Ganz peri-acetabular osteotomy is commonly used to treat symptomatic hip dysplasia. It aims to increase the load bearing contact area of the hip to reduce the risk of subsequent osteoarthritis. In this study we assess the radiographic and clinical results of the procedure since its introduction to our unit. All patients undergoing Ganz osteotomies at our unit were followed up prospectively. Data collected included patient demographics and pre- and post-operative functional scores (Harris and Non-arthritic hip scores). In addition, acetabular correction was evaluated on pre-and post-operative radiographs (using Centre-Edge angle and Tonnis angle). Complications were also noted. Overall 50 procedures were performed between 2007 and 2013 with median follow-up of 3 years (1–7 years). The majority of patients (90%) were female. Average age at time of surgery was 32 years (17–39). There were significant improvements in pre- and post-operative median functional scores (Modified Harris Hip Score = 52 versus 63, p=0.001), Non-arthritic Hip Score = 49 versus 60, p=0.01). Median Centre Edge Angle improved from 15 degrees pre-operatively (range = 8–19 degrees) to 29 degrees post-operatively (22–36 degrees), p=0.02. Similarly, pre-operative Tonnis angle improved from 19 degrees (16–38) to 7 degrees (2–14), p=0.01. Four patients developed post-operative complications: 1 superficial wound infection, 1deep infection requiring hip washout and antibiotic treatment and 2 patients subsequently requiring total hip replacements. We have shown that the Ganz peri-acetabular osteotomy can be effective for the treatment of painful hip dysplasia improving both functional and radiographic outcomes. However, patient selection is a key factor

The Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO) has become the established method for treating developmental dysplasia of the hip. In the 1990s, the surgical technique was modified to avoid postoperative cam impingement due to uncorrected head neck offset or pincer impingement due to acetabular retroversion after reorientation. The goal of the study was to compare the survivorship of two series of PAOs with and without the modifications of the surgical technique and to calculate predictive factors for a poor outcome. A retrospective, comparative study of two consecutive series of PAOs with a minimum follow-up of 10 years was carried out. Series A included 75 PAOs performed between 1984 and 1987 and represent the first cases of PAO. Series B included 90 hips that underwent PAO between 1997 and 2000. In this series, emphasis was put on an optimal acetabular version next to the correction of the lateral coverage. Additionally, a concomitant arthrotomy was performed in every hip to check impingement-free range of motion after reorientation and in 50 hips (56%) an additional offset correction was performed. Survivorship analyses according to Kaplan and Meier were carried out and the endpoint was defined as conversion to a total hip arthroplasty, progression of osteoarthritis, or a Merle d'Aubign score 14. Predictive factors for poor outcome were calculated using the Cox-regression analysis. The cumulative 10-year survivorship of Series A was significantly decreased (77%; 95%-confidence interval [CI] 72–82%) compared to Series B (86%; 95%-CI 82–89%, p=0.005). Hips with an aspherical head showed a significantly increased survivorship if a concomitant offset correction was performed intraoperatively (90% [95%-CI 86–94%] versus 77% [95%-CI 71–82%], p=0.003). Preoperative factors predicting poor outcome included a high age at surgery, a Merle d'Aubign score 14, a positive impingement test, a positive Trendelenburg sign, limp, an increased grade of osteoarthritis according to Tönnis, and (sub-) luxation of the femoral head (Severin > 3). In addition, predictive factors related to the three dimensional orientation of the acetabular fragment were identified. These included total, anterior, and posterior acetabular over-coverage or under-coverage, acetabular retroversion or excessive anteversion, a lateral center edge angle < 22 °, an acetabular index > 14 °, and no offset correction in aspherical femoral heads. A good long term result after PAO mainly depends on optimal three-dimensional orientation of the acetabulum and impingement-free range of motion with correction of an aspherical head neck junction if necessary

Cam type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is due to an aspheric femoral head, which is best quantified by the alpha angle described on MRI and CT-scan. Radiographic measurement of the alpha angle is not well codified and studies from the literature cannot conclude on the best view to measure it. Most authors also describe a mixed type FAI which associates an aspheric femoral head with an excessive anterior acetabular coverage of the femoral head. Anterior center edge (ACE) angle has been described on the false profile view to measure anterior acetabular coverage in hip dysplasia and has never been evaluated in FAI. In this study, we developed a new lateral hip view which associates a lateral view of the femoral neck and a false profile view of the acétabulum, which we called profile view in impingement position (PVIP). Twenty six patients operated for FAI had CT-scan, the PVIP and the false profile view of one or two hips according to pain. A control group of 19 patients who did not suffer from the hip had the PVIP. Alpha angles were measured twice on 17 CT scan of FAI patients by two observers and compared with the alpha angles measured on the corresponding hip PVIP by a correlation analysis. Alpha angles were measured twice on 45 PVIP in FAI patient and on 19 PVIP in the control group by three observers. ACE angles were measured once on 15 PVIP and on 15 false profile views. Means were compared by two tail paired t-tests, intra- and inter-observer reliability were measured by intraclass correlation coefficient. Mean alpha angle on CT scan was 65.8° and 65.6° for observers 1 and 2 respectively (p>0.05). It was 63.6° and 64.3° on the PVIP (p>0.05). No significant difference was found between CT scan and radiographic measurements, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were good at 0.74 and 0.8. ICC was 0.86 for inter-rater reliability, and 0.91 for intra-rater reliability for CT-scan alpha angle measures. ICC for PVIP measures varied from 0.82 to 0.9 for intra-rater reliability and from 0.6 to 0.9 for inter-rater reliability. Mean alpha angle measured on PVIP in FAI patients was 63.3° and was 44.9° in control subjects and the difference was significant (p<0.001) for the three observers. None of the FAI patients and 88% of the control subjects had an alpha angle < 50°. Mean ACE angle was 26.8° on PVIP and 32.8° on the false profile view, the difference was significant (p=0.015), and the Pearson's correlation coefficient was moderate (r=0.58). The PVIP is a reliable radiographic view to measure the alpha angle. It allows a good quantification of the alpha angle comparable to CT-scan measurements and permits to differentiate patients from control subjects. PVIP is not a good view to quantify anterior edge angle probably because of acetabular retroversion due to the hip flexion needed in this view. Mean ACE angle measured on the false profile view in FAI patient was comparable to ACE angle in general population reported in the literature