Femoral shaft fractures are potentially devastating injuries. Despite this, clinical studies of the biomechanics of this injury are lacking. We aimed to clinically evaluate bone behaviour under high and low energy trauma in paediatric, adult and older patients. Single-centre retrospective study identifying all diaphyseal femoral fractures between Feb 2015-Feb 2017. Peri-prosthetic and pathological fractures were excluded. Patients were subdivided into groups 1 (paediatric, <16yo), 2 (adult, 17–55yo) and 3 (older, >55yo) to reflect immature, peak bone age and osteoporotic bone respectively. Chi-Squared analysis assessed significance of bone age to degree of comminution and fracture pattern. A p-value <0.05 was significant. A total 4130 radiographs were analysed with 206 femoral shaft fractures identified. Forty-three patients were excluded with 163 remaining. Group 1, 2 and 3 included 38, 37 and 88 patients respectively. Mean age 50.8 (SD 32.8) with male-to-female ratio of 1:1.2. Groups 1 and 3 included majority simple fractures (35/38 and 62/88 respectively). Group 2 included more comminuted injuries (33/37). Bone age to degree of comminution proved significant (p<0.05) with a bimodal distribution of simple fractures noted in groups 1 and 3. Energy to fracture was significant in group 2, where a high energy injury was associated with comminution (p<0.05). This study is the first to demonstrate an association between fracture comminution and age. Simple femoral shaft fractures showed a bimodal age distribution in paediatric and older patients regardless of mechanism energy. High energy mechanism trauma was directly related to fracture comminution at peak bone age

Background. Polytrauma patients are at high risk of systematic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) due to an exaggerated unbalanced immune response that can lead to multiple organ failure and increased mortality. This response is often heightened following acute surgical management as a result, damage-control orthopaedics (DCO) was born. This allows the patient to be stabilised using external fixation allowing physiology to improve. This systematic review aims to compare DCO against early total care (ETC) (<24hrs intramedullary nailing) in polytraumatised patients with femoral shaft fractures using a diagnosis of acute lung injury (ALI) as the primary outcome measure. Method. A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and AMED was carried out to identify all English language studies comparing ETC versus DCO using ALI as the primary outcome measure. Two authors independently screened the studies and performed data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomised Studies. Results. Three studies were selected for final inclusion. One multicentre RCT demonstrated a significantly higher odds ratio (6.69) of ALI in the subgroup receiving ETC compared to DCO. The two other studies were retrospective case series with one reporting no significant difference and the second study reporting a significant reduction in ARDS when a DCO approach was used (7.8% vs 15.1%). Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity. Conclusions. This review supports evidence that in the more unstable patients (Injury Severity Score≥30) treated surgically for femoral shaft fractures in the first 24 hours, DCO may have a protective effect over ETC for ALI. However further studies with large sample sizes are needed to provide clarity on the subject area. Level of Evidence. 1. Ethics. No approval required given the nature of this study (systematic review)

There has been evidence of association between femoral shaft fractures and prolonged bisphosphonate therapy. We present a case series of bisphosphonate-associated fractures and invaluable lessons we have learnt. Over the last three years at our unit we have collected a case series of eight patients who have had atypical femoral fractures whilst on bisphosphonate therapy. We present illustrative cases, a summary of key findings, and invaluable lessons we have learnt. There was a long period of prodromal pain for two years before incomplete fractures developed. We speculate this is a warning sign of impending fracture. This may have been prevented with screening. Between incomplete fracture and complete fracture there was a short window of one month. Five patients presented with complete fracture, and three with thigh pain +/- evidence of incomplete fracture. Of the latter group all but one went on to develop complete fractures. The one patient who did not progress died six years after diagnosis. Of those five patients who presented with initial complete fracture, three patients recall thigh pain before fracture on further questioning. Despite being diaphyseal femoral fractures, there is a higher risk of neck of femur fractures in this patient cohort (both patients with initial interlocked nails subsequently developed neck of femur fractures soon after and were revised to cephalomedullary nails). Excluding one death from unrelated cause, only one patient has signs of complete fracture healing. All other patients are still receiving follow-up (mean 490 days). Three patients reported bilateral symptoms (pain). Two had had bilateral symptoms for one year. Both had visible incomplete fractures on further radiographic scrutiny; one underwent prophylactic cephalomedullary nailing, one was managed with active surveillance. We suggest that improved pain and radiographic changes of cortical healing may be misleading and should not be relied upon. Cephalomedullary nailing is the treatment of choice in these fractures due to higher risk of neck of femur fractures in this cohort. We suggest prompt prophylactic cephalomedullary nailing when radiographic incomplete fractures are identified due to a short window before progression to complete fracture, and the need to consider contralateral prophylactic nailing in patients describing bilateral symptoms. We speculate that thigh pain is a warning sign of impending fracture and fracture-progression can be prevented with appropriate screening

Summary. For injuries to the lower leg or forearm, supplemental support from soft tissue compression (STC) with a splint or brace-like system and combined with external fixation could be done effectively and quickly with a minimal of facilities in the field. Introduction. Soft tissue compression (STC) in functional braces has been shown to provide rigidity and stability for most closed fractures, selected open fractures and can supplement some other forms of fracture fixation. However, soft tissue injuries are compromised in war injuries. This study was designed to evaluate if STC can provide adequate rigidity and stability either with, or without other forms of fixation techniques of simple fractures or bone defects after standardised soft tissue defects. The load was applied either axially or in bending as the bending configuration is more like conditions when positioned on a stretcher in the field. Methods. A simple, oblique fracture was created in 23 cadaveric femurs, 23 tibiae and fibulae, 22 humeri and 22 radii and ulnae of intact limb segments. The weight of each intact limb segment was measured. Cyclic axial loads (12 – 120N) were applied for each progressive condition: intact limb, mid shaft osteotomy, a lateral 1/4 circumferential soft tissue defect, 1/3 circumferential defect and finally, 3 cm bone defect. Limbs were randomly assigned to be stabilised be either plate and screw (PS), intramedullary rod (IR) or external fixation (EF). Testing with and without STC in a brace was performed after each condition. In an additional 36 forearms, bending rigidity was measured using a modular fracture brace with external fixation. The bone and the soft tissue weighed separately and the ratio of soft tissue to bone was calculated. ANOVA multi-variant analysis corrected for multiple comparisons was used to compare the axial rigidity between the different conditions tested. Results. There was no significant difference in axial rigidity for humerus or femoral shaft fractures treated by any of the methods related to the degree of soft tissue damage. Femurs, tibias and humeri with a 3 cm bone defect were best stabilised with IR. Forearms with a 3 cm bone defect were best stabilised with PS. Progressive increase in soft tissue defects did create progressive loss in rigidity in forearms and legs, but the most dramatic loss occurred with the bone defect and ST defect. The rigidity of IR and EF in legs decreased over 50% with bone defect, and about 20% of that was restored with STC. The rigidity of IR and EF in forearms decreased almost 79%, and about 21% of that was restored with STC. The increase in resistance to bending in the forearm was most significantly improved by STC. Discussion/Conclusions. Invasive types of surgical intervention provide the best rigidity to fractures, regardless of the presence of or size of a soft tissue defect. In general, use of PS and IR and application of conventional types of braces to achieve STC is not practical in the field. EF, however, can be applied quickly and easily with a minimal of facilities in the field and can be applied in such a way that no foreign bodies end up in the contaminated wound. For injuries to the leg or forearm, supplemental support from STC with a splint or brace-like system could be effective

We have undertaken a prospective study in patients with a fracture of the femoral shaft requiring intramedullary nailing to test the hypothesis that the femoral canal could be a potential source of the second hit phenomenon. We determined the local femoral intramedullary and peripheral release of interleukin-6 (IL-6) after fracture and subsequent intramedullary reaming.

In all patients, the fracture caused a significant increase in the local femoral concentrations of IL-6 compared to a femoral control group. The concentration of IL-6 in the local femoral environment was significantly higher than in the patients own matched blood samples from their peripheral circulation. The magnitude of the local femoral release of IL-6 after femoral fracture was independent of the injury severity score and whether the fracture was closed or open.

In patients who underwent intramedullary reaming of the femoral canal a further significant local release of IL-6 was demonstrated, providing evidence that intramedullary reaming can cause a significant local inflammatory reaction.