Correct femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is critical in obtaining good clinical outcomes. We aimed to delineate whether any difference exists between the anteromedial (AM) and trans-tibial (TT) portal femoral tunnel placement techniques on the primary outcome of ACLR graft rupture. Adult patients (>18year old) who underwent primary ACLR between January 2011 – January 2018 were identified and divided based on portal technique (AM v TT). The primary outcome measure was graft rupture. Univariate analysis was used to delineate association between independent variables and outcome. Binary logistic regression was utilised to delineate odds ratios of significant variables. 473 patients were analysed. Median age at surgery was 27 years old (range 18–70). A total of 152/473, (32.1%) patients were AM group compared to 321/473 (67.9%) TT. Twenty-five patients (25/473, 5.3%) sustained graft rupture. Median time to graft rupture was 12 months (IQR 9). A higher odds for graft rupture was associated with the AM group, which trended towards significance (OR 2.03; 95% CI 0.90 – 4.56, p=0.081). Older age at time of surgery was associated with a lower odds of rupture (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 – 0.98, p=0.014). There is no statistically significant difference in ACLR graft rupture rates when comparing anteromedial and trans-tibial portal technique for femoral tunnel placement. There was a trend towards higher rupture rates in the anteromedial portal group

Introduction. Tunnelwidening in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can result in the staged revision procedures with a need for bone transplantation prior to revision reconstruction. Limited knowledge exist regarding to quality of different transplantation methods. The present study used CT-scanning to evaluate tunnel bone density after allogenic bone chips and bone cylinder transplantation. We hypothesized that bone chips transplantation resulted in higher bone density than bone cylinder transplantation due to possible voids between individual cylinders in the tunnels. Methods. The records of 24 patients operated for 1st stage revision ACLR from April 2003 to march 2010 were included in the study. twelve patients had their tunnels transplanted with bone chips and twelve patients with bone cylinders from allogenic femoral heads. Bone chips were created by fine bone milling and cylinders were extracted by 7–8 mm core drilling. Bone density 3–4 months after transplantation were evaluated by CT scanning reconstruction slides with 5 mm intervals throughout the tunnel length using histomorphometry. Results. There were 15 females and 9 males with an average age of 32 yrs. Using bone chips the bone density in the tibial tunnels was 55% and the femoral tunnels the bone density was 68% Using bone cylinders bone density was 60% in the tibial tunnels and 53% in the femoral tunnels. The femoral bone density in the bone chip group was significantly higher than the bone cylinders (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Transplantation with bone chips results in superior bone quality in the femoral tunnels where as no difference where demonstrated in the tibial tunnels

Introduction. Interest in platelet-derived growth factors has been increasing as an adjunct in surgical techniques for tissue repair. Its use in ligament injuries repair has been studied mainly in animals. The authors intend to study growth factors influence in ACL repair using BTB graft. Material. 20 individuals underwent ACL rupture BTB arthroscopic repair, using Double Incision Mini-Invasive Technique. MRI (3-Tesla) images. GPSIII ® System to obtain Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) thrombin activated. Methods. Prospective study consisting of 2 groups of 10 patients each. Surgical technique, fixation method and postoperative protocol were the same. In the study group (SG-10 patients) graft was imbued with PRP and the remaing plasma was intra-articularly injected. The MRIs took place 6 weeks and 6 months after the procedure with and without gadolinium-DTPA enhancement. Evaluation was performed blindly by independent radiologists concerning femoral tunnel integration, sinovialization process and nonspecific synovitis. Clinical and functional status evaluation: IKDC. Statistical analysis in SPSS®. Results. Radiological evaluation was similar in both groups. In the Study Group at 6 weeks we verified less joint effusion and synovitis. At 6 months: no diference in integration in femoral tunnel, and in granulation tissue around the femoral tunnel in graft sinovialization. IKDC (mean ± SD) with PRP: pre-operative −45,66 ±6,98, post-operative −94,35 ±3,54 (Age-29 ± 10), without PRP: preoperative −48,02 ±12,68, post-operative −91,7 ±6,99 (Age −31 ±10). There are no statistical differences between the groups with and without PRP in clinical and functional assessments and MRI images. Discussion. The use of technology to accelerate and improve the processes of tissue repair and integration is of great interest in repairing the ACL. Studies in humans are rare, with low level of evidence and contradictory results. Although the limitations of this study, it seems to us that the use of growth factors has no advantages in the process of PT graft integration at 6 months. Conclusion. PRP doesn't seem to contribute to enhancement of the ligamentation process and articular rehabilitation when used as a step of BTB technique