Introduction. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a potential source of cells for the repair of articular cartilage and osteochondral defects (OCD) in the ankle. Synovial tissue has been shown to be a rich source of MSCs with the ability to undergo chondrogenic differentiation. Although these cells represent a heterogenous population, clonal populations have not been previously studied. Methods. MSCs were isolated from synovial tissue of a patient undergoing joint arthroplasty and expanded in culture. Six clonal populations were also isolated and expanded. The cells from the mixed parent population and the derived clonal populations were characterised for stem cell surface epitopes, and then cultured in chondrogenic mediums. Various assays were determined to analyse for features of differentiation. Results. Cells from the mixed parent population and the derived clonal populations stained strongly for markers of adult mesenchymal stem cells including CD44, CD90 and CD105, and they were negative for the haematopoietic marker CD34 and for the neural and myogenic marker CD56. Interestingly, a variable number of cells were also positive for the pericyte marker 3G5 both in the mixed parent and clonal populations. The clonal populations exhibited a variable chondrogenic response. Conclusion. Pericytes are a candidate stem cell in many tissues and our results show that all six clonal populations derived from the heterogenous synovium population express the pericyte marker 3G5. The chondrogenic potential of synovial tissue could be optimised by the identification of clonal populations with a propensity to differentiate down particular differentiation pathways. Our study demonstrates a role for MSCs in of osteochondral defects (OCDs) and areas of focal cartilage damage in the ankle joint

Fusion remains the standard of care and is associated with a high satisfaction rate. But.… fusion generally requires 6 weeks of restricted weight bearing or immobilization. Potential problems include 1) nonunion, 2) malunion, 3) sesamoid pain (from DJD), 4) late onset IP1 DJD. Complete joint replacement has been performed with a number of different designs since the early 1970's. The metal and poly designed implants are associated with a high failure rate, presumably from high shear loads, eccentric axial loads, poor fixation and bone stock problems. Resurfacing of both sides of the joint with a one piece silicone based crosslinked rubber {“silastic”} in rheumatoid patients appears to function better with use of metal grommets to reduce generation of particle debris and foreign body reaction. These silastic implants are still used by surgeons in select low-demand rheumatoid patients. Salvage after failure of any of these total joint replacements can be challenging because of loss of bone stock. 3 other methods are used to resurface the joint in severe OA: 1) resurfacing the proximal phalangeal side only, 2) resurfacing the metatarsal head only and 3) resurfacing the joint with and interposition arthroplasty. 1) advantage of the proximal phalangeal side resurfacing is simplicity of geometry; the disadvantage is disruption of the FHB attachment and the relative scarcity of severe cartilage damage at that side of the joint. 2) Advantage of the metatarsal head side for resurfacing is that is the typical location of the arthritic change; the disadvantage is potential interference with the sesamoid complex and bulkiness of fixation could lead to a more difficult salvage. 3) The advantage of interposition arthroplasty is the maintenance of bone stock; disadvantages include inconsistent local tissue and somewhat less predictable outcomes. In this talk I will focus primarily on the technique and results of a proximal phalangeal resurfacing approach for OA of the MTP1 joint

Aims

Involvement of the posterior malleolus in fractures of the ankle probably adversely affects the functional outcome and may be associated with the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Anatomical reduction is a predictor of a successful outcome.

The purpose of this study was to describe the technique and short-term outcome of patients with trimalleolar fractures, who were treated surgically using a posterolateral approach in our hospital between 2010 and 2014.

We describe the surgical technique and results of arthroscopic subtalar release in 17 patients (17 feet) with painful subtalar stiffness following an intra-articular calcaneal fracture of Sanders’ type II or III. The mean duration from injury to arthroscopic release was 11.3 months (6.4 to 36) and the mean follow-up after release was 16.8 months (12 to 25). The patient was positioned laterally and three arthroscopic portals were placed anterolaterally, centrally and posterolaterally. The sinus tarsi and lateral gutter were debrided of fibrous tissue and the posterior talocalcaneal facet was released. In all, six patients were very satisfied, eight were satisfied and three were dissatisfied with their results. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score improved from a mean of 49.4 points (35 to 66) pre-operatively to a mean of 79.6 points (51 to 95). All patients reported improvement in movement of the subtalar joint. No complications occurred following operation, but two patients subsequently required subtalar arthrodesis for continuing pain.

In the majority of patients a functional improvement in hindfoot function was obtained following arthroscopic release of the subtalar joint for stiffness and pain secondary to Sanders type II and III fractures of the calcaneum.

We investigated 60 patients (89 feet) with a mean age of 64 years (61 to 67) treated for congenital clubfoot deformity, using standardised weight-bearing radiographs of both feet and ankles together with a functional evaluation. Talocalcaneal and talonavicular relationships were measured and the degree of osteo-arthritic change in the ankle and talonavicular joints was assessed. The functional results were evaluated using a modified Laaveg-Ponseti score. The talocalcaneal (TC) angles in the clubfeet were significantly lower in both anteroposterior (AP) and lateral projections than in the unaffected feet (p < 0.001 for both views). There was significant medial subluxation of the navicular in the clubfeet compared with the unaffected feet (p < 0.001). Severe osteoarthritis in the ankle joint was seen in seven feet (8%) and in the talonavicular joint in 11 feet (12%). The functional result was excellent or good (≥ 80 points) in 29 patients (48%), and fair or poor (< 80 points) in 31 patients (52%). Patients who had undergone few (0 to 1) surgical procedures had better functional outcomes than those who had undergone two or more procedures (p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the functional result and the degree of medial subluxation of the navicular (p < 0.001, r² = 0.164), the talocalcaneal angle on AP projection (p < 0.02, r2 = 0.025) and extent of osteoarthritis in the ankle joint (p < 0.001).

We conclude that poor functional outcome in patients with congenital clubfoot occurs more frequently in those with medial displacement of the navicular, osteoarthritis of the talonavicular and ankle joints, and a low talocalcaneal angle on the AP projection, and in patients who have undergone two or more surgical procedures. However, the ankle joint in these patients appeared relatively resistant to the development of osteoarthritis.

In this retrospective study, using the prospectively collected database of the AO-Documentation Centre, we analysed the outcome of 57 malunited fractures of the ankle treated by reconstructive osteotomy. In all cases the position of the malunited fibula had been corrected, in several cases it was combined with other osteotomies and the fixation of any non-united fragments. Patients were seen on a regular basis, with a minimum follow-up of ten years. The aim of the study was to establish whether reconstruction improves ankle function and prevents the progression of arthritic changes.

Good or excellent results were obtained in 85% (41) of patients indicating that reconstructive surgery is effective in most and that the beneficial effects can last for up to 27 years after the procedure. Minor post-traumatic arthritis is not a contraindication but rather an indication for reconstructive surgery. We also found that prolonged time to reconstruction is associated negatively with outcome.