Fracture of the acetabulum can lead to degenerative arthritis of the hip, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, or both. Total hip arthroplasty is a common form of surgical treatment when significant joint changes and pain are present. Ten patients with fracture acetabulum were treated in this study using metal on metal total hip arthoplasty. The initial fracture was posterior wall fracture in one patient, posterior column fracture in one patient, transverse fracture in 2 patients, fracture dislocation in 3 patients and fracture posterior wall and column in 3 patients. The indications of arthroplasty were secondry osteoarthritis after internal fixation or after conservative management or collapse of the femoral head. Arthroplasty was done after an average period of 1.8 years (range from 1 to 4 years). After a follow up period ranged from 3 to 7 years with a mean of 4.6 years, the Harris hip score was improved from a mean of 51 (range 20 to 65) to a mean of 92.5 (range 90 to 95). Infection occurred in one case and two stages revision was done. Another case developed loosening of the acetabular component and was revised using cementless cup fixed with screws and bone graft. Metal on metal THR after acetabular fracture are relatively uncomplicated and lead to a good outcome despite the difficulties faced during the procedure

Acetabulum fractures caused by civilian firearms represent a unique challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Treatment strategies should include the assessment of infection risk due to frequently associated abdominal injuries and maintenance of joint function. Still, internationally accepted treatment algorithms are not available. The aim of the study was to increase knowledge about civilian gunshot fractures of the acetabulum by describing their characteristics and management at a high-volume tertiary hospital. All adult patients admitted to our hospital between January 2009 and December 2022 with civilian gunshot fractures of the acetabulum were included in this descriptive retrospective study. In total our institution treated 301 patients with civilian gunshot fractures of the hip joint and pelvis during the observation period, of which 54 involved the acetabulum. Most patients were young males (88,9%) with a mean age of 29 years. Thirty patients (55,6%) had associated intraabdominal or urological injuries. Fracture patterns were mostly stable fractures with minor joint destruction amenable to conservative fracture treatment (n=48, 88,9%). Orthopaedic surgical interventions were performed in 21 patients (38,9%) with removal of bullets in contact with the hip joint via arthrotomy or surgical hip dislocation as most frequent procedures. Most patients received antibiotics on admission (n=49, 90,7%). Fracture related infections of the acetabulum were noted in six patients (11,1%) while the mortality in the study population was low with one demised patient (1,9%) due to the trauma burden. Most civilian acetabulum gunshot fractures are associated with intraabdominal or urological injuries. In comparison to the literature on extremity gunshot fractures, there is an increased risk of infection in our study population. The decision for surgical wash-out and bullet removal should be based on contamination and anticipated joint destruction, while osteosynthesis or primary arthroplasty are rarely necessary for these injuries

Aims. Accurate placement of acetabular and femoral stem components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an important factor in the success of the procedure. A variety of free hand or navigated techniques is reported. Survivorship and complications have been shown to be directly related to implant position during THA. The aim of this cadaver study was to assess the accuracy of the placement of the components in THA using patient specific instruments (PSI) in combination with a 3D planning software and the direct anterior approach. Method. Patient specific instruments (PSI) were developed to guide the surgeon during THA that were 3D printed with their bone models following a 3D software planning protocol (LPH software V2.5.1, Onefit-Medical, Eos Imaging Company, Besancon, France). Acetabular guides: cup, offset and straight reamer handle and impactor, femoral- and chisel guides were used in each THA (Fig. 1). To define anatomic bone landmarks and to generate a 3D model of each hip joint CT scans were performed preoperatively. The planning of component position was done by one surgeon (AZ) preop. Surgery was performed by two experienced surgeons (AZ, SD) on cadaver specimen with 4 hips in two separate series. A total of 8 hip replacements were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using CT-scans of each hip joint to compare planned to achieved results. Mechanical simulations of the guides were carried out to verify that there were no conflicts between the different instruments. To meet the ISO standard 16061: 2015 the compatibility of the instruments with the guides has been checked. Parameters were evaluated in 3D pelvic and femoral planes: center cup position, inclination angle, anteversion angle, cutting height and plan orientation, anteversion angle, flexion/extension angle, varus/valgus angle, anatomical and functional leg length, offset. Acceptance criteria: postop. parameters evaluated must not have a deviation of more than 5 degrees, 2,5 mm according to preop. planning. For every THA the test protocol has been completely realized. Results. The difference between the preop. and postop. measures in the first series of 4 hips revealed 2 outliers because of fractures of the acetabulum in 2 cases, related to bad cadaver quality. In the second series we found satisfactory results comparing the planned preop and postop component position (Fig. 2). For example difference of leg length showed a mean absolute of 1,58 mm, standard deviation 1,21 mm (min 0,62; max 3,34 mm). Offset revealed a mean absolute of 1,62 mm, standard deviation 0,57 mm (min 1,06; max 2,14 mm) concerning the difference between preop. planning and result postop. Conclusion. Accurate and safe placement of total hip components in THA, both acetabular cup and stem, performing the direct anterior approach can be achieved using a 3D preoperative planning along with patient specific instruments. The results of the cadaver study tests are promising and that is to be proven in the clinical setting and by application in the future

Objective. To investigate the relationship between the pattern of pelvic or acetabular fracture, and bladder injuries. Methods. A total of 173 patients admitted at our Academic Hospital from January 2006 to March 2012 with cystograms done for pelvic or acetabular fractures were studied retrospectively. Records of pelvic X-Rays, CT scans and cystograms were reviewed. Tile's classification and Young & Burgess classification were used for pelvic fractures and Judet & Letournel classification system for acetabular fractures. Results. Out of 173 patients 16% had bladder injuries of which 22% were intra-peritoneal and 70% were extra-peritoneal. The bladder injuries mostly occurred among male patients; 16 males compared to 9 female patients. Out of the 21 fractures of the acetabulum only 2 sustained bladder injury and they were secondary to gunshot wounds. Lateral compression fractures accounted for 67% of bladder injuries. Motor vehicle accidents were the leading mechanism of injury accounting for 117 patients in total and 81% of those with bladder injuries. Among the patients with bladder rupture 55% had at least 3 rami involved and only one patient (4%) with 1 ramus involved had a bladder injury. Overall 44 (34%) of patients with 3 or more rami fractured had bladder injury. Conclusion. Bladder injury appears to be related to the mechanism of injury. We recommend that a cystogram be done routinely when a patient presents with a type III lateral compression fracture. In isolated acetabulum fractures, single ramus fractures and lateral compression type I fractures, request for cystogram should be correlated with clinical signs and symptoms, and not done routinely. NO DISCLOSURES

Fracture of the acetabulum can result in damage to the articular surface that ranges from minimal to catastrophic. Hip arthroplasty may be required for more severe injuries due to marked articular surface damage, post traumatic degenerative changes, persistent malunion or nonunion, or occasionally avascular necrosis and destruction of the femoral head. These problems may be seen following both closed and open fracture treatment, but prior open reduction and internal fixation often makes subsequent THA more difficult due to soft tissue scarring and retained hardware. In select acute acetabular fracture cases with severe initial comminution of the joint, open reduction and fixation can be technically impossible or so clearly destined to early failure that initial fracture treatment with combined limited fixation and simultaneous THA is the best option, especially in osteoporotic elderly fracture patients. Problems which may be encountered during any THA in a patient with a prior acetabular fracture include: difficult exposure due to soft tissue defects and scarring, presence of heterotopic ossification, and nerve palsy from the original fracture or subsequent osteosynthesis. Retained hardware can present significant challenges and frequently is left in place or removed in part or completely, when intraarticular in location or blocking preparation of the acetabular cavity and placement of the cup. Additional potential problems include residual deformity and malunion, persistent pelvic dissociation or nonunion of fracture fragments, cavitary or segmental bone loss from displaced or resorbed bone fragments, and occasionally occult deep infection. Preoperative assessment and planning should include careful consideration of the most appropriate surgical approach, which may be impacted by the need for hardware removal. Screening laboratory studies and aspiration of the hip may prove helpful in excluding associated deep infection. Intraoperative sciatic nerve monitoring may be of assistance in patients with partial residual nerve deficits or where extensive posterior exposure and mobilization of the sciatic nerve is needed for hardware removal or excision of heterotopic ossification. Metal cutting tools to allow partial removal of long plates and adjunctive equipment for removal of broken or stripped screws should be routinely available during these cases. Careful preoperative planning regarding implant and reconstructive options can also ensure availability of proper components and equipment. Often implants and techniques developed for revision surgery for management of major bone deficiencies are needed. Reported results suggest that surgery is frequently prolonged, can be associated with greater blood loss and may result in increased risk of post-arthroplasty heterotopic ossification when compared to routine primary procedures. Bone stock and fracture union may be better in patients with prior internal fixation than in those with nonoperative treatment of major displaced acetabular fractures. Available long-term results document more durable results with lower rates of aseptic loosening with uncemented acetabular fixation compared to cemented acetabular components. These patients are at higher risk of revision and failure than patients undergoing THA for simple osteoarthritis, though initial short-term results are comparable to conventional hip arthroplasty patients, as long as early wound healing problems and deep infection can be avoided, which is a greater risk for acute THA for initial fracture care. The application of newer implant designs, highly porous ingrowth materials, and methods for management of acetabular bone deficiency developed for revision THA have helped improve results in this challenging subset of primary THA patients

The inability to consistently position components is associated with the major complications of hip replacement including instability, wear, liner breakage, limb length discrepancy, and limited function. This was a major catalyst for the demise of hard-on-hard bearings. The greatest challenge is accurate, reproducible positioning of acetabular component which is obtained in a surprisingly low percentage of cases. Other major issues include consistently obtaining proper limb length, offset, component sizing, and complete seating without fracture of either the acetabulum or the femur. There are two approaches to this issue; to either use virtual reality which applies technology that provides surrogates to direct visualization of components. The major issues with computer assisted techniques include questions of accuracy and increased time and cost. The other approach is to utilise intraoperative imaging which has been the gold standard traditionally, however, previously it has been a challenge to utilise intraoperative imaging without adding substantial time and cost. Historically intraoperative imaging has not been adopted because it disrupts work flow, the quality of images has been inadequate, and it has added too much additional time to allow for a series of repeat radiographs to be obtained. Modifications of existing portable imaging that utilise direct radiography (DR plate technology) allow for intraoperative images that display within seconds. Imbedded software allows measurement of all parameters of interest. Three or 4 systems are currently in use, and this is not virtual reality but it is the gold standard. Advantages include higher quality images, faster service speed, minimal impact on OR work flow, eventual reduction in operating costs, elimination of processing of chemicals and film room/storage room, and most importantly the elimination of outliers and return to the operating room due to unexpected findings on recovery room radiographs. Intraoperative imaging has been utilised at a number of centers in recent years and has led to numerous intraoperative changes to optimise component implantation in a surprisingly high percentage of cases. Advances in technology have made intraoperative digital imaging a practical feasible strategy to avoid outliers that increase complications and compromise results. The rapidly evolving technology makes this a very attractive option for optimising total hip component placement. In addition it is an excellent teaching tool that is rapidly embraced by residents and fellows and is an extremely effective in eliminating outliers

Injury to the sciatic nerve is one of the more serious complications of acetabular fracture and traumatic dislocation of the hip, both in the short and long term. We have reviewed prospectively patients, treated in our unit, for acetabular fractures who had concomitant injury to the sciatic nerve, with the aim of predicting the functional outcome after these injuries.

Of 136 patients who underwent stabilisation of acetabular fractures, there were 27 (19.9%) with neurological injury. At initial presentation, 13 patients had a complete foot-drop, ten had weakness of the foot and four had burning pain and altered sensation over the dorsum of the foot. Serial electromyography (EMG) studies were performed and the degree of functional recovery was monitored using the grading system of the Medical Research Council. In nine patients with a foot-drop, there was evidence of a proximal acetabular (sciatic) and a distal knee (neck of fibula) nerve lesion, the double-crush syndrome.

At the final follow-up, clinical examination and EMG studies showed full recovery in five of the ten patients with initial muscle weakness, and complete resolution in all four patients with sensory symptoms (burning pain and hyperaesthesia). There was improvement of functional capacity (motor and sensory) in two patients who presented initially with complete foot-drop. In the remaining 11 with foot-drop at presentation, including all nine with the double-crush lesion, there was no improvement in function at a mean follow-up of 4.3 years.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk orthopaedic patients. A total of 58 patients had a retrievable inferior vena cava filter placed as an adjunct to chemical and mechanical prophylaxis, most commonly for a history of previous deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, polytrauma, or expected prolonged immobilisation. In total 56 patients (96.6%) had an uncomplicated post-operative course. Two patients (3.4%) died in the peri-operative period for unrelated reasons.

Of the 56 surviving patients, 50 (89%) were available for follow-up. A total of 32 filters (64%) were removed without complication at a mean of 37.8 days (4 to 238) after placement. There were four filters (8%) which were retained because of thrombosis at the filter site, and four (8%) were retained because of incorporation of the filter into the wall of the inferior vena cava. In ten cases (20%) the retrievable filter was left in place to continue as primary prophylaxis. No patient had post-removal thromboembolic complications.

A retrievable inferior vena cava filter, as an adjunct to chemical and mechanical prophylaxis, was a safe and effective means of reducing the acute risk of pulmonary embolism in this high-risk group of patients. Although most filters were removed without complications, thereby avoiding the long-term complications that have plagued permanent indwelling filters, a relatively high percentage of filters had to be left in situ.