Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is often utilized to improve pain and dysfunction associated with end-stage osteoarthritis. Previous research has suggested that depression may negatively impact patient reported pain and function. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of pre-operative depressive symptoms, using the Center for Epidemiologic Scale for Depression (CES-D) scale, on patient reported function and pain at one, three and six months following TJA, after controlling for the impact of age, sex, pain, joint replaced, and other comorbidities. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of 710 patients aged 40 years and older who underwent elective primary TJA in the Edmonton zone. Participants were recruited pre-operatively and reported socio-demographics, comorbid conditions and medications (including depression medications where appropriate), each participant also completed the Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index and the CES-D scale preoperatively. Participants then completed the WOMAC and CES-D scale again at one, three, and six months postoperatively. Risk-adjusted longitudinal data analysis using a linear mixed regression model was performed, controlling for age, sex, joint replaced, chronic pain, comorbidity, social support and employment status. THA participants had a mean age of 65.9±10.1 years and included 175 (57%) female while TKA participants had a mean age of 67.9±10.1 years and included 249 (61%) females. ‘Possible’ depressive symptoms (CES-D score 16–19) were identified in 58 (8.1%) participants while ‘probable’ depressive symptoms (CES-D score ≥20) were identified in 68 (9.6%) participants. The mean WOMAC pain and function scores, when analyzed using the linear mixed regression model, demonstrated improvement from baseline at one, three, and six months (p < 0 .001 for both pain and function models as well as over time). However, in the patients with possible and probable depressive symptoms, WOMAC pain scores were 7.6±1.5 and 11.7±1.3 worse respectively than those without depressive symptoms after controlling for age, sex, joint replaced, chronic pain, comorbidities and social support. Similarly, WOMAC function scores in the patients with possible and probable depressive symptoms were 8.8±1.4 and 14.2±1.2 worse respectively than those without depressive symptoms after controlling for age, sex, joint replaced, comorbidities and employment status. Depressive symptoms negatively affect postoperative pain and function measured using WOMAC scales even after risk adjustment up to six-months post TJA. Screening for depressive symptomology both pre- and postoperatively may provide an opportunity to identify and manage depressive symptoms to improve postoperative pain and function

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is often utilized to improve pain and dysfunction associated with end-stage osteoarthritis. Previous research has suggested that depression may negatively impact patient reported pain and function. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of preoperative depressive symptoms, using the Center for Epidemiologic Scale for Depression (CES-D) scale, on patient reported function and pain at one, three and six months following TJA, after controlling for the impact of age, sex, pain, joint replaced, and other comorbidities. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of 710 patients aged 40 years and older who underwent elective primary TJA in the Edmonton zone. Participants were recruited pre-operatively and reported socio-demographics, comorbid conditions and medications (including depression medications where appropriate), each participant also completed the Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index and the CES-D scale preoperatively. Participants then completed the WOMAC and CES-D scale again at one, three, and six months postoperatively. Risk-adjusted longitudinal data analysis using a linear mixed regression model was performed, controlling for age, sex, joint replaced, chronic pain, comorbidity, social support and employment status. THA participants had a mean age of 65.9±10.1 years and included 175 (57%) female while TKA participants had a mean age of 67.9±10.1 years and included 249 (61%) females. ‘Possible’ depressive symptoms (CES-D score 16–19) were identified in 58 (8.1%) participants while ‘probable’ depressive symptoms (CES-D score ≥20) were identified in 68 (9.6%) participants. The mean WOMAC pain and function scores, when analyzed using the linear mixed regression model, demonstrated improvement from baseline at one, three, and six months (p < 0 .001 for both pain and function models as well as over time). However, in the patients with possible and probable depressive symptoms, WOMAC pain scores were 7.6±1.5 and 11.7±1.3 worse respectively than those without depressive symptoms after controlling for age, sex, joint replaced, chronic pain, comorbidities and social support. Similarly, WOMAC function scores in the patients with possible and probable depressive symptoms were 8.8±1.4 and 14.2±1.2 worse respectively than those without depressive symptoms after controlling for age, sex, joint replaced, comorbidities and employment status. Depressive symptoms negatively affect postoperative pain and function measured using WOMAC scales even after risk adjustment up to six-months post TJA. Screening for depressive symptomology both pre- and postoperatively may provide an opportunity to identify and manage depressive symptoms to improve postoperative pain and function

Radial head fractures are common and mainly require a functional conservative treatment. About 20% of patients will present an unsatisfactory final functional result. There is, however, little data allowing us to predict which patients are at risk of bad evolve. This makes it difficult to optimize our therapeutic strategies in these patients. The aim of this study is to determine the personal and environmental factors that influence the functional prognosis of patients with a radial head fracture. We realized over a 1-year period a prospective observational longitudinal cohort study including 125 consecutive patients referred for a fracture of the radial head in a tertiary trauma center. We originally collected the factors believed to be prognostic indicators: age, sex, socioeconomic status, factors related to trauma or fracture, alcohol, tobacco, detection of depression scale, and financial compensation. A clinical and radiological follow-up took place at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The main functional measurement tool is the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). 123 patients were included in the study. 114 patients required nonsurgical management. 102 patients completed the 1-year follow-up for the main outcome (89 for the DASH score). Two patients required an unplanned surgery and were excluded from analyses. At 1 year, the average MEPS was 96.5 (range, 65–100) and 81% of subjects had an excellent result (MEPS ≥90). The most constant factor to predict an unsatisfactory functional outcome (MEPS <90 or DASH >17) is the presence of depressive symptoms at the initial time of the study (P = 0.03 and P = 0.0009, respectively). This factor is present throughout the follow-up. Other observed factors include a higher socioeconomic status (P = 0.009), the presence of financial compensation (P = 0.027), and a high-velocity trauma (P = 0.04). The severity of the fracture, advanced age, female sex, and the nature of the treatment does not influence the result at 1 year. No factor has been associated with a reduction in range of motion. Most of the radial head fractures heal successfully. We identified for the first time, with a valid tool, the presence of depressive symptoms at the time of the fracture as a significant factor for an unsatisfactory functional result. Early detection is simple and fast and would allow patients at risk to adopt complementary strategies to optimize the result

Pain management in spine surgery can be challenging. Cannabis might be an interesting choice for analgesia while avoiding some side effects of opioids. Recent work has reported on the potential benefits of cannabinoids for multimodal pain control, but very few studies focus on spinal surgery patients. This study aims to examine demographic and health status differences between patients who report the use of (1) cannabis, (2) narcotics, (3) cannabis and narcotics or (4) no cannabis/narcotic use. Retrospective cohort study of thoracolumbar patients enrolled in the CSORN registry after legalization of cannabis in Canada. Variables included: age, sex, modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI), Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) for leg and back pain, tingling/numbness leg sensation, SF-12 Quality of Life- Mental Health Component (MCS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and general health state. An ANCOVA with pathology as the covariate and post-hoc analysis was run. The majority of the 704 patients enrolled (mean age: 59; female: 46.9%) were non-users (41.8%). More patients reported narcotic-use than cannabis-use (29.7% vs 12.9%) with 13.4% stating concurrent-use. MCS scores were significantly lower for patients with concurrent-use compared to no-use (mean of 39.95 vs 47.98, p=0.001) or cannabis-use (mean=45.66, p=0.043). The narcotic-use cohort had significantly worse MCS scores (mean=41.37, p=0.001) than no-use. Patients reporting no-use and cannabis-use (mean 41.39 vs 42.94) had significantly lower ODI scores than narcotic-use (mean=54.91, p=0.001) and concurrent-use (mean=50.80, p=0.001). Lower NRS-Leg pain was reported in cannabis-use (mean=5.72) compared to narcotic-use (mean=7.19) and concurrent-use (mean=7.03, p=0.001). No-use (mean=6.31) had significantly lower NRS-Leg pain than narcotic-use (p=0.011), and significantly lower NRS-back pain (mean=6.17) than narcotic-use (mean=7.16, p=0.001) and concurrent-use (mean=7.15, p=0.012). Cannabis-use reported significantly lower tingling/numbness leg scores (mean=4.85) than no-use (mean=6.14, p=0.022), narcotic-use (mean=6.67, p=0.001) and concurrent-use (mean=6.50, p=0.01). PHQ-9 scores were significantly lower for the no-use (mean=6.99) and cannabis-use (mean=8.10) than narcotic-use (mean=10.65) and concurrent-use (mean=11.93) cohorts. Narcotic-use reported a significantly lower rating of their overall health state (mean=50.03) than cannabis-use (mean=60.50, p=0.011) and no-use (mean=61.89, p=0.001). Patients with pre-operative narcotic-use or concurrent use of narcotics and cannabis experienced higher levels of disability, pain and depressive symptoms and worse mental health functioning compared to patients with no cannabis/narcotic use and cannabis only use. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and largest study to examine the use of cannabis amongst Canadian patients with spinal pathology. This observational study lays the groundwork to better understand the potential benefits of adding cannabinoids to control pain in patients waiting for spine surgery. This will allow to refine recommendations about cannabis use for these patients

Up to one-third of patients experience limited benefit following surgical intervention for LS-OA. Thus, identifying contributing factors to this is important. People with OA often have multijoint involvement, yet this has received limited attention in this population. We documented the occurrence and evaluated the influence of multijoint symptoms on outcome following surgery for LS-OA. 141 patients undergoing decompression surgery+/−fusion for LS-OA completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) pre- and 12-months post-surgery. Also captured pre-surgery: age, sex, education, BMI, smoking, depressive symptoms and comorbidities. Any joints with “pain/stiffness/swelling most days of the month” were indicated on a homunculus. A symptomatic joint site count (e.g. one/both knees= one site), excluding the back, was derived (range zero to nine) and considered as a predictor of magnitude of ODI change, and likelihood of achieving minimally clinically important improvement in ODI (MCID=12.8) using multivariable adjusted linear and log-Poisson regression analyses. Mean age: 66 years (range:42–90), 46% female. 76% reported one+ joint site other than the back, 43% reported three+, and nearly 10% reported six+. (< MCID) for those with three sites, and four units for those with six+ sites. Associated with a greater likelihood of not achieving MCID were increasing joint count (11% increase per site (p=0.012)), higher BMI, current/former smoker, and worse baseline ODI tertile. Results suggest there is more than just the back to consider to understand patient-reported back outcomes. Multijoint symptoms directly contribute to disability, but there is potential they may contribute to systemic, largely inflammatory, effects in OA as well

Patient satisfaction is an important measure of patient-centered outcomes and physician performance. Given the continued growth of the population undergoing surgical intervention for osteoarthritis (OA), and the concomitant growth in the associated direct costs, understanding what factors drive satisfaction in this population is critical. A potentially important driver not previously considered is satisfaction with pre-surgical consultation. We investigated the influence of pre-surgical consultation satisfaction on overall satisfaction following surgery for OA. Study data are from 1263 patients who underwent surgery for hip (n=480), knee (n=597), and spine (n=186) OA at a large teaching hospital in Toronto, Canada. Before surgery, patient-reported satisfaction with information received and degree of input in decision-making during the pre-surgical consultation was assessed, along with expectations of surgery (regarding pain, activity limitation, expected time to full recovery and likelihood of complete success). Pre- and post-surgery (6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months) patients reported their average pain level in the past week (0–10, 10 is worst). At each follow-up time-point, two pain variables were defined, pain improvement (minimal clinically important difference from baseline ≥2 points) and ‘acceptable’ pain (pain score ≤ 3). Patients also completed a question on satisfaction with the results of the surgery (very dissatisfied/dissatisfied/somewhat satisfied/very satisfied) at each follow-up time point. We used multilevel ordinal logistic regression to examine the influence of pre-surgery satisfaction with consultation on the trajectory of satisfaction over the year of recovery controlling for expectations of surgery, pain improvement, acceptable pain, socio-demographic factors (age, sex, and education), body mass index, comorbidity, and depressive symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Mean age of the sample was 65.5 years, and over half (54.3%) were women. Overall, 74% and 78.9% of patients were satisfied with the information received and with the decision-making in the pre-surgical consultation, respectively, no significant differences were found by surgical joint (p=0.22). Post-surgery, levels of satisfaction varied very little over time (6 weeks: 92.5% were satisfied and 66.4% were very satisfied, 1 year: 91.1% were satisfied and 65.6% were very satisfied). Results from a model including time, surgical joint, satisfaction with consultation and control factors indicated that being satisfied with the information received in the pre-surgical consultation was associated with higher odds of being more satisfied after surgery (OR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1–1.4). Additionally, spine and knee patients were more likely to be dissatisfied than hip patients (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 2.1–4.9 and OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.8–3.4 for spine and knee patients respectively). Achieving pain improvement (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.3–2.4) and acceptable pain (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.6–3.9) were both significantly associated with greater satisfaction. Pre-operative expectations were not significantly associated with post-surgery satisfaction. Findings highlight the important role of pre-surgery physician-patient communication and information on post-surgery satisfaction. This points to the need to ensure organizational provisions that foster supportive and interactive relationships between surgeons and their patients to improve patients' satisfaction. Findings also highlight that early post-recovery period (i.e. <= 3 months) as a key driver of longer-term satisfaction

Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) is a surgical technique that has become more popular in recent years for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis in young patients. For these patients, an HRA offers the advantages of preserving the physiologic anatomy of a patient's femoral head size and neck offset, which has been theoretically suggested to improve range of motion and muscle function, as well as preserving bone stock for future revision surgeries. Although the improvements in quality of life outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) are well-documented, there is a lack of literature documenting the improvements in quality of life in patients undergoing HRA. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred and four consecutive patients presenting for elective HRA at our institution were recruited between 2004 and 2008 for participation in this study, which was approved by the Ethics Review Board at our institution. The mean age was 51±6y, male:female ratio 79:24 and mean BMI of 29.7±4.4 Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were used to preoperatively plan each procedure, and intraoperative procedures were performed using individualized templates [Kunz M, Rudan JF, Xenoyannis GL, Ellis RE. Computer assisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates. J Arthroplasty 2010;25(4):600–6]. Surgery time was 90±28 min including time for intraoperative verification of templating accuracy. Mobilization with physiotherapy began within 24 hrs of surgery and continued until the patient was discharged, usually within 2–3 days of surgery. Each patient completed the modified Harris Hip Score (HHS), the UCLA activity rating, the SF-36 mental and physical health score and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaires at their preoperative appointment, then at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperative. In addition, radiographs were taken at these appointments to confirm component position, and to check for signs of loosening or heterotopic ossification. Chi-square and t-tests were used for within and between group comparisons on selected variables and across times. RESULTS. Only four patients required revision to THA, with one case of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, one femoral neck fracture and two infections. The mean of the preoperative modified Harris Hip Scores was 51±19.7 with a significant improvement in the mean score at 6 months, 1 and 2 years postoperative (p<0.01). The preoperative UCLA activity index averaged 4 (range 2–9), improving to a mean of 6 at 6 months (p<0.001) then at 1 to 2 years to 7 (p<0.001). Mental state and further assessment of physical function were performed using the SF-36 scores, with the physical score initially 27.5 and improving to 45.2 after 2 years (p<0.01). The mental component score (MCS) means were almost unchanged, from 50.3 preoperatively to 51.5 after 2 years (p<0.21). Further data processing showed that patients who began with a below-average mental score also had significantly worse WOMAC scores for pain, stiffness and function; these patient showed a significantly higher MCS at 2 years (p<0.05). Those whose MCS were above average preoperatively showed little difference after 2 years. DISCUSSION. The computer-assisted surgical procedure allowed excellent reproduction of the patients' native anatomy, with an average postoperative difference in neck-shaft angle of 8°. We found that template-guided HRA provided reliable improvements in the patients' self-reported quality of life, based on improvements in the modified HHS, WOMAC, UCLA activity index, and SF-36 physical and mental scores. The stiffness scores did not improve as significantly as did the pain and function scores; we suspect this is partly due to the patients continuing to rely on coping mechanisms they used preoperatively to reduce the range of motion in their hips. Regarding mental component scores, the lower MCS group had worse WOMAC scores preoperatively, as well as worse general physical and physical role subscales of the SF-36 and worse scores in all of the mental component subscales of the SF-36. It is difficult to determine causation because our study was not designed to focus keenly on mental components. However, it is reassuring that these patients with worse mental well-being experienced such significant improvements in their mental well-being with surgical management of their hip symptoms, and surgeons should thus not shy away from performing surgery on patients due to concerns that a patient's depressive symptoms may indicate a potential for a poorer result. We conclude that template-guided HRA provided significant and reproducible improvements in patient quality of life, irrespective of preoperative mental well-being, making this procedure attractive for carefully selected patients with early-onset hip osteoarthritis

Aims

Healthcare systems have been rapidly restructured to meet COVID-19 demand. Clinicians are working to novel clinical guidelines, treating new patient cohorts and working in unfamiliar environments. Trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) has experienced cancellation of routine clinics and operating, with redistribution of the workload and human resources. To date, no studies have evaluated the mental health impact of these changes on the T&O workforce. We report the results of a novel survey on the impact of the pandemic on the mental health of our orthopaedic workforce and the contributory factors.