Olecranon fractures are common injuries representing roughly 5% of pediatric elbow fractures. The traditional surgical management is open reduction and internal fixation with a tension band technique where the pins are buried under the skin and tamped into the triceps. We have used a modification of this technique, where the pins have been left out of the skin to be removed in clinic. The purpose of the current study is to compare the outcomes of surgically treated olecranon fractures using a tension-band technique with buried k-wires (PINS IN) versus percutaneous k-wires (PINS OUT). We performed a retrospective chart review on all pediatric patients (18 years of age or less) with olecranon fractures that were surgically treated at a pediatric academic center between 2015 to present. Fractures were identified using ICD-10 codes and manually identified for those with an isolated olecranon fracture. Patients were excluded if they had polytrauma, metabolic bone disease, were treated non-op or if a non-tension band technique was used (ex: plate/screws). Patients were then divided into 2 groups, olecranon fractures using a tension-band technique with buried k-wires (PINS IN) and with percutaneous k-wires (PINS OUT). In the PINS OUT group, the k-wires were removed in clinic at the surgeon's discretion once adequate fracture healing was identified. The 2 groups were then compared for demographics, time to mobilization, fracture healing, complications and return to OR. A total of 35 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 28 patients in the PINS IN group with an average age of 12.8 years, of which 82% male and 43% fractured their right olecranon. There were 7 patients in the PINS OUT group with an average age of 12.6 years, of which 57% were male and 43% fractured their right olecranon. All patients in both groups were treated with open reduction internal fixation with a tension band-technique. In the PINS IN group, 64% were treated with 2.0 k-wires and various materials for the tension band (82% suture, 18% cerclage wire). In the PINS OUT group, 71% were treated with 2.0 k-wires and all were treated with sutures for the tension band. The PINS IN group were faster to mobilize (3.4 weeks (range 2-5 weeks) vs 5 weeks (range 4-7 weeks) p=0.01) but had a significantly higher complications rate compared to the PINS OUT group (6 vs 0, p =0.0001) and a significantly higher return to OR (71% vs 0%, p=0.0001), mainly for hardware irritation or limited range of motion. All fractures healed in both groups within 7 weeks. Pediatric olecranon fractures treated with a suture tension-band technique and k-wires left percutaneously is a safe and alternative technique compared to the traditional buried k-wires technique. The PINS OUT technique, although needing longer immobilization, could lead to less complications and decreased return to the OR due to irritation and limited ROM

Olecranon Osteotomy is a common approach used in the management of intraarticular distal humerus fractures. Significant complication rates have been associated with this procedure, including non-union rates of 0–13% and implant removal rates between 12–86%. This study is a multicentre retrospective study involving the largest cohort of olecranon osteotomies in the literature, examining implant fixation types, removal rates and associated complications. Patients were identified between 2007 and 2017 (minimum one year follow-up) via Canadian Classification of Health Interventions (CCI) coding and ICD9/10 codes by our health region's data information service. CCI intervention codes were used to identify patients who underwent surgery for their fracture with an olecranon osteotomy. Reasons for implant removal were identified from a chart review. Our primary outcome was implant removal rates. Categorical data was assessed using Chi square test and Fischer's Exact test. Ninety-nine patients were identified to have undergone an olecranon osteotomy for treatment of a distal humerus fracture. Twenty patients had their osteotomy fixed with a plate and screws and 67 patients were fixed with a tension band wire. Eleven patients underwent “screw fixation”, consisting of a single screw with or without the addition of a wire. One patient had placement of a cable-pin system. Of patients who underwent olecranon osteotomy fixation, 34.3% required implant removal. Removal rates were: 28/67 for TBW (41.8%), 6/20 plates (30%), 0/1 cable-pin and 0/11 for osteotomies fixed with screw fixation. Screw fixation was removed less frequently than TBW p<.006. TBW were more commonly removed than all other fixation types p<.043. Screws were less commonly removed than all other fixation types p<.015. TBW were more likely to be removed for implant irritation than plates, p<.007, and all other implants p<.007. The average time to removal was 361 days (80–1503 days). A second surgeon was the surgeon responsible for the removal in 10/34 cases (29%). TBWs requiring removal were further off the olecranon tip than those not removed p=.006. TBWs were associated with an OR of 3.29 (CI 1.10–9.84) for implant removal if implanted further than 1mm off bone. Nonunion of the osteotomy occurred in three out of 99 patients (3%). K-wires through the anterior ulnar cortex did not result in decreased need for TBW removal. There was no relation between plate prominence and the need for implant removal. There was no association between age and implant removal. The implant removal rate was 34% overall. Single screw fixation was the best option for osteotomy fixation, as 0/11 required hardware removal, which was statistically less frequent than TBW at 28/67. Screw fixation was removed less frequently than TBW and screw fixation was less commonly removed than all other fixation types. Only 6/20 (30%) plates required removal, which is lower than previously published rates. Overall, TBW were more commonly removed than all other fixation types and this was also the case if hardware irritation was used as the indication for removal. Nonunion rates of olecranon osteotomy were 3%

The Royal Marines regularly deploy to Norway to conduct Cold Weather, Arctic and Mountain Warfare training. A total of 1200 personnel deployed to Norway in 2010 over a 14-week period. Patients, whose injuries prevented them from continuing training, were returned to the UK via AEROMED. The aim of this investigation was to describe the epidemiology of musculoskeletal injuries during cold weather training. All data on personnel returned to the UK was prospectively collected and basic epidemiology recorded. 53 patients (incidence 44/1,000 personnel) were returned to the UK via AEROMED. 20/53 (38%) of cases were musculoskeletal injuries (incidence 17/1000 personnel). 15/20 musculoskeletal injuries were sustained while conducting ski training (incidence 13/1,000): 4/20 were non-alcohol related injuries, 1/20 was related to alcohol consumption off duty. Injuries sustained whilst skiing: 5/15 sustained anterior shoulders dislocation, 5/15 Grade 1-3 MCL/LCL tears, 2/15 sustained ACJ injuries, 1/15 crush fracture T11/T12, 1/15 tibial plateau fracture and 1/15 significant ankle sprain. Non-Training injuries: 1 anterior shoulder dislocation, 1 distal radial fracture, 1 olecranon fracture, 1 Scaphoid Fracture and one 5th metatarsal fracture. 60% of injuries were upper limb injuries. The most common injury was anterior shoulder dislocation 6/20 (Incidence 5/1000). Our results suggest that cold weather warfare training has a high injury rate requiring evacuation: 4% of all people deployed will require AEROMED evacuation, and 2% have musculoskeletal injuries. Ski training causes the majority of injuries, possibly due to the rapid transition from non-skier to skiing with a bergen and weapon. Military Orthopaedic and rehabilitation units supporting the Royal Marines, should expect sudden increases in referrals when large scale cold weather warfare training is being conducted. Further research is required to see if musculoskeletal injury rates can be decreased in cold weather warfare training

Aims. Compression and absolute stability are important in intra-articular fractures such as transverse olecranon fractures. This biomechanical study aims to compare tension band wiring (TBW) with plate fixation by measuring compression within the fracture. Methods. A cross-over design and synthetic ulna models were used to reduce variation between samples. Identical transverse fractures were created using a 0.5mm saw blade and cutting jig. A Tekscan(tm) force transducer was calibrated and placed within the fracture gap. Twenty TBW or Acumed(tm) plate fixations were performed according to the recommended technique. Compression was measured while the constructs were static and during simulated elbow range of movement exercises. Dynamic testing was performed using a custom jig reproducing cyclical triceps contraction of 20N and reciprocal brachialis contraction of 10N. Both fixation methods were tested on each sample. Half were randomly allocated to TBW first and half to plating first. Data was recorded using F-scan (v 5.72) and analysed using SPSS(tm) (v 16). Paired T-tests compared overall compression and compression at the articular side of the fracture. Results. The mean overall compression for plating was 819N (+/− 602N 95%CI), TBW overall compression: 77N (+/−19N 95%CI) (P=0.039). Articular side compression for plating: 343N (+/− 276N 95%CI), TBW: 1N (+/− 2N 95%CI). (P=0.038). During simulated movements, overall compression reduced in both groups: TBW -14N (+/−7N) Plating -173N (+/−32N) and no increase in articular side compression was detected in the TBW group. Conclusion. Precontoured plates such as the Acumed(tm) olecranon system can provide significantly greater compression, compared to TBW in transverse olecranon fractures. This was significant for compression over the whole fracture surface and specifically at the articular side of the fracture. Also, in TBW, overall compression reduced and articular side compression remained negligible during simulated triceps contraction, challenging the tension band principle