Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) versus hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented HA for the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older adults. Methods. A within-trial economic evaluation was conducted based on data collected from the World Hip Trauma Evaluation 5 (WHiTE 5) multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK. Resource use was measured over 12 months post-randomization using trial case report forms and participant-completed questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness was reported in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from the NHS and personal social service perspective. Methodological uncertainty was addressed using sensitivity analysis, while decision uncertainty was represented graphically using confidence ellipses and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Results. The base-case analysis showed that cemented implants were cost-saving (mean cost difference -£961 (95% confidence interval (CI) -£2,292 to £370)) and increased QALYs (mean QALY difference 0.010 (95% CI 0.002 to 0.017)) when compared to uncemented implants. The probability of the cemented implant being cost-effective approximated between 95% and 97% at alternative cost-effectiveness thresholds held by decision-makers, and its net monetary benefit was positive. The findings remained robust against all the pre-planned sensitivity analyses. Conclusion. This study shows that cemented HA is cost-effective compared with hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented HA in older adults with displaced intracapsular hip fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):922–928

Aim

This paper describes the methods applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty among hip fracture patients in the World Hip Trauma Evaluation Five (WHiTE5) trial.

Introduction. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) currently recommends the use of total hip replacement (THR) for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in cognitively competent patients and who were independently mobile with the maximum use of one stick prior to the injury. Method. We conducted a prospective cross sectional study of the management of hip fractures within a defined geographic region in the North East of England to assess current practice and variation in provision of THR for displaced intracapsular hip fracture. Results. A total of 879 patients with hip fracture, admitted to eight acute trauma units were included in this study. 169 of 462 patients with displaced intracapsular hip fractures fulfilled the NICE criteria for THR. THR was performed for only 49 of the eligible patients (29%). There was significant variation in THR provision between the eight units (0% THR usage to 50% usage) (p<0.001). In the patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture, there were statistically significant differences in the age, ASA grade, AMTS and pre-injury walking ability between patients who underwent fixation, THR or hemiarthroplasty (all p≤0.05). There was an increased chance of undergoing THR if a patient was 77 years (the median age for the THR eligible cohort) or younger compared to older than 77 years (RR=7.9, 95%CI 2.8–22.0, p<0.001) and if the patients were either ASA grade 1 or 2 compared to ASA grade 3 (RR=2.7, 95%CI 1.0–7.3, p=0.06). The reasons given by the treating surgeon for not performing THR in eligible patients were multifactorial. Conclusion. There is significant variation in the provision of THR for eligible hip fracture patients which is influenced by both patient demographics and also by the unit to which the patient is admitted

Background. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly used for active patients with displaced intracapsular hip fractures. Dislocation rates in this cohort remain high postoperatively compared to elective practice, yet it remains unclear which patients are most at risk. The aim of this study was to determine the dislocation rate for these patients and to evaluate the contributing patient and surgeon factors. Methods. A five-year retrospective analysis of all patients receiving THA for displaced intracapsular hip fractures from 2013–18 was performed. Data was collected from the institutions' hip fracture database, including data submitted to the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Cox regression analysis and log-rank tests were implemented to evaluate factors associated with THA dislocation. Patient age, sex, ASA grade, surgeon seniority, surgical approach, femoral head diameter and acetabular cup type were all investigated as independent factors. Results. A total of 196 patients, with a mean age of 72 (range 49–90), received THA for hip fracture between 2013–18. A posterior approach, using standard cemented acetabular components and a 28mm femoral head, was used in 133 cases (72%). Fourteen dislocations (7%) were observed during this period, with 5 patients requiring revision surgery. Of these dislocations, all were performed through posterior approaches with standard cemented cups. 28mm femoral heads were used in all cases except one, which used a 32mm femoral head. In Cox regression analysis, ASA grade, but not age or sex, was significantly associated with dislocation (hazard ratio = 4.5; 95% confidence interval 2.0–10.0; p<0.001). On log rank testing no statistically, significant association was found between dislocation and surgeon grade (p=0.85), surgical approach (p=0.31), femoral head size (p=0.85) or cup type (p=0.30). Discussion. This study demonstrates an increased risk of dislocation following THA for hip fracture with higher ASA grades. It may be appropriate to offer more stable implants to this cohort of patients

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is indicated in independently mobile patients sustaining displaced intracapsular hip fractures. Studies presently suggest that the anterolateral approach is preferable to the posterior approach due to a perceived reduced risk of reoperations and dislocations. However, these observations come from small studies with short follow-up. We assessed whether surgical approach in THA performed for hip fractures effects outcomes. Patients and Methods. A retrospective observational study was performed using data collected prospectively by the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. All primary stemmed THAs implanted for hip fractures between 2003–2015 were eligible for inclusion (n=19,432). The two surgical approach groups (posterior versus anterolateral) were propensity-score matched for multiple potential patient and surgical confounding factors (n=14,536, with 7,268/group). Outcomes (implant survival, patient survival, intraoperative complications) were compared between the approach groups using regression analysis. Results. Five-year implant survival rates were similar between posterior and anterolateral approaches (97.3% vs. 97.4%; sub-hazard ratio (SHR)=1.15 (95% CI 0.93–1.42)). Five-year implant survival rates free from revision for dislocation (SHR=1.28 (CI=0.89–1.84)) and free from revision for periprosthetic fracture (SHR=1.03 (CI=0.68–1.56)) were also comparable. Thirty-day patient survival was significantly higher with a posterior approach (99.5% vs. 98.8%; hazard ratio (HR)=0.44 (CI=0.30–0.64)), which persisted at 1-year (HR=0.73 (CI=0.64–0.84)) and 5-years (HR=0.87 (CI=0.81–0.94)). The posterior approach had a lower risk of intraoperative complications (odds ratio=0.59 (CI=0.45–0.78)). Discussion. This is the largest study assessing the influence of surgical approach on outcomes following THA performed for hip fractures. In THA for hip fractures, the posterior approach had a similar risk of revision, and a lower risk of mortality and intraoperative complications compared with the anterolateral approach. Conclusion. We propose that the posterior approach is safer than the anterolateral approach when performing THA for hip fractures and should be preferred where possible

Aims

Cemented hemiarthroplasty is an effective form of treatment for most patients with an intracapsular fracture of the hip. However, it remains unclear whether there are subgroups of patients who may benefit from the alternative operation of a modern uncemented hemiarthroplasty – the aim of this study was to investigate this issue. Knowledge about the heterogeneity of treatment effects is important for surgeons in order to target operations towards specific subgroups who would benefit the most.

Aims

The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of reoperation (all cause and specifically for periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF)) and mortality, and associated risk factors, following a hemiarthroplasty incorporating a cemented collarless polished taper slip stem (PTS) for management of an intracapsular hip fracture.

Objectives

The annual incidence of hip fracture is 620 000 in the European Union. The cost of this clinical problem has been estimated at 1.75 million disability-adjusted life years lost, equating to 1.4% of the total healthcare burden in established market economies. Recent guidance from The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) states that research into the clinical and cost effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a treatment for hip fracture is a priority. We asked the question: can a trial investigating THA for hip fracture currently be delivered in the NHS?

We performed a case–control study to compare the rates of further surgery, revision and complications, operating time and survival in patients who were treated with either an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated Corail bipolar femoral stem or a cemented Exeter stem for a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip. The mean age of the patients in the uncemented group was 82.5 years (53 to 97) and in the cemented group was 82.7 years (51 to 99) We used propensity score matching, adjusting for age, gender and the presence or absence of dementia and comorbidities, to produce a matched cohort receiving an Exeter stem (n = 69) with which to compare the outcome of patients receiving a Corail stem (n = 69). The Corail had a significantly lower all-cause rate of further surgery (p = 0.016; odds ratio (OR) 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.84) and number of hips undergoing major further surgery (p = 0.029; OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.09). The mean operating time was significantly less for the Corail group than for the cemented Exeter group (59 min [12 to 136] vs 70 min [40 to 175], p = 0.001). The Corail group also had a lower risk of a peri-prosthetic fracture (p = 0.042; OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.42) . There was no difference in the mortality rate between the groups. There were significantly fewer complications in the uncemented group, suggesting that the use of this stem would result in a decreased rate of morbidity in these frail patients. Whether this relates to an improved functional outcome remains unknown.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:299–305.