BACKGROUND. The most common salvage of a failed metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is to remove both the femoral and acetabular resurfacing components and perform a total hip replacement. The other choices are to perform an acetabular or femoral only revision. A one or two piece acetabular component or a polyethylene bipolar femoral component that matches the retained metal resurfacing acetabular component is used. The considerations in favor of performing a one component resurfacing revision are maintaining the natural femoral head size, limiting the surgical effort for the patient and surgeon, and bone conservation. There are often favorable cost considerations with single component revision surgery. The reasons for femoral component revision are femoral neck fracture, femoral component loosening and an adverse reaction to metal wear debris. Performing a femoral component only revision requires a well fixed and well oriented acetabular component. Acetabular revision is most often performed for an adverse reaction to metal wear debris or loosening. METHODS. 81 acetabular revisions and 46 femoral revisions were evaluated 4 to 14 years after surgery. 83% of patients had their initial surgery at outside institutions. The mean age was 46 and 65% of patients were women. A two piece titanium backed polyethylene component was used in 44 patients and a one or two piece metal component was used in 37. A dual mobility femoral prosthesis mated to a retained metal acetabular component was used for the femoral revisions and no conversions to a metal-on-metal total hip replacement were performed. We selected polyethylene acetabular components for patients with adverse reactions to metal wear debris if their femoral component was less than 48 mm or if there was no matching metal acetabular component available for their femoral component. We used dual mobility components for femoral loosening, femoral neck fractures and adverse reactions to metal wear debris in patients with well-fixed and well oriented metal acetabular components. Dual mobility components were also used if there are any concerns about the femoral component or in some older patients. We performed one component revisions rather than conversion to total hip replacement on 88% of patients presenting with failed resurfacing prostheses. RESULTS. There were no failures with polyethylene acetabular components. There were two failures due to ongoing adverse metal reactions in patients receiving metal revision acetabular components. There was one failure with a dual mobility prosthesis due to accelerated polyethylene wear from undetected edge loading on a retained worn metal acetabular component. There were two infections and one patient with continued pain. There were no dislocations. The average Harris Hip Score was 94. The UCLA activity score was 6 or greater for all but 4 patients. There were 6 revisions to total hip replacement. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 94%. 95% of patients rated their outcome as excellent or good. CONCLUSIONS. Failed metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prostheses can be successfully revised without conversion to total hip replacement in most instances. A detailed knowledge of matching prostheses is necessary. Polyethylene prostheses for the acetabular or femoral reconstruction are often needed

Cement-in-cement femoral component revision is a useful and commonly practised technique. Onerous and hazardous re-shaping of the original cement mantle is required if the new stem does not seat easily. Furthermore, without removing the entirety of the original cement mantle, the freedom to alter anteversion or leg length is difficult to predict preoperatively. We present data from in vitro experiments testing the compatibility of the top cemented stems according to UK registry figures (NJR 2013). This data augments preoperative planning by indicating which revision stems require minimal or no cement reshaping when being inserted into another stem's mantle. We also present the maximum shortening and anteversion that can be achieved without reshaping the original cement mantle

Structural bulk autografts restore the severe bone loss at primary hip arthroplasty in dysplastic hips and have shown to have good long term outcomes. There are only a few reports of revision arthroplasty for these sockets that fail eventually. We report on a series of such primary hips which underwent cemented revision of the socket for aseptic loosening and their outcomes. A retrospective review was performed from our database to identify fifteen acetabular revisions after previous bulk autograft. The mean age at revision was 53.9 years (range 31–72.1). The mean duration between the primary and revision arthroplasty was 12.4 years (range 6.6 – 20.3). All procedures were done using trochanteric osteotomy and three hips also needed the femoral component revision. All fifteen hips needed re-bone grafting at the revision surgery to restore the new socket to the level of the true acetabulum. Of these ten hips had morsellised impaction allograft, and the remaining five also needing a structural bulk allograft. Two sockets underwent re-revision at mean 7.5 years for aseptic loosening. One patient had a dislocation that was reduced closed. At a mean follow up of 5.7 years, one socket showed superior migration, but was stable and did not need further intervention. Two other sockets also showed radiological evidence of loosening, and are being closely monitored. The medium term results of cemented acetabular revision in this younger age group are satisfactory, with repeat bone grafting being required to restore the true acetabular position. Though the primary arthroplasty with bulk bone graft recreates the acetabular bone stock, significant bone loss due to the mechanical loosening of the socket needs to be anticipated in revision surgery

Introduction. During primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), surgeons occasionally encounter compromised bone and fixation cannot be achieved using a primary femoral component. Revision knee replacement components incorporate additional features to improve fixation, such as modular connection to sleeves or stems, and feature additional varus-valgus constraint in the post-cam mechanism to compensate for soft tissue laxity. The revision femoral component can be used in place of the primary femur to address fixation challenges; however, it is unclear if additional features of the revision femoral components adversely affect knee kinematics when compared to primary TKA components. The objective of this study was to compare weight-bearing tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics between primary and revision femoral component with the primary tibial insert for a single knee replacement system. The hypothesis of the study was that kinematics for revision femoral components will be similar to kinematics of the primary femoral components. Methods. Eight cadaveric knees (age: 59±10 years, BMI 23.3±3.5) were implanted with a primary TKA system (ATTUNE™ Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Replacement System). Each knee was mounted and aligned in the Kansas Knee Simulator (Fig. 1) [1]. A deep knee bend was performed which flexed the knee from full extension to 110° flexion, while the medial-lateral translation, internal-external, and varus-valgus rotations at the ankle were unconstrained. The femoral component was then replaced with a revision femoral component of the same TKA system, articulating on the same primary insert component, and the deep knee bend was repeated. The translations of the lowest points (LP) of the medial and lateral femoral condyles along the superior-inferior axis of the tibia were calculated. In addition, tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics were calculated for each cycle based on the Grood-Suntay coordinate system [2] [1]. The change in LP and patellofemoral kinematics from the primary to revision femurs were calculated. Student t-tests were performed at 5° increments of knee flexion to identify significant differences between the two implant types. Results. No significant differences were observed between primary and revision femur for both LP and patellofemoral kinematics (Fig 2,3). The revision femoral anterior-posterior lowest point translations were similar to that of the primary femur. Deviations in patellofemoral spin, tilt, and flexion were less than one degree throughout the range of flexion. Patellofemoral translations were less than .5 mm during mid-flexion and greatest deviations were observed during early flexion. Less than .5° deviation was observed in tibiofemoral VV and IE rotations. Discussion. Typical knee revision systems have compromised knee mechanics to improve femoral fixation, yielding poorer functional outcomes and high rates of reoperation [3, 4]. The primary and revision femoral components in this knee system have identical condylar articular geometry which explains the similarity in patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics. Small difference in tibiofemoral kinematics could be a result of implant fixations using bone cement which slightly alters implant alignments between primary and revision surgeries. The revision femur resulted in similar kinematics and can be used during primary TKA when a stem is need for additional implant fixation without affecting the knee contact mechanics. For figures, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Recurrent dislocation after hip arthroplasty is a difficult problem. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the results with the use of a constrained cup for treatment for instability after hip arthroplasty. Materials/Method. A prospective database of 30 patients who underwent revision hip surgery for dislocation of hip arthroplasty was kept with the surgeries taking place between Nov 2005 to Feb 2010. Results. The mean age of the cohort was 76.5 years (53–93 years) with 17 female and 13 male patients. The gap between primary hip surgery and constrained cup ranged from 1 week to 21 years. The follow-up ranged from 8 months to 62 months with an average of 31 months. The primary surgery was a total hip arthroplasty in 27 patients and cemented hemiarthroplasty in 3 patients. Femoral component revision was done in 6 patients. At latest clinical follow-up 16 patients were mobilising unaided and 6 needed some support. Post-operative complications included capture cup pullout from the sidewall of the pelvis in the first week post op. Infection complicated 2 patients with one patient ending up having a girdlestone type excision and the other treated with antibiotic suppression. One patient had post op problems of wound dehiscence treated with VAC therapy. Conclusion. This is a useful technique for a difficult management problem

INTRODUCTION. The development of new bearing surfaces for total joint replacement is constantly evolving. Oxidized zirconium (Oxinium) has been introduced for use in both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aetiology of wear is multifactorial and includes adhesive, abrasive, third-body and fatigue wear mechanisms. Oxinium femoral components have demonstrated clear improvements in wear characteristics in-vitro. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the mid-term (minimum 5 year) clinical and radiographic results and survivorship of the Genesis II™ knee implant system using an Oxinium femoral component. METHODS. Between January 2001 and December 2008, 382 Genesis II Oxinium (Smith & Nephew) primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA) (313 patients) were implanted at our institution. A comparison with a cohort of 317 patients (382 knees) who received a Genesis II knee implant using a ‘conventional’ cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) femoral component was performed during the same time period. Prospective data was collected on all patients including demographics (age, BMI, diagnosis) as well as pre and postoperative clinical outcome scores (SF-12, WOMAC, and knee society clinical rating scores (KSCRS). Radiological analysis for evidence of osteolysis and loosening was performed in all patients. Comparisons were performed to determine differences between the Oxinium and Cobalt Chrome cohorts. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to show cumulative survival over time. Failure was defined as femoral component revision due to any cause. RESULTS. The mean age at time of surgery was 54.0 and 60.6 years respectively for the Oxinium and Co-Cr groups. The mean time from surgery was 8.13 +/− 2.03 years and 8.59 +/− 2.01 years for the Oxinium and Co-Cr groups respectively. Both groups demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in clinical outcome measures between pre, and post operative SF-12, WOMAC, and KSCRS scoring systems with no difference between two groups. There were a total of 15 revisions (infection: 8, stiffness: 2, aseptic loosening of patella component: 2, Aseptic loosening of the tibial component: 1, instability: 1, and one malaligned Femoral Component) in the Oxinium group. In the CoCr group there were a total of 9 revisions (Infection:5, aseptic loosening:1, instability: 1, stiffness: 1 and one patient revised for unexplained pain). Radiographically, no loosening was noted in the Oxinium group and all implants appeared well fixed. There was one case of loosening seen in the cobalt chrome group. The overall survival was 99.7 for both Oxinium and CoCr femoral components. Our study demonstrated no significant differences in validated clinical outcome scores and radiographic outcomes when comparing the Oxinium and Co-Cr femoral components. CONCLUSION. Despite the large numbers in our study, there were no statistically significant differences between Oxinium and CoCr femoral components at a minimum of five years follow up. While no clear benefits have been demonstrated, the use of an Oxinium femoral component demonstrated no adverse events at mid-term follow-up. Conventional Co-Cr femoral components remain the gold standard while long-term follow-up data is required to demonstrate the potential benefits of Oxinium

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has proven clinical success with reported longterm survivorship of 92% in the elderly population. Concerns regarding increased loosening rates and potential need for multiple revision surgeries in patients younger than 60 years have traditionally discouraged TKA in younger patients. The purpose of this study was to review the longterm clinical and radiographic results of patients under the age of 45 yrs who underwent a total knee replacement. Materials and Methods. A retrospective review of our institutional database was performed between January 1996 and December 2004 The criteria for inclusion in the study were as follows: age 45 years or younger at index arthroplasty, cemented condylar prosthesis, and a minimum follow-up of 9 years. A total of 39 consecutive primary cemented condylar knee arthroplasties in patients with end stage arthritis were performed in 36 patients who were 45 years or younger. The median length of followup was 13.6 years. There were 18 men and 21 women. The mean age was 40.6 years (range, 28–44). There were 23 right, 16 left, and 3 bilateral procedures. The mean body mass index was 31.2 kg/m2. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed before surgery and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year and every 2 years subsequently. Knee scores were calculated using the Knee Society Clinical Rating Scores (KSCRS), SF-12 and WOMAC scores to assess pre, and post-operative function. Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral views were assessed for femoral and tibial component position, alignment, and presence or progression of radiolucent lines at the bone-cement and prosthesis-cement interfaces. Statistical analysis was performed using the 2-sample test or Wilcoxon rank sum test for comparison of continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis of implant survival was performed with failure defined as femoral component revision due to any cause. Results. There was a statistically significant improvement in clinical outcome measures between pre and post-operative SF-12, WOMAC, and KSCRS validated scoring systems. 41% of patients had previous surgery prior to the TKA with 87% of patients receiving a cruciate sacrificing TKA and 64% of patients receiving a patellar resurfacing. There were 4 revisions in total, 2 patients were revised for pain, 1 for instability and 1 for infection treated with a single stage revision, the average time to revision was 3 years. There were no cases of aseptic loosening with an overall survival of 89.8% at an average follow-up of 13.6 yrs. The Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rate to revision was estimated to be % at 10 years and % at 15 years Radiographic assessment did not reveal any evidence of component migration, malalignment or radiolucencies at final follow up. There was no evidence of progressive radiolucencies noted on zonal analysis around both tibial and femoral components on serial radiographs in any patient. Conclusion. Excellent clinical outcomes are reported for patients 45 years of age or less who have undergone TKA. For the young patient who is not a candidate for other joint conserving or preserving procedures, Total Knee Replacements provide a successful longterm outcome

Patients with skeletal dysplasia are prone to developing advanced degenerative knee disease requiring total knee replacement (TKR) at a younger age than the general population. TKR in this unique group of patients is a technically demanding procedure due to the bone deformity, flexion contracture, generalised hypotonia and ligamentous laxity. We set out to retrospectively review the outcome of 11 TKR's performed in eight patients with skeletal dysplasia at our institution using the SMILES custom-made rotating-hinge total knee system. There were 3 males and 5 females with mean age 57 years (range, 41–79 years), mean height 138 cm (range, 122–155 cm) and mean weight 56 kg (range, 40–102 kg). Preoperative diagnoses included achondroplasia, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, pseudoachondroplasia, multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, morquio syndrome, diastrophic dysplasia and Larson's Syndrome. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean of 7 years (range, 3–11.5 years). Knee pain and function improved in all 11 joints. Mean Knee Society clinical and function scores improved from 24 (range, 14–36) and 20 points (range, 5–40) preoperatively to 68 (range, 28–80) and 50 points (range, 22–74) respectively at final follow-up. Four complications were recorded (36%), including a patellar fracture following a fall, a tibial periprosthetic fracture, persistent anterior knee pain and a femoral component revision for aseptic loosening. Our results suggest that custom rotating-hinge TKR in patients with skeletal dysplasia is effective at relieving pain, optimising movement and improving function. It compensates for bony deformity and ligament deficiency and reduces the need for corrective osteotomy. Patellofemoral joint complications are frequent and functional outcome is worse than primary TKR in the general population. Submission endorsed by Mr Peter Calder, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon and Society member

Background. Revision surgery for failed metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hip resurfacing (HR) has been a challenge. Previous studies have reported high failure and complication rates, including dislocation, infection, aseptic loosening and lower patient satisfaction. Options for revision depend on the integrity and stability of the femoral and acetabular components. When both components fail, full revision is required; however, when the acetabular component remains well fixed and oriented, only the isolated femoral component revision can be performed. Dual mobility components can be utilized to match the size to the inner diameter of the metal cup. With the dual mobility implant, the morbidity and complications associated with cup revision are avoided while maintaining a natural femoral head size and potentially increasing range of motion and stability postoperatively compared to standard THA. Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- to mid-term results of revision THA after failed metal-on-metal THA or HR using the dual mobility device. Study Design. Retrospective case series with prospective follow-up. Methods. A cohort of consecutive patients who underwent revision THA for failed MOM THA or HR utilizing a dual mobility device with a minimum follow-up of a year was identified. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for surgical indications, comorbidities, concomitant procedures, cup size, inner head size, outer head size, and perioperative complications, including infection, dislocation, mechanical failure and reoperation. Visual analogue pain scale (VAS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and SF-12 questionnaires were collected prospectively to assess functional outcomes after THA revision with a dual mobility component. Results. Fifteen consecutive patients (16 hips) underwent revision surgery utilizing a dual mobility component. Six hips were indicated for failed metal-on-metal THA and 10 for failed HR. The mean follow-up was 20 months (range, 12–29 months) and the mean VAS scores decreased from 8.9 preoperatively to 3.8 postoperatively (p < 0.01). The mean mHHS score increased from 26.9 preoperatively to 57.8 postoperatively (p < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in the mean SF-12 scores was also noted (p < 0.05). Complications consisted of two patients with residual chronic pain. No dislocations, fractures, or infections were observed. Conclusion. Single component revision THA for failed MOM THA or HR utilizing a dual mobility device is an effective and relatively simple procedure for a complex problem

Introduction. Revision hip arthroplasty with massive proximal femoral bone loss remains challenging. Whilst several surgical techniques have been described, few have reported long term supporting data. A proximal femoral allograft (PFA) may be used to reconstitute bone stock in the multiply revised femur with segmental bone loss of greater than 8 cm. This study reports the outcome of largest case series of PFA used in revision hip arthroplasty. Methods. Data was prospectively collected from a consecutive series of 69 revision hip cases incorporating PFA and retrospective analyzed. Allografts of greater than 8 cm in length (average 14cm) implanted to replace deficient bone stock during revision hip surgery between 1984 and 2000 were included. The average age at surgery was 56 years (range 32–84) with a minimum follow up of 10 years and a mean of 15.8 years (range). Results. From the original cohort four patients had died with the original PFA, 21 (30.4%) patients required further surgery with 14 (20.3%) of these needing revisions of the femoral component. The mean time to femoral revision was 9.5 years and Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis demonstrates a 79.9% PFA survivorship at 20 years. Discussion. Proximal femoral allograft affords long lasting reconstruction of the femoral component in revision hip surgery. We advocate PFA as an attractive option in the reconstruction of the hip in the presence of significant segmental bone loss in younger patients

Introduction. The ideal method of fixation for femoral components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is unknown. While good results have been reported for cemented and uncemented components, there is relatively little published prospective data with twenty years or more of follow up. Results of the Furlong femoral component have been presented at an average of 17 years follow up. We have extended this follow up period to an average of 22.5 years with a minimum of 22 years and a maximum of 25 years. Methods. This study included all patients treated using the Furlong femoral component between 1986 and 1991. Patients were reviewed preoperatively and then at 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks post operatively and annually thereafter. They were assessed clinically and radiographically and the Merle d'Aubigne Postel hip score was calculated at each visit. A Visual Analog Score (VAS) was also recorded to assess patient satisfaction with their procedure. A Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed. Results. Sixty patients (72 hips) were included (15 males, 45 females). Bilateral procedures were performed in 12 patients. Mean age was 82.9 years (70 to 100 years). Mean follow-up was 22.5 years (20 to 25). The Merle d'Aubigne Postel hip score at final follow up was 5.5 (pain), 3.8 (mobility) and 3.3 (function) for function. Seven patients required revision surgery. Survival of the femoral component with revision for any reason as the end point was 90.3%. There were no planned revisions up to the time of final follow up. Conclusion. The Furlong prosthesis results in improvement of pain in the long term. Survival of this component is comparable to the best results for primary THA with any means of fixation

Aim. The aim of this study was to determine the medium term survivorship and function of the Exeter Universal Hip Replacement when used in younger patients, a group that is deemed to place high demands on their arthroplasties. Since 1988 The Exeter Hip Research Unit has prospectively gathered data on all patients who have had total hip replacements at the Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Hospital. There were 130 Exeter Universal total hip replacements (THR) in 107 patients who were 50 years or younger at the time of surgery and whose surgery was performed at least 10 years before. Mean age at surgery was 42 years (range 17-50 years.) Six patients who had 7 THRs had died, leaving 123 THRs for review. Patients were reviewed at an average of 12.5 years (range 10-17 years). No patient was lost to follow-up. Results. At review, 12 hips had been revised. Of these, 9 were for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component and one cup was revised for focal lysis and pain. One hip was revised for recurrent dislocation. One femoral component required revision in 1 case of infection. Radiographs showed that a further 11 (10%) of the remaining acetabular prostheses were loose but that no femoral components were loose. Survivorship of stem and cup from all causes was 94%, at an average of 12.5 years. Survivorship of stem only from all causes was 99% and from aseptic loosening was 100%. Conclusion. The Exeter Universal Stem is shown to perform extremely well in the younger patient. No femoral component became loose and only 9 acetabular components were revised for aseptic loosening

Revision of the femoral component during revision hip arthroplasty may pose significant technical challenges, most notably femoral fracture and bone perforation. The in-cementing technique allows use of the original bone-cement interface which has been proven to be biomechanically stronger than recementing after complete removal of the original cement mantle. This study reviews a series of 54 consecutive revision hip arthroplasty procedures carried out by the senior author using the in-cementing technique from November 1999 to March 2003. Patients were followed up clinically and radiologically with serial outpatient reviews and their functional outcome was assessed using the Harris hip scoring system, the Oxford hip scoring system and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity profile. Their physical and mental well-being was also assessed using the SF-36 self-questionnaire. Fifty-four procedures were performed on 51 patients. There were 31 males and 20 females. The average age was 70.3+/-8.1 years (range: 45-83 years). The average time to revision from the original procedure was 132.8+/-59.0 months (range: 26-286 months). The average length of follow-up was 29.2+/-13.4 months (range: 6-51 months) post revision arthroplasty. Two patients suffered dislocations, one of which was recurrent and was revised with a Girdlestone's procedure. No patient displayed any evidence of radiographical loosening. The average Harris hip score of the study group was 85.2+/-11.6 (range: 51.9-98.5). The average Oxford hip score recorded was 19.6+/-7.7 (range: 12-41) and the average UCLA activity profile score was 5.9+/-1.6 (range: 3-8). The SF-36 questionnaire had an average value of 78.0+/-18.3 (range: 31.6-100). In conclusion, the results of this study show excellent clinical and radiological results of the in-cementing technique with high patient satisfaction in terms of functional outcome. This technique merits consideration where possible in revision hip arthroplasty

Hypothesis. The Synergy femoral component was introduced in 1996 as a second generation titanium proximally porous-coated tapered stem with dual offsets to help better restore femoral offset at THR. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the long-term (minimum 10 year) clinical and radiographic results and survivorship of this femoral component at our institution. Methods & Analysis. From 1996 to 1999, 256 cementless Synergy femoral components were inserted and followed prospectively in 254 patients requiring THR. 185 were standard offset stems (72.3%) while 71 stems (27.7%) were high offset. The average follow-up was 11.2 years (range 10.0 to 12.9 years). Average age at index THR was 58.9 year. Two hundred and eight stems had standard porous coating while 48 had additional HA coating. Fifty-two cases were either lost to follow-up or had died prior to 10 years follow-up. Patients were followed prospectively using validated clinical outcome scores and radiographs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Results. All health-related outcomes were significantly improved from pre-operative with a mean Harris Hip score and WOMAC at last follow-up of 91.6 and 81.8, respectively. From the initial 256 femoral stems inserted, only 5 stems have been revised. Two stems have been revised for infection. Only one stem has been revised due to subsidence at nine months, likely as a result of a calcar fracture at the index THR. Two stems were revised for peri-prosthetic fracture as a result of patient falls. Radiographic review of remaining stems in situ identified no cases of loosening. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis of the femoral component, with revision for aseptic loosening, was 99.2% at 12 years. Conclusion. The Synergy femoral component, a second generation titanium proximally porous-coated tapered stem design with dual offsets, has demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic results and long-term survivorship (99% at 10 years) at our institution