We have previously reported on the medium-term outcomes following a non-operative protocol of a short period of splinting followed by early movement to treat simple dislocations of the elbow. We undertook extended follow up of our original patient study group to determine whether the excellent results previously reported were maintained in the very long-term. A secondary question was to determine the rate and need for any late surgical intervention. We attempted to contact all patients in the original patient study group. Patients were requested to complete the Oxford elbow score (OES), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire. Patients were requested to attend a face-to-face assessment where they underwent a clinical examination including neurovascular assessment, range-of-motion and an assessment of ligamentous stability. Seventy-one patients (65%) from the original patient study group agreed to participate in the study. The mean duration of follow-up was 19.3 years. At final follow-up patients reported excellent functional outcome scores and a preserved functional range of movement in the injured elbows. The mean DASH score was 5.22 points and the mean Oxford Elbow Score was 91.6 points. The mean satisfaction score was 90.9 points. Our study shows that the excellent outcomes following treatment with a protocol of a short period of splinting and early movement remain excellent and are maintained into the very long term. These findings support our hypothesis that this treatment protocol is appropriate and suitable for most patients with simple dislocations of the elbow. The role for primary ligamentous repair for this patient group should be carefully considered. Work to more clearly define the anticipated benefits of surgery for specific patient groups or injury patterns would help to support informed decision making

The causes of a stiff elbow are numerous including: post-traumatic elbow, burns, head injury, osteoarthritis, inflammatory joint disease and congenital. Types of stiffness include: loss of elbow flexion, loss of elbow extension and loss of forearm rotation. All three have different prognoses in terms of the timing of surgery and the likelihood of restoration of function. Contractures can be classified into extrinsic and intrinsic (all intrinsic develop some extrinsic component). Functional impairment can be assessed medicolegally; however, in clinical practice the patient puts an individual value on the arc of motion. Objectively most functions can be undertaken with an arc of 30 to 130 degrees. The commonest cause of a Post-traumatic Stiff elbow is a radial head fracture or a complex fracture dislocation. Risk factors for stiffness include length of immobilisation, associated fracture with dislocation, intra-articular derangement, delayed surgical treatment, associated head injury, heterotopic ossification. Early restoration of bony columns and joint stability to allow early mobilisation reduces incidence of joint stiffness. Heterotopic ossification (HO) is common in fracture dislocation of the elbow. Neural Axis trauma alone causes HO in elbows in 5%. However, combined neural trauma and elbow trauma the incidence is 89%. Stiffness due to thermal injury is usually related to the degree rather than the site. The majority of patients have greater than 20% total body area involved. Extrinsic contractures are usually managed with a sequential release of soft tissues commencing with a capsular excision (retaining LCL/MCL), posterior bundle of the MCL +/− ulna nerve decompression (if there is loss of flexion to 100 degrees). This reliably achieved via a posterior incision, a lateral column exposure +/− ulna nerve mobilisation. A medial column exposure is a viable alternative. Arthroscopic capsular release although associated with a quicker easier rehabilitation is associated with increased neural injury. Timing of release is specific to the type of contracture, i.e. flexion contractures after approx. six months, extension contractures ASAP but after four months, loss of forearm rotation less 6 to 24 months. The use of Hinged Elbow Fixators is increasing. The indications include reconstructions that require protection whilst allowing early movement, persistent instability or recurrent/late instability or interposition arthroplasty. Post-operative rehabilitation requires good analgesia, joint stability and early movement. The role of CPM is often helpful but still being evaluated

Objectives. To evaluate management, direct-medical-costs and clinical outcome profile of a large trauma unit with respect to simple elbow dislocations. Methods. All simple elbow dislocations that were defined as not requiring acute surgical intervention, post-reduction, were considered between Jan-2008 and Dec-2010. Inclusion criteria consisted of age greater than 13; absence of major associated fractures, successful closed reduction, and follow-up as an outpatient. The management of these patients was classified in terms of immobilisation time into: short (< 2weeks), standard (2–3weeks) and prolonged (>3weeks). Direct-medical-costs were calculated based on current tariff rates associated with radiology, admission, theatre time (for reductions and recovery) and outpatient attendances. Clinical outcome was evaluated with respect to complications, secondary procedures, and time before discharge from clinic. Results. Of 81 patients in total, 6% required reduction in theatre, 17% admission, 9% were referred to a specialist or had a complication and 42% DNA their final appointment. The mean length-of-immobilisation was 2.25weeks (range 0–6weeks). The median direct-medical-cost was £893 per patient (range £418-£2,693). The median duration of patients' engagement with hospital services was 57days (range 3–831). There was no statistically significant relationship between length-of-immobilisation and time-before-discharge (p=0.42), or associated direct-medical-cost (p=0.586). In terms of clinical outcome the prolonged immobilisation group had a statistically significant worse outcome in comparison to the short (p=0.30) and the standard (p=0.01). The comparison between standard immobilisation and short resulted in a marginally (p=0.08) significant advantage of the first. Conclusion. Prolonged elbow immobilisation is generally associated with increased stiffness and a higher rate of complications. For simple elbow dislocations time-to-mobilisation was variable, as well as the mode of follow-up. The use of standardised protocols of treatment is essential in these type of injuries that are usually managed in an outpatient basis, to minimise the variability between clinical teams, improve outcome, and minimise costs

We report the results of six trauma and orthopaedic projects to Kenya in the last three years. The aims are to deliver both a trauma service and teaching within two hospitals; one a district hospital near Mount Kenya in Nanyuki, the other the largest public hospital in Kenya in Mombasa. The Kenya Orthopaedic Project team consists of a wide range of multidisciplinary professionals that allows the experience to be shared across those specialties. A follow-up clinic is held three months after each mission to review the patients. To our knowledge there are no reported outcomes in the literature for similar projects.

A total of 211 operations have been performed and 400 patients seen during the projects. Most cases were fractures of the lower limb; we have been able to follow up 163 patients (77%) who underwent surgical treatment. We reflect on the results so far and discuss potential improvements for future missions.