Aim. Dissolvable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate beads have been utilized for management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and for aseptic revision arthroplasty. However, wound drainage and toxic reactive synovitis have been substantial problems in prior studies. Currently a commercially pure, physiologic product has been introduced that may reduce complications associated with this treatment modality. We aim to answer the question: does a commercially pure, physiologic version of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads reduce wound drainage and provide efficacious treatment for PJI and aseptic revision arthroplasty?. Method. Starting January 2010, 756 consecutive procedures were performed utilizing a set protocol of Vancomycin and Tobramycin antibiotics in commercially pure dissolvable antibiotic beads. There were 8 designated study groups:. Aseptic Revision TKA. N = 216. Aseptic Revision THA. N = 185. DECRA. *. TKA. N = 44. DECRA. *. THA. N = 16. 1. st. Stage Resection TKA. N = 103. 1. st. Stage Resection THA. N = 62. Reimplant TKA. N = 81. Reimplant THA. N = 49. *. DECRA = Debridement, modular Exchange, Component Retention, iv Antibiotics for acute PJI. Results. Wound drainage in the entire series was 4.2%. Wound drainage was generally seen in cases using higher bead volumes (≥30cc). The rate of heterotopic ossification was 1.6%. With bead volumes of ≥30cc, we did notice transient hypercalcemia in 12% of the study group (14% hips, 10% knees). The overall rate of infection failure was 2.5%. In the DECRA groups, reinfection failure rate was encouraging, measuring 9.1% in knees and 6.3% in hips. The non-DECRA group with the highest infection rate was Reimplant TKA (6.2%). Conclusions. We utilized a large series of commercially pure dissolvable antibiotic-loaded beads in a wide variety of clinical scenarios in patients with substantial comorbidities. Our rate of wound drainage, compared to prior studies utilizing gypsum products, was reasonably good. Additionally, our infection failure rates were encouraging. Over-stuffing knee joints with too many beads, in our clinical review, does affect wound drainage rates. By removing impurities from calcium sulfate, we do not see the substantial toxic synovial reaction compared to the traditional gypsum-washed products. We feel that commercially pure, physiologic antibiotic-loaded dissolvable beads are an acceptable delivery tool for local antibiotic delivery in aseptic and septic revision joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee. In our opinion, further study is warranted. We advocate future randomized studies to examine the potential of improving outcomes of PJI and aseptic revision arthroplasty

Aim

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating and costly complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Use of extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) has become increasingly popular in the United States following a highly publicized study (Inabathula et al) from a single center demonstrating a significant protective effect (81% reduction) against PJI in ‘high-risk’ patients. However, these results have not been reproduced elsewhere and EOAP use directly conflicts with current antibiotic stewardship efforts. In order to study the role of EOAP in PJI prevention, consensus is needed for what defines ‘high-risk’ patients. The revision TJA (rTJA) population is an appropriate group to study due to having a higher incidence of PJI. The purpose of the current study was to rigorously determine which preoperative conditions described by Inabathula et al. (referred to as Inabathula criteria (IBC)) confer a higher rate of PJI in patients undergoing aseptic rTJA.

Aim. Culture-based conventional methods are still the gold standard to identify microorganisms in hip and knee PJIs diagnosis. However, such approach presents some limitations due to prior antimicrobial treatment or the presence of unusual and fastidious organisms. Molecular techniques, in particular specific real-time and broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are available for diagnostic use in a suspected PJI. However, limited data is available on their sensitivity and specificity. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a rapid and simple Investigational Use Only (IUO) version of the BioFire® JI multiplex PCR panel when compared to traditional microbiological procedures. Method. Fifty-eight native synovial fluid samples were recovered from 49 patients (female n=26; male =23) who underwent one or multiple septic or aseptic revision arthroplasties of the hip (n=12) and knee (n=46). The JI panel methodology was used either on specimens freshly collected (n=6) or stored at −80°C in our Musculoskeletal Biobank (n=52). The JI panel performance was evaluated by comparison with culture reference methods. Patient's medical records were retrieved from our institutional arthroplasty registry as well as our prospectively maintained PJI infection database. Results. The JI panel identified additional microorganisms in 3/39 (7.7%) positive cases, and a different microorganism in 1/39 (2.6%) sample. Out of 9/58 (15.5%) culture negative samples, two (22%) were positively detected by the JI panel. In total 49/58 (84%) native synovial fluid specimens were positive by culture methods, versus 39/58 (81.2%) with the JI panel. Ten samples are currently under investigation for confirmatory results. Out of 39 positive detections with the JI panel, 35 (89.7%) were concordant with the identified microorganism (n=29 same species; n=6 same genus). The combined information from the JI panel results and clinical records revealed the existence of 6/58 (10.3%) PJIs’ cases which would have required a different antibiotic therapeutic approach. Conclusions. The work presented, provides additional value for the clinical use of the JI panel to the improvement of PJI management in terms of rapid and successful treatment decisions, patient outcome, and healthcare costs. This technique shows high sensitivity to detect PJIs specific microorganisms in both fresh as well frozen native synovial fluid samples, thus emphasizing its use for retrospective studies analysis

Early and/or prolonged wound discharge after total knee arthroplasty often raises the question whether this is a sign of an early infection or if the prolonged discharge leads to a secondary deep wound infection from migrating skin bacteria. Confronted with the dilemma of what to do with early PWC our department implemented a new treatment protocol in 2002 to deal with early PWC after TKA in order to standardize decision-making. The aim of this study was to report our long-term results using this protocol on a prospective cohort primary TKA and revision TKA performed for other reasons than infection. This report focuses on the results of DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) performed for early PPJI and/or early wound complications without clinical signs of infection. After implementing our treatment algorithm regarding postoperative wound complications in early 2002, we initiated a quality registration including every primary and non infected revision TKA performed. Between January 2002 and August 2012 1439 consecutive primary knee arthroplasties were performed at our institution. During the same period a total of 120 knee revisions for reasons not related to infection were performed. All patients undergoing DAIR within three months of the index procedure where divided into two groups: successful and unsuccessful. Successful DAIR didn't require any more surgery and the implant could be retained with a minimum follow up time of two years. Unsuccessful DAIR required at least one more surgical intervention. Treatment with DAIR was successful in 47 of 62 patients operated with primary and revision TKA as index operation. Those patients had no signs of infection and no antimicrobial therapy after a minimum of one year follow up time. The remaining 15 patients were in need of further surgery. Positive cultures could be obtained in 41 of 62 patients including those operated for aseptic revision arthroplasty. Staphylococcus aureus was by far the most common isolated organism with 24 isolations and the sole causative pathogen in 15 cases. When looking at all patients even including those with aseptic revision TKA we could see that the algorithm resulted in 57 of 62 patients (91,9%) ending up with a working knee prosthesis at the final follow up. In 47 (75,8%) cases prosthesis retention could be achieved with only a single DAIR procedure. We therefore conclude that the algorithm applied at our centre leads to satisfactory results