Our primary objective was to compare healing rates in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for degenerative tears, with and without bone channeling. Our secondary objectives were to compare disease-specific quality of life and patient reported outcomes as measured by the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Constant score between groups. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at three sites were randomized to receive either bone channeling augmentation or standard repair. Healing rates were determined by ultrasound at 6 and 24 months post operatively. WORC, ASES, and Constant scores were compared between groups at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively. One hundred sixty-eight patients were recruited and randomized between 2013 to 2018. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from pre-operative to all time points in all clinical outcome scores (p < 0 .0001). Intention to treat analysis revealed no statistical differences in healing rates between the two interventions at 24 months post-operative. No differences were observed in WORC, ASES or Constant scores at any time-point. This trial did not demonstrate superiority of intra-operative bone channeling in rotator cuff repair surgery at 24 months post-operative. Healing rates and patient-reported function and quality of life measures were similar between groups

It is undetermined which factors predict return to work following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We aimed to identify which factors predicted return to work at any level, and return to pre-injury levels of work 6 months post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Multiple logistic regression analysis of prospectively collected demographic, pre-injury, preoperative, and intraoperative data from 1502 consecutive primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs, performed by a single surgeon, was performed to identify independent predictors of return to work, and return to pre-injury levels of work respectively, 6 months post-surgery. Six months post-rotator cuff repair, 76% of patients returned to work (RTW), and 40% returned to pre-injury levels of work (Full-RTW). RTW at 6 months was likely if patients were still working after their injuries, but prior to surgery (Wald statistic [W]=55, p<0.0001), were stronger in internal rotation preoperatively (W=8, p=0.004), had full-thickness tears (W=9, p=0.002), and were female (W=5, p=0.030). Patients who achieved Full-RTW were likely to have worked less strenuously pre-injury (W=173, p<0.0001), worked more strenuously post-injury but pre-surgery (W=22, p<0.0001), had greater behind-the-back lift-off strength preoperatively (W=8, p=0.004), and had less passive external rotation range of motion preoperatively (W=5, p=0.034). Patients who were still working post-injury, but pre-surgery were 1.6-times more likely to RTW than patients who were not (p<0.0001). Patients who nominated their pre-injury level of work as “light” were 11-times more likely to achieve Full-RTW than those who nominated “strenuous” (p<0.0001). Six months post-rotator cuff repair, a higher patient-rated post-injury, but pre-surgery level of work was the strongest predictor of RTW. A lower patient-rated pre-injury level of work was the strongest predictor of Full-RTW. Greater preoperative subscapularis strength independently predicted both RTW, and Full-RTW

Tears of the rotator cuff tendons are a very common entity. Despite recent advances in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the re-tear rate remains high. Thus, new methods to improve healing rates following rotator cuff repair must be sought. The purpose of this prospective randomized double-blind controlled study is to compare the functional outcomes and healing rates of an adjuvant pre-operative bone microfracture technique prior to arthroscopic cuff repair. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive either a percutaneous bone microfracture of the supraspinatus footprint or a “soft tissue needling” technique, in which the pin was passed through the peripheral edges of the rotator cuff, five-seven days prior to index surgery, under ultrasound guidance. Follow-ups were completed at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Healing status was determined by ultrasound at 6 and 24 months. The primary objective was to compare the WORC score at 24 months. Secondary objectives included the healing status via ultrasound, the Constant, and the ASES scores. A sample size calculation determined that 90 patients provided 80% power to detect a statistical difference between groups. Baseline demographic data did not differ between groups. No statistical differences were detected in the WORC outcome at any time points (p=0.47, baseline, p=0.60, 3 months, p=0.79, 6 months, p=0.50, 12 months, p=0.54, 24 months). Healing rates did not differ between groups (P=0.34) and no differences were observed in the ASES or Constant Scores at all time-points. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from baseline to all time points in all clinical outcome scores (p < 0 .0001). No statistically significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes were identified between pre-operative bone microfracture and soft tissue needling techniques prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This study does not support pre-operative microfracture as a adjuvant technique prior to arthroscopic cuff repair

Controversy exists regarding the optimal technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. No previous comparative trials have reported on the long-term follow-up of single and double row fixation in arthroscopic cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term functional outcomes of single-row and double-row suture techniques for repair of the rotator cuff 10-years post-operatively. Ninety patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive either single-row or double-row repair. The primary objective was to compare the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score 10-years post-operatively. Secondary objectives included comparison of the Constant, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and supraspinatus strength between groups. Out of 90 patients originally randomized, 57 returned for the long-term 10-year follow-up. Baseline demographic data did not differ between groups. The WORC score was not significantly different between groups at long-term follow-up (p=0.13). No statistical differences were observed between groups for the Constant (p=0.51), ASES (p=0.48) scores, or strength scores (p=0.93). A significant improvement was observed between pre-operative and the final 10-year follow-up. There were no differences observed in all outcomes between two and 10-years post-operatively. No statistically significant differences in functional or quality of life outcomes were identified between single-row and double-row fixation techniques at long-term follow-up

Introduction. One of the disadvantages of lateral decubitus position during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is the difficulty to control arm rotation intraoperatively making it necessary to create additional portals for anchor placement or an additional scrubbed assistant to control arm rotation. Methods & Technique. We describe the use of commercially available TRIMANO® support arm from Arthrex as an easy device for secure positioning during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in lateral decubitus position. Though initially marketed to be used for shoulder arthroplasties performed in beach chair position, the senior author has used TRIMANO® to perform arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in lateral decubitus position. The device is easily connected to the operating table side rail while the affected side forearm of the patient is placed in a disposable sterile foam arm holder and attached to the TRIMANO® arm. The “Click and Move” system of the TRIMANO® allows freedom to move the arm in any direction and also provides traction to distract the joint if needed. Conclusion. To conclude TRIMANO® arm is an easy to use flexible device for use in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in lateral decubitus position decreasing the need for additional portals or an additional scrub assistant thereby decreasing the manpower required and cost of surgery

Aim. Acute postoperative infection is reported to occur in 0.3–2% after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Few reports have addressed this dreaded complication although the costs are high both for the patient and for society. The aim of this prospective study was to describe incidence, treatment and outcome after acute postoperative infections following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Method. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in our department have been prospectively registered since 2009. 11 out of 1072 patients undergoing surgery developed an acute postoperative infection. The patients were examined with an MRI scan and/or functional scores (Constant Murley (CM) and WORC) at final follow-up. Results. All 11 patients that developed acute postoperative infections were male. Mean age was 54 (41–68) years. Except for male gender, no common underlying predisposing risk factor for infection could be identified. 1/11 patient had diabetes mellitus and 2/11 smoked. Average BMI was 27 (21–36). 1/11 was categorized as ASA 3 and the rest of the patients were ASA 1 and 2. All patients underwent arthroscopic debridement and biopsies were collected 26 (14–50) days after primary surgery. In 10 patients Propionibacterium acnes was cultured, and 6 of these patients also had positive cultures for coagulase negative staphylococci. In the remaining patient only coagulase negative staphylococcus was cultured. 5/11 patients were treated with one arthroscopic debridement, 5/11 had two arthroscopic debridements, whereas 1/11 required arthroscopic debridement four times before the infection was eradicated. Only 2/11 patients had to have their implants removed during the reoperation due to loosening of the suture anchors. All 11 patients were treated with parenteral antibiotics for 7–28 days, followed by oral treatment for 1–5 weeks, and all infections had resolved at final follow-up. Median CM score was 84 and median WORC score was 81% at follow-up median 22(11–28) months. 10 patients had a postoperative MRI scan after median 23 (3–49) months, 8 of them showing a healed cuff repair. Conclusions. Acute postoperative infections after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can be eradicated with arthroscopic debridement(s) and removal of implants may not be necessary if patency is adequate. Despite the postoperative acute infection our patients presented good functional results and were satisfied at last follow-up

Purpose. Controversy exists regarding the optimal technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this multicentre randomized double-blind controlled study was to compare the functional outcomes and healing rates of double-row suture techniques with single row repair. Method. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive either a double row (DR) or single row (SR) repair. The primary objective was to compare the WORC score at 24 months. Secondary objectives included anatomical outcomes by MRI or ultrasound, the Constant, and ASES scores. A sample size calculation determined that 84 patients provided 80% power with a 50% effect size to detect a statistical difference between groups. Results. Baseline demographic data did not differ between groups including age (p=0.4), sex (p=0.71), affected side (p=0.33) and cuff tear size (p=0.95). WORC outcome comparison between groups revealed that no statistical differences were detected at any time points (p=0.9, baseline; p=0.15, 3 months; p=0.41, 6 months; p=0.46, 12 months, p=0.42, 24 months). Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from baseline to all time points in all clinical outcome scores (p<0.0001). Conclusion. No statistically significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes were identified between DR and SR techniques. Given the added time to complete the procedures and the added cost of additional implants, this trial does not provide justification for use of the more complex repair technique

Aim. Review causes of anchor fixation failures in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods. Between 2003 and 2006, 650 arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were performed by the senior author. Of these, anchor fixation failure occurred in fifteen patients. A retrospective review was undertaken to find out the reasons for their failure. Results. There were ten women and five men, age range 46-84 (mean age 64). Thirteen underwent repair with metallic knotless anchors (Arthrocare), and two with 5.5mm biodegradable screw anchors (Arthrotek). Knotless anchors were used to repair six massive, one large, three medium and three small tears. The two patients with biodegradable anchor repair had only small tears, each held with a single anchor. All but one failure was apparent at six weeks. One metallic anchor failed at four months. Twelve knotless anchors failed through pull-out and one broke. Both biodegradable anchors broke at the eyelet. Discussion. The increasing strength of suture material has shifted the weak point away from the suture-tendon interface towards the anchor-bone interface. Arthroscopic techniques permit a wider age range of patients suitable for surgery, each with varying degrees of osteoporosis in the proximal humerus, increasing risk of anchor pull-out. Multiple anchor insertions to reduce stiff, retracted tears may also lead to weakening of the bone table in the footprint area of the greater tuberosity. Incomplete anchor deployment, commonly at the curved cortical bone edge of greater tuberosity can also lead to failure. Conclusion. Anchors failed if tension in the repair exceeds the bones capacity to retain the anchor, if the anchor is incompletely deployed or if one anchor is stressed beyond its tension capability. We recommend that consideration is given to spreading the tension of the tissue repair amongst the anchors placed in the greater tuberosity

Objective. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs now yield a similar footprint as open procedures with several advantages, including reduced tissue trauma, post-operative pain, swelling, and concern about the deltoid attachment. We present a new simple and reproducible technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods. Sutures are placed through the full thickness of the rotator cuff. The suture is tied in the following manner:. Traction is released, the assistant maintaining the arm in abduction and applying tension on the anterior cuff sutures while the posterior cuff sutures are tied. The procedure is repeated for the anterior cuff suture; and. One suture strand from the anterior cuff and one suture strand from the posterior cuff are tied. The procedure is then repeated using the second strand from the anterior cuff and second suture strand from the posterior cuff. This suture and knot tying technique snugs the cuff down to the prepared tuberosity and restores the articular footprint of the cuff. This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcome of 170 patients who underwent arthroscopic cuff repair using this technique. Results. The mean age of the patients was 56 years (range, 29-78 years), and the mean follow-up was 38 months (range, 12-60 months). 25 % patients had a cuff tear < 1 cm, 45 % with a cuff tear size 1-3 cm, 25 % with a cuff tear size 3-5cms and 5 % with a cuff tear larger than 5 cms. All patients had improvements in pain, range of motion and strength. Significant improvements were demonstrated for Constant scores (from 42 to 87 points, P < .001). 92 % of our patients were satisfied. 80 % of patients returned to pre-injury levels of work and leisure activities. Conclusion. This study demonstrates the successful clinical outcome of the parachute technique for arthroscopic cuff repair

The indication for rotator cuff repair in elderly patients is controversial. Methods. Consecutive patients over the age of 70 years, under the care of a single surgeon, receiving an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were reviewed. Predominantly, a single row repair was performed using one (34 cases) or two (30) 5mm Fastin, double-loaded anchors. Double-row repair was performed in four cases. Subacromial decompression and treatment of biceps pathology were performed as necessary. Data were collected from medical records, digital radiology archives and during clinic appointments. Pain, motion, strength and function were quantified with the Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score, administered pre operatively and at 1-year post operatively. Ultrasound scans were performed at one year to document integrity of the repair. Results. Sixty-nine arthroscopic cuff repairs were identified in 68 patients. The mean age was 77 years (70–86). The median ASA grade was 2 (79%). The dominant side was operated on in 68% of cases. A range of tear sizes were operated on (5 small, 17 moderate, 29 large and 18 massive). The tendons involved in the tear also varied (supraspinatus 12, supra and infraspinatus 53, supraspinatus and subscapularis 2, supraspinatus infraspinatus and subscapularis 2). Re-rupture occurred in 20 cases (29%). The mean Constant score increased from 23 (95% CI 19–26) to 59 (54–64) (P< 0.001). Where the repair remained sound, Constant score improved 42 points (95%CI 36–48). If the cuff re-ruptured, constant score also increased on average 12 points (95% CI 2–21). Re-rupture rate was highest for massive cuff repairs: ten out of eighteen (56%). Conclusion. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the elderly is a successful procedure. Approximately seven out of ten repairs remained intact after one year. Even where re-rupture occurs, a significant improvement in the Constant score was found

The purpose of this study was to validate a dry model for the assessment of performance of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) and labral repair (LR). We hypothesised that the combination of a checklist and a previously validated global rating scale (GRS) would be a valid and reliable means of assessing RCR and LR when performed by residents in a dry model. An arthroscopic RCR and LR was performed on a dry model by residents, fellows, and sports medicine staff. Any prior RCR and LR exposure was noted. Participants were given a detailed surgical manuscript and technique video before the study began. Evaluation of residents was performed by staff surgeons with task-specific checklists created using a modified Delphi procedure, and the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET). The hand movements and arthroscopic view of the procedures were recorded. Both videos were scored by a fellow blinded to the year of training of each participant. A total of 35 residents, six fellows and five staff surgeons performed both arthroscopic RCR and LR on a dry model model (48 total). The internal reliability (Cronbach's Alpha) of the test using the total ASSET score was high (>0.8)). One-way analysis of variance for the total ASSET score and the total checklist score demonstrated a difference between participants based upon year of training (p<0.05). Post hoc analysis also demonstrated a significant difference in global ratings and checklist scores between junior residents (PGY1–3) and senior residents (PGY4&5), senior residents and fellows, and fellows and staff. A good correlation was seen between the total ASSET score and prior exposure to RCR and LR. The inter-rater reliability (ICC) between the examiner ratings and the blinded assessor ratings for the total ASSET score was good (0.8). The results of this study provide evidence that the performance of a RCR and LR in a dry model is a valid and reliable method of assessing a resident's ability to perform these procedures, prior to performance in the operating room

The optimal approach to arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff is controversial, and both single row and double row fixation methods are commonly used. Which construct yields the highest efficacy is not clear. Given the current era of increasing costs in which health care delivery models are aiming for improved efficiencies and optimal outcomes, a cost-effectiveness study was performed to inform the decision making process of the utilisation of single versus double row repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of single row versus double row constructs in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A cost-utility analysis was performed. Health resource use and outcome data were obtained from a previous prospective randomised controlled trial in which 90 patients were randomised to two treatment arms, single row rotator cuff repair (n=48) and double row (n=42). The patients were followed over a two-year span from the time of initial surgery. Unit cost data were captured using case costs collected from the hospital database and the Ontario Schedule of Benefits. Utility values were derived from published literature. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as the difference in cost between the two types of rotator cuff fixation divided by the difference in quality adjusted life years (QALY), was determined. Double row fixation was more costly ($2,279.94 versus $1,587.37) but was more effective than the single row method (QALY of 4.073 versus 4.055). An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated to be $38,504.92 per QALY for double row fixation relative to single row. This is well below the commonly used willingness to pay threshold of $50,000/QALY. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with larger rotator cuff tears (>3cm) had a lower ICER, suggesting that double-row fixation may be more cost-effective in more severe tears. Double row rotator cuff fixation is a cost-effective option compared to single row rotator cuff repair with an ICER of $38,504.92/QALY, well within the accepted willingness to pay threshold of $50,000/QALY. Furthermore, the ICER between single and double row fixation improved with larger rotator cuff tears (>3cm), suggesting an additional benefit of a double row construct in those cases

Purpose. Tenodesis of the long head of biceps is an established technique for management of biceps pathology including tears, instability, and chronic tendinosis intractable to non-operative management. Very few studies have reported on clinical outcomes of all-arthroscopic, non-interference, biceps tenodesis techniques. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional and quality of life outcomes of patients treated with an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with a suture anchor. Method. Case Series Level 4 Evidence. Fifty-eight (58) patients with a mean age of 58.5 years were treated with an arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in a single surgeons practice. A single suture anchor was used with a non-interference technique, either in isolation or in association with an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected outcome measures on patients with a minimum one-year follow-up. Patients were evaluated with an ASES, Constant, and WORC scores pre-operatively and at 6 and 12 months post-operatively. In addition, patients were questioned post-operatively as to whether they experienced any biceps cramping, fatigue, or cosmetic deformity (popeye sign). Results. Following an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, the ASES, Constant, and WORC scores improved significantly from 45, 54, 32 to 58, 75, 73 respectively (P<0.001). When analyzed separately, patients who underwent an arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in isolation (no cuff repair) and in association with an arthroscopic cuff repair demonstrated similar gains in functional and quality of life outcomes. (P<0.001). Few patients reported post-operative bicipital cramping, fatigue, or cosmetic deformity. Conclusion. The all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis is a reliable procedure that results in significant improvement in functional outcome and quality of life measures

Given that there is limited time available to the surgeon in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, how is the time best spent? Should they place one Modified Mason-Allen, two mattress or four simple sutures? This study reverses current thought. In an in-vitro biomechanical single pull to failure study we compared the ultimate tensile strength of simple, mattress and grasping sutures passed with an arthroscopic suture passer (Surgical Solutions Express-Sew). The aim was to determine which suture configurations would most simply, repeatably and reliably repair the rotator cuff. The ultimate tensile strength and mode of failure of six different suture configurations was repeatedly tested on a validated porcine rotator cuff tendon model, using a standard suture material (Number 2 Fiberwire) passed with the Surgical Solutions Express-sew, in a Hounsfield type H20K-W digital tensometer. Standardising the number of suture passes to four, the strongest construct was two mattress sutures (Mean 169N), followed by single Modified Kessler (Mean 161N), four simple sutures (Mean 155N) and finally a single Mason Allen suture (Mean 140N). Suture configurations involving two passes were all weaker than those with four (one way analysis of variance p=0.026), even when Number 2 Fibertape was used to augment strength. These results show little difference in strength for varying complexity of four pass suture passage (one way analysis of variance p=0.61). In simple terms there is no demonstrable difference in the strength of construct whether the surgeon uses four simple, two mattress or one grasping suture. This study allows the surgeon to justify using the simplest configuration of suture passage that works in his hands in order to obtain a reliable and repeatable repair of the rotator cuff arthroscopically

The transosseous equivalent/Suture Bridge or TOE/SB repair has received much attention in recent years as more shoulder surgeons transition to all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical behaviour of several variants of the Suture Bridge repair performed by the authors. Four different Suture Bridge constructs were performed six times on 24 sheep infraspinatus tendon humerus constructs. The first group was a standard Suture Bridge with two medial mattress stitches with knots (KSSB4). The second group had four medial mattress stitches with knots and was called KDSB8. The third group had two medial mattress stitches without knots and was called USBFT4. These first three repairs used two medial 5.5 mm Bio-Corkscrew FT Anchors and two lateral 3.5 mm PushLock Anchors (Arthrex). The fourth repair had two medial mattress stitches without knots and used all Pushlocks and was called USBP4. The repairs were then analysed for failure force, cyclic creep and stiffnessafter. Cycling was performed from 10 to 100 N at 1 Hz for 500 cycles. Following cyclic testing a single cycle pull to failure at 33 mm/sec was performed. The constructs were also observed for failure mechanism and gap formation using digital video recording. The KDSB8 repair with a mean failure force of 456.9N was significantly stronger than the USBP4 repair at 299.7N (P=0.023), the KSSB4 repair at 295.4N (P=0.019) and lastly the USBFT4 repair at 284.0N (P=0.011). There was no statistical difference between the measured failure force for the two mattress stitch KSSB4 repair with knots and the knotless two mattress stitch repairs USBFT4 and USBP4. There was not a statistical difference between any of the repairs for measured stiffness and cyclic creep. However, the KDSB8 repair showed no discernable gap formation or movement at the footprint during cyclic testing. The KSSB4, USBFT4 and USBP4 repairs demonstrated bursal sided gap formation in the range of 1 to 3 mm. Based on the results of this study the transosseous equivalent/Suture Bridge repair with four stitches tied in the medial row and maximal lateral suture strand utilization (KDSB8 TOE/SB) is the strongest. The KDSB8 also appeared to show less bursal sided gap formation and greater footprint stability than the other Suture Bridge constructs tested

Aims

To evaluate safety outcomes and patient satisfaction of the re-introduction of elective orthopaedic surgery on ‘green’ (non-COVID-19) sites during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aims

Elective surgery has been severely curtailed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is little evidence to guide surgeons in assessing what processes should be put in place to restart elective surgery safely in a time of endemic COVID-19 in the community.