World Bank as countries with gross national income per capita equal or less than 1045US$. Inclusion criteria were (1) studies performed in a LIC, (2) conducted on patients afflicted by an orthopaedic condition, and (3) evaluated either an orthopaedic intervention or outcome. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were used to objectively rate the overall methodological quality of each study. Additional data collected from these studies included the publication year, journal demographics, orthopaedic subspecialty and authors' country of origin. A total of 1,809 articles were screened and 277 studies met our inclusion criteria. Eighty-eight percent of studies conducted in LIC were of lower quality evidence according to the GRADE score and consisted mostly of small case series or case reports. Bangladesh and Nepal were the only two LIC with national journals and produced the highest level of research evidence. Foreign researchers produced over 70% of the studies with no collaboration with local LIC researchers. The most common subspecialties were trauma (42%) and paediatrics (14%). The 3 most frequent countries where the research originated were the United States (42%), United Kingdom (11%), and Canada (8%). The 3 most common locations where research was conducted were Haiti (18%), Afghanistan (14%), and Malawi (7%). The majority of orthopaedic studies conducted in LIC were of lower quality and performed by foreign researchers with little local collaboration. In order to promote the development of global orthopaedic surgery and research in LIC, we recommend (1) improving the collaboration between researchers in developed and LIC, (2) promoting the teaching of higher-quality and more rigorous research methodology through shared partnerships, (3) improving the capacity of orthopaedic research in developing nations through national peer-reviewed journals, and (4) dedicated subsections in international orthopaedic journals to global healthcare research

Quadriceps femoris muscle weakness has long been associated with disuse atrophy in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis but more recently implicated in the aetiology of this condition. The purpose of this study was to assess the benefits of two interventions aimed at increasing quadriceps strength in subjects with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis. Twenty-eight patients, aged fifty-five to seventy-five, were recruited and randomised to either a six-week home resistance-training exercise program or a six-week neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) program. Eleven patients matched for age, gender and osteoarthritis severity formed a control group, receiving standard care. The resistance-training group performed six exercises three times per week, while the NMES group used the garment stimulator for twenty minutes five times per week Outcome measures included isometric and isokinetic quadriceps strength, functional capacity, quadriceps cross-sectional area, and validated health survey scores. These measures were assessed at baseline, post-intervention and at 6-weeks post-intervention. Both intervention groups showed significant improvements in all functional tests, in the global health survey, and in quadriceps cross-sectional area immediately post-intervention. An increase in isokinetic strength was seen in the exercise group only. With the exception of isokinetic strength, all benefits were maintained six weeks post-intervention. Both a six-week home resistance-training program and a six-week NMES program produce significant improvements in functional performance as well as physical and mental health for patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis. Home-based NMES is an acceptable alternative to physical therapy, and is especially appropriate for patients who have difficulty complying with an exercise program

Pelvic ring fractures usually result from significant trauma, frequently requiring operative stabilisation. The use of an anterior internal fixator (INFIX) is a new technique. This temporary construct is quick and easy to apply using pre-existing spinal implants. No reports of functional outcomes or compartive studies with existing surgical techniques exist in indexed literature. We present a prospective comparative case matched series of 21 patients treated with pelvic INFIX. 1:1 matching was achieved to a cohort of patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) based on fracture pattern. All patients with rotationally and/or vertically unstable pelvic ring fractures treated within our level 1 trauma centre were considered for inclusion. Patients were prospectively followed up with health outcome measures (SF-36, EQ-5D) and joint specific outcome scores (Oxford and Harris hip scores). Results. No statistically significant differences in age (mean 42v38 p=0.3143), length of stay, or operative time were seen. The ISS was significantly higher in the INFIX group (32v22 p=0.0019). Mean INFIX removal was at 14 weeks. Baseline responses were obtained on admission where feasible. Although there was no significant difference between the treatment groups, the ORIF group showed a significantly greater deterioration from the baseline than the INFIX group, suggesting INFIX better maintains pre-injury function. 29% of patients experienced LCNT palsy whilst the INFIX was in situ. 6 patients in the INFIX group experienced some form of metal work failure (3 required surgical removal), compared with 7 ORIF patients (4 required removal). Conclusions. Pelvic INFIX achieves bony stabilisation of unstable pelvic fractures, and should be considered for rotational or vertically unstable fractures requiring operative intervention. Despite higher ISS scores, INFIX patients performance in joint specific and global health functioning scores was not significantly different from ORIF patients. We do not use INFIX for pelvic fractures with symphyseal disruption

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of baseline mental health on functional outcomes after primary knee arthroplasty by reviewing the data collected in a multi-centre prospective observational cohort study. We hypothesised that those patients with lower baseline mental health status would demonstrate significantly worse outcomes vs their counterparts with higher mental status following primary total knee arthroplasty. Methods. Data from a multi-centre prospective cohort study of PS (posterior stabilising implant) and CR (cruciate retaining implant) primary knee arthroplasty were compared to determine the relationship between baseline mental health status and functional outcomes post-surgery. Subjects were followed from the time of the index surgery to monitor outcomes and complications. Validated quality of life instruments, including SF-36, WOMAC, Knee Society Score, and an activity scale were used. Changes from baseline to 1 year on the SF-36 and WOMAC were evaluated. Regression analysis was completed to assess changes in WOMAC based on baseline SF-36 scores. All analyses were adjusted for age, BMI, gender, and implant type. Results. Baseline data was available for 436 subjects in the primary PS study and 493 subjects in the primary CR study. Patients improved significantly on all SF-36 and WOMAC components between baseline and 12 months post-surgery. Correlation and regression analysis between WOMAC and SF-36 showed that Global Health (GH), Mental Health (MH), Role-Emotional (RE), and Mental Component Score (MCS) subscales on the SF-36 were significantly associated with positive post-operative changes in WOMAC scores. Conclusion. This study examined the effects of baseline mental health on functional outcomes after primary knee arthroplasty and found that baseline mental health was a significant predictor of functional outcomes twelve months after surgery. This relationship between mental health and outcomes needs to be examined carefully to help surgeons better prepare their patients for surgery

Aims

The COVID-19 pandemic presents an unprecedented burden on global healthcare systems, and existing infrastructures must adapt and evolve to meet the challenge. With health systems reliant on the health of their workforce, the importance of protection against disease transmission in healthcare workers (HCWs) is clear. This study collated responses from several countries, provided by clinicians familiar with practice in each location, to identify areas of best practice and policy so as to build consensus of those measures that might reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19 to HCWs at work.