Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XIV | Pages 49 - 49
1 Apr 2012
Mascard E Rosset P Beaudet P Missenard G Salles de Gauzy G Mathieu G Oberlin O Eid A Plantaz D Wicart P Glorion C Gouin F
Full Access

For many surgeons amputation is the usual treatment in sarcoma of the foot. The aim of our study was to report the functional and oncologic results of treatment in 54 sarcomas of the foot to assess if conservative treatment was acceptable. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 54 patients with sarcomas of the foot, aged 6 to 50 (mean 17), 30 females and 26 males. At time of referral, 18 had a local recurrence of a previous inadequate treatment. There were 27 soft tissue sarcomas (STS: 10 synovial sarcomas, 6 rhadomyosarcomas, 1 liposarcomas and 10 others) and 27 bone tumours (16 Ewing's, 8 chondrosarcomas, 3 osteosarcomas). Toes tumours were excluded, 18 tumours involved the metatarsal, 12 the plantar soft tissues, 11 the calcaneum, 3 the talus, 2 the midtarsal bones. Surgery consisted in 19 resection without reconstruction, 21 resections with bone reconstruction, 9 partial amputations of the foot, and 6 trans tibial amputations. In 34 cases surgical margins were adequate (R0), in 13 patients resection was inadequate (9 R1 and 4 R2). In 7 cases the margins were not assessed. After a 5.5 years average follow-up (3m to 17y), 31 patients had no evidence of disease, 8 were in second remission, 4 had an evolutive disease and 11 were deceased. The mean MSTS score was 26/30 (31 cases). In conclusion, a conservative treatment is feasible in metatarsal bones with skin coverage by flap if necessary. In STS adequate margins are difficult to achieve with a high rate of local recurrence. In calcaneus and talus, a conservative treatment is possible in tumours limited to bone after good response to chemotherapy. In other cases conservative treatment is debatable because amputation gives excellent functional results


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 4 | Pages 788 - 794
1 Apr 2021
Spierenburg G Lancaster ST van der Heijden L Mastboom MJL Gelderblom H Pratap S van de Sande MAJ Gibbons CLMH

Aims

Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is one of the most common soft-tissue tumours of the foot and ankle and can behave in a locally aggressive manner. Tumour control can be difficult, despite the various methods of treatment available. Since treatment guidelines are lacking, the aim of this study was to review the multidisciplinary management by presenting the largest series of TGCT of the foot and ankle to date from two specialized sarcoma centres.

Methods

The Oxford Tumour Registry and the Leiden University Medical Centre Sarcoma Registry were retrospectively reviewed for patients with histologically proven foot and ankle TGCT diagnosed between January 2002 and August 2019.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 6 | Pages 838 - 845
1 Jun 2013
Oliveira VC van der Heijden L van der Geest ICM Campanacci DA Gibbons CLMH van de Sande MAJ Dijkstra PDS

Giant cell tumours (GCTs) of the small bones of the hands and feet are rare. Small case series have been published but there is no consensus about ideal treatment. We performed a systematic review, initially screening 775 titles, and included 12 papers comprising 91 patients with GCT of the small bones of the hands and feet. The rate of recurrence across these publications was found to be 72% (18 of 25) in those treated with isolated curettage, 13% (2 of 15) in those treated with curettage plus adjuvants, 15% (6 of 41) in those treated by resection and 10% (1 of 10) in those treated by amputation.

We then retrospectively analysed 30 patients treated for GCT of the small bones of the hands and feet between 1987 and 2010 in five specialised centres. The primary treatment was curettage in six, curettage with adjuvants (phenol or liquid nitrogen with or without polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)) in 18 and resection in six. We evaluated the rate of complications and recurrence as well as the factors that influenced their functional outcome.

At a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (2 to 26) the rate of recurrence was 50% (n = 3) in those patients treated with isolated curettage, 22% (n = 4) in those treated with curettage plus adjuvants and 17% (n = 1) in those treated with resection (p = 0.404). The only complication was pain in one patient, which resolved after surgical removal of remnants of PMMA. We could not identify any individual factors associated with a higher rate of complications or recurrence. The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores were slightly higher after intra-lesional treatment including isolated curettage and curettage plus adjuvants (29 (20 to 30)) compared with resection (25 (15 to 30)) (p = 0.091). Repeated curettage with adjuvants eventually resulted in the cure for all patients and is therefore a reasonable treatment for both primary and recurrent GCT of the small bones of the hands and feet.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:838–45.