Traditionally, spinal surgeons placed radiographs on viewing boxes in a manner (PA) to replicate the view they would have at surgery. The introduction of digital Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) appears to have had marked impact upon this convention. Some Units have the ability to lock digital radiographs such that they are always viewed in the same manner and cannot be reversed. Following ‘two near misses’ we carried out a survey to confirm the previous practice with radiographs; to ascertain the current practice with PACS and to find out whether the variation in practice could lead to clinical mishaps and harm to patients. Questionnaires were completed by practicing spinal surgeons. Previous and current practice of viewing radiographs. Either actual or potential wrong side surgery. Opinions as to whether a single convention was important were recorded. 78 % Spine surgeons used to flip radiographs over prior to introduction of PACS. With PACS, 56 % spine surgeons flip the radiographs over in clinic and 72 % in theatre so to resemble viewing spine from behind. 56% Surgeons had nearly operated on the wrong side of the spine while 94 % have seen or heard of a patient operated on the wrong side. 72 % Spine surgeons agree that the radiographs should be flipped over so as to resemble the spine as viewed intraoperatively. There is need for a single convention in spine surgery to view radiographs to avoid potential clinical mistakes

Purpose. This study aims to identify factors that influence the Cobb angle at presentation to a tertiary referral scoliosis centre, and the outcome of the referrals. Methods. 81 consecutive patients referred were reviewed retrospectively. Hospital database, clinic letters and radiographs were examined. Patient demographics, mode of referral (GP vs. tertiary), severity and type of scoliosis were recorded. The season of referral was defined as ‘warm’ between months of June and September, and ‘cold’ between November and March. Cobb angle measurements were made independently on digital radiographs by 2 Orthopaedic trainees. Results. There were 60 females and 21 males referred. Of these patients, 31 (38%) were offered surgery. The overall mean Cobb angle was 43° (SD 22.5°), where the surgical group was 58° (SD 20°) and the non-surgical group was 33° (SD 18°), p < 0.05. The mean age of the patients for surgery was 22, compared to 19 in the non-operative group (p < 0.05). There was no significant influence of sex, season of referral, and mode of referral on operations offered. Males had a higher mean Cobb angle (52°) than female (39°) with marginal significance (p = 0.09). Advancing age correlated with increasing Cobb angle (r = 0.2, p = 0.09) with marginal significance. No other factors influenced the presenting Cobb angle. There was excellent inter-observer agreement in the Cobb angle measurements (α = 0.99). Conclusion. High Cobb angle and age were the only significant predictors for requirement of surgery in a tertiary referral scoliosis centre. Secondary or tertiary referral did not influence the severity or the outcome of patients with scoliosis. This may imply that GP direct referrals to scoliosis centres are sufficient, especially if Cobb angle measurements and age are included in the criteria. Seasonal differences in scoliosis presentation were not found, however further comparison can be made with countries with warmer climate to demonstrate the cosmetic influence. Ethics Approval: none. Interest Statement: none

Introduction. How translation of different parts of spine responds to selective thoracic fusion has not been well investigated. Furthermore, how posterior pedicle-screw-only constructs affect spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC) remains unknown. In a retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the balance change after selective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1C type adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with posterior pedicle-screw-only constructs. Methods. All AIS cases, surgically treated between 2002 and 2008 in our institute, were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: patients with Lenke 1C scoliosis treated with posterior pedicle-screw-only constructs; the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) ended at L1 level or above; and a minimum 2-year radiographic follow-up. Standing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral digital radiographs from different timepoints (preoperative, immediately postoperative, 3 months postoperative, and final follow-up) were reviewed. In each standing AP radiograph, centre sacral vertical line (CSVL) was drawn first, followed by measurement of the translation (deviation from the CSVL) of some key vertebrae, such as the LIV, LIV+1 (the first vertebra below LIV), LIV+2 (the second vertebra below LIV), LIV+3 (the third vertebra below LIV), lumbar apical vertebra, thoracic apical vertebra, and T1. Additionally, the Cobb angles of major thoracic and lumbar curve were measured at different timepoints, and the correction rate was calculated. Furthermore, clinical photos of patients' back appearance were taken preoperatively and postoperatively. Results. Of the 278 patients reviewed, 29 met the inclusion criteria. The continuous follow-up of our study revealed an interesting occurrence. Criteria were established to define this finding, and the validity of the criteria was verified by a series of tests. The results of our study showed that the selective thoracic fusion was prone to cause left imbalance in patients with Lenke 1C AIS. Even though some patients regained spinal balance by postoperative spinal alignment remodelling, there were still about a third who remained imbalanced at 2 year follow-up. Smaller thoracic curve before surgery did not show higher risk of causing postoperative imbalance. Conclusions. Selective thoracic fusion is prone to cause left spinal imbalance in patients with Lenke 1C scoliosis. Postoperative spinal alignment remodelling can make some patients regain spinal balance. The postoperative spinal balance condition in patients with this disorder could be improved by selecting LIV at stable vertebrae or above, or by checking balance condition during surgery to prevent overcorrection. Additionally, to establish the presence of postoperative spinal alignment remodelling, the criteria we recommend is that thoracic apical vertebra shifts towards the right side by more than 5 mm 2 years after surgery

Aims

To benchmark the radiation dose to patients during the course of treatment for a spinal deformity.