Abstract. Objective. In this phase 2 clinical trial (EudraCT 2011-000541-20) we examined the effect of denosumab versus placebo on osteolytic lesion activity in patients undergoing revision surgery after THA. Methods. Men and women ≥ 30 years old scheduled for revision surgery for symptomatic, radiologically-confirmed osteolysis were randomised (1:1) to receive either denosumab 60mg or placebo subcutaneously eight weeks prior to operation. At surgery, biopsies from the osteolytic membrane-bone interface were taken for histomorphometric analysis of osteoclast number, the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included other static histomorphometric indices and systemic bone turnover markers. Adverse events and patient-reported clinical outcome scores were recorded as safety endpoints. Results. Of the 24 subjects enrolled, 22 completed the study (10 denosumab) and comprise the per-protocol analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics and bone turnover markers between groups (p>0.05). The denosumab group had 78% fewer osteoclasts at osteolytic lesion sites (95% CI −61 to −95, P=0.011), 81% lower osteoclast surface (−70 to −95, P=0.009), and 73% lower eroded surface (−54 to −92, P=0.020) compared to the placebo group. Number of osteoblasts and osteoblast surface were also reduced by 81% (−62 to −100, p=0.021) and 82% (−64 to −101, p=0.017), respectively. Immunocytochemistry for cell proliferation (Ki67) and apoptosis (Caspase 3) identified no differences between the groups (p>0.05). At surgery, serum CTX-I in the denosumab group was 80% lower (−65 to −95, p<0.001), TRAP5b −65% (−40 to −90, p<0.001), PINP −53% (−41 to −65, p<0.001). Patient-reported outcome measures and the rate of adverse events (denosumab 6, placebo 7) were similar between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion. A single dose of denosumab reduced osteoclast activity within osteolytic lesions and was safe to administer. These data provide a biological basis for a phase 3 trial using clinical outcomes of pain, function and prosthesis survival as the study endpoints. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

A painful “dreaded black line” (DBL) has been associated with progression to complete fractures in atypical femur fractures (AFF). Adjacent sclerosis, an unrecognized radiological finding, has been observed in relation to the DBL. We document its incidence, associated features, demographics and clinical progression. We reviewed plain radiographs of 109 incomplete AFFs between November 2006 and June 2021 for the presence of sclerosis adjacent to a DBL. Radiographs were reviewed for location of lesions, and presence of focal endosteal or periosteal thickening. We collected demographical data, type and duration of bisphosphonate therapy, and progression to fracture or need for prophylactic stabilization, with a 100% follow up of 72 months (8 – 184 months). 109 femurs in 86 patients were reviewed. Seventeen sclerotic DBLs were observed in 14 patients (3 bilateral), involving 15.6% of all femora and 29.8% of femora with DBLs. Location was mainly subtrochanteric (41.2%), proximal diaphyseal (35.3%) and mid-diaphyseal (23.5%), and were associated with endosteal or periosteal thickening. All patients were female, mostly Chinese (92.9%), with a mean age of 69 years. 12 patients (85.7%) had a history of alendronate therapy, and the remaining 2 patients had zoledronate and denosumab therapy respectively. Mean duration of bisphosphonate therapy was 62 months. 4 femora (23.5%) progressed to complete fractures that were surgically managed, whilst 6 femora (35.3%) required prophylactic fixation. Peri-lesional sclerosis in DBL is a new radiological finding in AFFs, predominantly found in the proximal half of the femur, at times bilateral, and are always associated with endosteal or periosteal thickening. As a high proportion of patients required surgical intervention, these lesions could suggest non-union of AFFs, similar to the sclerotic margins commonly seen in fractures with non-union. The recognition of and further research into this new feature could shed more light on the pathophysiological progression of AFFs

Objectives. Osteoporosis has become an increasing concern for older people as it may potentially lead to osteoporotic fractures. This study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of ten therapies for post-menopausal women using network meta-analysis. Methods. We conducted a systematic search in several databases, including PubMed and Embase. A random-effects model was employed and results were assessed by the odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Furthermore, with respect to each outcome, each intervention was ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value. Results. With respect to preventing new vertebral fractures (NVF), all ten drugs outperformed placebo, and etidronate proved to be the most effective treatment (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.39). In addition, zoledronic acid and parathyroid hormone ranked higher compared with the other drugs. With respect to preventing clinical vertebral fractures (CVF), zoledronic acid proved to be the most effective drug (OR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.92), with denosumab as a desirable second option (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.96), when both were compared with placebo. As for adverse events (AE) and severe adverse events (SAE), no significant difference was observed. According to SUCRA, etidronate ranked first in preventing CVF; parathyroid hormone and zoledronic acid ranked highly in preventing NVF and CVF. Raloxifene was safe with a high rank in preventing AEs and SAEs though performed unsatisfactorily in efficacy. Conclusions. This study suggests that, taking efficacy and safety into account, parathyroid hormone and zoledronic acid had the highest probability of satisfactory performance in preventing osteoporotic fractures. Cite this article: G. Wang, L. Sui, P. Gai, G. Li, X. Qi, X. Jiang. The efficacy and safety of vertebral fracture prevention therapies in post-menopausal osteoporosis treatment: Which therapies work best? a network meta-analysis. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:452–463. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2016-0292.R1

Introduction and Objective. Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) of the spine is a locally aggressive benign lesion which can be treated by en bloc resection with wide margin to reduce the risk of local recurrence. To avoid morbidity associated with surgery, selective arterial embolization (SAE) can be considered the first-line treatment for ABCs of the spine. Other emerging treatments for ABCs include bisphosphonates, percutaneous doxycycline, sclerotherapy and Denosumab. In addition, we previously introduced the use of autologous bone marrow concentrate (BMC) injection therapy to stimulate bone healing and regeneration in ABC of the spine. One of the potential advantages of such a method is that surgical treatments are not necessary, thus allowing for both a minimally invasive approach and the treatment of poorly accessible lesions. In this prospective study we described the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous injection of autologous BMC in a series of patients affected by ABCs of the spine and followed for at least one year. Materials and Methods. Fourteen patients (6 male, 8 female) were treated between June 2014 to December 2019 with BMC injection for ABC of the spine. The mean age was 17.85 years. The mean follow up was 37.4 months (range 12– 60 months). The dimension of the cyst and the degree of ossification were measured by Computed Tomography (CT) scans before the treatment and during follow-up visits. Results. Six patients received a single dose of BMC, five patients received two doses and in three patients three doses of BMC were administered. The mean ossification of the cyst (expressed in Hounsfield units) increased statistically from 43.48±2.36 HU to 161.71±23.48 HU during follow-up time and the ossification was associated to an improvement of the clinical outcomes. The mean ossification over time was significantly higher in patients treated with a single injection compared to patients treated with multiple injections. No significant difference in ossification was found between cervical and non-cervical localization of the cyst. Moreover, the initial size of the cyst was not statistically associated with the degree of ossification during follow-up. We also observed that five out of six female patients (83.3%) were less than sixteen years old and four of these (66.7%) were managed with a single dose of BMC injection, while a higher percentage of male patients (6/8, 75%) were more than sixteen years old and more than one injection was administered to them. Conclusions. The results of this study reinforce our previous evidence on the use of BMC as a valid alternative for spinal ABC management when SAE is contraindicated or ineffective. The initial size of the cyst and its localization does not influence the efficacy of the treatment. However, BMC injection could be indicated as treatment of choice for spinal ABC in young adolescent women

The nature of the Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (ABC) is still controversial among benign tumor, often identifiable in the “aggressive” form (Enneking stage 3) or pseudotumoral lesion. It is well known instead the very high risk of intraoperative bleeding, indicating a strongly unfavorable relationship between the surgical morbidity and the nature of the disease. Recently, excellent results have been obtained in the treatment of ABC by repeated arterial embolizations (SAE), without any surgery, while initial experiences with administration of denosumab and doxycycline are still under study. This study presents the results of our initial experience in the treatment of vertebral ABC through the use of concentrated autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Two teenagers aged 15 years, male, and 14 years, female, came to our attention both with diagnosis of ABC in C2 vertebra which was histologically confirmed. They were both neurologically intact, the girl complained of neck pain. The arteriography showed in both cases close relationships between the pathological ABC vascularization and the vertebral and cervical ascending arteries, making treatment by selective arterial embolization unsuitable. After discussion with the parents of patients, we jointly decided to undertake the treatment by direct injection of MSCs preceded, in the same operative session, by harvesting from the iliac crest of 60 cc of bone marrow (by needle aspiration) and its separation with the use of concentration system Res-Q ™ 60 BMC. In the second case the treatment was repeated two times at distance of 4 months. The clinical and radiological follow-up is to of 30 months from the first treatment in both cases. In the first case the presence of newly formed bone within the ABC appeared as a clear sign of recovery just a month after the first treatment and increased gradually, until the cyst appeared completely ossified one year after the treatment, with associated disappearance of the pain. In the second case an initial sclerotic peripheral margin appeared after the second treatment and later ossification progressed, concurrently with the disappearance of the pain. Treatment with selective serial arterial embolization is considered effective in the treatment of ABC even if not without risks, mainly related to the frequent and repeated exposure to ionizing radiation. Furthermore, in a certain percentage of cases the procedure is not technically executable, especially for the presence of arteries afferent to the medullar vascularization. Inconsistent results were obtained with other procedures: the injection of calcitonin, steroid, alcoholic solutions, or the use of sclerosing substances. Radiation therapy, though very effective, it is not considered the first choice. Recently, promising results have been achieved by the injection of mononuclear cells derived from bone marrow in the treatment of Aneurysmal Bone Cyst. Based on the early results obtained in the two cases described, the injection of MSCs can be considered a valid alternative in the treatment of vertebral ABCs untreatable by embolization

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder characterized by reduced bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, which results in increased bone fragility and fracture risk. Casein kinase 2-interacting protein-1 (CKIP-1) is a protein that plays an important role in regulation of bone formation. The effect of CKIP-1 on bone formation is mainly mediated through negative regulation of the bone morphogenetic protein pathway. In addition, CKIP-1 has an important role in the progression of osteoporosis. This review provides a summary of the recent studies on the role of CKIP-1 in osteoporosis development and treatment.

Cite this article: X. Peng, X. Wu, J. Zhang, G. Zhang, G. Li, X. Pan. The role of CKIP-1 in osteoporosis development and treatment. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:173–178. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.72.BJR-2017-0172.R1.