Introduction. The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main stabilizer of the patella and therefore mostly reconstructed in the surgical correction of patellofemoral dislocation. Various biomechanical and clinical studies have been conducted on MPFL reconstruction, while the patellofemoral contact pressure (PFCP) which is indicated as one of the predictors of retropatellar osteoarthritis was neglected. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate how different MPFL reconstruction approaches affect PFCP. Material & Methods. After radiographic examination and preparation six human cadaveric knee joints (52.1 ± 8.4yrs) were placed in a 6-DOF knee simulator. Three flexion-extension cycles (0–90°) were applied, while the extensor muscles (175N) and an axial joint load (200N) were simulated. PFCP was measured in knee flexion of 0°, 30° and 90° using a calibrated pressure measurement system (K-Scan, Tekscan Inc., USA). The following MPFL conditions were examined: native (P. nat. ), anatomical reconstruction (P. a. ), proximal and distal patellar single-bundle reconstruction (P. p. , P. d. ), proximal and ventral femoral reconstruction (F. p. , F. v. ). The cohesive gracillis graft of each knee was used for MPFL reconstruction. Further, the effect of three different graft pre-tensioning levels (2N, 10N, 20N) on the PFCP were compared. Nonparametric statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (IBM Inc., USA). Results. In 0° knee flexion median PFCP of the native state (P. nat. =0.46MPa) was significantly higher (p=0.04) compared to the ventral
Background and aim. Recent proposals have been introduced to modify stem design and/or
A large number of total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed each year, of which 60 % use cementless
The effects of the method of fixation and interface conditions on the biomechanics of the femoral component of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty were examined using a highly detailed three-dimensional computer model of the hip. Stresses and strains in the proximal femur were compared for the natural femur and for the femur resurfaced with the Birmingham hip resurfacing. A comparison of cemented