Introduction. An aneurysmatic bone cyst (ABC) is a benign cystic lesion of bone composed of blood-filled spaces separated by connective septa. The most common treatment is curettage with or without bone grafting. Curettage with bone grafting and Ethibloc injection therapy have a comparable recurrence rate. Ethibloc is a radiopaque alcohol solution of corn protein which is percutaneously injected in the ABC. Objective. To compare percutaneous Ethibloc injection (ETHI) with curettage with bone grafting (CUBG) in the treatment of ABC. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 73 treatments on 56 patients with ABC, between 1985 and 2007. The number of treatments were divided in two groups, one consisting of treatments with ETHI (n=35) and the other of treatments with CUBG (n=38). Both groups are comparable for the number of primary lesions; ETHI (n=17) and CUBG (n=21) or recurrences; ETHI (n=18) and CUBG (n=17). Radiological and clinical outcomes were assessed pre- and post-operatively. We evaluated the outcome measures of ETHI and of CUBG during a mean of 24.7 (range: 2–48) months. We evaluated the recurrence rate in both groups for a maximum period of 4 years to prevent the influence of outliers. Recurrence was defined as a radiological progression/recurrence of the lesion or progression/persistence of symptoms (pain, tumor, function impairment). Statistical analysis included a Kaplan Meier survival analysis, a cox-regression analysis to account for potential confounders and a chi-square test. Results. A survival analysis showed no difference in recurrence rate between both groups. A cox regression analysis showed that type of treatment, after correcting for size of tumor, location and previous treatment, had no influence on recurrence rate. There was no significant difference in clinical outcome in both groups; complete relief of all symptoms was found after ETHI and CUBG n=30 (86%) and n=33 (87%) respectively. Radiologically, 24 (69%) of the treatments with ETHI were effective (no recurrence) in 24 months (range: 3–48) and 28 (74%) of the treatments with CUBG in 23 months (range: 2–48). There was no significant difference between the ETHI vs. CUBG in the number of effective treatments in both primarily treated ABC's (10 vs. 15, p=0.3) as in ABC's with previous treatments (14 vs. 13, p=0.6). Complications after ETHI consisted of 2 fistulas and after CUBG of an AVN and failure of reconstruction. Discussion. This study shows that the relatively simple, percutaneous Ethibloc injection is comparable to curettage with bone grafting, regarding both clinical and radiological outcome. Recurrence rate was not influenced by type of treatment, location or size of tumour. We recommend Ethibloc injection as the first-choice treatment of primary and recurrent ABC's

Objectives

The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical level of evidence of commercially available demineralised bone matrix (DBM) products for their use in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery.

A total of 20 patients with a depressed fracture of the lateral tibial plateau (Schatzker II or III) who would undergo open reduction and internal fixation were randomised to have the metaphyseal void in the bone filled with either porous titanium granules or autograft bone. Radiographs were undertaken within one week, after six weeks, three months, six months, and after 12 months.

The primary outcome measure was recurrent depression of the joint surface: a secondary outcome was the duration of surgery.

The risk of recurrent depression of the joint surface was lower (p < 0.001) and the operating time less (p < 0.002) when titanium granules were used.

The indication is that it is therefore beneficial to use porous titanium granules than autograft bone to fill the void created by reducing a depressed fracture of the lateral tibial plateau. There is no donor site morbidity, the operating time is shorter and the risk of recurrent depression of the articular surface is less.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:836–41

We reviewed 59 bone graft substitutes marketed by 17 companies currently available for implantation in the United Kingdom, with the aim of assessing the peer-reviewed literature to facilitate informed decision-making regarding their use in clinical practice. After critical analysis of the literature, only 22 products (37%) had any clinical data. Norian SRS (Synthes), Vitoss (Orthovita), Cortoss (Orthovita) and Alpha-BSM (Etex) had Level I evidence. We question the need for so many different products, especially with limited published clinical evidence for their efficacy, and conclude that there is a considerable need for further prospective randomised trials to facilitate informed decision-making with regard to the use of current and future bone graft substitutes in clinical practice.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:583–97.

In a randomised trial involving 598 patients with 600 trochanteric fractures of the hip, the fractures were treated with either a sliding hip screw (n = 300) or a Targon PF intramedullary nail (n = 300). The mean age of the patients was 82 years (26 to 104). All surviving patients were reviewed at one year with functional outcome assessed by a research nurse blinded to the treatment used. The intramedullary nail was found to have a slightly increased mean operative time (46 minutes (sd 12.3) versus 49 minutes (sd 12.7), p < 0.001) and an increased mean radiological screening time (0.3 minutes (sd 0.2) versus 0.5 minutes (sd 0.3), p <  0.001). Operative difficulties were more common with the intramedullary nail. There was no statistically significant difference between implants for wound healing complications (p = 1), or need for post-operative blood transfusion (p = 1), and medical complications were similarly distributed in both groups. There was a tendency to fewer revisions of fixation or conversion to an arthroplasty in the nail group, although the difference was not statistically significant (nine versus three cases, p = 0.14). The extent of shortening, loss of hip flexion, mortality and degree of residual pain were similar in both groups. The recovery of mobility was superior for those treated with the intramedullary nails (p = 0.01 at one year from injury).

In summary, both implants produced comparable results but there was a tendency to better return of mobility for those treated with the intramedullary nail.