Cartilage lesions vary in the spectrum from benign enchondromas to highly malignant dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas. From the treatment perspective, enchondromas are observed, Grade 1 chondrosarcomas are curetted like aggressive benign tumors, and rest are resected like other sarcomas. Although biopsy for tissue diagnosis is the gold standard for diagnosis and grade determination in chondrosarcoma, tumor heterogeneity limits the grading in patients following a biopsy. In the absence of definite pre-treatment grading, a surgeon is therefore often in a dilemma when deciding the best treatment option. Radiology has identified aggressive features and aggressiveness scores have been used to try and grade these tumors based on the imaging characteristics but there have been very few published reports with a uniform group and large number of cases to derive a consistent scoring and correlation. The authors asked these study questions :(1) Does Radiology Aggressiveness and its Score correlate with the grade of chondrosarcoma? (2) Can a cut off Radiology Agressiveness Score value be used to guide the clinician and add value to needle biopsy information in offering histological grade dependent management?. A retrospective analysis of patients with long bone extremity intraosseous primary chondrosarcomas were correlated with the final histology grade for the operated patients and Radiological parameters with 9 parameters identified a priori and from published literature (radiology aggressiveness scores - RAS) were evaluated and tabulated. 137 patients were identified and 2 patients were eliminated for prior surgical intervention. All patients had tissue diagnosis available and pre-treatment local radiology investigations (radiographs and/or CT scans and MRI scans) to define the RAS parameters. Spearman correlation has indicated that there was a significant positive association between RAS and final histology grading of long bone primary intraosseous chondrosarcomas. We expect higher RAS values will provide grading information in patients with inconclusive pre-surgery biopsy to tumor grades and aid in correct grade dependant surgical management of the lesion. Prediction of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma from higher RAS will be attempted and a correlation to obtain a RAS cut off, although this may be challenging to achieve due to the overlap of features across the intermediate grade, high grade and dedifferentiated grades. Radiology Aggressiveness correlates with the histologic grade in long bone extremity primary chondrosarcomas and the correlation of radiology and biopsy can aid in treatment planning by guiding us towards a low-grade neoplasm which may be dealt with intralesional extended curettage or high-grade lesion which need to be resected. Standalone RAS may not solve the grading dilemma of primary long bone intraosseous chondrosarcomas as the need for tissue diagnosis for confirming atypical cartilaginous neoplasm cannot be eliminated, however in the event of a needle biopsy grade or inconclusive open biopsy it may guide us towards a correlational diagnosis along with radiology and pathology for grade based management of the chondrosarcoma
