Previous studies describing drill trajectory for single incision distal biceps tendon repair suggest aiming ulnar and distal (Lo et al). This suggests that the starting point of the drill would be anterior and radial to the anatomic insertion of the distal biceps tendon. Restoration of the anatomic footprint may be important for restoration of normal strength, especially as full supination is approached. To determine the safest drill trajectory for preventing injury to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) when repairing the distal biceps tendon to the ANATOMIC footprint through a single-incision anterior approach utilising cortical button fixation. Through an anterior approach in ten cadaveric specimens, three drill holes were made in the radial tuberosity from the centre of the anatomic footprint with the forearm fully supinated. Holes were made in a 30º distal, transverse and 30º proximal direction. Each hole was made by angling the trajectory from an anterior to posterior and ulnar to radial direction leaving adequate bone on the ulnar side to accommodate an eight-millimetre tunnel. Proximity of each drill trajectory to the PIN was determined by making a second incision on the dorsum of the proximal forearm. A K-wire was passed through each hole and the distance between the PIN and K-wire measured for each trajectory. The PIN was closest to the trajectory K-wires drilled 30° distally (mean distance 5.4 mm), contacting the K-wire in three cases. The transverse drill trajectory resulted in contact with the PIN in one case (mean distance 7.6 mm). The proximal drill trajectory appeared safest with no PIN contact (mean distance 13.3 mm). This was statistically significant with a Friedman statistic of 15.05 (p value of 0.00054). When drilling from the anatomic footprint of the distal biceps tendon the PIN is furthest from a drill trajectory aimed proximally. The drill is aimed radially to minimise blowing out the ulnar cortex of the radius. For any reader inquiries, please contact . vansurgdoc@gmail.com

Recent literature has demonstrated that conventional arthroscopic techniques do not adequately visualise areas of predilection of pathology of the long head of biceps (LHB) tendon and are associated with a 30–50% rate of missed diagnoses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and ease of performing biceps tenoscopy as a novel strategy for reducing the rate of missed diagnoses. Five forequarter amputation cadaver specimens were studied. The pressure in the anterior compartment was measured before and after surgical evaluation. Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy was performed and the biceps tendon was tagged to mark the maximum length visualised by pulling the tendon into the joint. Biceps tenoscopy was performed using 3 different techniques (1. Flexible video-endoscopy, 2. Standard arthroscopy via Neviaser portal. 3. Standard arthroscope via antero-superior portal with retrograde instrumentation). Each was assessed for safety, ease of the procedure and whether the full length of the extra-articular part of the LHB tendon could be visualised. The t-test was used to compare the length of the LHB tendon visualised at standard glenohumeral arthroscopy vs that visualised at biceps tenoscopy. An open dissection was performed after the arthroscopic procedures to evaluate for an iatrogenic injury to local structures. Biceps tenoscopy allowed visualisation to the musculotendinous junction in all cases. The mean length of the tendon visualised was therefore significantly greater at biceps tenoscopy (104 mm) than at standard glenohumeral arthroscopy (33 mm) (mean difference 71 mm, p<0.0001). Biceps tenoscopy was safe with regards to compartment syndrome and there was no difference between pre- and post-operative pressure measurements (mean difference 0 mmHg, p=1). No iatrogenic injuries were identified at open dissection. Biceps tenoscopy allows excellent visualisation of the entire length of the LHB tendon and therefore has the potential to reduce the rate of missed diagnoses. This study did not demonstrate any risk of iatrogenic injury to important local structures or any risk of compartment syndrome. Clinical evaluation is required to further validate this technique

The extracortical single-button (SB) inlay repair is one of the most preferred distal biceps tendon repair techniques. However, specific complications such as neurovascular injury and non-anatomic repairs have led to the development of techniques that utilize intracortical double-button (DB) fixation. To compare the biomechanical stability of the extracortical SB repair with the anatomical DB repair technique. Controlled laboratory study. The distal biceps tendon was transected in 18 cadaveric elbows from 9 donors. One elbow of each donor was randomly assigned to the extracortical SBor anatomical DB group. Both groups were cyclically loaded with 60N over 1000 cycles between 90° of flexion and full extension. The elbow was then fixed in 90° of flexion and the repair construct loaded to failure. Gap-formation and construct stiffness during cyclic loading, and ultimate load to failure was analysed. After 1000 cycles, the anatomical DB technique compared with the extracortical SB technique showed significantly less gap-formation (mean difference 1.2 mm; p=0.017) and significantly more construct stiffness (mean difference 31 N/mm; p=0.023). Ultimate load to failure was not significantly different comparing both groups (SB, 277 N ±92 vs. DB, 285 N ±135; p=0.859). The failure mode in the anatomical DB group was significantly different compared with the extracortical SB technique (p=0.002) and was due to fracture avulsion of the BicepsButton in 7 out of 9 specimens (vs. none in SB group). Our study shows that the intracortical DB technique produces equivalent or superior biomechanical performance to the SB technique. The DB repair technique reduces the risk of nerve injury and better restores the anatomical footprint of biceps tendon. The DB technique may offer a clinically viable alternative to the SB repair technique

Background:. Massive rotator cuff tear can cause functional disability due to instability and degenerative changes of the shoulder joint. In patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tear, tendon transfer is often used as the salvage procedure. Latissimus dorsi and pectoris major transfer are technically demanding procedures and may incur complications. The biceps tendon transfer may provide a biologically superior tissue patch that improves the biomechanics of the shoulder joint in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tear. This study evaluated the functional outcomes of biceps tendon transfer for irreparable rotator cuff tear in 6 patients with two years and longer follow-up. Methods:. Between September 2006 and October 2011, 50 patients with 50 shoulders underwent surgical repair for MRI confirmed rotator cuff tear. Among them, six patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tear were identified intraoperatively, and underwent proximal biceps tendon transfer to reconstruct the rotator cuff tear. The biceps tendon was tenodesed at the bicipital groove, and the proximal intra-articular portion of the biceps tendon was transected. The biceps graft was fanned out and the distal end fixed to the cancellous trough around the greater tuberosity with suture anchor. The anterior edge was sutured to the subscapularis and the posterior edge to the infraspinatus tendon or supraspinatus if present. Postoperative managements included sling protection and avoidance of strenuous exercises for 6 weeks, and then progressive rehabilitation until recovery. Results:. The evaluation parameters included VAS pain score, UCLA score, Constant score and AHES score, and X-rays of the shoulder. At follow-up of 25.3 ± 25.0 (range 22 to 63) months, the mean VAS pain score decreased from 9.3 ± 0.8 preoperatively to 1.7 ± 1.4 postoperatively (p < 0.001). All patients presented with significant improvements in pain and function of the shoulder for daily activities after surgery, however, only one patient achieved excellent results. There is no correlation of functional outcome with age, gender and body mass index. There was no infection or neurovascular complication. Discussion:. The biceps transfer provides soft tissue coverage of the humeral head, and restores the superior stability of the shoulder joint. The transferred biceps tendon also improves the mechanics and increases the compression force of the humeral head to the glenoid fossa. The results of the current study showed significant pain relief and improvement of shoulder function after biceps tendon transfer for irreparable rotator cuff tear. Conclusion:. Biceps tendon transfer is effective in the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tear. The procedure is technically accessible with minimal surgical risks

Management of the pathologic long-head biceps tendon remains controversial. Biceps tenotomy is a simple intervention but may result in visible deformity and subjective cramping. Comparatively, biceps tenodesis is technically challenging, and has increased operative times, and a more prolonged recovery. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis, identify predictors for developing a deformity, and compare subjective and objective outcomes between those that have one and those that do not. Data for this study were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial comparing tenodesis versus tenotomy in the treatment of lesions of the long head of biceps tendon. Patients 18 years of age or older with an arthroscopy confirmed biceps lesion were randomized to one of these two techniques. The primary outcome measure for this sub-study was the rate of a popeye deformity at 24-months post-operative as determined by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Secondary outcomes were patient reported presence/absence of a popeye deformity, satisfaction with the appearance of their arm, as well as pain and cramping on a VAS. Isometric elbow flexion and supination strength were also measured. Interrater reliability (Cohen's kappa) was calculated between patient and evaluator on the presence of a deformity, and logistic regression was used to identify predictors of its occurrence. Linear regression was performed to identify if age, gender, or BMI were predictive of satisfaction in appearance if a deformity was present. Fifty-six participants were randomly assigned to each group of which 42 in the tenodesis group and 45 in the tenotomy group completed a 24-month follow-up. The incidence of popeye deformity was 9.5% (4/42) in the tenodesis group and 33% (15/45) in the tenotomy group (18 male, 1 female) with a relative risk of 3.5 (p=0.016). There was strong interrater agreement between evaluator and patient perceived deformity (kappa=0.636; p<0.001). Gender tended towards being a significant predictor of having a popeye with males having 6.6 greater odds (p=0.090). BMI also tended towards significance with lower BMI predictive of popeye deformity (OR 1.21; p=0.051). Age was not predictive (p=0.191). Mean (SD) satisfaction score regarding the appearance of their popeye deformity was 7.3 (2.6). Age was a significant predictor, with lower age associated with decreased satisfaction (F=14.951, adjusted r2=0.582, p=0.004), but there was no association with gender (p=0.083) or BMI (p=0.949). There were no differences in pain, cramping, or strength between those who had a popeye deformity and those who did not. The risk of developing a popeye deformity was 3.5 times higher after tenotomy compared to tenodesis. Male gender and lower BMI tended towards being predictive of having a deformity; however, those with a high BMI may have had popeye deformities that were not as visually apparent to an examiner as those with a lower BMI. Younger patients were significantly less satisfied with a deformity despite no difference in functional outcomes at 24 months. Thus, biceps tenodesis may be favored in younger patients with low BMI to mitigate the risk of an unsatisfactory popeye deformity

The diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon remains controversial. There is uncertainty as to the role of the long head of biceps and it can be difficult to determine whether the patient's pathology is coming from the biceps or other adjacent structures. In addition, the appropriate type of treatment remains controversial. We retrospectively reviewed the files of the senior author's experience in over 4000 arthroscopic shoulder procedures. We examined cases involving isolated biceps pathology, excluding those patients with rotator cuff tears and labral pathology, involving 92 biceps tenotomies and 103 biceps tenodeses. Our analysis supports the benefit of clinical examination over all types of radiological investigations. The benefits and technique of biceps tenodesis is described including surgical technique. Irritation by PLA interference screw is examined. A paradigm is put forward to help in diagnosis and management of these lesions. Long head of biceps pathology is a significant cause of shoulder pain in association with other shoulder problems and in isolation. Biceps tenodesis and tenotomy is an efficacious way of dealing with this pathology

The functional importance of the long head of biceps tendon remains controversial, but it is well accepted as an important source of anterior shoulder pain. Both biceps tenotomy and tenodesis have well-documented results in the native shoulder. Management of the long head of biceps tendon during shoulder arthroplasty remains controversial. The existing literature supports surgical treatment of the biceps during shoulder arthroplasty. Walch et al. reported the largest series in multicenter study of over eight hundred shoulder arthroplasty patients with or without biceps tenodesis. The authors found more reproducible pain relief with biceps tenodesis and no difference in range of motion. Similarly, Soliman et al. reported on a prospective review of 37 patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for fracture randomly assigned to biceps tenodesis vs. no treatment. The authors found a statistically significant improvement in Constant score and shoulder pain with biceps tenodesis. If left untreated during shoulder arthroplasty, the intact biceps tendon may be a source of anterior shoulder pain requiring revision surgery. Tuckman et al. reported excellent pain relief after biceps tenotomy or tenodesis for biceps-related pain after previous shoulder arthroplasty. The decision to perform a biceps tenotomy versus a tenodesis during shoulder arthroplasty also remains controversial. Tenotomy may increase the risk of cosmetic pop-eye deformity and muscle cramping or fatigue over tenodesis. Therefore, routine long head of biceps soft tissue tenodesis is recommended during shoulder arthroplasty as it safe, reproducible, cost-effective, associated with improved outcome scores, and minimises the risk of cosmetic deformity and pain associated with biceps tenotomy

Total shoulder arthroplasty is becoming increasingly common. A biceps tenodesis or tenotomy has become a routine part of the operation. There are several advantages to a tenodesis or tenotomy. First, the long head of the biceps tendon is routinely pathologic. One study has shown that there are differences in gene expression and mechanical properties in the long head of the biceps tendon in the setting of glenohumeral joint arthritis. Clinically, we often see inflammation, tearing, adhesions, or other pathology. Second, it is largely accepted that the long head of the biceps tendon has minimal function at the shoulder. The biceps muscle primarily functions at the elbow. Therefore, there is little downside to performing a tenodesis if there is a chance of it generating pain after surgery. Another major reason to perform a tenodesis or a tenotomy is that the technique of total shoulder arthroplasty requires a subscapularis takedown or lesser tuberosity osteotomy. The ligaments and tendon associated with the subscapularis contribute to the stability of the biceps tendon and after subscapularis takedown, it is unlikely that the tendon would remain reduced in the groove. In addition, it is part of a technique to incise and release the rotator interval, additionally creating scarring and/or instability associated with the biceps tendon. Given those reasons, this is a very common and reasonable routine part of the procedure of total shoulder arthroplasty

Compared to single-incision distal biceps repair (SI), double-incision repair (DI) theoretically allows for reattachment of the tendon to a more anatomically favorable position. We hypothesized that DI repair would result in greater terminal supination torque compared to SI repair for acute distal biceps ruptures. In this retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they sustained an isolated, acute (° supinated position. Secondary outcomes included supination torque in 45° supinated, neutral, and 45° pronated positions, ASES elbow score, DASH, SF-12, and VAS. Power analysis revealed that at least 32 patients were needed to detect a minimum 15% difference in the primary outcome (β = 0.20). Statistical analysis was performed with significance level α = 0.05 using R version 3.4.1 (R Core Team 2017, Vienna, Austria). Of 53 eligible patients, 37 consented to participate. Fifteen were repaired using DI technique and 22 using SI technique. Mean age was 47.3yrs and median follow-up time was 28.1months. The groups did not differ with respect to age, time-to-follow-up, dominance of arm affected, Workers Compensation or smoking status. Mean supination torque, measured as the percentage of the unaffected side, was 60.9% (95%CI 45.1–76.7) for DI repair versus 80.4% (95%CI 69.1–91.7) for SI repair at the 60°supinated position (p=0.036). There were no statistically significant differences in mean supination torque at the 45°supinated position: 67.1% (95%CI 49.4–84.7) for DI versus 81.8% (95%CI 72.2–91.4) for SI (p=0.102), at the neutral position: 88.8% (95%CI 75.2–102.4) for DI versus 97.6% (95%CI 91.6–103.7) for SI (p=0.0.170), and at the 45°pronated position: 104.5% (95%CI 91.1–117.9) for DI versus 103.4 (95%CI 97.2–109.6) for SI (p=0.0.862). No statistically significant differences were detected in the secondary outcomes ASES Pain, ASES Function, DASH scores, SF-12 PCS or MCS, or VAS Pain. A small difference was detected in VAS Function (median 1.3 for DI repair versus 0.5 for SI repair, p=0.023). In a multivariate linear regression model controlling for arm dominance, age, and follow-up time, SI repair was associated with a greater mean supination torque than DI repair by 19.6% at the 60°supinated position (p=0.011). Contrary to our hypothesis, we found approximately a 20% mean improvement in terminal supination torque for acute distal biceps ruptures repaired with the single-incision technique compared to the double-incision technique. Patients uniformly did well with either technique, though we contend that this finding may have clinical significance for the more discerning, high-demand patient

Compared to single-incision distal biceps repair (SI), double-incision repair (DI) theoretically allows for reattachment of the tendon to a more anatomically favorable position. We hypothesized that DI repair would result in greater terminal supination torque compared to SI repair for acute distal biceps ruptures. In this retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they sustained an isolated, acute (° supinated position. Secondary outcomes included supination torque in 45° supinated, neutral, and 45° pronated positions, ASES elbow score, DASH, SF-12, and VAS. Power analysis revealed that at least 32 patients were needed to detect a minimum 15% difference in the primary outcome (β = 0.20). Statistical analysis was performed with significance level α = 0.05 using R version 3.4.1 (R Core Team 2017, Vienna, Austria). Of 53 eligible patients, 37 consented to participate. Fifteen were repaired using DI technique and 22 using SI technique. Mean age was 47.3yrs and median follow-up time was 28.1months. The groups did not differ with respect to age, time-to-follow-up, dominance of arm affected, Workers Compensation or smoking status. Mean supination torque, measured as the percentage of the unaffected side, was 60.9% (95%CI 45.1–76.7) for DI repair versus 80.4% (95%CI 69.1–91.7) for SI repair at the 60°supinated position (p=0.036). There were no statistically significant differences in mean supination torque at the 45°supinated position: 67.1% (95%CI 49.4–84.7) for DI versus 81.8% (95%CI 72.2–91.4) for SI (p=0.102), at the neutral position: 88.8% (95%CI 75.2–102.4) for DI versus 97.6% (95%CI 91.6–103.7) for SI (p=0.0.170), and at the 45°pronated position: 104.5% (95%CI 91.1–117.9) for DI versus 103.4 (95%CI 97.2–109.6) for SI (p=0.0.862). No statistically significant differences were detected in the secondary outcomes ASES Pain, ASES Function, DASH scores, SF-12 PCS or MCS, or VAS Pain. A small difference was detected in VAS Function (median 1.3 for DI repair versus 0.5 for SI repair, p=0.023). In a multivariate linear regression model controlling for arm dominance, age, and follow-up time, SI repair was associated with a greater mean supination torque than DI repair by 19.6% at the 60°supinated position (p=0.011). Contrary to our hypothesis, we found approximately a 20% mean improvement in terminal supination torque for acute distal biceps ruptures repaired with the single-incision technique compared to the double-incision technique. Patients uniformly did well with either technique, though we contend that this finding may have clinical significance for the more discerning, high-demand patient

Isolated rupture of short head of biceps is a rare injury. There have been no published reports of rupture at the musculotendinous junction. We report two cases of complete rupture of the musculotendinous junction of the short head of biceps in young males both occurring during water skiing. Two males sustained water skiing injuries where the handle was forced against the flexor region of the arm. Whilst trying to adduct and flex the extended arm, they both sustained complete musculotendinous ruptured of their short head of biceps. Both underwent pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging and one underwent isokinetic strength testing of elbow flexion and supination. Surgical repair was performed using absorbable sutures. One patient had the short head muscle belly flipped distally to lie in a subcutaneous plane in front of the elbow. Post-operative management included cast immobilisation for three weeks then gentle range of motion exercises. Both patients recovered their full range of motion in the arm. There were no complications. Post-operative strength testing was performed and will be presented. This is a unique series of complete musculotendinous rupture of the short head of biceps. The mechanism of injury was resisted adduction and flexion against the towrope handle with the arm in extension. These ruptures occurred in high impact high velocity accidents. Surgical repair lead to an excellent outcome

This is largest collection of outcomes of distal biceps reconstruction in the literature. 8 subjects prospectively measured pre and post reconstruction Strength deficit in patients with chronic tendon deficit is described. To describe outcomes for 53 chronic distal biceps reconstructions with tendon graft. Clinical outcomes as well as strength and endurance in supination and flexion are reported. To examine eight patients measured pre- and post-reconstruction. To identify deficit in supination and flexion in chronic reconstruction. 53 reconstructions of chronic distal biceps with tendon graft were carried out between 1999 and 2015. 26 subjects agreed to undergo strength testing after minimum one year follow up. Eight subjects were tested both before and after reconstruction. Primary outcomes were strength in elbow flexion and forearm supination. Strength testing of supination and flexion included maximum isokinetic power and endurance performed on a Biodex. Clinical outcomes measures included pre-operative retraction severity, surgical fixation technique, postoperative contour, range of motion, subjective satisfaction, SF-12, DASH, MAYO elbow score, ASES and pain VAS Non-parametric data was reported as median (interquartile range), while normally-distributed data was reported as mean with 95% Confidence Limits. Hypothesis testing was performed according to two-tailed, paired t-tests. Median time from index rupture to reconstructions 9.5 (range 3–108) months. Strength measurements were completed at a median follow-up time of 29 (range 12–137) months on 26 subjects. The proportion of patients that achieved 90% strength of the contralateral limb post-reconstruction was 65% (17/26) for peak supination torque, and 62% (16/26) for peak flexion torque. Supination and flexion endurance was 90% of the contralateral arm in 81% (21/26) and 65% (17/26) of subjects, respectively. Ten subjects (39%) achieved 90% strength of the contralateral arm on at least four of five strength tests. Eight of the 26 patients were evaluated pre- and post-surgery. As compared to the contralateral limb, chronic distal biceps rupture was found to have a mean [95%CI] deficit in peak supination torque of 31.0 [21.0, 42.9]% (p=0.002). Mean deficit in peak flexion torque of 34.2 [23.1, 45.4]% (p <0.001). Reconstruction resulted in an increase in peak supination torque of 33.5 [8.7, 58.3]% (p=0.0162), increase in peak flexion torque of 35.0 [6.4, 63.6]% (p=0.023), increase in isometric strength of 57.6 [36.1, 79.1]% (p<0.001), increase in supination endurance of 0.6 [-22.2, 23.4]% (p=0.668), and a decrease in flexion endurance of 4.8 [-23.3, 13.7](p=0.478). Ninety-six percent of the patients (25/26) were satisfied, or very satisfied with the overall outcome of the surgery, while median Mayo score post-reconstruction was 100 (range: 55–100). Chronic distal biceps tendon rupture results in less supination loss and greater flexion loss than previously reported. Reconstruction with tendon graft results in a significant, but incomplete recovery of peak supination and flexion torque, but no significant change in endurance. Clinical patient satisfaction with surgical outcomes is high

We know little regarding the long head of the biceps tendon's function but it is generally felt that it serves as a humeral head stabiliser by resisting superior migration during shoulder elevation. In total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) the long head tendon is most commonly tenodesed as some have reported post-operative pain generated from an intact long head tendon. How does tenotomy or tenodesis of the long head tendon after TSA effect superior translation of the humeral head? We do not know the answer to this or if this increased tension causes any increase in subscapularis tendon failure. This will be presented as a possible reason to not remove the long head tendon of the biceps during TSA

Purpose. Based on anatomic studies, it appears that the short head (SH) and long head (LH) of the distal biceps tendons have discreet distal attachments on the radial tuberosity. The SH attaches distally and therefore may function as a stronger flexor, whereas the LH attaches more proximal and ulnar which would make it a greater supinator. The contribution of each of the two heads to flexion and supination has not yet been defined. The rationale of this study was to directly measure the contribution of the SH and LH of the biceps to elbow flexion and forearm supination and provide biomechanical evidence for what is inferred in the anatomical studies. Method. Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric arms were secured using in vitro elbow simulator, while controlled loads were applied to the individual biceps tendons short and long heads. Isometric supination torque and flexion force were recorded with the forearm in 45 degrees supination, neutral rotation and 45 degrees pronation. Results. In all specimens examined the LH and SH of the distal biceps were important contributors to flexion and supination of the forearm. On average, the SH showed 16% more contribution to flexion for all forearm positions. Torque measurements showed that in pronation and neutral positions the SH contributed 11% more than LH. In the supinated forearm, the SH and LH showed no difference in contribution. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used for statistical analysis. Conclusion. In most anatomic studies, it has been suggested that the LH and SH of the distal biceps contribute in different ways to flexion and supination. Based on anatomy only, authors have suggested that the SH is a more important flexor and that the LH is more important in supination. In this biomechanical study we demonstrated that both the LH and SH contribute to flexion and supination. Loss of either the LH or SH will result in weakness in flexion or supination. When assessing contribution to flexion, as anatomic studies suggest, the SH alone is a stronger flexor than the LH. This is most likely due to the fact that the SH has a more distal attachment on the bicipital tuberosity. When assessing contribution to supination, the SH alone was a stronger supinator than the LH consistently in our model. This is in contradiction to previous authors who felt the anatomy of the LH attachment, in a slightly more ulnar position, would make it a stronger supinator

Purpose. Tenodesis of the long head of biceps is an established technique for management of biceps pathology including tears, instability, and chronic tendinosis intractable to non-operative management. Very few studies have reported on clinical outcomes of all-arthroscopic, non-interference, biceps tenodesis techniques. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional and quality of life outcomes of patients treated with an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with a suture anchor. Method. Case Series Level 4 Evidence. Fifty-eight (58) patients with a mean age of 58.5 years were treated with an arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in a single surgeons practice. A single suture anchor was used with a non-interference technique, either in isolation or in association with an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected outcome measures on patients with a minimum one-year follow-up. Patients were evaluated with an ASES, Constant, and WORC scores pre-operatively and at 6 and 12 months post-operatively. In addition, patients were questioned post-operatively as to whether they experienced any biceps cramping, fatigue, or cosmetic deformity (popeye sign). Results. Following an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, the ASES, Constant, and WORC scores improved significantly from 45, 54, 32 to 58, 75, 73 respectively (P<0.001). When analyzed separately, patients who underwent an arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in isolation (no cuff repair) and in association with an arthroscopic cuff repair demonstrated similar gains in functional and quality of life outcomes. (P<0.001). Few patients reported post-operative bicipital cramping, fatigue, or cosmetic deformity. Conclusion. The all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis is a reliable procedure that results in significant improvement in functional outcome and quality of life measures

Our study aims to demonstrate the efficacy of using endobutton and interference screw technique in the repair of acute distal biceps ruptures. From April 2009 to May 2013, 25 consecutive patients had acute distal biceps tendon repairs using an endobutton and interference screw technique. 3 patients were lost to follow up leaving 22 patients for review. Mean follow up was 24 months (1–51). All were evaluated using a questionnaire, examination, radiographs, power measurements, and Oxford Elbow (OES) and MAYO scores. Overall 95% patients (21/22) felt that their surgery was successful and rated their experience as excellent or good. Mean return to work was 100 days (0–280) and mean postoperative pain relief was 23 days (1–56). 55% returned to sport at their pre-injury level. There was one case (4.5%) of heterotopic calcification with 3 superficial infections (14%). There were no intra or postoperative radial fractures, metalwork failures or metalwork soft tissue irritations. Mean pre-operative OES were 18 (6–37) and post operative 43 (24–48) (p < 0.01). Mean pre-operative Mayo scores were 48 (5–95) and post-operative 95 (80–100) (p < 0.01). Our study supports that distal biceps repairs' with endobutton and interference screw technique appears to lead to high patient satisfaction rates with a relatively early return to function

A larger radial tuberosity, and therefore a smaller radioulnar space, may cause mechanical impingement of the DBT predisposing to tear. We sought to investigate anatomic factors associated with partial DBT tears by retrospectively reviewing 3-T MRI scans of elbows with partial DBT tears and a normal elbow comparison group

3-T MRI scans of elbows with partial DBT tears and elbows with no known pathology were reviewed retrospectively by two independent observers. Basic demographic data were collected and measurements of radial tuberosity length, radial tuberosity thickness, radio-ulnar space, and radial tuberosity-ulnar space were made using simultaneous tracker lines and a standardised technique. The presence or absence of enthesophytes and the presence of a single or double DBT were noted.

26 3-T MRI scans of 26 elbows with partial DBT tears and 30 3-T MRI scans of 30 elbows without pathology were included. Basic demographic data was comparable between the two groups. The tear group showed statistically significant larger mean measurements for radial tuberosity length (24.3mm vs 21.3mm, p=0.002), and radial tuberosity thickness (5.5mm vs 3.7mm, p=<0.0001. The tear group also showed statistically significant smaller measurements for radio-ulnar space (8.2mm vs 10.0mm, p=0.010), and radial tuberosity-ulnar space (7.2mm vs 9.1mm, p=0.013). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between partial DBT tears and presence of enthesophytes (p=0.007) as well as between partial DBT tears and having two discrete DBTs rather than a single or interdigitating tendon (p=<0.0001).

Larger radial tuberosities, and smaller radio-ulnar and radial tuberosity-ulnar spaces are associated with partial DBT tears. This may be due to chronic impingement, tendon delamination and consequent weakness which ultimately leads to tears. Enthesophytes may be associated with tears for the same reason. Having two discrete DBTs that do not interdigitate prior to insertion is also associated with partial tears.

The majority of studies reporting sensitivity and specificity data for imaging modalities and physical examination tests for long head of biceps (LHB) tendon pathology use arthroscopy as the gold standard. However, there is little published data to validate this as an appropriate benchmark. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum length of the LHB tendon that can be seen at glenohumeral arthroscopy and whether it allows adequate visualisation of common sites of pathology. Seven female cadaveric specimens were studied. Mean age was 74 years (range 44–96 years). Each specimen underwent arthroscopy in lateral decubitus (LD) and beach chair (BC) positions. The LBH-tendon was tagged with a suture placed with a spinal needle marking the intra-articular length and the maximum excursions achieved using a hook and a grasper in both LD and BC positions. T-tests were used to compare data. The mean intra-articular and extra-articular lengths of the tendon were 23.9 mm and 82.3 mm respectively. The mean length of tendon that could be visualised by pulling it into the joint with a hook was significantly less than with a grasper (LD: hook 29.9 mm, grasper 33.9 mm, mean difference 4 mm, p=0.0032. BC: hook 32.7 mm, grasper 37.6 mm, mean difference 4.9 mm, p=0.0001). Using the BC position allowed visualisation of a significantly greater length than the LD position when using either a hook (mean difference 2.86 mm, p=0.0327) or a grasper (mean difference 3.7 mm, p=0.0077). The mean length of the extra-articular part of the tendon visualised using a hook was 6 mm in LD and 8.9 mm in BC. The maximum length of the extra-articular portion visualised using this technique was 14 mm (17%). Pulling the tendon into the joint with a hook does not allow adequate visualisation of common distal sites of pathology in either LD or BC. Although the BC position allows a significantly greater proportion of the tendon to be visualised this represents a numerically small value and is not likely to be clinically significant. The use of a grasper also allowed greater excursion but results in iatrogenic tendon injury which precludes its use. The reported incidence of pathology in Denard zone C (distal to subscapularis) is 80% and in our study it was not possible to evaluate this zone even by using a grasper or maximum manual force to increase excursion. This is consistent with the extremely high rate of missed diagnoses reported in the literature. Surgeons should be aware that the technique of pulling the LHB-tendon into the joint is inadequate for visualising distal pathology and results in a high rate of missed diagnoses. Furthermore, efforts to achieve greater excursion by “optimum” limb positioning intra-operatively do not confer an important clinical advantage and are probably unnecessary

Adequate visual clarity is paramount to performing arthroscopic shoulder surgery safely, efficiently, and effectively. The addition of epinephrine in irrigation fluid, and the intravenous or local administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) have independently been reported to decrease bleeding thereby improving the surgeon's visualization during arthroscopic shoulder procedures. No study has compared the effect of systemic administered TXA, epinephrine added in the irrigation fluid or the combination of both TXA and epinephrine on visual clarity during shoulder arthroscopy with a placebo group. The purpose of this study is to determine if intravenous TXA is a safe alternative to epinephrine delivered by a pressure-controlled pump in improving arthroscopic shoulder visualization during arthroscopic procedures and whether using both TXA and epinephrine together has an additive effect in improving visualization. The design of the study was a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with four 1:1:1:1 parallel groups conducted at one center. Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic shoulder procedures including rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic biceps tenotomy/tenodesis, distal clavicle excision, subacromial decompression and labral repair by five fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons were randomized into one of four arms: Pressure pump-controlled regular saline irrigation fluid (control), epinephrine (1ml of 1:1000) mixed in irrigation fluid (EPI), 1g intravenous TXA (TXA), and epinephrine and TXA (EPI/TXA). Visualization was rated on a 4-point Likert scale every 15 minutes with 0 indicating ‘poor’ quality and 3 indicating ‘excellent’ quality. The primary outcome measure was the unweighted mean of these ratings. Secondary outcomes included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), surgery duration, surgery complexity, and adverse events within the first postoperative week. One hundred and twenty-eight participants with a mean age (± SD) of 56 (± 11) years were randomized. Mean visualization quality for the control, TXA, EPI, and EPI/TXA groups were 2.1 (±0.40), 2.1 (±0.52), 2.6 (±0.37), 2.6 (±0.35), respectively. In a regression model with visual quality as the dependent variable, the presence/absence of EPI was the most significant predictor of visualization quality (R=0.525; p < 0 .001). TXA presence/absence had no effect, and there was no interaction between TXA and EPI. The addition of MAP and surgery duration strengthened the model (R=0.529; p < 0 .001). Increased MAP and surgery duration were both associated with decreased visualization quality. When surgery duration was controlled, surgery complexity was not a significant predictor of visualization quality. No adverse events were recorded in any of the groups. Intravenous administration of TXA is not an effective alternative to epinephrine in the irrigation fluid to improve visualization during routine arthroscopic shoulder surgeries although its application is safe. There is no additional improvement in visualization when TXA is used in combination with epinephrine beyond the effect of epinephrine alone

Adequate visual clarity is paramount to performing arthroscopic shoulder surgery safely, efficiently, and effectively. The addition of epinephrine in irrigation fluid, and the intravenous or local administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) have independently been reported to decrease bleeding thereby improving the surgeon's visualization during arthroscopic shoulder procedures. No study has compared the effect of systemic administered TXA, epinephrine added in the irrigation fluid or the combination of both TXA and epinephrine on visual clarity during shoulder arthroscopy with a placebo group. The purpose of this study is to determine if intravenous TXA is a safe alternative to epinephrine delivered by a pressure-controlled pump in improving arthroscopic shoulder visualization during arthroscopic procedures and whether using both TXA and epinephrine together has an additive effect in improving visualization. The design of the study was a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with four 1:1:1:1 parallel groups conducted at one center. Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic shoulder procedures including rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic biceps tenotomy/tenodesis, distal clavicle excision, subacromial decompression and labral repair by five fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons were randomized into one of four arms: Pressure pump-controlled regular saline irrigation fluid (control), epinephrine (1ml of 1:1000) mixed in irrigation fluid (EPI), 1g intravenous TXA (TXA), and epinephrine and TXA (EPI/TXA). Visualization was rated on a 4-point Likert scale every 15 minutes with 0 indicating ‘poor’ quality and 3 indicating ‘excellent’ quality. The primary outcome measure was the unweighted mean of these ratings. Secondary outcomes included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), surgery duration, surgery complexity, and adverse events within the first postoperative week. One hundred and twenty-eight participants with a mean age (± SD) of 56 (± 11) years were randomized. Mean visualization quality for the control, TXA, EPI, and EPI/TXA groups were 2.1 (±0.40), 2.1 (±0.52), 2.6 (±0.37), 2.6 (±0.35), respectively. In a regression model with visual quality as the dependent variable, the presence/absence of EPI was the most significant predictor of visualization quality (R=0.525; p < 0 .001). TXA presence/absence had no effect, and there was no interaction between TXA and EPI. The addition of MAP and surgery duration strengthened the model (R=0.529; p < 0 .001). Increased MAP and surgery duration were both associated with decreased visualization quality. When surgery duration was controlled, surgery complexity was not a significant predictor of visualization quality. No adverse events were recorded in any of the groups. Intravenous administration of TXA is not an effective alternative to epinephrine in the irrigation fluid to improve visualization during routine arthroscopic shoulder surgeries although its application is safe. There is no additional improvement in visualization when TXA is used in combination with epinephrine beyond the effect of epinephrine alone