Aims. Occult (clinical) injuries represent 15% of all scaphoid fractures, posing significant challenges to the clinician. MRI has been suggested as the gold standard for diagnosis, but remains expensive, time-consuming, and is in high demand. Conventional management with immobilization and serial radiography typically results in multiple follow-up attendances to clinic, radiation exposure, and delays return to work. Suboptimal management can result in significant disability and, frequently, litigation. Methods. We present a service evaluation report following the introduction of a quality-improvement themed, streamlined, clinical scaphoid pathway. Patients are offered a removable wrist splint with verbal and written instructions to remove it two weeks following injury, for self-assessment. The persistence of pain is the patient’s guide to ‘opt-in’ and to self-refer for a follow-up appointment with a senior emergency physician. On confirmation of ongoing signs of clinical scaphoid injury, an urgent outpatient ‘fast’-wrist protocol MRI scan is ordered, with instructions to maintain wrist immobilization. Patients with positive scan results are referred for specialist orthopaedic assessment via a virtual fracture clinic. Results. From February 2018 to January 2019, there were 442 patients diagnosed as clinical scaphoid fractures. 122 patients (28%) self-referred back to the emergency department at two weeks. Following clinical review, 53 patients were discharged; MRI was booked for 69 patients (16%). Overall, six patients (< 2% of total; 10% of those scanned) had positive scans for a scaphoid fracture. There were no known missed fractures, long-term non-unions or malunions resulting from this pathway. Costs were saved by avoiding face-to-face clinical review and MRI scanning. Conclusion. A patient-focused opt-in approach is safe and effective to managing the suspected occult (clinical) scaphoid fracture. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(2):117–122

The aim of this study was to produce estimates of specificity and predictive value of presenting symptoms and signs of paediatric bone cancer, a rare and frequently misdiagnosed condition, to aid clinical decision-making in primary care. A systematic literature review plus questionnaire to primary care physicians were carried out to determine frequency of bone cancer symptoms in both cancer and the benign conditions as which cancer is misdiagnosed. Literature sources – Ovid MEDLINE (1950-May 2008), EMBASE (1980-May 2008) and AMED (Allied and Alternative Medicine) (1985-May 2008). Literature review methods – We included systematic reviews, cohort studies or case series (where n ≥ 10), reporting frequency of symptoms and signs at initial presentation, as originally recorded in case notes or observed by the authors, in subjects aged 0–18 years. Disease incidence data was taken from retrospective and prospective studies from 1980 onwards which recorded incidence over a defined time period, in a large pre-defined population within Europe, North America or Australia. Questionnaire respondents – 32 general practitioners and paediatric Accident & Emergency physicians throughout Scotland and England. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for bone cancer symptoms range from 0.003 to 0.034% (percentage of children presenting with symptom who have cancer). Specificity (percentage of children without cancer who do not have the symptom) varies considerably between symptoms and ranges from 24% (tenderness) to 95% (weight loss). Specificity can be improved by looking for combinations of symptoms. Weight loss and fever are the features with both highest specificity and highest PPV. Bone cancer symptoms, even those with high specificity for cancer, have low positive predictive value. We suggest that diagnosis based on initial presentation to primary care is intrinsically difficult and that delay in diagnosis is not unreasonable if it is to make use of time as a diagnostic aid

There have been many advances in the resuscitation and early management of patients with severe injuries during the last decade. These have come about as a result of the reorganisation of civilian trauma services in countries such as Germany, Australia and the United States, where the development of trauma systems has allowed a concentration of expertise and research. The continuing conflicts in the Middle East have also generated a significant increase in expertise in the management of severe injuries, and soldiers now survive injuries that would have been fatal in previous wars. This military experience is being translated into civilian practice.

The aim of this paper is to give orthopaedic surgeons a practical, evidence-based guide to the current management of patients with severe, multiple injuries. It must be emphasised that this depends upon the expertise, experience and facilities available within the local health-care system, and that the proposed guidelines will inevitably have to be adapted to suit the local resources.