Introduction. The peri-operative analgesic management of patients having either Total Knee Replacement (TKR) or Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) is an area that continues to have prominence, driven in part by the desire to reduce hospital stay, while maintaining high patient satisfaction. This is particularly relevant in the current climate of healthcare cost savings. We evaluated the role of “top up” intra-articular local anaesthetic injection after identifying that an appreciable number of patients in the unit suffered “breakthrough pain” on the first post-op day, when the effects of local analgesia are wearing off. Method. 43 patients, who were scheduled to have a cemented Oxford UKR, were prospectively recruited and randomised. All patients had the same initial anaesthetic regime of general anaesthesia, femoral nerve block and intra-operative intra-articular infiltration of the cocktail. All patients had a 16G multi-holed epidural catheter placed intra-articularly prior to wound closure. Patients had the same operative technique, post operative rehabilitation and rescue analgesia. An independent observer recorded post-operative pain scores using a visual analogue score (1–10) every 6 hours and any rescue analgesia that was required. On the morning after surgery, 22 patients, (Group I), received 20 mls of 0.5% bupivicaine through the catheter whilst 21 patients, (Group II), had 20 mls of normal saline by the same observer, (who was blinded to the contents of the solution being injected), after which the catheter was removed. Results. When comparing these two groups there was no statistical difference found in their pain scores on the day of operation. However, patients in Group I had a significantly better pain score initially post top up and then at 6 hours (2.4 (0–8) vs 5.7 (2–9), Mann-Whitney p<0.001). This cohort of patients required less rescue analgesia (22% vs 75%, Mann-Whitney p<0.001). In addition, Group I had statistically significant higher patient satisfaction outcome scores after the infiltration, (p<0.001), with 16 reporting very good satisfaction in comparison to 1 in Group II. There were no complications in either group. Discussion. Our study has shown that injection of local anaesthesia via an intra-articular catheter does reduce pain scores when compared to placebo. This implies that this technique may have a role in providing optimal pain relief after UKR

Aims

Factors associated with high mortality rates in geriatric hip fracture patients are frequently unmodifiable. Time to surgery, however, might be a modifiable factor of interest to optimize clinical outcomes after hip fracture surgery. This study aims to determine the influence of postponement of surgery due to non-medical reasons on clinical outcomes in acute hip fracture surgery.

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) experience significant postoperative pain. This impedes early mobilization and delays hospital discharge. A prospective audit of 1081 patients undergoing primary TKA during 2008 was completed. All patients followed a programme including preoperative patient education, pre-emptive analgesia, spinal/epidural anaesthesia with propofol sedation, intra-articular soft tissue wound infiltration, postoperative high volume ropivacaine boluses with an intra-articular catheter and early mobilization. Primary outcome measure was length of stay. Secondary outcomes were verbal analogue pain scores on movement, time to mobilization, nausea and vomiting scores, urinary catheterization for retention, need for rescue analgesia, range of motion at discharge and six weeks postoperatively. The median day of discharge was postoperative day four. Median pain score on mobilization was three for first postoperative night, day one and two. 35% of patients ambulated on the day of surgery and 95% of patients within 24 hours. 79% patients experienced no nausea or vomiting. Catheterization rate was 6.9%. Rescue analgesia was required in 5% of cases. The median day of discharge was postoperative day four. Median range of motion was 85° on discharge and 93° at six weeks postoperatively. This comprehensive care plan provides satisfactory postoperative analgesia allowing early safe ambulation and discharge

Aims

Posterior column plating through the single anterior approach reduces the morbidity in acetabular fractures that require stabilization of both the columns. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of posterior column plating through the anterior intrapelvic approach (AIP) in the management of acetabular fractures.

Aim. To present selective arterial embolization with N-2-butyl Cyanoacrylate for the palliative and/or adjuvant treatment of painful bone metastases not primarily amenable to surgery. Material and Methods. From January 2003 to December 2009, 243 patients (148 men and 95 women; age range, 20–87 years) with painful bone metastases were treated with N-2-butyl Cyanoacrylate. Overall, 309 embolizations were performed; 56 patients had more than one embolization. Embolizations were performed in the pelvis (168 procedures), in the spine (83 procedures), in the upper limb (13 procedures), in the lower limb (38 procedures) and in the thoracic cage (21 procedures). Primary cancer included urogenital, breast, gastrointestinal, thyroid, lung, musculoskeletal, skin, nerve and unknown origin. Renal cell carcinoma was the most commonly treated tumor. In all patients, selective embolization was performed by transfemoral catheterization. Results. Complete or significant resolution of pain for more than 6 months was observed in 236 patients (97%), in 56 of them (23%) after repeated embolization; 12 patients had subsequent surgical treatment. Function was restored to normal in the patients with extremity tumors. In 21 cases, after angiography embolization was judged infeasible due to arteriovascular reasons or high risk. Skin and subcutaneous necrosis at the pelvis occurred in one patient after multiple embolizations for a metastatic paraganglioma. Conclusions. Selective embolization of bone metastases with N-2-butyl Cyanoacrylate is safe and effective for the palliative and/or adjuvant management of painful bone metastases. It can be used for surgically inaccessible or irresponsive to radiation therapy lesions, and as an adjuvant to surgical treatment

The longitudinal midline and medial-parapatellar incision are commonly used in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Medial-parapatellar incision n offers a smaller wound, avoids creation of thin skin flaps and easier exposure in obese patients. This incision creates a lateral skin flap which may be subject to poor blood supply and delayed wound healing. We undertook a Randomised Controlled Trial (n=20) comparing midline and medial-parapatellar incisions. Cutaneous blood-flow was measured using a Doppler Imager. Interstitial fluid measurements for lactate, pyruvate, lactate/pyruvate ratio and glucose were obtained from subcutaneous microdialysis catheters. Wound cosmesis was graded and skin sensation tested. Immediately post-op there was no significant difference in subcutaneous blood flow, but by day 3 patients with medial-parapatellar incisions showed greater bloodflow than midline incisions, particularly on the medial side (387 vs 278units p=0.148). At both day 1 and 3 post-op the lateral flap of the medial parapatellar incision showed decreased blood flow compared to the medial side, though these failed to reach significance. In contrast the midline incision showed no discernable difference in blood flow between the medial and lateral flaps. Concentrations of subcutaneous glucose increased from 4 hours post-op in the midline group, returning to baseline by 24hours. In contrast, the parapatellar group remained at base line throughout. Lactate concentrations increased over time in both groups peaking at 12hours post-op. No difference was noted between incision types with regard to wound cosmesis. We conclude that the use of a medial-parapatellar incision results in only minimal biochemical changes, which are unlikely to alter wound healing. Medial-parapatellar incision is therefore a safe alternative to a midline incision and can be utilised in appropriate complex cases to aid surgical exposure

The CALEDonian Technique™, promoting enhanced recovery after surgery, is a multimodal multidisciplinary technique. This has demonstrated excellent analgesic control allowing early mobilisation and discharge following TKA, whilst maintaining patient safety. All patients follow a planned programme beginning with pre-operative out-patient education at the pre-assessment visit. An anaesthetic regimen consisting of pre-emptive analgesia is combined with a spinal/epidural with propofol sedation. Intra-articular local anaesthetic soft tissue wound infiltration by the surgeon under direct vision is supplemented by post-operative high volume intermittent boluses via an intra-articular catheter. Early active mobilisation is positively encouraged. A prospective audit of over 1000 patients demonstrated 35% of patients mobilised on day 0 and 95% by day 1, with rescue analgesia required in only 5% of cases. 79% of patients experienced no nausea or vomiting helping reduce length of stay from six to four postoperative days. A catheterisation rate of 7%, a DVT rate of 0.6% and a PE rate of 0.5% remained within or below previously published levels. Laboratory studies examining the performance of the epidural filter and injection technique used for the post-operative intra-articular injections demonstrated this to be robust and effective at preventing bacterial ingress. This in-vitro data is supported by clinical results demonstrating no increase in the deep infection rate of 0.7% since the implementation of the technique at our institution. We conclude that the CALEDonian Technique™ effectively and safely improves patient post-operative recovery following TKA

Background. We compared pain relief after total hip arthroplasty using periarticular intraoperative injection along with single dose post operative injection of local anesthetic (THA) with the well-established practice of epidural infusion. Methods. 70 patients undergoing elective THA under combined spinal anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either (1) continuous epidural infusion (group B) or (2) infiltration around the hip joint with a mixture of 100 ml of bupivacaine (2 mg/ml) + 1ml ketorolac (30mg/ml) and 0.5ml epinephrine (1mg/ml) at the conclusion of surgery combined with one postoperative intraarticular injection of 20 ml. of Bupivacaine 0.5% + 1ml ketorolac (30mg/ml)+ 0.5 ml. epinephrine (1mg/ml) through an intraarticular catheter (group A). All patients received acetoaminophen 1gm 8 hourly for 72 hrs and injection ketoralac 30mg every 6 hourly IV(15mg if >65 yr 30mg if <65 yr). Breakthrough pain in any group (VAS >7) was treated by injection fentanyl 20 μg bolus at 10 min. interval till VAS reduced to < 4. If VAS 4–7 injection tramadol 50mg IV was given if VAS continued to be >4 after 15 min. then injection fentanyl 20 μg bolus was given at 10 min interval till VAS <4. Results. Narcotic consumption was significantly reduced in group A compared to group B (p=0.007). Pain levels at rest and during mobilization were similar in both groups during first 24 hrs but significantly reduced in group A after cessation of treatment. Interpretation. Wound infiltration combined with intraarticular injection of local Anaesthetics provides good pain relief for patients undergoing THA

High volume infiltration with local anaesthetics (LIA) during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for postoperative pain relief may be beneficial as compared to traditional methods. Retransfusion drains are used in TKA as alternative for allogeneic blood transfusions. When combining both modalities, recollected blood may contain large doses of local anaesthetics potentially leading to systemic toxicity during retransfusion. We investigated the safety of combining LIA and retransfusion of shed blood. Twenty patients scheduled for primary TKA were included. During surgery two peri-articular injections with ropivacaine (total 375 mg) were given. Patients received an intraarticular retransfusion drain and a wound catheter for continuous infusion of ropivacaine (8 mg/hr) for 24 hours. Blood collected in the retransfusion device, was not retransfused but used for laboratory analyses. Patients’ blood samples were taken immediately after surgery, 3, 6 and 24 hours postoperatively. We predicted cumulative ropivacaine concentrations using patient and shed blood samples from 6 hours postoperatively. We modelled instant retransfusion by estimating the cumulative plasma concentrations. Our safety threshold was 0.15 mg/L unbound ropivacaine in a venous plasma sample, based on literature. Total ropivacaine concentration was highest 24 hours postoperatively and unbound ropivacaine was maximal predominantly at 6 hours. Total ropivacaine concentrations ranged from 0.7 to 1.9 mg/L and unbound ropivacaine concentrations varied between 0.03 and 0.11 mg/L. At 6 hours median shed blood volume was 600 mL (range 303–869 mL). Interestingly was the difference (mean ± SD) in free fraction ropivacaine, in shed blood (68.8–4.6%) and in plasma (4.8 ± 1.1%). Assuming retransfusion, an average 13 mg (range 6–18mg) of unbound ropivacaine would have been administered intravenously. The model used to estimate cumulative ropivacaine plasma levels showed that instant retransfusion potentially would have led to unbound venous plasma concentrations of above 0.15 mg/L. Under the conditions in our study it is safe to use LIA in combination with continuous infusion of ropivacaine. However, in combination with the retransfusion of shed blood collected with the Bellovac ABT system this may lead to toxic levels. Before implementing the combination of both modalities formal testing is required

Introduction. In the orthogeriatric model of care, orthopaedic surgeons, geriatricians, anesthesiologists, physiotherapists and the nursing staff work together with the aim to optimize the outcomes of vulnerable older patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. It is recommended that the orthogeriatric care of hip fracture patients should be based on systematic treatment guidelines. We describe here how operative and perioperative management of hip fracture patients changed between the first and the second year after initiation of orthogeriatric collaboration. Method. Data on all patients aged 65 years or over and experiencing a hip fracture between September 1st 2007 and August 31st 2009 were prospectively collected in a Finnish hospital district with a total of 200,000 inhabitants. The patients were evaluated 4–6 months postoperatively at the geriatric outpatient clinic. Starting from the second year, geriatrician's rounds 2–3 times a week at the orthopaedic ward were provided. In addition, a systematic treatment protocol agreed by orthopaedic surgeons, geriatricians and anesthesiologists was introduced to the hospital staff responsible for the care of hip fracture patients. Results. Data were available on 177 patients in the first and 232 patients in the second year (87 % and 95 % of eligible patients, respectively). There were no significant differences in the patient characteristics in regard with age, sex distribution, prefracture mobility level, living arrangements, number of medication used, body mass index, anesthesiological risk score or the type of the fracture between the two years. Compared to the first year, the patients were more likely to be operated by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon (74 % vs. 49 %, p<0.001) and to undergo hemiarthroplasty (64 % vs. 53 %, p=0.013) during the second year. Urinary catheters were also removed before discharge from the orthopaedic ward more frequently (28 % vs. 14 %, p=0.001). There was a trend towards shorter delay to operation (<24 hours in 40 % vs. 32 %, p=0.140) and more frequent use of blood transfusions (39 % vs. 32 %, p=0.128). There was no difference in the mean length of stay at the orthopaedic ward between the two years (6 days in the first vs. 7 days in the second year, p=0.081). The 4-month mortality was 20 % in the first and 17 % in the second year (p=0.436). Conclusions. The treatment practices showed changes towards guideline recommendations after initiation of orthogeriatric collaboration in the care of hip fracture patients without increasing the length of stay at the orthopaedic ward. Further follow-up is required to show how these improvements translate into longer-term outcomes and mortality

Introduction. New methods to reduce inpatient stay, post-operative complications and recovery time are continually being sought in surgery. Many factors affect length of hospital stay, such as, analgesia, patient and surgeon expectations, as well as provision of nursing care and physiotherapy. Development of the use of postoperative local anaesthetic infiltration delivered intra-articularly by a catheter appears to be an effective analgesic method which reduces patient's opioid requirements and allows early physiotherapy without motor blockade of muscles. Our study aimed to explore if the use of local anaesthetic infiltration intra-articularly following joint athroplasty affected the patient's duration of hospitalisation. Methods. Looking retrospectively at arthroplasty audit data, we compared two groups of age and sex-matched patients who underwent primary hip arthroplasty (replacement and resurfacing) and knee arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon using the same surgical techniques. The surgeon began to utilize local anesthetic infiltration intra-articularly in 2009. The first group included patients operated on the year prior to the change and the second group were those operated on within a year of the change of practice. There were 103 patients (27 resurfacings, 28 knees, 48 hips) in the local anaesthetic group and 141 patients (48 resurfacings, 36 knees, 64 hips) in the non-local anaesthetic group. The length of stay was investigated for plausible Normality using the Shapiro Wilks statistic. Between-treatment group differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Factors observed were, use of local anaesthetic (yes/no), joint (hip/knee) and day of surgery (weekend/not weekend). Between treatment group differences in gender and complications were investigated using Chi-squared methods. Results. Patients who received local anaesthetic had shorter stays, irrespective of the joint or day of operation. Patients undergoing hip arthroplasty discharged sooner when local anaesthetic was used compared with those without (mean 4.0 days and 4.4 days respectively P=0.04). Patients undergoing knee replacement also discharged sooner when local anaesthetic was used compared with those without (mean 4.9 days and 6.1 days respectively P=0.09). When knee and hip figures were combined and analysed to measure the significance of effects of treatment on the length of stay, local anaesthetic use was found to be statistically significant in reducing length of stay (P=0.01). There were no between-treatment group differences in proportions of complications, gender or day of surgery. Conclusion. The findings of this study highlight that local anaesthetic infiltration reduces duration of in-patient stay following knee and hip joint athroplasty and there is no associated significant increase in immediate post-operative complications

At Bispebjerg University Hospital in Denmark, an Optimized Hip Fracture Program, (OHP) is the standard of care for all hip fracture patients. Part of OHP is pain treatment with a femoral nerve catheter placed at the emergency room, dosed 4 times a day with Bupivacain until 4 days after surgery, combined with systemic analgesics as needed. In 2008, a database and a bio bank were created at the ward including all hip fracture patients to make a better description of the population and as a tool for further optimisation of the OHP. One of the aims was to identify possible subgroups having specific complications, which could lead to a differentiation of the OHP by markers known at the time of admission. In this analysis, we will focus on postoperative pain that inhibits mobilization by fracture type and type of surgery. Methods. A consecutive cohort of 898 hip fracture patients hospitalized within two years from September 2008 to July 2010 was used for this study. Patients coming from nursing homes were excluded from the study, since nearly all are discharged 1 or 2 days after surgery to rehabilitation. If the exact type of fracture was not known, or if the patient was admitted for rehabilitation after surgery at another hospital, the patient was also excluded. 508 patients were thus included in the study. Mean age 80.0 years (SD:23.7), 72.1% women and 27.9% men. Mobilization inhibited by postoperative pain as documented in the patient files was registered in the database. Overall mobilization was inhibited by pain in 26.7% of the 508 patients included. The following fracture types were studied: Femoral neck Garden 1–2, Femoral neck Garden 3–4, Pertrochanteric Evans 1–2, Pertrochanteric Evans 3–5, Basocervical and Subtrochanteric. Results. Mobilization inhibited by pain was not significantly associated with type of surgery:. Cannulated Hip Screws 16/80 (20.0%), sliding hip screw 23/94 (24.5%), Intramedullary Nail 63/186 (33.9%), partial hip replacement 33/144 (22.9%), total hip replacement 1/5 (20.0%). P = 0.09 chi square. On the other hand mobilization inhibited by pain was significantly associated with fracture type:. Femoral neck Garden 1–2: 13/64 (20.3%), Femoral neck Garden 3–4: 38/172 (22.1%), Pertrochanteric Evans 1–2: 18/69 (26.1%), Pertrochanteric Evans 3–5: 46/149 (30.9%), Basocervical: 6/28 (21.4%), Subtrochanteric 15/27(55.6%). P = 0.009 chi square. Conclusion. The fracture types Pertrochanteric Evans 3–5 and Subtrochanteric had the biggest inhibition of mobilization caused by pain. No significant association between type of surgery and inhibition of mobilization caused by pain was found

There have been many advances in the resuscitation and early management of patients with severe injuries during the last decade. These have come about as a result of the reorganisation of civilian trauma services in countries such as Germany, Australia and the United States, where the development of trauma systems has allowed a concentration of expertise and research. The continuing conflicts in the Middle East have also generated a significant increase in expertise in the management of severe injuries, and soldiers now survive injuries that would have been fatal in previous wars. This military experience is being translated into civilian practice.

The aim of this paper is to give orthopaedic surgeons a practical, evidence-based guide to the current management of patients with severe, multiple injuries. It must be emphasised that this depends upon the expertise, experience and facilities available within the local health-care system, and that the proposed guidelines will inevitably have to be adapted to suit the local resources.

Aims

Compartment syndrome results from increased intra-compartmental pressure (ICP) causing local tissue ischaemia and cell death, but the systemic effects are not well described. We hypothesised that compartment syndrome would have a profound effect not only on the affected limb, but also on remote organs.

Objectives

Deep bone and joint infections (DBJI) are directly intertwined with health, demographic change towards an elderly population, and wellbeing.

The elderly human population is more prone to acquire infections, and the consequences such as pain, reduced quality of life, morbidity, absence from work and premature retirement due to disability place significant burdens on already strained healthcare systems and societal budgets.

DBJIs are less responsive to systemic antibiotics because of poor vascular perfusion in necrotic bone, large bone defects and persistent biofilm-based infection. Emerging bacterial resistance poses a major threat and new innovative treatment modalities are urgently needed to curb its current trajectory.

Isolated fractures of the anterior column and anterior wall are a relatively rare subgroup of acetabular fractures. We report our experience of 30 consecutive cases treated over ten years. Open reduction and internal fixation through an ilioinguinal approach was performed for most of these cases (76.7%) and percutaneous techniques were used for the remainder. At a mean follow-up of four years (2 to 6), 26 were available for review. The radiological and functional outcomes were good or excellent in 23 of 30 patients (76.7%) and 22 of 26 patients (84.6%) according to Matta’s radiological criteria and the modified Merlé d’Aubigné score, respectively.

Complications of minor to moderate severity were seen in six of the 30 cases (20%) and none of the patients underwent secondary surgery or replacement of the hip.

We reviewed 27 diabetic patients who sustained a tibial fracture treated with a reamed intramedullary nail and compared them with a control group who did not have diabetes. There were 23 closed fractures and four were open. Union was delayed until after six months in 12 of the 23 (52%) diabetic patients with closed fractures and ten of the 23 (43%) control patients (p = 0.768). In two patients with diabetes (9%), closed tibial fractures failed to unite and required exchange nailing, whereas all closed fractures in the control group healed without further surgery (p = 0.489). In both the diabetic and control groups with closed fractures two patients (9%) developed superficial infections. There were two (9%) deep infections in diabetic patients with closed fractures, but none in the control group (p = 0.489).

Overall, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the diabetic patients and the control group, but there was a tendency for more severe infections in patients with diabetes.