Objective. To define the common pathology of the hips with irreducible posterior dislocation combined with femoral head fracture and the outcome of surgical treatment using surgical hip dislocation technique. Design: retrospective observational clinical study. Setting: Level III referral trauma center. Patients/Participants: from January 2011till February 2014 five patients with irreducible posterior hip dislocation and femoral head fracture who underwent operation were included and they followed for at least 18 months. Intervention. Open reduction and internal fixation of fractured femoral head and labral repair by suture anchors using surgical hip dislocation through trochanteric flip osteotomy approach. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical and radiographical findings of the irreducible posterior hip dislocation, intraoperative findings, clinical outcomes using Merle d'Aubigné & Postel and Thompson & Epstein scores, and radiological outcome. Results. All patients presented clinically with a shortened lower limb in neutral or external rotation of the hip (not in Internal rotation). All were Pipkin type II fracture of femoral head with the intact part of the head buttonholed on the posterior wall of the acetabulum through a capsule-labral flap. Postoperative computed tomography revealed perfect reduction except one case with severe comminution with good reduction. Only one patient with delayed operative management developed avascular necrosis and underwent total hip arthroplasty. Conclusion. Irreducible femoral head fracture-dislocation is rare injury with different clinical presentation that shows neutral or externally rotated limb and optimal surgical management is not clear. Surgical hip dislocation gives full access to the femoral head for reconstruction and opportunity to direct repair of the labral tears

Since its creation, labral repair has become the preferred method among surgeons for the arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labral tears resulting in pain and dysfunction for patients. Labral reconstruction is performed mainly in revision hip arthroscopy but can be used in the primary setting when the labrum cannot be repaired or is calcified. The purpose of this study was to compare the survival between primary labral repair and labral reconstruction with survival defined as no further surgery (revision or total hip replacement). Patients who underwent labral repair or reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2018 in the primary setting were included in the study. Patients were included if they had primary hip arthroscopy with the senior author for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), involving either labral reconstruction or labral repair, and were within the ages of 18 and 65 at the time of surgery. Exclusion criteria included confounding injuries (Leggs Calves Perthes, avascular necrosis, femoral head fracture, etc.), history of unilateral or bilateral hip surgeries, or Tönnis grades of 2 or 3 at the time of surgery. Labral repairs were performed when adequate tissue was available for repair and labral reconstruction was performed when tissue was absent, ossified or torn beyond repair. A total of 501 labral repairs and 114 labral reconstructions performed in the primary setting were included in the study. Labral reconstruction patients were older (37±10) compared to labral repair (34±11).(p=0.021). Second surgeries were required in 19/114 (17%) of labral reconstruction and 40/501(8%) [odds ratio: 2.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 4.2] (p=0.008). Revision hip arthroscopy were required in 6/114(5%) labral reconstructions and 33/501(6.5%) labral repair (p=0.496). Total hip replacement was required in 13/114 labral reconstructions and 7/501 labral repairs [odds ratio:9.1 95%CI 3.5 to 23] (p=< 0.01). The mean survival for the labral repair group was 10.2 years (95%CI:10 to 10.5) and 11.9 years (98%CI:10.9 to 12.8) in the labral reconstruction group. Conversion to total hip was required more often following primary labral reconstruction. Revision hip arthroscopy rates were similar between groups as was the mean survival, with both over 10 years. Similar survival was seen in labral repair and reconstruction when strict patient selection criteria are followed

Recent issues related to trunionosis have created a new paradigm in choosing femoral head material in total hip arthroplasty. While many consider highly-crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) to be the gold standard currently in acetabular liner bearing surface, the debate remains whether metal or ceramic heads are best paired with XLPE. Wear characteristics are similar within an order of magnitude when comparing cobalt chrome femoral heads with ceramic when used in combination with XLPE. Therefore, discernable differences between the two femoral head materials with respect to outcomes would be the result of other biomechanical factors. Notably the fretting and corrosion of metal heads at the modular taper of femoral components is a serious concern and represents a significant deterrent when considering this material. The fretting corrosion that occurs with metal femoral heads has recently been well documented in multiple reports, and can be associated with adverse local tissue reactions necessitating revision hip arthroplasty. Frictional torque has recently been implicated in taper corrosion at modular junctions. In a recent simulated in vivo study, large diameter CoCr femoral heads were associated with increased frictional torque compared to smaller metal heads, supporting recent taper corrosion retrieval studies. In one recent series, a 1.1% incidence of head-neck taper corrosion with a metal head was reported and the authors recommended use of ceramic femoral heads. The notable downside of ceramic femoral heads is the implant cost and potential for fracture. However, the incidence of femoral head fracture with the newer mixed delta ceramic heads is exceptionally low and infrequent (rate 1.7 per 100,000). Furthermore, the incidence of taper corrosion is negligible with ceramic heads, making it the bearing couple of choice among many surgeons in combination with XLPE

Young patients have been reported to have a higher risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty than older cohorts. This was attributed to the higher activity level which led to increased wear, osteolysis, and component fracture. We prospectively assessed the clinical results, wear and osteolysis, the incidence of squeaking, and the survivorship of ceramic on ceramic THA in patients younger than 50 years (mean age of 42 [18–50] years). The series included 425 THAs in 370 patients with 368 hips followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean 7.1 years, range 2–14 years). All patients received uncemented acetabular components with flush-mounted acetabular liners using an 18 degree taper. No osteolysis was observed in any uncemented construct. There was osteolysis around one loose cemented femoral component. The survivorship for reoperation for implant revision was 96.7%. There were only two acetabular liner fractures (0.47%) and one femoral head fracture (0.24%). Two of the three fractures involved a fall from a significant height. There were no hip dislocations. Five patients (1.17%) noted rare or occasional squeaking. None had reproducible squeaking. In summary, the current study shows that ceramic-on-ceramic THAs in the young patient population are extremely reliable with a very low revision rate and an absence of wear-induced osteolysis. In addition, it shows that both bearing fracture in this young patient population typically occurs with polytrauma and squeaking issues that have been raised relative to ceramic bearings occur very rarely with the flush-mounted ceramic liner design used in this study

This study shows the radiographic results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Revelation stem ® (Djo surgical USA) for hip joint disease. We removed cases which we couldn't follow up, the remaining of the patients who had undergone a primary THA July 2007 to December 2009 in our institution using Revelation hip stem® and 58 cases-65 hips (14 men and 44 women) were possible for progress observation on this study, and radiographic evaluation was done at the time of the last observation. The preoperative diagnosis of the hip included osteoarthritis (OA) in 40 patients, idiopatic, necrosis of the hip in 13 patients, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 4 patients, and femoral head fracture in 1 patient. Three patients had undergone femoral head replacement (FHA) and 55 patients had undergone THA. At the time of the last evaluation, spot welds were detected in 63 hips (97%) in zone1 and 7. Demarcation lines, which indicates movement of the stem, were detected in zone3,4,5, but not in the proximal of the stem. Stress shielding were observed in 32 joints, according to Engh's classification, first degree were 27 joints and second degree were 5 joints. Cortical hypertrophy were detected in 13 joints. The revelation stem features a lateral overhang structure (lateral flare) and the stem has an expanded proximal geometry allowing the device to rest on both medial and lateral cortices at the metaphyseal level. Above all the stem has anterior overhand structure (trapezoidal structure). The medullary cavity occupation rate is made to increase by these structures. Above all, the stability of the stem is increased by a proximal portion by three point support. The distal stem is tapered and polished, which prevents the stress loading to a distal portion of the device. Stress shielding more than the third degree is not detected, and spots welds were detected in the proximal of the stem. These facts indicate that the concept of this stem, transmit loading to the femur bone, at the proximal portion of the stem, would be achieved

Certain acetabular fractures involve impaction of the weight-bearing dome and medialisation of the femoral head. Intra-operative fracture reduction is made easier by traction on the limb, ideally in line with the femoral neck (lateral traction). However, holding this lateral traction throughout surgery is very difficult for a tiring assistant. We detail a previously undescribed technique of providing intra-operative lateral femoral head traction via a pelvic reduction frame, to aid fixation of difficult acetabular fractures. The first 10 consecutive cases are reviewed (Group 1) and compared with a retrospective control (Group 2, n=18) of case-matched patients, treated prior to introducing the technique. The post-operative X-rays and CT scans were assessed to identify quality of fracture reduction according to the criteria of Tornetta and Matta. Operative time, blood loss and early complication rates were also compared. All cases in both groups were acute injuries with medial and/or superior migration of the femoral head. The majority were either associated both column or anterior column posterior hemi-transverse. There was no statistical difference between the groups in age, time to surgery, BMI or ASA grade. Fracture reduction was assessed as excellent in seven, good in three and poor in one. This was not significantly different from the control group (p=0.093). The mean operative time was 232 minutes in Group 1 and 332.78 minutes in Group 2 (p = 0.0015). There was no difference between the groups for blood loss or complication rates. We conclude that this new technique is at least equivalent to using manual traction and early results suggest it reduces operative time and technical difficulty in treating these complex acetabular fractures

Introduction. Hip resurfacing (HRA) designer centres have reported survivorships between 88.5–96% at 12 years. Arthroplasty Registries (AR) reported less favourable results especially in females gender and small sizes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum 10-year survival and outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) from an independent specialist centre. Methods. Since 1998, 1967 BHRs have been implanted in our centre by a single hip resurfacing specialist. The first 249 BHR, implanted between 1999 and 2001 in 232 patients (17 bilateral) were included in this study. The majority of the patients were male (163; 69%). The mean age at surgery was 50.6 years (range: 17–76), with primary OA as most common indication (201; 81%), followed by avascular necrosis (23; 9.2%) and hip dysplasia (11; 4.4%). Mean follow up was 10.2 years (range: 0.1 (revision) to 13.1). Implant survival was established with revision as the end point. Harris Hip Scores (HHS), radiographs and metal ion levels were assessed in all patients. Sub-analysis was performed by gender, diagnosis and femoral component size (Small: <50 mm; Large: ≥50 mm). Results. Of the 232 patients, 15 were deceased (4 bilateral BHR), 16 lost to follow-up and 9 revised. 205 BHR were evaluated at minimum 10 years postoperatively. Failure modes included 2 component malpositioning, 2 loose femoral heads, 1 fracture, 1 metal sensitivity, 2 impingement and 1 with high metal ions. The overall survival was 95.1% (95% CI: 93.6–96.6) at 12.8 years. The mean HHS was 97.8 (range: 65–100). Survivorship in men was 98.6% (95%CI: 97.4–99.8%) at 13 years. Survivorship in women was inferior to men (log rank = 0.003): 87.9% (95%CI: 84.3–91.5%) at 12 years. There was no difference in HHS between genders in the non-revised cases (p = 0.46). There was no difference in survivorship with different pre-operative diagnosis (log-rank = 0.83) but a significant difference in 12-year survivorship between Small (90.1%) and Large components (97.2%) (log rank = 0.01). After adjusting for head size, the difference in survival between males and females was no longer significant (log-rank = 0.125). The median ion levels were Cr:2.0μg/l; Co:1.0μg/l. In 24 patients the ion levels were undetectable. Four patients (1.9%) had ions above the upper acceptable limits of Cr:4.6μg/l;Co:4.0μg/l for unilateral or Cr:7.4μg/l;Co:5.0μg/l for bilateral HRA. In 67 patients with consecutive ion measurements, levels decreased significantly with time with a mean decrease of 0.97μg/l for Cr and 0.60μg/l for Co. Discussion. This study reports the more than 10-year survival of BHR and reflects an experienced specialist's practice, including his learning curve of the procedure. The overall 12.8-year survival was superior to registry reported figures of THA amongst young patients and corresponded well with reports from designer centres. Survivorship and clinical outcome were excellent in men. In women survivorship was significantly inferior and related to smaller component sizes, but the >10-year clinical outcome in non-revised cases was excellent. In well-functioning BHR, the metal ions decrease significantly with time. The results of this study support the use of HRA with a good design

Injury to the sciatic nerve is one of the more serious complications of acetabular fracture and traumatic dislocation of the hip, both in the short and long term. We have reviewed prospectively patients, treated in our unit, for acetabular fractures who had concomitant injury to the sciatic nerve, with the aim of predicting the functional outcome after these injuries.

Of 136 patients who underwent stabilisation of acetabular fractures, there were 27 (19.9%) with neurological injury. At initial presentation, 13 patients had a complete foot-drop, ten had weakness of the foot and four had burning pain and altered sensation over the dorsum of the foot. Serial electromyography (EMG) studies were performed and the degree of functional recovery was monitored using the grading system of the Medical Research Council. In nine patients with a foot-drop, there was evidence of a proximal acetabular (sciatic) and a distal knee (neck of fibula) nerve lesion, the double-crush syndrome.

At the final follow-up, clinical examination and EMG studies showed full recovery in five of the ten patients with initial muscle weakness, and complete resolution in all four patients with sensory symptoms (burning pain and hyperaesthesia). There was improvement of functional capacity (motor and sensory) in two patients who presented initially with complete foot-drop. In the remaining 11 with foot-drop at presentation, including all nine with the double-crush lesion, there was no improvement in function at a mean follow-up of 4.3 years.