Objective. To define the common pathology of the hips with irreducible posterior dislocation combined with femoral head fracture and the outcome of surgical treatment using surgical hip dislocation technique. Design: retrospective observational clinical study. Setting: Level III referral trauma center. Patients/Participants: from January 2011till February 2014 five patients with irreducible posterior hip dislocation and femoral head fracture who underwent operation were included and they followed for at least 18 months. Intervention. Open reduction and internal fixation of fractured femoral head and labral repair by suture anchors using surgical hip dislocation through trochanteric flip osteotomy approach. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical and radiographical findings of the irreducible posterior hip dislocation, intraoperative findings, clinical outcomes using Merle d'Aubigné & Postel and Thompson & Epstein scores, and radiological outcome. Results. All patients presented clinically with a shortened lower limb in neutral or external rotation of the hip (not in Internal rotation). All were Pipkin type II fracture of femoral head with the intact part of the head buttonholed on the posterior wall of the acetabulum through a capsule-labral flap. Postoperative computed tomography revealed perfect reduction except one case with severe comminution with good reduction. Only one patient with delayed operative management developed avascular necrosis and underwent total hip arthroplasty. Conclusion. Irreducible femoral head fracture-dislocation is rare injury with different clinical presentation that shows neutral or externally rotated limb and optimal surgical management is not clear. Surgical hip dislocation gives full access to the femoral head for reconstruction and opportunity to direct repair of the labral tears

We describe a 15-year-old boy with a posterior dislocation of the hip, fracture of the posterior column of the acetabulum and separation of the femoral capital epiphysis. To our knowledge no previous case in a child has been reported. Such high-energy injuries are extremely rare, and a poor outcome is expected.

We advocate early referral to a specialised tertiary centre, and the use of a modification of Delbet’s classification to reflect the complexity and displacement which may occur with this injury.

Since 1977 we did implant ceramic on ceramic THR in younger and active population. In 1991 we published (JBJS B N°4) data's in a consecutive group of patients under 50 years of age. What about the same patients for more than 30 years? Eighty-six hips in 75 patients, 41 males 34 females, mean age 43 (18 to 50), mean weight 68 kg (36 to 100), Charnley class: 38 A, 28 (38 hips) B, 9 patients (10 hips) C. Sixty-six primary procedures, 20 revisions (18 failed arthroplasties: 6 THR, 5 resurfacing, four single cup, two hemiarthroplasty, one bipolar), one after acetabular fractures. Four hips previously infected. Eight Patients deceased (8 hips) prosthesis still in place, ten lost to follow-up before 2 years, eight hips in 8 patients were revised before the review, partially followed: from 2 to 20 years: 35, completely followed: 25 hips in 23 patients resuming in: No pain in 20, slight pain in 2, severe disability in 3 not related to the hip, no radiolucent lines in 22, radiolucent lines in 3, no osteolysis in 25. Revision for: early sepsis in one, socket loosening in 8 (3 revisions cases), femoral head fractures in 2: one extra small head (22mm) for Crowe 3 DDH, one fractured at 24 years. Inertness, stability related to fibrous tissue generation, no noise

Since its creation, labral repair has become the preferred method among surgeons for the arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labral tears resulting in pain and dysfunction for patients. Labral reconstruction is performed mainly in revision hip arthroscopy but can be used in the primary setting when the labrum cannot be repaired or is calcified. The purpose of this study was to compare the survival between primary labral repair and labral reconstruction with survival defined as no further surgery (revision or total hip replacement). Patients who underwent labral repair or reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2018 in the primary setting were included in the study. Patients were included if they had primary hip arthroscopy with the senior author for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), involving either labral reconstruction or labral repair, and were within the ages of 18 and 65 at the time of surgery. Exclusion criteria included confounding injuries (Leggs Calves Perthes, avascular necrosis, femoral head fracture, etc.), history of unilateral or bilateral hip surgeries, or Tönnis grades of 2 or 3 at the time of surgery. Labral repairs were performed when adequate tissue was available for repair and labral reconstruction was performed when tissue was absent, ossified or torn beyond repair. A total of 501 labral repairs and 114 labral reconstructions performed in the primary setting were included in the study. Labral reconstruction patients were older (37±10) compared to labral repair (34±11).(p=0.021). Second surgeries were required in 19/114 (17%) of labral reconstruction and 40/501(8%) [odds ratio: 2.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 4.2] (p=0.008). Revision hip arthroscopy were required in 6/114(5%) labral reconstructions and 33/501(6.5%) labral repair (p=0.496). Total hip replacement was required in 13/114 labral reconstructions and 7/501 labral repairs [odds ratio:9.1 95%CI 3.5 to 23] (p=< 0.01). The mean survival for the labral repair group was 10.2 years (95%CI:10 to 10.5) and 11.9 years (98%CI:10.9 to 12.8) in the labral reconstruction group. Conversion to total hip was required more often following primary labral reconstruction. Revision hip arthroscopy rates were similar between groups as was the mean survival, with both over 10 years. Similar survival was seen in labral repair and reconstruction when strict patient selection criteria are followed

Fracture of the femoral head usually results from high-energy trauma, particularly motor vehicle accidents. These fractures are often associated with poor functional outcomes. SF-36 and MFA scores were obtained for twenty-five femoral head fractures. The mean SF-36 scores was 57.2 (22.6 to 82) and the mean MFA score was 37.6 (10–72). As expected the scores were negatively correlated (−0.587, p=0.005). The presence of an ipsilateral posterior acetabluar wall fracture negatively affected functional outcome. Fragment excision was associated with a higher functional outcome when compared to internal fixation. Posterior surgical approach resulted in higher scores than patients who underwent an anterior procedure. Fracture of the femoral head is a rare but severe injury. The purpose of this study is to determine the functional outcome of and prognostic factors associated with femoral head fractures. Acetabular wall fracture, surgical approach, and method of surgical treatment are prognostic factors of functional outcome as measured by the SF-36 and the MFA. There is currently no consensus on the management of femoral head fractures and treatment practices have evolved on the basis of a limited series of studies. Functional outcome following femoral head fracture has been evaluated using Epstein’s criteria in several studies, however, only one study has been conducted using a validated outcome measure. Twenty-five femoral head fractures in twenty-four patients were identified from the trauma and orthopaedic databases of two major trauma centres. The patient with bilateral femoral head fractures was not included in the analysis. After obtaining informed consent, the patients’ medical records were reviewed. Functional outcome was assessed using two validated, patient-based outcome measures, the Short Form (SF)-36 and the Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment instrument (MFA). The average age of the patients was 36.8 (std. dev. 11.1) and the mean length of follow-up was 41.4 months (minimum twelve months). Three factors were identified using non-parametric analysis that significantly affected the functional outcome scores:. The presence of an ipsilateral posterior acetabluar wall fracture negatively affected functional outcome (p=0.08). Fragment excision resulted in significantly higher scores when compared with the patients treated by internal fixation (p=0.067). A posterior surgical approach resulted in a better functional outcome than the anterior approach (p=0.013)

Purpose: Fractures of the femoral head are relatively uncommon injuries and usually occur following a traumatic dislocation of the hip joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate self-reported functional outcome of patients who have sustained a femoral head fracture. Methods: A search of the trauma database at a Level I trauma center between the years 1987–2003 was conducted. Sixty two patients, sustaining 63 femoral head fractures were identified. Two patient-based outcome measures, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) were used to evaluate functional outcome. Forty patients were lost to follow-up including three deaths. Results: To date twenty-three subjects (13 male, mean age 37.3 +/− 15.6), with 24 femoral head fractures have complete functional outcome data. Ten hips (42%) were classified as Pipkin type I, 12 (50%) type II, 1 (4%) type III, and 1 (4%) type IV. The mean follow-up was 10.3 +/− 5.4 yrs. Mechanism of injury included motor vehicle collisions (18/24), and falls from height (6/24). The mean ISS was 11.3 +/− 5.3. Fifteen subjects were treated operatively (13 internal fixation, 1 excision, 1 open reduction only). Four hips failed initial treatment and required delayed total hip arthroplasty (THA). Subjects (n=20) not having a THA functioned below the Canadian normal population for SF-36 physical component score (mean 44.5 +/− 11.0, p < 0.03). Conclusions: This is the first report of patient-based functional outcome following treatment of femoral head fractures. Physical function was significantly lower when compared to Canadian population norms

Aims

To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compares three treatments for acetabular fractures in older patients: surgical fixation, surgical fixation and hip arthroplasty (fix-and-replace), and non-surgical treatment.

Aims

This study reports the ten-year wear rates, incidence of osteolysis, clinical outcomes, and complications of a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing oxidized zirconium (OxZr) versus cobalt-chrome (CoCr) femoral heads with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Cartilage defects of the hip cause significant pain and may lead to arthritic changes that necessitate hip replacement. We propose the use of fresh osteochondral allografts as an option for the treatment of such defects in young patients. Here we present the results of fresh osteochondral allografts for cartilage defects in 17 patients in a prospective study. The underlying diagnoses for the cartilage defects were osteochondritis dissecans in eight and avascular necrosis in six. Two had Legg-Calve-Perthes and one a femoral head fracture. Pre-operatively, an MRI was used to determine the size of the cartilage defect and the femoral head diameter. All patients underwent surgical hip dislocation with a trochanteric slide osteotomy for placement of the allograft. The mean age at surgery was 25.9 years (17 to 44) and mean follow-up was 41.6 months (3 to 74). The mean Harris hip score was significantly better after surgery (p < 0.01) and 13 patients had fair to good outcomes. One patient required a repeat allograft, one patient underwent hip replacement and two patients are awaiting hip replacement. Fresh osteochondral allograft is a reasonable treatment option for hip cartilage defects in young patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(11 Supple A):11–16

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of femoral head material (delta ceramic versus metal) on polyethylene wear in a consecutive prospective randomized series of low friction total hip arthroplasty. A total of 110 patients with a mean age of 60.6 ± 9.3 (34–75) years were randomized (power of 90%, alpha of 5%) to receive either a metal (55 hips) or a delta ceramic (55 hips) femoral head. The polyethylene socket was moderately cross-linked (3 Mrads of gamma radiation in nitrogen) and annealed at 130°C in all hips. All other parameters were identical in both groups. The primary criterion for evaluation was linear head penetration measurement using the Martell system, performed by an investigator blinded to the material of the femoral head. Creep and steady state wear values were calculated. At the minimum of 3-year follow-up, complete data were available for analysis in 38 hips at a median follow-up of 4.4 years (3.0 to 5.7), and in 42 hips at a median follow-up of 4.0 years (3.0 to 5.4) in the metal and delta ceramic groups, respectively. The mean creep, measured as the linear head penetration at one year follow-up, was 0.42 ± 1.0 mm in the metal group versus 0.30 ± 0.81 mm in the delta ceramic group (Mann and Whitney test, p = 0.56). The mean steady state penetration rate from one year onwards measured 0.17 ± 0.44 mm/year (median 0.072) in the metal group versus 0.074 ± 0.44 mm/year (median 0.072) in the delta ceramic group (Mann and Whitney test, p = 0.48). No case of delta ceramic femoral head fracture was recorded, and no hip had signs of periprosthetic osteolysis. This study demonstrated that up to 5-year follow-up, delta ceramic femoral head did not significantly influence creep neither wear of a contemporary annealed polyethylene. Longer follow-up is necessary to further evaluate the potential clinical benefits of delta ceramic

Femoral head fractures i.e. Pipkin fractures are uncommon injuries and there are very few large series in literature with reported outcomes. There remain many controversies regarding diagnosis and management. This study, which is the largest single surgeon experience, is an attempt to get answers to some of these controversies. This series is an analysis of 51 patients with femoral head fractures. There were 44 males and seven females. The right side was involved in 36 and left in 16 patients. According to Pipkin classification these were 13 Pipkin-I, 27 Pipkin-11, three Pipkin-111 and eight Pipkin-IV fractures. Thirty-two patients were managed by surgical intervention. The surgical approach was posterior in Pipkin-I and in seven cases of Pipkin-II fractures. Another eight Pipkin II cases were managed surgically by anterior Smith-Peterson approach while another eight fractures were accessed by posterior approach with flip osteotomy. The Pipkin III and IV cases were managed using surgical approaches that varied depending on the pattern of associated acetabular injury. The fractured fragment, if small, was excised and, if large, was re-fixed using small fragment partially threaded cancellous screw. Follow-up of two to eight years was available in 39 cases. Using Thompson and Epstein criteria, 26 patients were rated as having good results, eight fair and five poor results. Early osteoarthritic changes were seen in five patients, avascular necrosis of the femoral head in three patients and one patient had re-fracture in same hip during an epileptic fit with subsequent fixation problems. Of four patients with sciatic nerve injury, two had persisting motor deficit. There was one case of heterotopic ossification. Most Pipkin-I fractures can be managed by closed reduction, Pipkin-II fractures usually require ORIF. The best results have been obtained by a Smith-Peterson approach if the hip has already been reduced, but posterior approach with flip osteotomy offers the best exposure if the hip is still unreduced. Pipkin III patients need hip replacement if presentation is late, while ORIF gives acceptable outcome in Pipkin IV fractures

Recent issues related to trunionosis have created a new paradigm in choosing femoral head material in total hip arthroplasty. While many consider highly-crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) to be the gold standard currently in acetabular liner bearing surface, the debate remains whether metal or ceramic heads are best paired with XLPE. Wear characteristics are similar within an order of magnitude when comparing cobalt chrome femoral heads with ceramic when used in combination with XLPE. Therefore, discernable differences between the two femoral head materials with respect to outcomes would be the result of other biomechanical factors. Notably the fretting and corrosion of metal heads at the modular taper of femoral components is a serious concern and represents a significant deterrent when considering this material. The fretting corrosion that occurs with metal femoral heads has recently been well documented in multiple reports, and can be associated with adverse local tissue reactions necessitating revision hip arthroplasty. Frictional torque has recently been implicated in taper corrosion at modular junctions. In a recent simulated in vivo study, large diameter CoCr femoral heads were associated with increased frictional torque compared to smaller metal heads, supporting recent taper corrosion retrieval studies. In one recent series, a 1.1% incidence of head-neck taper corrosion with a metal head was reported and the authors recommended use of ceramic femoral heads. The notable downside of ceramic femoral heads is the implant cost and potential for fracture. However, the incidence of femoral head fracture with the newer mixed delta ceramic heads is exceptionally low and infrequent (rate 1.7 per 100,000). Furthermore, the incidence of taper corrosion is negligible with ceramic heads, making it the bearing couple of choice among many surgeons in combination with XLPE

Aims

Acetabular fractures in older adults lead to a high risk of mortality and morbidity. However, only limited data have been published documenting functional outcomes in such patients. The aims of this study were to describe outcomes in patients aged 60 years and older with operatively managed acetabular fractures, and to establish predictors of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

A moderator and panel of five experts led an interactive session in discussing five challenging and interesting patient case presentations involving surgery of the hip. The hip pathologies reviewed included failed open reduction internal fixation of subcapital femoral neck fracture, bilateral hip disease, evaluation of pain after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty, avascular necrosis, aseptic loosening secondary to osteolysis and polyethylene wear, and management of ceramic femoral head fracture.

Purpose: Fracture-posterior dislocation of the femoral head is an exceptional hip injury. Emergency reduction is required. Relocation into the acetabular cavity of the displaced femoral head may not be feasible. Irreducibility, instability, and more rarely accidental fracture of the femoral neck may also occur. We encountered this latter complication in four patients and report here its frequency and mechanism and propose preventive therapeutic measures. Material and methods: Seventy dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the hip were treated in our unit from March 1997 to February 2003. Among these cases, fourteen hip dislocations were complicated by femoral head fractures. Fracture of the femoral neck occurred during reduction in four. All four cases occurred in men, mean age 49.7 years, who were traffic accident victims (drivers or passengers). There were two Pipkin IV fracture-dislocations and two Pipkin II. The first reduction, achieved under general anaesthesia in an emergency setting, was performed by an orthopaedic surgeon in one patient and a general surgeon in three patients. Arthroplasty was used to treat the femoral neck fracture in three patients and pinning in one. We reviewed retrospectively the clinical and imaging data before and after reduction. Results: Sub-capital fracture situated 4.0 cm (mean, range 3.5–4.5 cm) from the lesser trochanter occurred in all four cases. The head remained attached above and posteriorly to the acetabulum and was rotated less than 90°. The fragment remaining in the acetabulum was displaced in two cases. In one patient, the fracture-dislocation of the head was associated with a fracture of the posterior rim of the acetabulum. Discussion: Neck fracture during reduction of traumatic hip dislocation is a serious complication. Prevention of this iatrogenic event requires a slow, progressive reduction limiting the trauma to a minimum; first intention open surgery may be required in selected cases

Young patients have been reported to have a higher risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty than older cohorts. This was attributed to the higher activity level which led to increased wear, osteolysis, and component fracture. We prospectively assessed the clinical results, wear and osteolysis, the incidence of squeaking, and the survivorship of ceramic on ceramic THA in patients younger than 50 years (mean age of 42 [18–50] years). The series included 425 THAs in 370 patients with 368 hips followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean 7.1 years, range 2–14 years). All patients received uncemented acetabular components with flush-mounted acetabular liners using an 18 degree taper. No osteolysis was observed in any uncemented construct. There was osteolysis around one loose cemented femoral component. The survivorship for reoperation for implant revision was 96.7%. There were only two acetabular liner fractures (0.47%) and one femoral head fracture (0.24%). Two of the three fractures involved a fall from a significant height. There were no hip dislocations. Five patients (1.17%) noted rare or occasional squeaking. None had reproducible squeaking. In summary, the current study shows that ceramic-on-ceramic THAs in the young patient population are extremely reliable with a very low revision rate and an absence of wear-induced osteolysis. In addition, it shows that both bearing fracture in this young patient population typically occurs with polytrauma and squeaking issues that have been raised relative to ceramic bearings occur very rarely with the flush-mounted ceramic liner design used in this study

This study shows the radiographic results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Revelation stem ® (Djo surgical USA) for hip joint disease. We removed cases which we couldn't follow up, the remaining of the patients who had undergone a primary THA July 2007 to December 2009 in our institution using Revelation hip stem® and 58 cases-65 hips (14 men and 44 women) were possible for progress observation on this study, and radiographic evaluation was done at the time of the last observation. The preoperative diagnosis of the hip included osteoarthritis (OA) in 40 patients, idiopatic, necrosis of the hip in 13 patients, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 4 patients, and femoral head fracture in 1 patient. Three patients had undergone femoral head replacement (FHA) and 55 patients had undergone THA. At the time of the last evaluation, spot welds were detected in 63 hips (97%) in zone1 and 7. Demarcation lines, which indicates movement of the stem, were detected in zone3,4,5, but not in the proximal of the stem. Stress shielding were observed in 32 joints, according to Engh's classification, first degree were 27 joints and second degree were 5 joints. Cortical hypertrophy were detected in 13 joints. The revelation stem features a lateral overhang structure (lateral flare) and the stem has an expanded proximal geometry allowing the device to rest on both medial and lateral cortices at the metaphyseal level. Above all the stem has anterior overhand structure (trapezoidal structure). The medullary cavity occupation rate is made to increase by these structures. Above all, the stability of the stem is increased by a proximal portion by three point support. The distal stem is tapered and polished, which prevents the stress loading to a distal portion of the device. Stress shielding more than the third degree is not detected, and spots welds were detected in the proximal of the stem. These facts indicate that the concept of this stem, transmit loading to the femur bone, at the proximal portion of the stem, would be achieved