Hamstring grafts have been associated with reduced strength, donor site pain and muscle strains following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR). Traditional graft fixation methods required both semitendinosus and gracilis tendons to achieve a graft of sufficient length and diameter, but newer techniques allow for shorter, broad single tendon grafts. This study seeks to compare the outcomes between Single Tendon (ST) and Dual Tendon (DT) ACLR, given there is no prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the literature comparing outcomes between these options. In this ongoing RCT: (ANZ Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN126200000927921) patients were recruited and randomised into either ST or DT groups. All anaesthetic and surgical techniques were uniform aside from graft technique and tibial fixation. 13 patients were excluded at surgery as their ST graft did not achieve a minimum 8mm diameter. 70 patients (34 ST, 36DT) have been assessed at 6 months, using PROMS including IKDC2000, Lysholm and Modified Cincinnati Knee, visual analog scale for pain frequency (VAS-F) and severity (VAS-S), dedicated donor site morbidity score, KT-1000 assessment, and isokinetic strength. Graft diameters were significantly lesser in the ST group compared to the DT group (8.44mm/9.11mm mean difference [MD],-0.67mm; P<0.001). There was a significant and moderate effect in lower donor site morbidity in the ST group compared to the DT group (effect size [ES], 0.649; P = .01). No differences between groups were observed for knee laxity in the ACLR limb (P=0.362) or any of the patient-reported outcome measures (P>0.05). Between-group differences were observed for hamstrings strength LSI favouring the ST group, though these were small-to-moderate and non-significant (ES, 0.351; P = .147). ST (versus DT) harvest results in significantly less donor site morbidity and this is the first prospective RCT to determine this. There were no differences between ST and DT hamstring ACLR were observed in PROMs, knee laxity and hamstring strength. Younger female patients tend to have inadequate single tendon size to produce a graft of sufficient diameter, and alternative techniques should be considered. Further endpoints include radiological analysis, longer term donor site morbidity, revision rates and return to sport and will continue to be presented in the future

Introduction. Significant donor site morbidity (3–61%) has been associated with tri-cortical iliac crest bone graft harvesting and reconstruction of the defect has been shown to reduce it. Chitra-HABG (Chitra-Hydroxyapatite-Bio-active glass ceramic composite) is an indigenously developed ceramic which has been evaluated as a bone graft substitute. Aim. To prospectively validate the hypothesis that iliac crest donor site morbidity is a structural issue and reconstructing the crest reduces its incidence. The study also evaluates the efficacy of Chitra - HABG as a material for reconstructing the crest. Methods. 26 cases of iliac crest reconstruction with Chitra-HABG blocks were prospectively evaluated. Outcome measures were donor site morbidity as assessed clinically and radiological assessment for ceramic incorporation, dissolution, fragmentation and migration. Results. At the end of one year from surgery, 25 patients (96.15%) had no donor site pain. Radiological evaluation showed that ceramic incorporation was complete in 21 cases, partial in three and absent in two. Partial dissolution of ceramic was noticed in three patients and migration in one. Conclusion. The present study validates our hypothesis that the donor site morbidity following tri-cortical iliac crest graft harvesting is probably a structural issue and it can be reduced by reconstruction of the defect. It also highlights the fact that the Chitra-HABG block is an excellent material for reconstruction of the iliac crest defect, as it gets incorporated into the surrounding bone without adverse effects. Significance. Study describes a simple and effective method to decrease iliac crest donor site morbidity. Level of evidence: IV. Study Design. Prospective study. Summary. Prospectively evaluate the efficacy of Chitra-HABG blocks for iliac crest reconstruction

Introduction. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries represent a significant burden of disease to the orthopaedic surgeon and often necessitate surgical reconstruction in the presence of instability. The hamstring graft has traditionally been used to reconstruct the ACL but the quadriceps tendon (QT) graft has gained popularity due to its relatively low donor site morbidity. Methods. This is a single centre comparative retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who had an ACL reconstruction (either with single tendon quadrupled hamstring graft or soft tissue quadriceps tendon graft). All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using the All-inside technique. For this study, there were 20 patients in each group. All patients received the same post-operative rehabilitation protocol and were added to the National Ligament Registry to monitor their patient related outcome scores (PROM). Results. The average age of patients in the QT group was 29 years (16 males, 4 females) and in the hamstring group was 28 years (18 males, 2 females). The most common mechanism of injury in both groups was a contact twisting injury. There were no statistical differences between the two patient groups in regards to PROMS and need for further revision surgery as analysed on the National Ligament Registry. Conclusions. The all soft tissue QT graft seems to be equivocal to quadrupled hamstring graft in terms of patient function and recovery graft characteristics. Further research may be needed to elucidate the long-term results of the all soft tissue QT graft given its recent increase in use

Ankle sprains are common injuries. Most of them involve the lateral ligament complex. 20–40%% of these injuries will go onto develop symptomatic chronic lateral instability (CLI) and require surgical intervention. The gold standard surgical treatment remains the Brostom-Gould. There are however certain scenarios where this may be unsuitable, such as in hyperlaxity, poor native tissue or revision surgeries. In these situations, a reconstruction with some form of augmentation or grafting is necessary. The anterior half of peroneus longus (AHPL) has gained in popularity as an autograft due to its favourable tendon properties, ease of harvesting, and low reported morbidity. This technique has been adopted by the senior author in these situations. Our primary aim was to assess patient reported outcomes and satisfaction following this surgery. Our secondary objectives were to assess return to sports, donor site morbidity and to report any surgical complications. We performed a retrospective single surgeon study on all patients who underwent CLI reconstruction using the anterior half of peroneus longus between 2014 and 2021. Data was collected prospectively. The Karlsson foot and ankle scoring chart as well as a simple satisfaction table were used to assess outcomes. Minimum follow up was 1 year. 44 patients met the inclusion criteria. 23 women, 21 men. The average age was 37.0 (+−13.5). 24 were very satisfied with the surgery, 10 were satisfied, 6 were fair and 4 were dissatisfied. The average Karlsson score improved from 65/90 (34–77) to 85/90 (range 45–90). The average return to sport was 5 months. There was 1 non-surgical complication recorded. There was no repeat surgery for a complication, or recurrent instability and no donor-site morbidity was reported. The results of our study demonstrates that the CLIR using AHPL is a reliable, predictable and safe

Introduction:. Open bone graft harvesting continues to be recognized as the gold standard of obtaining autograft in patients needing bone graft. Conventional bone graft harvesting using the iliac crest is often cited as having significant donor site morbidity and complications. Intramedullary harvesting, using a reamer irrigation aspiration system (RIA) has recently become available. Method:. We performed a retrospective case series on 16 patients, where this system was used. A single pass reaming technique to harvest autograft from the femoral canal was performed. Fluoroscopy was used to size the canal and to confirm placement of a guide wire. Bone harvest volumes, complications encountered and donor site satisfaction post operatively was assessed. Patient satisfaction was determined via telephonic interviews at regular intervals with follow-up times up to 2 years. Results:. The study group consisted of 16 patients with an average age of 31 years. The mean post-operative follow up period was 18.8 months. The average amount of bone harvested was 39.6 cc. Although two technical complications were encountered intra-operatively, there were no systemic effects due to reaming. Most of the patients reported mild to severe pain immediately post operatively with an average pain score of 6.5 (1–10). Only seven patients reported minor pain at the donor site with the last interview bringing the average pain score down to 1.2. All pain scores reduced to zero after 21 months. Conclusion:. RIA was found to be a safe technique with reliable volumes of autograft obtained. Patients recovered quickly with no wound complications reported and minimal donor site morbidity at early follow-up. This new technique seems to be a viable option as an alternative to conventional bone graft harvesting

Objectives. A defect following resection of Giant Cell Tumour of the distal radius (GCT-DR) is reconstructed by either vascularised free fibular transfer (VFF) or non-vascularised structural iliac crest transfer (NIC). The purpose of this study was to compare these procedures. Methods. Twenty-seven patients at two centres were identified, 14 underwent VFF and 13 NIC. The two groups were comparable for age, sex, and tumour grade. Functional outcomes were assessed with TESS, MSTS, and DASH. In the VFF group, ankle joint morbidity was assessed with the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale. In the NIC group, iliac crest morbidity was assessed with a short questionnaire. Results. Two local recurrences occurred in the VFF group and one in the NIC group. Following the index surgery, three patients in the VFF group underwent surgery for cosmesis, hardware removal or tendon release, and one is scheduled for tendon release. In the NIC group two infections required debridement, one of which went on to free fibular transfer, but there were no re-operations for union or donor site morbidity. The surgical time was significantly shorter for NIC. Functional scores showed no differences between the groups on any of the parameters studied for the upper limb (Mann-Whitney test). The Anke OA scale and the iliac crest morbidity questionnaire revealed only a few mild problems with donor site morbidity in either group. Conclusion. Both VFF and NIC are effective surgical techniques that result in a well-functioning wrist arthrodesis. VFF should be considered when there is a significant skin defect, as it allows the inclusion of a vascularised skin paddle, or when the osseous defect is too long for NIC. We were unable to demonstrate any difference in functional scores between VFF and NIC. As the re-operation rate is less for NIC and surgical time is shorter, we recommend NIC whenever possible

Introduction. A significant burden of disease exists with respect to critical sized bone defects; outcomes are unpredictable and often poor. There is no absolute agreement on what constitutes a “critically-sized” bone defect however it is widely considered as one that would not heal spontaneously despite surgical stabilisation, thus requiring re-operation. The aetiology of such defects is varied. High-energy trauma with soft tissue loss and periosteal stripping, bone infection and tumour resection all require extensive debridement and the critical-sized defects generated require careful consideration and strategic management. Current management practice of these defects lacks consensus. Existing literature tells us that tibial defects 25mm or great have a poor natural history; however, there is no universally agreed management strategy and there remains a significant evidence gap. Drawing its origins from musculoskeletal oncology, the Capanna technique describes a hybrid mode of reconstruction. Mass allograft is combined with a vascularised fibula autograft, allowing the patient to benefit from the favourable characteristics of two popular reconstruction techniques. Allograft confers initial mechanical stability with autograft contributing osteogenic, inductive and conductive capacity to encourage union. Secondarily its inherent vascularity affords the construct the ability to withstand deleterious effects of stressors such as infection that may threaten union. The strengths of this hybrid construct we believe can be used within the context of critical-sized bone defects within tibial trauma to the same success as seen within tumour reconstruction. Methodology. Utilising the Capanna technique in trauma requires modification to the original procedure. In tumour surgery pre-operative cross-sectional imaging is a pre-requisite. This allows surgeons to assess margins, plan resections and order allograft to match the defect. In trauma this is not possible. We therefore propose a two-stage approach to address critical-sized tibial defects in open fractures. After initial debridement, external fixation and soft tissue management via a combined orthoplastics approach, CT imaging is performed to assess the defect geometry, with a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer placed at index procedure to maintain soft tissue tension, alignment and deliver local antibiotics. Once comfortable that no further debridement is required and the risk of infection is appropriate then 3D printing technology can be used to mill custom jigs. Appropriate tibial allograft is ordered based on CT measurements. A pedicled fibula graft is raised through a lateral approach. The peroneal vessels are mobilised to the tibioperoneal trunk and passed medially into the bone void. The cadaveric bone is prepared using the custom jig on the back table and posterolateral troughs made to allow insertion of the fibula, permitting some hypertrophic expansion. A separate medial incision allows attachment of the custom jig to host tibia allowing for reciprocal cuts to match the allograft. The fibula is implanted into the allograft, ensuring nil tension on the pedicle and, after docking the graft, the hybrid construct is secured with multi-planar locking plates to provide rotational stability. The medial window allows plate placement safely away from the vascular pedicle. Results. We present a 50-year-old healthy male with a Gustilo & Anderson 3B proximal tibial fracture, open posteromedially with associated shear fragment, treated using the Capanna technique. Presenting following a fall climbing additional injuries included a closed ipsilateral calcaneal and medial malleolar fracture, both treated operatively. Our patient underwent reconstruction of his tibia with the above staged technique. Two debridements were carried out due to a 48-hour delay in presentation due to remote geographical location of recovery. Debridements were carried out in accordance with BOAST guidelines; a spanning knee external fixator applied and a small area of skin loss on the proximal medial calf reconstructed with a split thickness skin graft. A revision cement spacer was inserted into the metaphyseal defect measuring 84mm. At definitive surgery the external fixator was removed and graft fixation was extended to include the intra-articular fragments. No intra-operative complications were encountered during surgeries. The patient returned to theatre on day 13 with a medial sided haematoma. 20ml of haemoserous fluid was evacuated, a DAIR procedure performed and antibiotic-loaded bioceramics applied locally. Samples grew Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic treatment was rationalised to Co-Trimoxazole 960mg BD and Rifampicin 450mg BD. The patient has completed a six-week course of Rifampicin and continues on suppressive Co-Trimoxazole monotherapy until planned metalwork removal. There is no evidence of ongoing active infection and radiological evidence of early union. The patient is independently walking four miles to the gym daily and we believe, thus far, despite accepted complications, we have demonstrated a relative early success. Conclusions. A variety of techniques exist for the management of critical-sized bone defects within the tibia. All of these come with a variety of drawbacks and limitations. Whilst acceptance of a limb length discrepancy is one option, intercalary defects of greater than 5 to 7cm typically require reconstruction. In patients in whom fine wire fixators and distraction osteogenesis are deemed inappropriate, or are unwilling to tolerate the frequent re-operations and potential donor site morbidity of the Masqualet technique, the Capanna technique offers a novel solution. Through using tibial allograft to address the size mismatch between vascularised fibula and tibia, the possible complication of fatigue fracture of an isolated fibula autograft is potentially avoidable in patients who have high functional demands. The Capanna technique has demonstrated satisfactory results within tumour reconstruction. Papers report that by combining the structural strength of allograft with the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of a vascularised autograft that limb salvage rates of greater than 80% and union rates of greater than 90% are achievable. If these results can indeed be replicated in the management of critical-sized bone defects in tibial trauma we potentially have a treatment strategy that can excel over the more widely practiced current techniques

Background of study. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstructions are often performed using gracilis autografts, this can be associated with donor site morbidity and complications. The use of synthetic material can circumvent a harvest operation and have previously been demonstrated to be effective in other types of reconstructive procedures and may be effective in MPFL reconstruction. We report our experience and clinical results with the use of FiberTape (FT) in MPFL reconstruction and compare it to the same surgical technique using standard autografts. Materials and Methods. Data were collected prospectively in 50 MPFL reconstructions. The first 27 underwent reconstruction using autograft; the following 23 patients were treated with FT. All patients were clinically and radiologically assessed and underwent pre- and post-operative scoring using the Kujala score, Bartlett score, Modified Tegner activity rating scale, SF 12 score and Lysholm score. Statistical significance was tested between groups using ANOVA with repeated measures. Results. There was no significant differences in the pre-operative scores between the FT and GT groups (p>0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement across all scoring modalities between pre- and post-operative periods 12, 24 and 48 months of follow-up (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in knee function scores between the GT and FT groups. Conclusion. The use of FT in MPFL reconstruction is safe and effective, it significantly improved patient's quality of life and related postoperative outcome measures. There were no significant differences in all knee scores compare to GT autografts. Tendon harvesting is unnecessary and FT is a feasible option for MPFL reconstruction

Background. In young patients with femoral neck non-union it is desirable to preserve the femoral head. The objective of this study was to assess the outcome results of revision internal fixation and nonvascular fibular bone grafting. Patients and Methods:. Ten patients with non united fracture neck femur were included in this prospective study. Fixation was done with two cancellous screws leaving behind a space between two screws for fibular strut graft. Assessment of union was done by both clinical and radiological criteria. Results:. union was achieved in 8 cases in an average time of 16 weeks (range 12–20 weeks). There was no infection, thromboembolic complications, donor site morbidity or implant failure in our series. Conclusion:. Nonvascularized fibular strut graft along with cancellous screws provides a biological and mechanically sound method of treatment. Fibula being cortical provides mechanical strength besides stimulating union and getting incorporated as biological graft

Allograft materials have been the mainstay in addressing bone deficiencies in knee and hip replacement and revision surgery for decades because of the associated donor site morbidity of autografts. Bone graft substitutes have been developed to address allograft issues including potential contamination, disease transmission, and availability. Although non-autogenous products have no osteogenic potential, they do have a variable degree of osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties. Unfortunately, there are limited reports regarding use of bone graft substitutes for use in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Bone graft substitutes have most frequently been used as an “extender”, in combination with morsellised allograft, to fill cavitary defects. Incorporation of this bone graft substitute and morsellised allograft combination appears to occur incompletely. Stable implant fixation appears to be a prerequisite for incorporation of bone graft substitutes, as these cannot be relied upon for structural support. Although bone graft substitutes appear to perform satisfactorily as “fillers” for contained cavitary bone defects, ultraporous metal augments have become the preferred method of providing structural support for some defects. In view of their substantial cost, high quality clinical, radiographic and retrieval data regarding performance of bone graft substitutes is needed

Bone is a dynamic organ with remarkable regenerative properties seen only otherwise in the liver. However, bone healing requires vascularity, stability, growth factors, a matrix for growth, and viable cells to obtain effective osteosynthesis. We rely on these principles not only to heal fractures, but also achieve healing of benign bone defects. Unfortunately we are regularly confronted with situations where the local environment and tissue is insufficient and we must rely on our “biologic tool box.” When the process of bone repair requires additional assistance, we often look to bone grafting to provide an osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and/or osteogenic environment to promote bone healing and repair. The primary workhorses of bone grafting include autogenous bone, cadaver allograft, and bone graft substitutes. Among the first types of bone graft used and still used in large quantities today include autogenous and cadaver allograft bone. Allografts are useful because it is present in multiple forms that conform to the desired situation. But autogenous bone graft is considered the gold standard because it possesses all the fundamental properties to heal bone. However, it has been associated with high rates of donor site morbidity and typically requires an inpatient hospitalization following the procedure only adding to the associated costs. The first bone graft substitute use was calcium sulfate in 1892, and over the past 122 years advancements have achieved improved material properties of calcium sulfate and helped usher in additional bioceramics for bone grafting. Today there are predominantly four types of bioceramics available, which include calcium sulfate, calcium phosphate, tricalcium phosphate, and coralline hydroxyapatite. They come in multiple forms ranging from pellets and solid blocks to injectable and moldable putty. In comparison to autogenous bone graft, the primary limitation of bioceramics are the lack of osteogenic and osteoinductive properties. Bioceramics work by creating an osteoconductive scaffold to promote osteosynthesis. The options of bone graft substitutes don't end with these four types of bioceramics. Composite bioceramics take advantage of the differing biomechanical properties of these four basis types of bioceramics to develop improved materials. To overcome the lack of osteoinductive and osteogenic properties growth factors or bone marrow aspirate can be added to the bioceramic. As a result, the list of combinations available in our “biologic tool box” continues to expand. More than 20 BMPs have been identified, but only BMP-2 and BMP-7 have FDA approval. As we look forward to areas of future research and need within orthobiologics, some will likely come in the near future while others are much further in the future. We will continue to strive for the ideal bone graft substitute, which will have similar osteoinductive properties as autograft. The ultimate bone graft substitute will likely involve stem cells because it will allow an alternative to autogenous bone with the same osteogenic potential

Statement of purpose. To demonstrate how contemplating reconstructive options among members of Orthoplastic team can prevent accidental damage during initial wound debridement in foot and ankle injuries. Complex defects of the foot and ankle often require input from plastic and orthopaedic surgeons. There are different reconstructive options but one excellent regional option for small defects is the Extensor Digitorum Brevis muscle (EDB) flap. The anatomy of the flap and surgical technique and utility are described and demonstrated through a case series. We present a series of 4 consecutive cases of the use of the pedicled EDB flap for soft tissue coverage of difficult defects around the foot and ankle. This regional pedicled flap can be proximally based to cover defects around the ankle or distally based for distal foot coverage. When possible, it facilitates a reconstruction with minimal donor site morbidity, shorter operating times, and fewer complications than alternative options. The flap would usually be performed by the plastic surgical member of the orthoplastic team, but an understanding of it by foot and ankle and reconstructive orthopaedic surgeons is relevant as it's vascular supply via the lateral tarsal artery can be easily damaged, preventing its use in the management of wound complications or trauma

Autologous bone grafting for bone defect reconstruction is associated with complications including donor site morbidity, infection risk, pain and surgical time. Therefore, bone graft substitutes provide an alternative for distinct indications and different characteristics with regard to their mechanical properties and resorption rates. In order to fill the loss of bone substance and to control the infection, we tried the efficacy of Cerament™G, a new absorbable composite of Calcium Sulphate and Hydroxyapatite with Gentamicin. We present 3 male patients aged between 45 and 68 years affected by post-traumatic severe septic non union of femur, tibia and foot. The first patient with femur fracture was involved in a car accident (mixed flora Acinetobacter Baumanii, MRSA and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing), the second patient with femur and foot fracture falled by height in a work accident (MRSA) and the third one had a chronic tibial osteomyelitis several years after a road accident (Pseudomonas Aeruginosa). All 3 patients had undergone previous surgery. The first patient had several operations including multiple bone resection and debridement with external fixator, occlusion of superficial femoral artery with arterial bypass and finally debridement with implantation of Cerament™ G with external fixator and long term antibiotic therapy. The other 2 patients were subjected to resection of tissue septic with debridement, implantation of Cerament™ G and soft tissue closure and systemic antibiotics. Clinical and radiographic outcome were assessed at final follow-up (mean 8 months; range 8–18). The follow-up was 8–18 months with examining clinical, radiographic, CT scan and laboratory tests. The patients had self-limiting fluid leakage. There was no recurrence of infection during the follow-up period. Bone ingrowth occurred in all cases with limb shortening. Cerament™ G gives good elution of antibiotic and allows bone ingrowth. The implantation of Cerament™ G was associated with good clinical outcomes and satisfactory bone consolidation. We acknowledge Antonella Esposito for septic nursing assistance

Bone is a dynamic organ with remarkable regenerative properties seen only otherwise in the liver. However, bone healing requires vascularity, stability, growth factors, a matrix for growth, and viable cells to obtain effective osteosynthesis. We rely on these principles not only to heal fractures, but also achieve healing of benign bone defects. Unfortunately, we are regularly confronted with situations where the local environment and tissue is insufficient and we must rely on our “biologic tool box.” When the process of bone repair requires additional assistance, we often look to bone grafting to provide an osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and/or osteogenic environment to promote bone healing and repair. The primary workhorses of bone grafting includes autogenous bone, cadaver allograft, and bone graft substitutes. Among the first types of bone graft used and still used in large quantities today include autogenous and cadaver allograft bone. Allografts are useful because it is present in multiple forms that conform to the desired situation. But autogenous bone graft is considered the gold standard because it possesses all the fundamental properties to heal bone. However, it has been associated with high rates of donor site morbidity and typically requires an inpatient hospitalization following the procedure only adding to the associated costs. The first bone graft substitute use was calcium sulfate in 1892, and over the past 122 years advancements have achieved improved material properties of calcium sulfate and helped usher in additional bioceramics for bone grafting. Today there are predominantly 4 types of bioceramics available, which include calcium sulfate, calcium phosphate, tricalcium phosphate, and coralline hydroxyapatite. They come in multiple forms ranging from pellets and solid blocks to injectable and moldable putty. In comparison to autogenous bone graft, the primary limitation of bioceramics are the lack of osteogenic and osteoinductive properties. Bioceramics work by creating an osteoconductive scaffold to promote osteosynthesis. The options of bone graft substitutes don't end with these four types of bioceramics. Composite bioceramics take advantage of the differing biomechanical properties of these four basis types of bioceramics to develop improved materials. To overcome the lack of osteoinductive and osteogenic properties growth factors or bone marrow aspirate can be added to the bioceramic. As a result, the list of combinations available in our “biologic tool box” continues to expand. More than 20 BMPs have been identified, but only BMP-2 and BMP-7 have FDA approval. As we look forward to areas of future research and need within orthobiologics, some will likely come in the near future while others are much further in the future. We will continue to strive for the ideal bone graft substitute, which will have similar osteoinductive properties as autograft. The ultimate bone graft substitute will likely involve stem cells because it will allow an alternative to autogenous bone with the same osteogenic potential

Bone is a dynamic organ with remarkable regenerative properties seen only otherwise in the liver. However, bone healing requires vascularity, stability, growth factors, a matrix for growth, and viable cells to obtain effective osteosynthesis. We rely on these principles not only to heal fractures, but also achieve healing of benign bone defects. Unfortunately we are regularly confronted with situations where the local environment and tissue is insufficient and we must rely on our “biologic tool box.” When the process of bone repair requires additional assistance, we often look to bone grafting to provide an osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and/or osteogenic environment to promote bone healing and repair. The primary workhorses of bone grafting include autogenous bone, cadaver allograft, and bone graft substitutes. Among the first types of bone graft used and still used in large quantities today include autogenous and cadaver allograft bone. Allografts are useful because it is present in multiple forms that conform to the desired situation. But autogenous bone graft is considered the gold standard because it possesses all the fundamental properties to heal bone. However, it has been associated with high rates of donor site morbidity and typically requires an inpatient hospitalization following the procedure only adding to the associated costs. The first bone graft substitute use was calcium sulfate in 1892, and over the past 122 years advancements have achieved improved material properties of calcium sulfate and helped usher in additional bioceramics for bone grafting. Today there are predominantly 4 types of bioceramics available, which include calcium sulfate, calcium phosphate, tricalcium phosphate, and coralline hydroxyapatite. They come in multiple forms ranging from pellets and solid blocks to injectable and moldable putty. In comparison to autogenous bone graft, the primary limitation of bioceramics are the lack of osteogenic and osteoinductive properties. Bioceramics work by creating an osteoconductive scaffold to promote osteosynthesis. The options of bone graft substitutes don't end with these four types of bioceramics. Composite bioceramics take advantage of the differing biomechanical properties of these four basis types of bioceramics to develop improved materials. To overcome the lack of osteoinductive and osteogenic properties growth factors or bone marrow aspirate can be added to the bioceramic. As a result, the list of combinations available in our “biologic tool box” continues to expand. More than 20 BMPs have been identified, but only BMP-2 and BMP-7 have FDA approval. As we look forward to areas of future research and need within orthobiologics, some will likely come in the near future while others are much further in the future. We will continue to strive for the ideal bone graft substitute, which will have similar osteoinductive properties as autograft. The ultimate bone graft substitute will likely involve stem cells because it will allow an alternative to autogenous bone with the same osteogenic potential

Bone is a dynamic organ with remarkable regenerative properties seen only otherwise in the liver. However, bone healing requires vascularity, stability, growth factors, a matrix for growth, and viable cells to obtain effective osteosynthesis. We rely on these principles not only to heal fractures, but also achieve healing of benign bone defects. Unfortunately, we are regularly confronted with situations where the local environment and tissue is insufficient and we must rely on our “biologic tool box.” When the process of bone repair requires additional assistance, we often look to bone grafting to provide an osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and/or osteogenic environment to promote bone healing and repair. The primary workhorses of bone grafting include autogenous bone, cadaver allograft, and bone graft substitutes. Among the first types of bone graft used and still used in large quantities today include autogenous and cadaver allograft bone. Allografts are useful because they are present in multiple forms that conform to the desired situation. But autogenous bone graft is considered the gold standard because it possesses all the fundamental properties to heal bone. However, it has been associated with high rates of donor site morbidity and typically requires an inpatient hospitalization following the procedure only adding to the associated costs. The first bone graft substitute used was calcium sulfate in 1892, and over the past 122 years advancements have achieved improved material properties of calcium sulfate and helped usher in additional bioceramics for bone grafting. Today there are predominantly four types of bioceramics available, which include calcium sulfate, calcium phosphate, tricalcium phosphate, and coralline hydroxyapatite. They come in multiple forms ranging from pellets and solid blocks to injectable and moldable putty. In comparison to autogenous bone graft, the primary limitation of bioceramics are the lack of osteogenic and osteoinductive properties. Bioceramics work by creating an osteoconductive scaffold to promote osteosynthesis. The options of bone graft substitutes don't end with these four types of bioceramics. Composite bioceramics take advantage of the differing biomechanical properties of these four basis types of bioceramics to develop improved materials. To overcome the lack of osteoinductive and osteogenic properties growth factors or bone marrow aspirate can be added to the bioceramic. As a result, the list of combinations available in our “biologic tool box” continues to expand. More than 20 BMPs have been identified, but only BMP-2 and BMP-7 have FDA approval. As we look forward to areas of future research and need within orthobiologics, some will likely come in the near future while others are much further in the future. We will continue to strive for the ideal bone graft substitute, which will have similar osteoinductive properties as autograft. The ultimate bone graft substitute will likely involve stem cells because it will allow an alternative to autogenous bone with the same osteogenic potential

Introduction. There are controversies in the literature about thoracoplasty and its effect on lung function changes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect and outcome of thoracoplasty in conjunction with pedicle screw construct in the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on lung functions. Materials and methods. It is a retrospective study of consecutive series of 62 patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgically treated by single surgeon between 2007 and 2008 at a tertiary referral Orthopaedic Spinal unit. Posterior spinal fusion and thoracoplasty (n=32, all but one girls) were compared with 30 without thoracoplasty (all but one girls). Clinical and radiographic analysis was performed, including the SRS-30 questionnaire and Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT). Absolute and percent-predicted values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and total lung capacity (TLC) were evaluated preoperatively and at 3-months, 1 year and/or 2-year follow-up, and comparisons were made between two groups. The minimum follow-up was one year. Results. No statistical differences were found between the two groups in PFT's both pre-operatively and at latest follow up ranging 1 to 3 years. Our findings suggest that thoracoplasty did not adversely affected long-term PFT's in AIS patients compared to patients treated by posterior spinal fusion alone. Three-month postoperative pulmonary function test values in both groups experienced 15–30% decline which returned to the preoperative baseline at 1 year in > 90% patients. In thoracoplasty group, 5 to 8 ribs were resected and used for bone graft. Chest complications were observed in 2 patients requiring chest drainage. Prolonged donor site morbidity was noted in 3 patients. Conclusions. Thoracoplasty showed comparable clinical and radiological correction without any significant pulmonary function compromise. Pulmonary function test values returned to the preoperative baseline at 1 year in > 90% patients

Bone is a dynamic organ with remarkable regenerative properties seen only otherwise in the liver. However, bone healing requires vascularity, stability, growth factors, a matrix for growth, and viable cells to obtain effective osteosynthesis. We rely on these principles not only to heal fractures, but also achieve healing of benign bone defects. Unfortunately we are regularly confronted with situations where the local environment and tissue is insufficient and we must rely on our “biologic tool box.” When the process of bone repair requires additional assistance, we often look to bone grafting to provide an osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and/or osteogenic environment to promote bone healing and repair. The primary workhorses of bone grafting includes autogenous bone, cadaver allograft, and bone graft substitutes. Among the first types of bone graft used and still used in large quantities today include autogenous and cadaver allograft bone. Allografts are useful because it is present in multiple forms that conform to the desired situation. But autogenous bone graft is considered the gold standard because it possesses all the fundamental properties to heal bone. However, it has been associated with high rates of donor site morbidity and typically requires an inpatient hospitalization following the procedure only adding to the associated costs. The first bone graft substitute use was calcium sulfate in 1892, and over the past 122 years advancements have achieved improved material properties of calcium sulfate and helped usher in additional bioceramics for bone grafting. Today there are predominantly 4 types of bioceramics available, which include calcium sulfate, calcium phosphate, tricalcium phosphate, and coralline hydroxyapatite. They come in multiple forms ranging from pellets and solid blocks to injectable and moldable putty. In comparison to autogenous bone graft, the primary limitation of bioceramics are the lack of osteogenic and osteoinductive properties. Bioceramics work by creating an osteoconductive scaffold to promote osteosynthesis. The options of bone graft substitutes don't end with these four types of bioceramics. Composite bioceramics take advantage of the differing biomechanical properties of these four basis types of bioceramics to develop improved materials. To overcome the lack of osteoinductive and osteogenic properties growth factors or bone marrow aspirate can be added to the bioceramic. As a result, the list of combinations available in our “biologic tool box” continues to expand. More than 20 BMPs have been identified, but only BMP-2 and BMP-7 have FDA approval. As we look forward to areas of future research and need within orthobiologics, some will likely come in the near future while others are much further in the future. We will continue to strive for the ideal bone graft substitute, which will have similar osteoinductive properties as autograft. The ultimate bone graft substitute will likely involve stem cells because it will allow an alternative to autogenous bone with the same osteogenic potential

There is very limited literature available on the use of prosthetic replacement in the treatment of primary and secondary tumours of the radius. In the past these were treated with vascularised and non-vascularised autografts which had associated donor site morbidity, problems of non union, graft or junctional fractures and delayed return to function. Our study is a mid to long term follow-up of implant survivorship and the functional outcome of metal prosthetic replacement used for primary and metastatic lesions of radius. We had 15 patients (8 males:7 females) with a mean age of 53 years. 8 patients underwent proximal radial replacement, 2 with mid-shaft radial replacement and 6 patients had distal radial replacements with wrist arthrodesis. The indications for replacement included metastatic lesions from renal cell carcinoma, primary giant cell tumours, ewings' sarcoma, chondroblastoma, radio-ulnar synostosis and benign fibrous histiocytoma. The average follow up was 5 years and 6 months (range 3 months - 18 years). Four patients died as a result of dissemination of renal cell carcinoma and two patients were lost to follow-up. There were no complications with the prosthesis or infection. Clinically and radiographically there was no loosening demonstrated at 18 years with secure fixation of implants. Two patients developed interossoeus nerve palsies which partially recovered. Functional outcomes of the elbow were assessed using the Mayo performance score with patients achieving a mean score of 85 postoperatively (range 65-95). All but one patient had full range of motion of the elbow. The patient with radio-ulnar synostosis had a 25 degree fixed flexion pot-operatively. Although the distal radial replacements had decreased range of movements of the wrist due to arthrodesis, they had excellent functional outcomes. Only one patient required revision surgery due to post-traumatic loosening of the implant. Our results of the use of endoprosthetic replacement of radius in the treatment of tumours are encouraging with regards to survivorship of the implant and functional outcome. This type of treatment results in an early return to daily routine activties, good functional outcome and patient satisfaction

Objective. To determine differences in fracture stability and functional outcome between synthetic bone graft and allograft/autograft with internal fixation of tibia plateau metaphyseal defects. Patient & Methods. Between 2007- 2008, 84 consecutive cases of internal fixation of tibia plateaux were identified from our theater logbook. 29 patients required additional autologous, allogenic bone graft, or synthetic bone graft substitute to ensure fracture stability. 5 patients were excluded due to lost to follow up leaving a cohort of 24 patients. Hydroxyapatite calcium carbonate synthetic bone graft was utilised in 14 patients (6 male and 8 female). Allograft/autograft were utilised in the remaining 10 patients (6 male and 4 female). All 24 patients had closed fractures, classified using the AO and Schatzker classification. Roentograms at presentation, post-operatively and regular follow-up till 12 months were analysed for maintenance of reduction, early and late subsidence of the articular surface. Functional outcomes such as knee range of movement and WOMAC Knee scores were compared between groups. Results. There was no significant statistical difference between groups for post-operative joint reduction, long term subsidence, and WOMAC scores. The degree of subsidence was not related to age or fracture severity. Maintenance of knee flexion was found to be better in the allograft/autograft group (p=0.015) when compared between groups. Multivariate analysis compared graft type, fracture severity, postoperative reduction, subsidence rate, range of movement and WOMAC score. The only finding was a statistical significant (p=0.025) association with the graft type and range of movement. Conclusion. Allograft/autograft may allow better recovery of long-term flexion, possibly due to reduced inflammatory response compared with synthetic bone graft. However, all other parameters such as maintenance of joint reduction and subjective outcome measures were comparable with the use of hydroxyapatite calcium carbonate bone graft. This study shows that synthetic bone graft is a suitable option in fixation of unstable tibia plateau fractures, avoiding risk of viral disease transmission with allograft and donor site morbidity associated with autograft