Purpose and background. Whether to order an MRI scan or not for patients with low back and leg pain (LBP). Resources are limited. Waiting for diagnostic imaging impacts time to treatment and may be critical to the “18 week target”. We have looked into devising a system in which we can ordered MRI scans for patients with LBP pre-clinical assessment based on questionnaire and accessing their referral letter. Methods and results. 49 patient's referrals were looked into (randomly picked). 23 had a questionnaire filled by either themselves or their GPs. the rests had MRI scans ordered based on their referral letters. MRI scans were requested pre-clinical assessment for patients with symptoms spreading beyond their knees and willing to consider interventional treatments (injections or operations). We considered MRI positive if the report mentioned stenosis or disc prolapse causing nerve root or cauda compression. 7 out of the 23 fitted the criteria for MRI. 6 (85%) of them had positive results. 26 of the GP referrals letters had MRI out of those 16 (61%) had positive results. In total out of 33 MRI, 22 (66.7%) were positive. Conclusion. Our study showed that pre-clinic MRI scanning for patients with LBP is an effective method to find surgically treatable pathology. Using the questionnaire was more advantageous than the referral letter in order to identify patients who would benefit from pre-clinic MRI scanning. With the small numbers this is not statistically significant. We propose that rather than a blanket scanning, it would be reasonable to scan patients based on their referral letter. No Conflict of interest. No funding obtained. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Introduction. This study sought to determine whether the functional outcome of two common spinal operations could be improved by a programme of post-operative rehabilitation and/or an educational booklet each compared with usual care. Methods. This was a multi-centre, factorial, randomised controlled trial on the post operative management of spinal surgery patients, with randomisation stratified by surgeon and operative procedure. The study compared the effectiveness of a rehabilitation programme and an education booklet for the postoperative management of patients undergoing discectomy or lateral nerve root decompression surgery, each compared with “usual care” using a 2 × 2 factorial design, randomising patient to four groups; rehabilitation-only, booklet-only, rehabilitation-plus-booklet, and usual care only. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months, with secondary outcomes including visual analogue scale measures of back and leg pain. An economic analysis was also performed. Results. 338 patients were recruited into the study with outcomes preformed pre-operatively, and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-operatively. At the one year review the effect of rehabilitation on ODI was −2.7 (95% CI −6.8 to 1.5) and the effect of booklet was 2.7 (95% CI −1.5 to 6.9). There were no significant differences in costs or outcomes associated with either intervention and neither intervention was cost-effective. Discussion. This study found that neither intervention had a significant impact on long term outcome or cost. There was some evidence to suggest that the impact of the interventions was different between patients undergoing discectomy and those having spinal decompression. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. Arthritis Research UK. Previously presented at International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine 2011