Meniscal tears are the most common injury in the knee, affecting 66/100,000 people/year. Surgical treatment includes arthroscopic meniscectomy or meniscal repair. Little is known regarding medium-term outcomes following these procedures in isolated meniscal tears. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate patients with meniscal tears, and those who have undergone meniscectomy and meniscal repair using validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), further exploring factors which affect surgical outcomes. This observational study screened 334 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery at South Tyneside Hospital since August 2013. 134 patients with isolated meniscal tears were invited to complete postal PROMs. A combination of patient notes and radiological imaging was used to collect information of interest including age, gender, knee-laterality, injured meniscus, tear pattern, procedure performed, complications, and associated injuries. A total of 115 patients (pre-operative patients with current meniscal tear (n=36), meniscectomy (n=63), meniscal repair (n=16)) were included in the analysis with 96% successful PROM completion. Both meniscectomy and meniscal repairs (mean 55-months follow-up) showed better outcomes than pre-operative patients with meniscal tears. Meniscal repairs demonstrated superior outcomes across all PROMs when compared to meniscectomy, with a greater mean overall KOOS score of 17.2 (p=0.009). Factors including higher pre-operative Kellgren-Lawrence Grade, pre-operative articular cartilage lesions and bilateral meniscectomies were shown to negatively influence outcomes. Both meniscectomy and meniscal repair maintain clinical benefit at mean 55-months follow-up, affirming their use for treatment of meniscal tears. When feasible, meniscal repair should be performed preferentially over meniscectomy in isolated meniscal tears. Identified predictive factors allow adequate treatment stratification in specific patient groups

The aim of this study was to determine if patient reported outcome scores for arthroscopic meniscectomy are adversely affected by the degree of knee osteoarthritis or patient body mass index (BMI). All patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy within the NHS in Scotland between 6th February and 29th April 2012 were audited as part of the Scottish Government Musculoskeletal Knee Arthroscopy Audit and were eligible for inclusion within this study. A total of 270 patients returned both their pre-operative and post-operative EuroQol 5Q5D5L descriptive questionnaire and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Scores. Patients were stratified according to BMI, degree of osteoarthritis, history of injury, and duration of knee symptoms. Pre-operative to post-operative EuroQol index scores [0.642±0.253 to 0.735±0.277, median±SD] and Knee injury and Osteoarthrtis Outcome Scores [44.63±18.78 to 62.28±24.94, median±SD] improved across all patients (p<0.0001). This was irrespective of degree of BMI, history of injury, or duration of symptoms. There was no such improvement in patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis. Those patients with a BMI >35 kg/m2 had lower post-operative scores than the pre-operative scores of those of BMI <30 kg/m2. Arthroscopic meniscectomy is beneficial regardless of patient BMI, duration of symptoms, history of injury, or in the presence of mild arthritis

The role of arthroscopic meniscectomy in middle-aged patients has not previously been evaluated. This paper reports on 73 knees in 68 patients aged over 40, all of whom were shown arthroscopically to have meniscal tears and who were felt to be suitable candidates for meniscectomy. Many of these patients had typical traumatic meniscal tears, and if no degenerative joint changes were present at the time of meniscectomy, 95 per cent of them had good or excellent results an average of two and a half years later. In those instances where degenerative joint changes were present, removal of the offending segment of torn meniscus produced 80 per cent good or excellent results over the same period of time. These facts seem important now that arthroscopy permits such precise diagnosis of meniscal tears and of joint degeneration

The April 2023 Research Roundup. 360. looks at: Ear protection for orthopaedic surgeons?; Has arthroscopic meniscectomy use changed in response to the evidence?; Time to positivity of cultures obtained for periprosthetic joint infection; Bisphosphonates for post-COVID-19 osteonecrosis of the femoral head; Missing missed fractures: is AI the answer?; Congenital insensitivity to pain and correction of the knee; YouTube and paediatric elbow injuries

In a double-blind, randomised, prospective study of 139 patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy, those receiving a prostaglandin inhibitor (naproxen sodium) had significantly less pain, less synovitis and less effusion. They had significantly more rapid return of movement and of quadriceps function; their return to work and to sport also was significantly faster. It is recommended that, provided there are no contraindications, a prostaglandin inhibitor should be used after arthroscopic procedures

Arthroscopy is now well established as a method of diagnosing meniscal lesions, and its advantages have been pointed out in several reports. Arthroscopic surgery, however, is difficult to master, so that for meniscectomy open methods remain commoner. By taking advantage of the new instruments and equipment developed for arthroscopic operations, a modified technique of open meniscectomy, designed to improve the postoperative course, has been developed. In a prospective randomised study, the results after this modified open meniscectomy were comparable with those obtained after arthroscopic operation and were significantly better than those after conventional meniscectomy. The best results of all, however, were those after partial arthroscopic meniscectomy

The value of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in the severely arthritic knee has been questioned. Some authors suggest that it may result in progression of osteoarthritis precipitating the need for joint replacement and that symptomatic improvement may occur from lavage alone.

126 patients with a torn meniscus and Outerbridge grade IV changes in the same compartment underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and limited debridement of unstable articular cartilage. The indication for surgery was a symptomatic meniscal tear not osteoarthritis. A control group consisted of 13 patients with grade IV changes and intact but frayed menisci who underwent washout alone. Mean age and follow up were similar in the two groups.

Initially meniscectomy improved symptoms in 82 cases (65%). Symptoms were unchanged in 26 cases (21%) and were made worse in 18 cases (14%). At a mean follow up of 55 months, 50 patients (40%) felt their knees were better than they were preoperatively. Their mean Lysholm score was 75. 5. 35 knees (28%) were not improved (mean Lysholm socre 59). 41 patients (32%) had undergone further surgery: 39 total knee replacements, 1 unicompartmental knee replacement and 1 tibial osteotomy. Older patients, those with varus/ valgus malalignment, and those with exposed bone on both articular surfaces fared worse.

Outcome following meniscectomy was better than outcome following washout alone: more patients reported an improvement after meniscectomy and fewer had undergone further surgery on their knees (p=0. 04). The median time between arthroscopy and the decisions for joint replacement was the same in both groups (8 months in the meniscectomy group and 7. 5 months in the washout group) indicating meniscectomy did not precipitate joint replacement.

These results suggest that arthroscopic partial men-iscectomy in the presence of Outerbridge grade IV changes can result in satisfactory long term outcomes for many patients, is more effective than washout alone and does not precipitate the need for joint replacement.

We reviewed 74 partial medial meniscectomies in 57 patients with stable knees, to assess the long-term functional and radiological outcome. The International Knee Documentation Committee score and the residual laxity were assessed in both knees. At the time of surgery the mean age of the patients was 36 ± 11 years and the mean follow-up was 12 ± 1 years. All had a limited medial meniscectomy. The anterior cruciate ligament was intact in all cases. The meniscal tear was vertical in 95% and complex in 5%. The posterior part of the meniscus was removed in 99%. A peripheral rim was preserved in all cases. After 12 years 95% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their knee(s). Objectively, 57% had grade A function and 43% were grade B. The outcome correlated only with the presence of anterior knee pain at final follow-up. In the 49 cases of arthroscopic meniscectomy for which there was a contralateral normal knee there was narrowing of the ‘joint-space’ in 16% of the operated knees. There was no correlation between this and other parameters such as age or different meniscal pathologies

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this retrospective multicentric analysis was to study the functional and radiological outcomes at more than 20 years of 89 arthroscopic lateral menisectomy procedures performed on stable knees. Materialandmethod:The series included 89 arthroscopic lateral meniscectomies performed on knee with intact anterior cruciate ligaments (ACL). Mean follow-up was 22±3 years; 56 male, mean BMI 25±4, mean age at meniscectomy 35 years, mean age at last follow-up 57 years. Most of the injuries were vertical (41%), complex (22%) and radial (20%) lesions. The middle segment was involved in 79%. The meniscectomy removed more than one-third of the meniscus in 67%. All patients were reviewed by an independent operator for subjective assessment KOOS (100% normal) and IKDC, and for objective clinical and radiological measurements (IKDC). P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There was no independent control group. Results: Revisions were performed for 16% of the knees. Intense or moderate activity was maintained by all patients. The subjective IKDC score was 71.1±23, comparable with an age and gender matched population. The mean KOOS score was 82% for pain, 80% for symptoms, 85% for daily activities, 64% for sports, and 69% for quality of life. The rate of of osteoarthritis was 56%, and 44% of patients had a difference between the two knees for osteoarthritis. The incidence of osteoarthritis was 53% and shift to valgus on the arthritic side was significantly associated with osteoarthritis, while the opposite side was well aligned. The knee was pain free in 27% of patients. Significant factors for good prognosis were age less than 38 years at first operation, moderate BMI, and minimal cartilage damage (grade 0 or 1). Conclusion: After the first postoperative year after arthroscopic lateral meniscectomy on a stable knee, the results remain stable and satisfactory for more than 22 years. Nevertheless, patients aged over 40 with a high BMI and cartilage damage at the time of the first operation have a less encouraging prognosis

Aims. Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee commonly have degenerative meniscal tears. Arthroscopic meniscectomy is frequently performed, although the benefits are debatable. Recent studies have concluded that there is no role for arthroscopic washout in osteoarthritis of the knee. Our aim was to perform a systematic review to assess the evidence for the efficacy of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with meniscal tears and degenerative changes in the knee. Patients and Methods. A literature search was performed, using the PubMed/MEDLINE database, for relevant articles published between 1975 and 2015. A total of six studies, including five randomised controlled trials and one cross-sectional study of a prospective cohort, met the inclusion criteria. Relevant information including study design, operations, the characteristics of the patients, outcomes, adverse events and further operations were extracted. Results. The degree of osteoarthritis in the patients who were included and the rate of cross over from one form of treatment to another varied in the studies. Two randomised controlled trials showed a benefit of arthroscopic surgery in patients with limited degenerative joint disease, compared with conservative treatment. One cross-sectional study showed that patients with less severe degenerative changes had better outcomes. Conclusion. Patients with symptomatic meniscal tears and degenerative changes in the knee can benefit from arthroscopic meniscectomy, particularly if the osteoarthritis is mild. A trial of conservative management may be effective and should be considered, especially in patients with moderate osteoarthritis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:934–8

Abstract. Introduction. Recent research has questioned the role of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with a meniscal tear leading to the development of treatment recommendations for these patients. There is a clear need to understand patient perceptions of living with a meniscal tear in order to plan future research and treatment guidelines. Aims. To explore the experiences and expectations of treatment of young patients with a meniscal tear of the knee. Methodology. Ten participants diagnosed with a meniscal tear were recruited from the METRO cohort study using a purposive sampling strategy. These patients underwent semi-sructured interviews between April and May 2021. Thematic analysis was used to code the transcripts and generate key themes in order to describe the data. Results. Themes identified relate to the broad areas of: the effect of symptoms, the expericne of the clinical consultation and the experience of the treatment modality undertaken. Meniscal tears have a profound impact on pain and many patients experience effects on their family and financial life in addition to physical symptoms. Participants expected the majority of their management to occur in secondary care and most thought surgery would be a definitive treatment, while the effectiveness of physiotherapy could not be guaranteed as it would not fix the physical tear. Conclusion. Patient experience of meniscal tear may not correspond with current available clinical evidence. Clinicians should consider the common misconceptions highlighted in this study when conducting a consultation and pre-empt them to optimally manage patient expectations

Abstract. Introduction. Previous research has demonstrated no clinically significant benefit of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with a meniscal tear, however, patients included in these studies would not meet current treatment recommendations. Prior to further randomised controlled trials (RCTs) research is needed to understand a younger population in more detail. Aim. To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with a meniscal tear and explore any association between baseline characteristics and outcome. Methodology. A prospective, national multicentre cohort study was performed recruiting patients aged 18 to 55 presenting to secondary care. MRI analysis of arthritis was performed using Whole Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) and bone shape analysis. Outcomes included the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4) at 12 months. Results. 150 participants were recruited across eight sites with a mean age of 43.47 (SD 9.63). MRI analysis using WORMS score and bone shape analysis revealed no or early osteoarthritis. At 12 months, 67 (44.67%) of participants were managed non-operatively and 68 (45.33%) were operatively. Participants in the operative group were significantly younger with a lower BMI (p<0.05). A stepwise logistic regression model including 17 characteristics revealed that only baseline score and surgery significantly affected 12-month WOMET and KOOS4. Conclusion. This study in contrast to previous trials demonstrated a benefit of surgery for patients with a meniscal tear. The METRO study demonstrates that it is feasible to recruit younger patients and a future RCT is required using the study population included in this cohort

The February 2014 Knee Roundup. 360 . looks at: whether sham surgery is as good as arthroscopic meniscectomy; distraction in knee osteoarthritis; whether trans-tibial tunnel placement increases the risk of graft failure in ACL surgery; whether joint replacements prevent cardiac events; the size of the pulmonary embolism problem; tranexamic acid and knee replacement haemostasis; matching the demand for knee replacement and follow-up; predicting the length of stay after knee replacement; and popliteal artery injury in TKR

The April 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Genetic determinants of ACL strength; TKA outcomes influenced by prosthesis; Single- or two-stage revision for infected TKA?; Arthroscopic meniscectomy: a problem that just won’t go away!; Failure in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction; ACL reconstruction in the over 50s?; Knee arthroplasty for early osteoarthritis; All inside meniscal repair; Steroids, thrombogenic markers and TKA

The February 2014 Research Roundup. 360 . looks at: blood supply to the femoral head after dislocation; diabetes and hip replacement; bone remodelling over two decades following hip replacement; sham surgery as good as arthroscopic meniscectomy; distraction in knee osteoarthritis; whether joint replacement prevent cardiac events; tranexamic acid and knee replacement haemostasis; cartilage colonisation in bipolar ankle grafts; CTs and proof of fusion; atorvastatin for muscle re-innervation after sciatic nerve transection; microfracture and short-term pain in cuff repair; promising early results from L-PRF augmented cuff repairs; and fatty degeneration in a rodent model

We reviewed 230 patients an average of 34 months after they had undergone partial or total meniscectomy by surgeons of different experience in a busy unit. Open and arthroscopic meniscectomies were compared. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy resulted in a significant reduction of inpatient stay and earlier return to work and sport. Analysis of the type of meniscal damage showed that arthroscopic removal of "bucket handles" achieved better results than open techniques. Comparatively poor results were found for lateral meniscectomy

Aim: Osteoarthritis can be a progressive disabling disease, which results from the pathological imbalance of degradative and reparative processes. The synovium, bone, and cartilage are each well established sites involved in the pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to progressive joint degeneration. However, the role of meniscus is not known enough. We studied the distribution of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) in man menisci and its changes in osteoarthritis. Patients and Methods: We studied 30 internal menisci from patients with knee osteoarthritis that underwent a total knee arthroplasty and meniscal tissue get from partial arthroscopic meniscectomy in 5 young patients that suffered internal meniscus tear within three months after the damage. Meniscal samples were processed for histology, immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, for assessment of cell density, cells actively dividing as well as apoptotic cells, distribution of COMP and estimate the proteoglycan content. Results: Osteoarthritic meniscus demonstrated areas depleted of cells and significant decrease in COMP immunostaining. Cell clusters were found around meniscal tears. We did not find cells activity dividing in the osteoarthritic group, but there were dividing cells in meniscectomy group. Proteoglycan staining was decreased in meniscus from osteoarthritis group. Conclusions: Osteoarthritis leads to decrease cell population in menisci, loose of COMP as well as altered matrix organization. The role of meniscus in osteoarthritis of the knee is no clear but our results demonstrate changes in COMP and cells in osteoarthritis menisci. These changes reveal an altered scaffold and changes in the meniscus function. Perhaps these alterations have influence on development of knee osteoarthritis

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review the clinical results of a series of 108 children treated artroscopically for symptomatic discoid lateral menisci. Methods: The medical records of more than 100 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for symptomatic discoid meniscus between 1990 and 2005 were reviewed. Results: The mean patient age was 8.7 years (range, 2,5 to 14 years), with 55% female and 45% male patients. The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 20 months (range, 2 to 48 months), with 95% having pain and 38% having mechanical impingment. All patients were treated arthroscopically. Partial or subtotal arthroscopic meniscectomy was performed. Operative classification of the menisci revealed 64 complete, 18 Wrisberg type and 26 incomplete discoid menisci, with meniscal tears being present in 48 knees (45%). At final follow-up, all patients exhibited full knee flexion beyond 135 degrees. Three patients reported residual knee pain, and four reported intermittent mechanical symptoms. At final follow-up, 3 years minimum, according to Ikeuchi clinical score more than 50 % of the patients were considered very good and 25 % good. Only 8 patients felt that their activity level remained partially limited. Conclusions: Our results show the middle-term efficacy of arthroscopic partial or subtotal meniscectomy in cases of symptomatic lateral discoid menisci. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is preferrable only when the posterior attachment of the discoid meniscus is stable. A total meniscectomy is indicated for the Wrisberg-ligament type of discoid meniscus and when the meniscus is completely degenerated. This to our knowledge is the largest series of discoid lateral menisci arthroscopically treated. Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(11):1133–1134.

The December 2022 Knee Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Effect of physical therapy versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: the ESCAPE trial at five years; Patellofemoral arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial; Rehabilitation versus surgical reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament injury; End-stage knee osteoarthritis in Australia: the effect of obesity; Do poor patient-reported outcome measures at six months relate to knee revision?; What is the cost of nonoperative interventions for knee osteoarthritis?