Introduction. Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants use an interference fit to achieve fixation, which depends on the difference between the inner dimensions of the implant and outer dimensions of the bone. However, the most optimal interference fit is still unclear. A higher interference fit could lead to a superior fixation, but it could also cause bone abrasion and permanent deformation during implantation. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of increasing the interference fit from 350 µm to 700 µm on the primary stability of cementless tibial implants by measuring micromotions and gaps at the bone-implant interface when subjected to two loading conditions. Methods. Two cementless e.motion® tibial components (Total Knee System, B. Braun) with different interference fit and surface coating were implanted in six pairs of relatively young human cadaver tibias (47–60 years). The Orthoload peak loads of gait (1960N) and squat (1935N) were applied to the specimens with a custom made load applicator (Figure 1A). The micromotions (shear displacement) and opening/closing gaps (normal displacement) were measured with Digital Image Correlation (DIC) in 6 different regions of interest (ROIs - Figure 1B). Two General Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) were created with micromotions and interfacial gaps as dependent variables, bone quality, loading conditions, ROIs, and interference fit implants as independent variables, and the cadaver specimens as subject variables. Results. No significant difference was found for the micromotions between the two interference fit implants (gait p=0.755, squat p=0.232), nor for interfacial gaps (gait p=0.474, squat p=0.269). In contrast, significant differences were found for the ROIs in the two dependent variables (p < 0.001). The micromotions in the anterior ROIs (AM and AL) showed fewer micromotions for the low interference fit implant (Figure 2). More closing gaps (negative values) were seen for all ROIs (Figure 3), except in AM ROI during squat, which showed opening gaps (positive values). The posterior ROIs (PM and PL) showed more closing than seen in the anterior ROIs (AM and AL) for both loading configurations. Discussion. The results presented here demonstrate that increasing the interference fit from 350 µm to 700 µm does not affect the micromotions at the implant-bone interface of tibial TKA. While micromotions values were all below the threshold for bone ingrowth (40 µm), closing gaps were quite substantial (∼−150 µm). Since cementless e.motion® TKA components with an interference fit of 350 µm had shown a survival rate of 96.2% after 8.3 years postoperatively, interfacial gaps can be expected to be within a threshold value that can guarantee good primary stability. Moreover, increasing the interference fit to 700 µm can be considered a good range for an interference fit. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Initial stability of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) tibial trays is necessary to facilitate biological fixation. Previous experimental and computational studies describe a dynamic loading micromotion test used to evaluate the initial stability of a design. Experimental tests were focused on cruciate retaining (CR) designs and walking gait loading. A FEA computational study of various constraints and activities found CR designs during walking gait experienced the greatest micromotion. This experimental study is a continuation of testing performed on CR and walking gait to include a PS design and stair descent activity. Methods. The previously described experimental method employed robotic loading informed by a custom computational model of the knee. Different TKA designs were virtually implanted into a specimen specific model of the knee. Activities were simulated using in-vivo loading profiles from instrumented tibia implants. The calculated loads on the tibia were applied in a robotic test. Anatomically designed cementless tibia components were implanted into a bone surrogate. Micromotion of the tray relative to the bone was measured using digital image correlation at 10 locations around the tray. Three PS and three CR samples were dynamically loaded with their respective femur components with force and moment profiles simulating walking gait and stair descent activities. Periods of walking and stair descent cycles were alternated for a total of 2500 walking cycles and 180 stair descent cycles. Micromotion data was collected intermittently throughout the test and the overall 3D motion during a particular cycle calculated. The data was normalized to the maximum micromotion value measured throughout the test. The experimental data was evaluated against previously reported computational finite element model of the micromotion test. Results. The maximum average micromotion was on the CR design during walking gait. The greatest CR micromotion during stair descent was 67% of the maximum. The maximum micromotion in the PS design was 55% of the CR walking maximum and occurred during stair descent. The next highest PS value was 52% during walking. The absolute difference in these values was under 3 µm. The majority of the PS micromotion values around the tray were less than 50% that of the maximum micromotion of the CR design. Discussion. The experimental continuation of this investigation into cementless tray stability aligned with computational results in this model. The computational model predicted the PS tray would have 50% of the micromotion of the CR design, which was close to the experimental test. For CR, the computational rank order for walking and stair descent was also the same in the experimental follow-up. Future work in this investigation will include continued validation of the computational and experimental models, including more designs. Further exploration into accounting for patient and surgical variability should be explored. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mid-term results of clinical and radiographic results Hi-tech knee a cementless total knee arthroplasty (Nakashima medical Co. Ltd., Okayama, Japan). This TKA system was developed in Chiba University from 1994. The characteristic of this system are flat on flat CR-TKA and cementless fixation. Contact surface are made of titanium alloy and UHMWPE, which is produced by the direct compression mold manufacturing method. Material and Method. Between May 1998 and May 2005, we performed 53 consecutive primary TKAs for 42 patients. There were 41 women and 1 man with a mean age of 64.4 years (39 to 78 years). The average follow up period was 7 years 8 months (5 years to 12 years). Osteoarthritis knee were 21 knees and rheumatoid arthritis were 32 knees. The mean pre-operative FTA was 181.7 degrees (168 to 203 degrees). The method of the operation went in measured cut technique for all cases. All 53 knees were implanted with a cruciate retaining prosthesis. All comportments, included a patella component, were fixed without cement. Clinical evaluations were performed according to American Knee Society (KS) system, knee score and function score. Results. The mean preoperative and postoperative, at the latest follow up, maximum flexion angles were 104 and 114 degrees, respectively. The KS knee score and function score improved from 47.5 and 38.9 points before surgery to 87.6 and 80.4 points after surgery, respectively. Postoperative alignment FTA average 174.8 degrees. Within follow up period, it maintained good valgus-varus stability. There was no major loosening. Six knees (11%) were observed radiolucent line at medial tibia plateau less than 1mm. No revisions of TKA were required because of loosening or sinking. There was also no problem at patellar component. Conclusions. Hi-Tech knee a cementless TKA system was made for the suitable for a Japanese knee, strong initial fixation in a concept. The patella component is also cementless fixation. Contact surface are made of titanium alloy and UHMWPE of the direct compression mold method, it was able to protect the abrasion of the polyethylene in a stable state, too. The mid-term results of Hi-Tech knee a cementless TKA, not only OA but also RA patient knee, provided almost good results

Introduction

A total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the standard of care treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Over the last decade, we have observed a change in TKA patient population to include younger patients. This cohort tends to be more active and thus places more stress on the implanted prothesis. Bone cement has historically been used to establish fixation between the implant and host bone, resulting in two interfaces where loosening may occur. Uncemented fixation methods provide a promising alternative to cemented fixation. While vulnerable during the early post-operative period, cementless implants may be better suited to long-term stability in younger patient cohorts. It is currently unknown whether the surgical technique used to implant the cementless prostheses impacts the longevity of the implant. Two different surgical techniques are commonly used by surgeons and may result in different load distribution across the joint, which will affect bone ingrowth. The overall objective of the study is to assess implant migration and in vivo kinematics following cementless TKA.

Cementless fixation in TKA has been inconsistently adopted since its early use but is increasing due to a number of factors, predominantly related to a demand for improved survivorship in younger patients. Modern biomaterials have demonstrated optimal bone ingrowth and have also contributed to a renewed confidence by surgeons to utilise cementless fixation in TKA. With a modern design and appropriate surgical technique, optimal mechanical stability of new designs have been demonstrated and can build upon the excellent long-term outcomes that have rivaled traditional cemented TKA. Paramount to obtaining successful long-term osseointegration and clinical survivorship with cementless fixation is an awareness of the past failure mechanisms to improve implant modern implant design, and should also guide meticulous surgical technique.

A robust implant design with optimal surgical technique is critical to success when employing cementless fixation in TKA. The tried and true principles of sufficient mechanical stability to minimise micromotion of an osteoconductive implant surface with intimate contact against viable bone are essential to allow osseointegration and long-term survivorship. The surgical techniques and tips for “getting it right” include: 1.) Meticulous planar cuts - Prevention of saw blade deviation (particularly anterior femoral cortex and sclerotic medial tibial plateau), Appropriate tolerances in cutting guides (particularly 4-in-1 femoral cutting guide), Appropriate interference fit for tibial keel/stem, patella planar cut, Perfect planar cut on tibial surface confirmed with “4-corner test”. 2.) Implantation of components to maximise mechanical stability - Intimate implant contact with bone (minimizing gaps), Consider bone slurry to minimise gaps, Prevention of femoral component flexion with impaction, Ensure parallel position of tibial baseplate with tibial cut surface during impaction, Peripheral fixation on tibial baseplate, either screws or pegs, to provide supplemental fixation and stability in titanium tray designs.

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is typically performed using cement to secure the prosthesis to bone. There are complications associated with cementing that include intra-operative hypotension, third-body abrasive wear, and loosening at the cement interfaces. A cementless prosthesis using a novel keeled trabecular metal tibial baseplate was developed to eliminate the need for cementing the tibial component in TKA.

This paper reports the clinical outcomes and survivorship of a prospective series of Advantim cementless TKR performed at the RAH between 1993 and 2005. There were 210 knees in 176 patients. All procedures were performed or supervised by a single surgeon.

All patients were followed up at regular intervals, up to 15 years later, with Knee Society Cinical Rating System and X-Rays. No patients were lost to follow-up. The knee rating improved from a median of 47 to 90. The median range of motion was 0–100. At 11 years the survivorship of the tibial component was 95.5% and femur was 93.7%. There were two major revisions and three minor revisions for polyethelene exchange. There was no deep sepsis. There was no knee stiffness requiring arhrolysis or manipulation. No screw osteolysis observed. Advantim was the best perfoming TKR in the AOA registry in 2008 with 0.3 revisions per 100 observed component years.

Cementless total knee replacement (TKR) is at the present date a controversial topic. Aim of the study was to compare the effect on tibial periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) between different implant materials and designs.

During the two-year period between January 2005 and December 2006, we analysed data of 45 patients who underwent consecutively cementless TKR (49 implants) at our Institution for primary osteoarthritis. Data was divided in 2 groups: A) 26 implants with tantalium tibial component (Zimmer NexGen Trabecular Metal^TM Monoblock); B) 23 implants with porous titanium tibial component (Lima MultiGen^TM). Data was comparable per sex, age, BMI, post-op alignment, post-op KSS > 75, absence of major post-op complications. Standard AP x-rays were taken 4 months post-op and 8 years post-op. In order to quantify the reduction of BDM, we determined using ImageJ (an open source software) the Mean Grey Value (MGV) of a specific area on the 4 months- and 8 yrs-postop AP x-rays.

Group A and Group B had an average MGV variation of, respectively, 11.79% and 10.51%; there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Reduction of BMD in a TKR is known to be a biomechanical response to load and it is conditioned by the alignment of the components and their design. Our study shows that the different materials (porous titanium vs. tantalium), in relation to the different implant design, have a similar effect on the surrounding bone. The overall results show a valid osseointegration in both group of patients.

Background

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as a method of fixation; however, its durability has been questionable for the long-term use because of the loosening after the cement deterioration, its vulnerability toward infectious resistance, and a smaller amount of healthy bone left for the knee revision surgery. Especially, a decrease of bone density on the proximal tibia has been believed to be triggered as a result of stress shielding. When compared with a cemented TKA, a cementless TKA reduces the amount of bone loss after surgery. In 1999, the Trabecular Metal (TM), with its main composition being the porous tantalum metal, became available as a choice of the porous cementless knee joint prosthesis. The characteristics of porous tantalum metal are its great affinity to the bone as well as its similarity to cancellous bone. The porous tantalum metal starts to bond with osteoblasts, and fills up 80% of porous structure in one year; therefore, it has been characterized by its higher initial fixation strength. However, it is questionable if strong fixation strength due to bone ingrowth between the tibial tray mainly made up with the porous tantalum metal and a cancellous bone will continually be kept. Bobyn, JD, Dunbar et al. have acknowledged the existence of bone ingrowth based on the radiographic evaluation; however, their data had not been quantified in their report. In this study, the bone ingrowth density have periodically quantified using 3D bone morphometric software (TRI/3D-BON64.RATOC) after taking CT of the knee joint prosthesis.

Background. Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty has been developed to reduce the incidence of failure secondary to aseptic loosening, osteolysis and stress-induced osteopenia, especially in younger and more active patients. However, failures are still more common compared to cemented components, especially those involving the tibia. It is hypothesized that this is caused by incomplete contact between the tibial tray and the underlying bony surface due to: (i) inadequate flatness of the tibial osteotomy, or (ii) failure of implantation to spread the area of contact over the exposed cancellous surface. In the present study we compare the contact area developed during implantation of a cementless tray as a function of the initial flatness of the tibial osteotomy. Method. Eight joint replacement surgeons prepared 14 cadaveric knees for cementless TKR using a standard instrumentation set (ZimmerBiomet Inc). The tibial osteotomy was created using an oscillating bone saw and a 1.27mm blade (Stryker Inc) directed by a slotted cutting guide mounted on an extramedullary rod and fixed to the tibia with pins and screws. The topography of the exposed cancellous surface was captured with a commercial laser scanner (Faro Inc, Halifax, approx. 33,000 surface points). 3D computer models of each tibial surface were generated in a CAD environment (Rapidform, Inuus). After scanning, a cementless tibial tray was implanted on the prepared tibial surface using a manual impactor. The tray-tibia constructs were dissected free of soft tissue, embedded in mounting resin, and sectioned with a diamond wafering saw. Points of bone-tray contact and interface separation were identified by stereomicroscopy and incorporated in the 3D computer models. Maps were generated depicting contacting and non-contacting areas Each model was subdivided into 7 zones for characterizing the distribution of interface contact in terms of anatomic location. Results. The flatness for the tibial osteotomies averaged 1.1±0.35 mm (range: 0.56–1.81mm). After impaction, 79.8±0.3% of the tibial surface had plastically deformed to establish a contacting interface with the implant. 15.1% of the bony surface was within 0.2mm of the tray and 17.6% was within 0.3mm. Gaps large enough to impede ingrowth only occupied 2.6% of the exposed tibial These non-contacting areas were typically located centrally at the ACL, PCL and canal zones. There was an inverse linear relationship between the initial flatness of the tibial osteotomy and the percentage of tray-bone contact. Conclusions. The amount of direct contact between the bone and implant is critical for the development of stability in cementless fixation. We found a relationship between ultimate bony contact and initial flatness. However, we also found that during impaction of the implant, bony contact increased through deformation of the most prominent peaks of the cancellous surface. Interface gaps were consistently observed in central areas of the tibia surface located above the medullary canal which may be reduced through selection of trays with distal keels. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs are clinically successful and allow for long term biological fixation. Utilizing morselized bone to promote biological fixation is a strategy in cementless implantation. However, it is unknown how bone debris influences the initial placement of the tray. Recent findings show that unseated tibia trays without good contact with the tibial resection experience increased motion. This current study focuses on the effect of technique and instrument design on the initial implantation of a cementless porous tibia. Specifically, can technique or instrument design influence generation of bone debris, and thereby change the forces required to fully seat a cementless tray with pegs?. Methods. This bench top test measured the force-displacement curve during controlled insertion of a modern cementless tibia plate with two fixation pegs. A total of nine pairs of stripped human cadaver tibias were prepared according to the surgical technique. However, the holes for the fixation pegs were drilled intentionally shallow to isolate changes in insertion force due to the hole preparation. A first generation instrument set (Instrument 1.0) and new instrument set design (Instrument 2.0), including a new drill bit designed to remove debris from the peg hole, were used. The tibias prepared with Instrument 1.0 were either cleaned to remove bone debris from the holes or not cleaned. The tibias prepared with the Instrument 2.0 instruments were not cleaned, resulting in three groups: Instrument 1.0 (n=7), Instrument 1.0 Cleaned (n=5), and Instrument 2.0 (n=6). Following tibia resection and preparation of holes for the fixation pegs, the tibias were cut and potted in bone cement ensuring the osteotomy was horizontal. The tibial tray was mounted in a load frame (Enduratec) and the trays were inserted at a constant rate (0.169mm/sec) while recording the force. The test was concluded when the pegs were clearly past the bottom of the intentionally shallow holes. Results. The force-displacement curves from this method were dependent on the instrument used and cleaning of the holes. Instrument 2.0 specimens were inserted about 2 mm past the maximum peg depth before experiencing a significant increased resistance. The Instrument 1.0 Cleaned holes saw an increase in force slightly past the maximum peg depth, while the Instrument 1.0 group saw increase in force around 1 mm before reaching the maximum peg depth. The average insertion force required to reach maximum peg depth was significantly higher (p<0.05) for the Instrument 1.0 group (790.7 N, sd=185.9) than both the Instrument 1.0 Cleaned (429.7 N, sd=116.8) and the Instrument 2.0 group (580.4 N, sd=89.3). The insertion forces at a ‘mid-tunnel’ location, before the increase in resistance, were not affected by drill design as the drill diameters were the same, resulting in the same press fit. Conclusions. Bone debris in fixation feature holes increases the force to fully seat a cementless tibia plate. This suggests there is a cost to leaving morselized bone in place. Removing bone debris through instrument design or surgical technique can ensure that a tibial plate is fully seated at time of implantation, maximizing initial fixation

In properly chosen patients, cementless total knee arthroplasty has achieved success rates equal to cemented designs. The initial variable results of early cementless total knee replacements were a function of design, surgical technique and patient selection. Important design considerations that have enhanced biologic ingrowth include the use of commercially pure titanium with optimal pore size and porosity, and avoidance of porous-coated stems and plugs that cause stress shielding of the bone-implant interface. Factors in surgical technique that enhance bone ingrowth include precise bone cuts that maximise bone-implant contact, and the application of autogenous bone slurry to cut surfaces. Additional factors are restoration of normal alignment, appropriate ligament balance, and the reproduction of the patient's native tibial slope in order to prevent tibial component subsidence. Young and active patients are ideal biological hosts for the use of cementless knee fixation. Their relatively dense cancellous bone and rich blood supply provides for robust purchase for initial fixation and the appropriate milieu for long-term biologic fixation. With increasing life expectancy, this more durable interface is desirable. With avoidance of porous-coated stems and pegs and prevention of fibrous tissue attachment, potential future revisions are more bone-sparing relative to methylmethacrylate fixation. Numerous reports, as well as the authors’ published 10- to 14-year results, demonstrate that cementless fixation in appropriately selected patients provides results comparable to cemented TKA, with the advantage of conserving bone stock and eliminating the potential problems of cement fixation

This video presentation serves to illustrate the pertinent aspects of bone preparation and implant insertion in cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) utilizing porous tantalum as a fixation surface integral to the success of the procedure. The patient is typical of the surgical candidate frequently encountered for arthroplasty—a 60-year-old female with three compartment osteoarthritis of the knee, and manifesting a 10-degree varus deformity and 5-degree flexion contracture. She is a limited community ambulator without the use of support. A standard surgical exposure is utilised and the bone preparation is identical to that used in the fixation of cemented implants—no alignment guides, cutting guides, or referencing instrumentation is used that is unique in the femoral or tibial bone preparation. The principal difference is in the patellar preparation. Instrumentation unique to the cementless porous tantalum patella is utilised in order to achieve three goals: a composite implant/residual bone thickness that replicates the thickness of the native patella, the generation of a planar patellar resection that is parallel to the anterior cut of the femur, and secure initial stability of fixation. Keys to the initial fixation of the porous tantalum tibial and patellar components include the high surface friction of the material against bone, as well as the interference between the hexagonal pegs of each implant within the fixation holes (which are dimensionally smaller in diameter than the major and minor dimensions of the peg geometry). Care must be instituted to ensure that no bone or soft tissue debris is interposed at the mating surfaces of the implants that would compromise interface contact, and to carefully suction the peg holes to ensure that no debris impedes the complete seating of the pegs and the prosthesis. Lastly, all mating surfaces at the implant/bone interface must approach each other in a parallel fashion to optimise contact between the fixation surfaces and the bone resection surfaces. The procedure is simply, easily performed, and is time saving. Total elapsed time for insertion of all three TKA implants in this video is 90 seconds

In properly chosen patients, cementless total knee arthroplasty has achieved success rates equal to cemented designs. The initial variable results of early cementless total knee replacements were a function of design, surgical technique and patient selection. Important design considerations that have enhanced biologic ingrowth include the use of commercially pure titanium with optimal pore size and porosity, and avoidance of porous-coated stems and plugs that cause stress shielding of the bone-implant interface. Factors in surgical technique that enhance bone ingrowth include precise bone cuts that maximize bone-implant contact, and the application of autogenous bone slurry to cut surfaces. Additional factors are restoration of normal alignment, appropriate ligament balance, and the reproduction of the patient's native tibial slope in order to prevent tibial component subsidence. Young and active patients are ideal biological hosts for the use of cementless knee fixation. Their relatively dense cancellous bone and rich blood supply provides for robust purchase for initial fixation and the appropriate milieu for long-term biologic fixation. With increasing life expectancy, this more durable interface is desirable. With avoidance of porous-coated stems and pegs and prevention of fibrous tissue attachment, potential future revisions are more bone-sparing relative to methylmethacrylate fixation. Numerous reports, as well as the authors' published 10- to 14-year results, demonstrate that cementless fixation in appropriately selected patients provides results comparable to cemented TKA, with the advantage of conserving bone stock and eliminating the potential problems of cement fixation

Introduction. Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has several advantages compared to the cemented approach, including elimination of bone cement, a quicker and easier surgical technique, and potentially a stronger long-term fixation. However, to ensure the successful long-term biological fixation between the porous implant and the bone, initial press-fit stability is of great importance. Undesired motion at the bone-implant interface may inhibit osseointegration and cause failure of biological fixation. Initial stability of a cementless femoral implant is affected by implant geometry, bone press-fit dimension, and characteristics of the porous coating. The purpose of this study was to compare the initial fixation stability of two types of porous femoral implants by quantifying the pull-out force using a paired cadaveric study design. Methods. The two types of cementless TKA femoral implants evaluated in this study had identical implant geometry but different porous coatings (Figure 1). The first type had a conventional spherical-bead coating (Type A), while the second type had an innovative irregularly-shaped-powder coating (Type B). The porous coating thickness was equivalent for both types of implants, thus the dimensional press-fit with bone was also equivalent. Three pairs of cadaveric femurs were prepared using standard TKA surgical technique, with each pair of the femurs receiving one of each porous implant type. An Instron 3366 load frame (Norwood, MA, USA) was used to pull the femoral implant out from the distal femur bone (Figure 2). The testing fixture was designed to allow free rotation between the implant and the actuator. The pullout was performed under a displacement control scheme (5 mm/min). Peak pull-out force was recorded and compared between the two implant groups. Results. Mean pull-out force for the Type B porous femoral implants (512 ± 246 N) was greater than that of the Type A porous femoral implants (310 ± 185 N), although the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05) (Figure 3). Discussion. This paired cadaveric study showed that the innovative Type B porous coating provides equivalent and potentially greater pull-out force than the conventional Type A porous coating. Lack of statistical significance could be attributed to the limited sample size. Although pull-out testing is not a physiological loading scenario for TKA implant, it provides a relevant assessment of the implant-bone press-fit stability. With all other factors the same, the greater pull-out force observed in the Type B implants is likely related to the higher roughness and friction of the new porous coating. Previous experiments have shown that the Type B porous coating has significantly greater friction against Sawbones surface (coefficient of friction 0.89) compared to Type A porous coating (coefficient of friction 0.50), which was consistent with the findings in this study. Greater initial fixation stability is more favorable in cementless TKA as it reduces the risk of interface motion and better facilitates long-term biological fixation

Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is an alternative to cemented TKA and hybrid fixation. We present incidence of loosening of uncemented porus coated tibial trays (two to five years with a mean of 3.8 years) in our retrospective clinical and radiological follow up of 53 uncemented TKA in 40 patients. Between 2001 and 2007, 53 uncemented primary TKA were performed by two senior surgeons in 53 knees for 40 patients. This was for diagnosis of Osteoarthritis. Five patients underwent patellar resurfacing. Patients were evaluated at the six week mark, three months, one year and then yearly using Knee Society knee score. In addition, radiograph analysis was done to all patients during each visit and evaluated using Knee Society roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. The follow-ups have been done by independent surgeons. End point of failure is defined as revision. There were 14 revisions (12 for aseptic loosening, none for infection and one for component malposition, one for instability) among 53 knees. We found that there is significant increase in rate of tibial component loosening (26%), which is very high compared to rate of loosening with other series. There is radiographic evidence of loosening in four femoral prosthesis but one required revision. Intraoperatively we noticed that there is very poor osseointegration into tibial components. All of them have been revised with cemented tibial component. With our experience we conclude that uncemented porus coated Tibial trays have higher rates of failures because of poor osseointegration. And we recommend that all tibial trays need to be cemented

Introduction. Initial stability of the tibial component influences the success of uncemented total knee arthroplasty. In uncemented components, osseointegration provides long-term fixation which is particularly important for the tibial component. Osseointegration is facilitated by minimising bone-implant interface micromotion to within acceptable limits. To investigate initial stability, this study compares the micromotion and initial seating of two uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated tibial components, the Genesis II and Profix. This is the first stability comparison of two hydroxyapatite-coated tibial components. Methods. Six components of each type were implanted into synthetic tibias by a single orthopaedic surgeon. Good coverage was achieved. No screws or articular inserts were used. Initial seating was measured using ImageJ software at five areas on each tibia. Tibias were transected and their proximal section implanted into a molten alloy parallel to horizontal. Dynamic mechanical testing was performed using a hydraulic 858-Bionix machine. Prostheses underwent unilateral axial point-loading of 700N cyclically applied four times. The load was applied to three locations approximating femoral loading points. The loading cycle was repeated six times at each point, allowing micromotion to be recorded at three contralateral locations. Micromotion was measured by optical lasers. After dynamic testing, two tibial components of each type were removed with claw pliers while measuring the force required on the 858-Bionix machine. Implant under-surfaces were photographed for wear. Results. The micromotion readings allowed a directional (subsidence or lift-off) movement profile to be constructed. The absolute micromotion recordings demonstrated areas experiencing the most micromotion. Micromotion was not significantly different between components (P>0.05). Absolute micromotion during posterolateral loading was significantly different (P<0.05). Loading points producing the most absolute micromotion were antero- and centrolateral in Genesis II prostheses and anteromedial and posterolateral in Profix prostheses. The areas which showed the greatest absolute micromotion were anteromedial in Genesis II prostheses and posteromedial and posterolateral in Profix prostheses. Average absolute micromotion did not exceed 75μm. Initial gap ranged from 535–633 μm in Genesis II prostheses and 631–799 μm in Profix prostheses. Initial gap did not significantly correlate with either prosthesis. Pullout force was significantly different (P<0.0001), requiring less than 75N for Profix prostheses and greater than 150N for Genesis II prostheses. Wear was seen anteromedially in all Profix components. In Profix prostheses the only loading point to consistently produce liftoff was anteromedially. Conclusions. Average micromotion is not significantly different in Genesis II and Profix trays during point loading central condylar areas in synthetic tibias. With posterolateral loading the Genesis II was significantly more stable. Unilateral loading demonstrated a pivot type micromotion pattern about the tibial stem in both designs. Seating was not a significant factor influencing micromotion, presumably while the initial gap is small (<800μm). The deficit of an anteromedial peg in the Profix prostheses predisposes to liftoff when this point is loaded. Using a force approximating that of walking, distributed through typical femoral loading points, results in micromotion in both designs at a level not expected to prevent osseointegration