Introduction. Partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) has demonstrated the potential to improve patient satisfaction over total knee arthroplasty. It is however perceived as a more challenging procedure that requires precise adaptation to the complex mechanics of the knee. A recently developed PKA system aims to address these challenges by anatomical, compartment specific shapes and fine-tuned mechanical instrumentation. We investigated how closely this PKA system replicates the balance and kinematics of the intact knee. Materials and Methods. Eight post-mortem human knee specimens (age: 55±11 years, BMI: 23±5, 4 male, 4 female) underwent full leg CT scanning and comprehensive robotic (KUKA KR140 comp) assessments of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics. Specimens were tested in the intact state and after fixed bearing medial PKA. Implantations were performed by two experienced surgeons. Assessments included laxity testing (anterior-posterior: ±100 N, medial-lateral: ±100 N, internal-external: ±3 Nm, varus- valgus: ±12 Nm) under 2 compressive loads (44 N, 500 N) at 7 flexion angles and simulations of level walking, lunge and stair descent based on in-vivo loading profiles. Kinematics were tracked robotically and optically (OptiTrack) and represented by the femoral flexion facet center (FFC) motions. Similarity between intact and operated curves was expressed by the root mean square of deviations (RMSD) along the curves. Group data were summarized by average and standard deviation and compared using the paired Student's T-test (α = 0.05). Results. During the varus-valgus balancing assessment the medial and lateral opening of the PKAs closely resembled the intact openings across the full arch of flexion, with RMSD values of 1.0±0.5 mm and 0.4±0.2 mm respectively. The medial opening was nearly constant across flexion, its average was not statistically different between intact (3.8±1.0 mm) and PKA (4.0±1.1 mm) (p=0.49). Antero-posterior envelope of motion assessments revealed a close match between the intact and PKA group for both compression levels. Net rollback was not statistically different, either under low compression (intact: 10.9±1.5 mm, PKA: 10.7±1.2, p=0.64) or under high compression (intact: 13.2±2.3 mm, PKA: 13.0±1.6 mm, p=0.77). Similarly, average laxity was not statistically different, either under low (intact: 7.7±3.2 mm, PKA: 8.6±2.5 mm, p=0.09) or under high (intact: 7.2±2.6 mm, PKA: 7.8±2.2 mm, p=0.08) compression. Activities of daily living exhibited a close match in the anterior-posterior motion profile of the medial condyle (RMSD: lunge: 2.2±1.0 mm, level walking: 2.4±0.9 mm, stair descent: 2.2±0.6 mm) and lateral condyle (RMSD: lunge: 2.4±1.4 mm, level walking: 2.2±1.4 mm, stair descent: 2.7±2.0 mm). Patellar medial-lateral tilt (RMSD: 3.4±3.8°) and medial-lateral shift (RMDS: 1.5±0.6 mm) during knee flexion matched closely between groups. Conclusion. Throughout the comprehensive functional assessments the investigated PKA system behaved nearly identical to the intact knee. The small residuals are unlikely to have a clinical effect; further studies are necessary as cadaveric studies are not necessarily indicative of clinical results. We conclude that PKA with anatomical, compartment specific shapes and fine-tuned mechanical instrumentation can be adapted precisely to the complex mechanics of the knee and replicates intact knee balance and kinematics very closely

Backgrounds. In order to permit soft tissue balancing under more physiological conditions during total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), we developed an offset type tensor to obtain soft tissue balancing throughout the range of motion with reduced patella-femoral (PF) and aligned tibiofemoral joints and reported the intra-operative soft tissue balance assessment in cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA [1, 2]. However, the soft tissue balance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is unclear. Therefore, we recently developed a new tensor for UKAs that is designed to assist with soft tissue balancing throughout the full range of motion. The first purpose of the present study is to assess joint gap kinematics in UKA. Secondly, we attempted to compare the pattern in UKA with those in CR and PS TKA with the reduced PF joint and femoral component placement, which more closely reproduces post-operative joint alignment. Methods. Using this tensor, we assessed the intra-operative joint gap measurements of UKAs performed at 0, 10, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 and 135° of flexion in 20 osteoarthritic patients. In addition, the kinematic pattern of UKA was compared with those of CR and PS TKA that were calculated as medial compartment gap from the previous series of this study. Results. While the joint gap measurements of UKAs increased from full extension to extension (10 degrees of flexion), these values remained constant throughout the full range of motion. Of note, the gap values of CR TKA were significantly smaller from midrange to deep flexion compared with PS TKA, and furthermore UKA showed a significantly smaller gap from extension to midrange flexion compared with CR TKA. Conclusions. Accordingly, we conclude that the intra-operative joint gap kinematic pattern in UKA differs from the pattern in TKA

There are some reports that the invasive surgery of knee joint replacement repair static and dynamic balance. We investigated the changes in static and dynamic balance and muscle strength in pre- and postoperative of TKA and UKA for the purpose of assessing time dependent improvement. A total of 168 patients (137 TKA; mean age 75.3, 31 UKA; mean age 78.1) were recruited to the study. These patients underwent static and dynamic balance assessment and muscle strength pre operation and 3, 6, 12 months post operation. The parameters of assessment were one leg standing time (open or close eyes), postural sway test (open or close eyes), 3m timed-up-and-go test, maximum stride and Isokinetic muscle strength. We have evaluated both the absolute value and the index which divided the value of the post-operation with the value of pre-operation. Alignment had improved significantly after surgery in TKA and UKA. Isokinetic muscle strength (Fig. 1), one leg standing time with open eyes, 3m timed-up-and-go test (Fig. 2) and maximum stride showed better improvement than pre operation at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery in TKA and UKA. On the other hand, one leg standing time with close eyes and postural sway test showed no improvement than pre operation at any time after operation (Fig. 3). Butpostural sway test in UKA showed the improvement trend at 3 months after surgery. In contrast, those test in TKA showed no improvement at 3 months after surgery (Fig. 3). Our result showed the improvement of balance function correlated with muscle recovery and improvement of lower limb alignment than equilibrium function after the artificial knee joint replacement surgery. Because one leg standing time with close eyes and one leg postural sway test represent the equilibrium function than other tests. It is interesting that significant difference in the recovery of postural sway in three months after surgery in UKA compared with TKA