Patient reported outcomes and satisfaction as a measure of service quality is becoming an increasingly important tool in local service assessment as well as a quality indicator within commissioning frameworks. We analyse the introduction of SCP led MDT facilitated patient group meetings addressing the education and preparation of patients listed for ankle and hindfoot surgery at WSH HYPOTHESIS- To identify the outcome benefits to patients from this type of quality initiative. This has been previously demonstrated in other specialities in the trust such as hip and knee replacement resulting in mandatory attendance as part of the care pathway. Feedback was gathered via a patient questionnaire from 60 patients invited to meetings over an 18 month period. Two groups of patients who have undergone hindfoot/ankle surgery at WSH were compared. Group 1 attended a 1 hour MDT meeting preoperatively designed to educate the patient on all aspects of their surgery from pre assessment through to post operative management. Group 2 did not attend any such meeting whether invited or not. Results. Group 1 found the meetings beneficial in preparing them for surgery and improved their knowledge of disease, treatment options and recovery. Group 2 felt less prepared with less knowledge of post op limitations, and available support. No significant difference in length of stay was observed. Recommendations. Additional to their consultant examination, patients undergoing major foot surgery benefit from receiving additional information provided by a mixed group of professionals involved in their care. Physiotherapists and occupational therapists as well as volunteer post operative patients at these meetings provided valuable advice and instruction in preparing for and recovering from this type of surgery

Introduction. Greater length of stay (LOS) after elective surgery results in increased use of health care resources and higher costs. Within the realm of foot and ankle surgery, improved perioperative care has enabled a vast majority of procedures to be performed as a day surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the perioperative factors that predict a prolonged LOS after elective ankle replacement or fusion. Methods. Data was prospectively collected on patients undergoing either an ankle fusion or ankle replacement for end-stage ankle arthritis at our institution (2003–2010). In the analysis, LOS was the outcome and age, sex, physical and mental functional scores, comorbid factors, ASA grades, type and length of operation and body mass index (BMI) were potential perioperative risk factors. Univariate and multivariate generalized linear regression models with gamma distribution and log link function were conducted. Results. A total of 336 patients were included in the study. The median LOS was 76 hours with interquartile range of 52.5–97. Using regression analysis, we showed aging, female gender, a higher ASA score, multiple medical comorbidities, rheumatoid arthritis, a lower score in the physical component (PCS) and general health domain (GH) of SF-36, open surgery and an increased length of surgical time were all significantly associated with an increased LOS. Conversely, obesity, the SF-36 Mental Component Score and the date of admission were noninfluential of LOS. A predictive model was also developed using these same risk factors. Conclusions. Increased age, female gender, high ASA scores, low SF-36 GH and PCS scores, increased number of medical comorbidities, rheumatoid arthritis and open surgery were all factors that increased LOS significantly after ankle fusion or ankle replacement. This group of patients may warrant better education and more focused perioperative care when it comes to designing care pathways and allocating health care resources

Aims

A pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of serious complications and long-term disability, and with devastating consequences on patients’ quality of life and financial prospects. Robust evidence to guide treatment is currently lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two surgical interventions that are most commonly used to treat pilon fractures.