We studied the effect of the surface finish of the stem on the transfer of load in the proximal femur in a sheep model of cemented hip arthroplasty. Strain-gauge analysis and corresponding finite-element (FE) analysis were performed to assess the effect of friction and creep at the cement-stem interface.

No difference was seen between the matt and polished stems. FE analysis showed that the effects of cement creep and friction at the stem-cement interface on femoral strain were small compared with the effect of inserting a cemented stem.

The role of vacuum mixing on the reduction of porosity and on the clinical performance of cemented total hip replacements remains uncertain. We have used paired femoral constructs prepared with either hand-mixed or vacuum-mixed cement in a cadaver model which simulated intra-operative conditions during cementing of the femoral component. After the cement had cured, the distribution of its porosity was determined, as was the strength of the cement-stem and cement-bone interfaces.

The overall fraction of the pore area was similar for both hand-mixed and vacuum-mixed cement (hand 6%; vacuum 5.7%; paired t-test, p = 0.187). The linear pore fractions at the interfaces were also similar for the two techniques. The pore number-density was much higher for the hand-mixed cement (paired t-test, p = 0.0013). The strength of the cement-stem interface was greater with the hand-mixed cement (paired t-test, p = 0.0005), while the strength of the cement-bone interface was not affected by the conditions of mixing (paired t-test, p = 0.275). The reduction in porosity with vacuum mixing did not affect the porosity of the mantle, but the distribution of the porosity can be affected by the technique of mixing used.

Background. Aseptic loosening of cemented femoral stems results from migration of wear particles along the bone-cement interface, producing a foreign body reaction. After cement insertion, blood back pressure can disrupt the bone-cement interface, enabling this spread of wear particles. Our study investigates whether altering timing and speed of stem insertion can reduce this risk. Methods. We inserted mock “C-Stem” femoral components (De Puy-Synthes), using Smartset HV cement (De Puy-Synthes) into artificial femora, fitted with proximal and distal pressure transducers. Cement insertion began two, three or four minutes after mixing. Cement pressures were then allowed to settle for one minute and the stems were then inserted over durations of 25, 60 or 90 seconds. Results. Quicker insertion led to high peak pressures; however insertion over 90 seconds at 4 and 5 minutes achieved more sustained pressures above blood back pressure. Slower insertion particularly improved proximal pressurisation. Furthermore when the stem was inserted over 90 seconds at 5 minutes then the cement pressures remained high after full insertion of the stem. Conclusions. Commonly, femoral stems are inserted rapidly. Our study demonstrates that by inserting the femoral stem more slowly, cement pressure can be maintained above blood back pressure for longer. We believe that after slower stem insertion, the higher cement viscosity enables the surgeon to maintain cement pressure, via the stem, sufficient to resist blood back pressure without inadvertently over inserting the stem. This safe and simple modification of cementing technique generates higher and more sustained cement pressures. Level of evidence. 3. Disclosures. Depuy-Synthes kindly provided the equipment used in the study. None of the authors received any payment or other benefits

250 words max Long polished cemented femoral stems, such as the Exeter Hip Revision stem, are one option available to the revision hip arthroplasty surgeon. When proximal bone stock is compromised, distal fixation is often relied upon for stability of the femoral component. In such circumstances, torsional forces can result in debonding and loosening. This study compared the torsional behaviour of a cemented polished and featureless (plain) stem with cemented, polished stems featuring fins or flutes. Nine torsional tests were carried out on each of these three different stem designs. The finned stem construct was significantly stiffer than the fluted stem (mean 24.5 Nm/deg v 17.5 Nm/deg). The plain stem mean stiffness was less than the featured stems (13 Nm/deg), but wide variability lead to no statistically significant difference. The maximum torque of the finned (30.5 Nm) and fluted stems (29 Nm) was significantly higher than the plain stem (10.5 Nm); with no significance to the difference between the finned and fluted stems. Distal stem features may provide a more reliable and greater resistance to torque in polished, cemented revision hip stems. Finned stem features may also increase the stiffness of the construct. Consideration should thus be given to the incorporation of distal stem features in the design of revision hip stems

Recent NICE guidance recommends use of a well proven cemented femoral stem for hip hemiarthroplasty in management of fractured neck of femur. The Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS) has been designed based on the well proven Exeter hip stem. It has a double taper polished stem design, proclaimed to share geometry and surface finish with the Exeter hip. This study investigated the surface finish of the two stems in order to investigate the hypothesis that they were different. Two ETS and two Exeter stems were examined using a profilometer with a sensitivity of one nanometer. Macroscopic visual inspection showed that the two Exeter stems had significantly smoother surface finish than the ETS stems. The roughness average (RA) values on the ETS stems were approximately an order of magnitude higher than those of the Exeter stems, mean of 0.235μm compared with 0.025μm (p<0.0001). This difference in surface finish has implications for the biomechanical functioning of the stem. Previous change of the Exeter stem to a matt surface-finish in 1976 resulted in a significant increase in stem failure rates and an understanding of the importance of the polished surface-finish in order to function within a taper-slip philosophy. By changing the surface finish in the ETS stem, longevity of the implant may similarly be affected. Clinical results have yet to be published demonstrating this. We recommend the manufacturer reconsiders the surface finish of the ETS stem to ensure it functions as well as the Exeter primary stem with which it shares a design philosophy

Prosthesis migration and acetabular cup wear are useful short term measurement which may predict later implant outcome. However, the significance of the magnitude and pattern of the migration is very much dependent on the specific design studied. This study aimed to characterise patterns of migration by following four cemented femoral stem designs using Radiostereometry (RSA) within a prospective randomised longitudinal trial. 164 patients undergoing cemented femoral hip replacement for osteoarthritis were randomised to receive either an Exeter (Howmedica Stryker), Ultima Tapered Polished Stem (TPS) (Depuy), Ultima Straight Stem (USS) (Johnson and Johnson) or Elite Plus (Depuy) stem. Each subject received the OGEE PE cemented acetabular component (Depuy). RSA examinations were performed at 1 week and 6, 12, 18, 24 and 60 months post surgery. They were analysed using the UMRSA system (RSA Biomedical AB, Umea, Sweden), and our local geometric stem measurement software. 149 patients had RSA measurements available to 2 years, and 96 patients to 5 years. Differences were analysed using mixed linear modelling (SPSS). Median linear proximal cup wear rate reduced to a minimum of 0.02-0.06mm/year in year two. Between 2 and 5 years the wear rate increased, being significantly higher for the Elite. Cup migration was small but continuous. At 2 years it was median 0.3mm proximally, increasing to 0.5 mm at 5 years. Median rotations were less than 0.3 degrees. Proximal migration was positive and increasing at all time points for all stems. For the tapered polished designs, while the overall magnitude was significantly higher, the rate of migration significantly decreased, whereas for the other stem designs it did not. The TPS stem showed a tendency for posterior tilt which was significant compared to the other stems at 5 years. All stems tended to retroversion, with the USS significantly less than the others and the Elite showing and relative increase at 5 years. In summary migration patterns are characterised by the stem design, including where there were only small changes between designs. We are now testing measured migrations as predictors of outcome, and will continue to follow this group of patients to 10 years

The use of impaction bone grafting during revision arthroplasty of the hip in the presence of cortical defects has a high risk of post-operative fracture. Our laboratory study addressed the effect of extramedullary augmentation and length of femoral stem on the initial stability of the prosthesis and the risk of fracture.

Cortical defects in plastic femora were repaired using either surgical mesh without extramedullary augmentation, mesh with a strut graft or mesh with a plate. After bone impaction, standard or long-stem Exeter prostheses were inserted, which were tested by cyclical loading while measuring defect strain and migration of the stem.

Compared with standard stems without extramedullary augmentation, defect strains were 31% lower with longer stems, 43% lower with a plate and 50% lower with a strut graft. Combining extramedullary augmentation with a long stem showed little additional benefit (p = 0.67). The type of repair did not affect the initial stability. Our results support the use of impaction bone grafting and extramedullary augmentation of diaphyseal defects after mesh containment.