header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 8 | Pages 497 - 503
16 Aug 2023
Lee J Koh Y Kim PS Park J Kang K

Aims

Focal knee arthroplasty is an attractive alternative to knee arthroplasty for young patients because it allows preservation of a large amount of bone for potential revisions. However, the mechanical behaviour of cartilage has not yet been investigated because it is challenging to evaluate in vivo contact areas, pressure, and deformations from metal implants. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the contact pressure in the tibiofemoral joint with a focal knee arthroplasty using a finite element model.

Methods

The mechanical behaviour of the cartilage surrounding a metal implant was evaluated using finite element analysis. We modelled focal knee arthroplasty with placement flush, 0.5 mm deep, or protruding 0.5 mm with regard to the level of the surrounding cartilage. We compared contact stress and pressure for bone, implant, and cartilage under static loading conditions.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 10 | Pages 739 - 750
4 Oct 2022
Shu L Abe N Li S Sugita N

Aims

To fully quantify the effect of posterior tibial slope (PTS) angles on joint kinematics and contact mechanics of intact and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient (ACLD) knees during the gait cycle.

Methods

In this controlled laboratory study, we developed an original multiscale subject-specific finite element musculoskeletal framework model and integrated it with the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints with high-fidelity joint motion representations, to investigate the effects of 2.5° increases in PTS angles on joint dynamics and contact mechanics during the gait cycle.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 9, Issue 2 | Pages 60 - 70
1 Feb 2020
Li Z Arioka M Liu Y Aghvami M Tulu S Brunski JB Helms JA

Aims

Surgeons and most engineers believe that bone compaction improves implant primary stability without causing undue damage to the bone itself. In this study, we developed a murine distal femoral implant model and tested this dogma.

Methods

Each mouse received two femoral implants, one placed into a site prepared by drilling and the other into the contralateral site prepared by drilling followed by stepwise condensation.