Ankle fractures are the fourth most common fracture requiring surgical management. The deltoid ligament is considered the primary stabilizer of the ankle against a valgus force. The management of the deltoid ligament in ankle fractures is currently a controversial topic no consensus exists regarding repair in the setting of ankle fractures. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the role and indications for deltoid ligament repair in ankle fractures. A systematic database search was conducted with Medline, Pubmed and Embase for relevant studies discussing patients with ankle fractures involving deltoid ligament rupture and repair. The papers were screened independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. Study quality was evaluated using the MINORs criteria. Data extraction included post-operative outcomes, pain, range of motion (ROM), function, medial clear space (MCS), syndesmotic malreduction and complication rates. Following title, abstract and full text screening, 10 eligible studies published between 1987 and 2017 remained for data extraction (n = 528). The studies include 325 Weber B and 203 Weber C type fractures. Malreduction rate in studies with deltoid ligament repair was 7.4% in comparison to those without repair at 33.3% (p < 0.05). Eleven (4%) of deltoid ligament repair patients returned for re-operation to have implants removed in comparison to eighty three (42%) of those without repair (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference for pain, function, ROM, MCS and complication rates (p < 0.05). The mean operating time of deltoid ligament repair groups was 20 minutes longer than non-repair groups(p < 0.05). Deltoid ligament repair offers significantly lower syndesmotic malreduction rates and reduced re-operation rates for hardware removal when performed instead of transsyndesmotic screw fixation. When compared to non-repair groups, there are no significant differences in pain, function, ROM, MCS and complication rates. Deltoid ligament repair should be considered for ankle fracture patients with syndesmotic injury, especially those with Weber C. Other alternative syndesmotic fixation methods such as suture button fixation should be explored. A large multi-patient randomized control trial is required to further examine the outcomes of ankle fracture patients with deltoid ligament repair

Abstract. Objectives. The study aims to determine whether an arthroscopic ligament reconstruction is necessary to relieve clinical ankle instability symptoms in patients with an MRI scan showing medial or lateral ligament tear. Methods. This was a single centre retrospective case series study of 25 patients with ankle instability and ligament tear on MRI scan who had undergone arthroscopic procedures from January 2015 to December 2018. Patients were followed up for an average period of 3 years postoperatively to check for any recurrence of symptoms. Results. Of the 25 patients, 23 had ATFL tear on MRI scan, and 2 had deltoid ligament tear. Examination under anaesthesia was stable in 13 patients and unstable in 12 patients. The majority of the patients (76%) had a simple arthroscopic ankle debridement and no ligament repair. Six patients needed Brostrom repair. Conclusions. Our study has shown that in patients with MRI proven ligament tear and clinical instability, a ligament reconstruction was unnecessary in most patients. The instability symptoms of patients were relieved by simple ankle arthroscopic debridement

The most important determinant in the treatment of malleolar fractures is stability. Stable fractures have an intact deep deltoid ligament and do not displace with functional treatment. If the deep deltoid/medial malleolar complex is disrupted, the talus is at risk of displacement. Weber (2010) showed that weightbearing radiographs predicted stability in patients with undisplaced ankle fractures. We developed clinical criteria for potential instability and applied them to a prospective series of patients. Criteria included: medial clear space of < 4mm; medial tenderness, bruising or swelling; a fibular fracture above the syndesmosis; a bimalleolar or trimalleolar fracture; an open fracture; a high-energy fracture mechanism. A consecutive, prospectively documented series of 37 patients chose functional brace treatment of potentially unstable fractures. Weightbearing radiographs were performed in the brace before treatment, and free of brace at clinical union (6–9 weeks in all patients). Patients were encouraged to bear full weight and actively exercise their ankles in the brace. All fractures healed without displacement. The risk of displacement was 0% (95% CI 0–11.2%). This preliminary series gives support for the use of weightbearing radiographs to guide treatment of undisplaced ankle fractures

Traditional screw fixation of the syndesmosis can be prone to malreduction. Suture button fixation however, has recently shown potential in securing the fibula back into the incisura even with intentional malreduction. Yet, if there is sufficient motion to aid reduction, the question arises of whether or not this construct is stable enough to maintain reduction under loaded conditions. To date, there have been no studies assessing the optimal biomechanical tension of these constructs. The purpose of this study was to assess optimal tensioning of suture button fixation and its ability to maintain reduction under loaded conditions using a novel stress CT model. Ten cadaveric lower limbs disarticulated at the knee were used. The limbs were placed in a modified external fixator frame that allows for the application of sustained torsional (5 Nm), axial (500 N) and combined torsional/axial (5Nm/500N) loads. Baseline CT scans of the intact ankle under unloaded and loaded conditions were obtaining. The syndesmosis and the deltoid ligament complex were then sectioned. The limbs were then randomised to receive a suture button construct tightened at 4 kg force (loose), 8 kg (standard), or 12 kg (maximal) of tension and CT scans under loaded and unloaded conditions were again obtained. Eight previously described measurements were taken from axial slices 10 mm above the tibiotalar joint to assess the joint morphology under the intact and repair states, and the three loading conditions: a measure of posterolateral translation (a, b), medial/lateral translation (c, g), a measure of anterior-posterior translation (f), a ratio of anterior-posterior translation (d/e), an angle (Angle 1) created by a line parallel to the incisura and the axis of the fibula, and an angle (Angle 2) created between the medial surfaces of two malleoli. These measurements have all been previously described. Each measurement was taken at baseline and compared with the three loading scenarios. A repeated measures ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was used to test for significance. Significant lateral (g, maximum 5.26 mm), posterior (f, maximum 6.42 mm), and external rotation (angle 2, maximum 11.71°) was noted with the 4 kg repair when compared to the intact, loaded state. Significant posterior translation was also seen with the both the 8 kg and 12 kg repairs, however the incidence and magnitude was less than with the 4 kg repair. Significant overcompression (g, 1.69 mm) was noted with the 12 kg repair. Suture button constructs must be appropriately tensioned to maintain reduction and re-approximate the degree of physiological motion at the distal tibiofibular joint. If inserted too loosely, these constructs allow for supraphysiologic motion which may have negative implications on ligament healing. These constructs also demonstrate overcompression of the syndesmosis when inserted at maximal tension however the clinical effect of this remains to be determined

Purpose. The anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AiTFL) is the primary lateral ligamentous stabilizer of the ankle syndesmosis. Current syndesmosis repair techniques traverse the tibia and fibula, but do not anatomically reconstruct the AiTFL. We compared a novel AiTFL anatomic repair technique (ART) to rigid syndesmosis screw fixation (SCREW). Method. Twelve cadaveric below knee specimens were compared radiographically and using a biomechanical testing protocol. All specimens underwent a CT scan of the ankle joint prior to testing. Next, the AiTFL, interosseous membrane and deltoid ligament were sectioned, and the posterior malleolus osteotomized, to recreate a trimalleolar-equivalent ankle fracture. The posterior malleolus was repaired with the posterior ligamentous insertions intact and functional (PMALL). Ankles were examined under fluoroscopy with an external rotation stress exam and the medial clear space (MCS) measured. Specimens were then randomized to receive either a conventional syndesmosis screw (SCREW), or the novel anatomic repair technique (ART). External rotation stress fluoroscopy was repeated. A second CT was completed and the fibular position compared to the pre-injury CT. Each specimen was then loaded in external rotation until failure using a custom biomechanical jig. Results. The MCS during stress examination increased by 1.04 0.31mm in the PMALL group. MCS increased significantly less at only 0.300.07mm (p=0.002) in the ART group. The SCREW fixation method demonstrated a delta MCS of 0.280.16mm (p=0.008). Post repair CT showed that 33% of specimens were subluxed from the SCREW group compared to 0% for the ART. Mean torque at failure for ART was 24.85.5Nm compared to 16.85.8Nm for SCREW (p=0.01). Conclusion. Repair of the posterior malleolus alone demonstrated a greater than 1mm of medial clear space widening and is not sufficient to re-establish syndesmotic stability. Addition of the ART or SCREW technique restored syndesmotic stability. None of the ART specimens demonstrated fibular subluxation, while 33% of SCREW specimens were subluxed anteriorly on CT. Biomechanical strength of the ART was found to be greater than that of rigid screw fixation