Background. There are few studies of total knee replacements with cemented tibia and uncemented femur (hybrid). Previous studies have not shown any difference in revision rate between different fixation methods, but these studies had few hybrid prostheses. This study evaluates the results of hybrid knee replacements based on data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR). Patients and Methods. Primary total knee replacements without patella resurfacing, reported to the NAR during the years 1999–2009, were evaluated. Hinged-, posterior stabilized- and tumor prostheses were excluded. LCS- and Profix prostheses with conforming plus bearing were included. With the risk for revision at any cause as the primary end-point, 2945 hybrid knee replacements (HKR) were evaluated against 20838 cemented knee replacements (CKR). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis with adjustment for age, sex and preoperative diagnosis were used. Results. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival at 8 years was 94.0% (95% CI: 93.6–94.4) in the CKR group and 97.0% (95% CI: 96.0–98.0) in the HKR group. The HKR group was made op of three brands of prosthesis, LCS, LCS-complete and Profix. Profix was the only brand with a statistically significant difference between cemented and hybrid fixation. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival at 8 years was 97.7% (95% CI: 96.7–98.7) in hybrid Profix group (HPG) and 95.5% (95% CI: 94.7–96.3) in the cemented Profix group (CPG). The adjusted Cox regression analysis showed a statistically significantly lower risk for revision in the HPG group (relative risk=0.44, 95% CI: 0.39–0.59, p<0.001). Mean operating time was 15 minutes longer in the CKR group. Conclusion. Survivorship at 8 years of the hybrid primary total knee replacements was the same or superior compared to cemented total knee replacements depending on prosthesis brand Hybrid fixation seems to be a safe alternative to cemented fixation in total knee replacement surgery

Background. Improving positioning and alignment by the use of computer assisted surgery (CAS) might improve longevity and function in total knee replacements. This study evaluates the short term results of computer navigated knee replacements based on data from a national register. Patients and Methods. Primary total knee replacements without patella resurfacing, reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register during the years 2005–2008, were evaluated. The five most common implants and the three most common navigation systems were selected. Cemented, uncemented and hybrid knees were included. With the risk for revision due to any cause as the primary end-point, 1465 computer navigated knee replacements (CAS) were evaluated against 8214 conventionally operated knee replacements (CON). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis with adjustment for age, sex, prosthesis brand, fixation method, previous knee surgery, preoperative diagnosis and ASA category were used. Results. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival at two years was 97.9% (95% CI: 97.5–98.3) in the CON group and 96.4% (95% CI: 95.0–97.8) in the CAS group. The adjusted Cox regression analysis showed a statistically significantly higher risk for revision in the CAS group (relative risk = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1–2.5, p = 0.019). The LCS complete knees had a significantly higher risk for revision with CAS, compared to CON (relative risk = 2.1 (95% CI 1.3–3.4, p = 0.004)). Mean operating time was 15 minutes longer in the CAS group. Conclusion. Survivorship at two years of computer navigated primary total knee replacements was inferior compared to conventionally operated knees. Therefore, an extensive use of CAS in primary total knee replacement surgery cannot be encouraged until proven superior in long term register studies and clinical trials

Introduction. Austin Moore cervicocephalic prostheses have been a therapeutical option for femoral neck fractures in patients with a reduced general condition for many years. Since treatments other than total hip arthroplasties have also been included in National arthroplasty registers during the last decade, adequate reference data for comparative analyses have recently become available. Materials and Methods. Based on a standardised methodology, a comprehensive literature analysis of clinical literature and register reports was conducted. On the one hand, the datasets were examined with regard to validity and the occurrence of possible bias factors, on the other hand, the objective was to compile a summary of the data available. The main criterion is the indicator of Revision Rate. The definitions used with respect to revisions and the methodology of calculations are in line with the usual standards of international arthroplasty registers. Results. Publications of clinical studies since the year 2000 have been found to significantly underestimate revision rates, on average by a factor of 2.15 as compared to register data. With 2 revisions per 100 observed component years, the revision rate in registers clearly exceeds the comparative values for total hip arthroplasty. The medium-term outcome of treatment with Austin Moore implants shows statistically significantly worse values than the use of total hip endoprostheses, bipolar implants or modular cervicocephalic prostheses. This may be rated as a hint that, in particular cases, there is potential for improvement as regards the indication for cervicocephalic implants. In the datasets of a single National register of a country such as Australia, with a population of just over 21.7 million, approximately 3 times as many cases have been documented within a period of 9 years than in all clinical studies that have been published in Medline-listed journals since the year 1960. Since these data are much more homogeneous, they allow for markedly more accurate evaluations and statements of higher validity. The period of time by which sufficient data are available for a well-founded recommendation is considerably shorter in a register. Conclusion. The results of a meta-analysis of clinical literature deviate conspicuously from data from a National arthroplasty register. The medium- and long-term revision rates after treatment with Austin Moore implants are significantly higher than for treatment with total hip prostheses or modular implants. There is evidence that more stringent indications for monobloc implants could improve the outcome of surgery

Introduction. Infection after total hip arthroplasty is a severe complication. Controversies still exist as to the use of cemented or uncemented implants in the revision of infected THAs. Based on the data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) we have studied this topic. Material and Methods. During the period 2002–2008 45.724 primary THAs were reported to NAR. Out of these 459 were revised due to infection (1,0%). The survival of the revisions with uncemented prostheses were compared to revisions with cemented prostheses with antibiotic loaded cement and to cemented prostheses with plain cement. Only prostheses with the same fixation both in acetabulum and in femur were included in the study. Cox-estimated survival and relative revision risks were calculated with adjustments for differences among groups in gender, type of surgical procedure, type of prosthesis, and age at revision. Results. 92 (23%) of all the revisions were performed with uncemented prostheses, 286 (71%) with cemented prostheses with antibiotic loaded cement, and 25 (6%) with plain cement. Compared to uncemented prostheses and with all reasons for revision as endpoint in the Cox-analyses, prostheses fixed with antibiotic loaded cement had 3.0 (1.4–6.3) times increased risk for re-revision (p=0.004) and prostheses with plain cement 1.9 (0.4–9.3) times increased risk (p=0.44). With infection as endpoint, prostheses with antibiotic loaded cement had 2.8 (1.2–6.4) times increased risk for re-revision (p=0.02) and prostheses with plain cement 2.6 (0.5–13.7) times increased (p=0.26). 77% of the re-revisions (48 of 60) were performed due to infection. Conclusion. Data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Registry indicate that uncemented prostheses should be used in the revision of infected total arthroplasties

Aims

The aims of this study were to assess quality of life after hip fractures, to characterize respondents to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to describe the recovery trajectory of hip fracture patients.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate if there are differences in outcome between sliding hip screws (SHSs) and intramedullary nails (IMNs) with regard to fracture stability.

Aims

This study aimed to identify risk factors (patient, healthcare system, and socioeconomic) for mortality after hip fractures and estimate their relative importance. Further, we aimed to elucidate mortality and survival patterns following fractures and the duration of excess mortality.

Aims

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are common. There is increasing evidence that most of these fractures should be treated conservatively. However, recent studies have shown an increase in use of operative treatment. The aim of this study was to identify the trends in the incidence and methods of treatment of PHFs in Finland.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the potentially increased risk of dislocation in patients with neurological disease who sustain a femoral neck fracture, as it is unclear whether they should undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA). A secondary aim was to investgate whether dual-mobility components confer a reduced risk of dislocation in these patients.

Aims

There is no consensus on the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Hemiarthroplasty has been widely used in patients when non-surgical treatment is not possible. There is, despite extensive use, limited information about the long-term outcome. Our primary aim was to report ten-year patient-reported outcome after hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. The secondary aims were to report the cumulative revision rate and risk factors for an inferior patient-reported outcome.

Background. Both from experimental studies and the large arthroplasty registries there is evidence that bacteria are more often involved in implant loosening then is currently reported. To further elucidate this potential problem, the current study investigated the hypothesis that many total hip arthroplasty revisions, classified as aseptic, are in fact low-grade infections missed with routine diagnostics. Methods. In 7 Dutch hospitals, 176 patients with the preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening of their total hip arthroplasty were enrolled. From each patient, the preoperative history was obtained. During surgery, between 14 and 20 tissue samples were obtained for routine culture, pathology analysis and broad range 16S rRNA PCR with reverse line blot hybridization (PCR-RLB). Samples were taken from the (neo-) capsule and acetabular and femoral interface tissue. Cultures were performed locally according to similar protocols. One specialized pathologist, blinded for all other results, analyzed all pathology samples. The PCR-RLB analysis was performed centrally, using a technique previously validated for orthopedic use. Patients were classified as not infected, suspect for infection or infected, according to strict, predefined criteria. Each patient had a follow-up visit after 1 year. Results. Seven patients were classified as infected, of whom 4 were not identified by routine culture. In these patients, positive PCR-RLB results were supported by pathology analyses suspect for infection as well. An additional 15 patients were suspect for infection as well. The microorganisms identified were low virulent bacteria, like coagulase negative staphylococci and Proprionibacterium acnes, in most cases. Twenty of these 22 patients received a cemented prosthesis, fixated with antibiotic-loaded bone cement. All patients received prophylactic systemic antibiotics, after obtaining the tissue samples. Seven of the 22 patients reported complaints one year post-surgery, only one showing signs of early loosening. However, in none of the patients additional surgery was performed. Discussion. Although percentages were not as high as previously reported in literature, between 4 and 13 percent of patients with the preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening were infected. However, as thorough debridement was performed during surgery and prophylactic antibiotics were used, it did not have many clinical consequences, as most patients performed well at the 1-year follow-up. Whether it has implications for long-term implant survival remains to be seen

Introduction. Stiffness of the knee after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) impairs knee function and reduces patient satisfaction. Limited preoperative range of motion (ROM) and a diagnosis of osteoarthritis seem to be associated with postoperative stiffness, and medical comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus have been discussed as predisposing factors. The present study was undertaken in order to analyse both patient-related and surgical factors that could be associated with the need for mobilization under anaesthesia (MUA) after TKA. Methods. We designed a case-control-study and extracted the study population from our local arthroplasty register. We identified all patients in our register that required MUA following primary TKA (n=35) and then randomly selected 4 control patients for each case of MUA. Incomplete medical records resulted in the exclusion of 18 patients, leaving 157 patients. Univariate analysis was used in order to investigate differences between the two groups with respect to demographics, pre- and postoperative ROM, medical or psychiatric comorbidities, and the type of implant. Variables with a proposed influence on outcome were entered into a binary logistic regression model, and risk ratios (RR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. Regression analysis showed that age at operation, the presence of chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD), and preoperative flexion significantly affected outcome: Increasing age decreased the risk for needing MUA with a RR of 0.88 (CI 0.82–0.94, p<0.001) per year. Patients with COLD had significantly higher risk of needing MUA with a RR of 9.82 (CI 1.84–52.3, p=0.007). Impaired preoperative flexion was an important predictor of postoperative stiffness with a RR of 0.97 (CI 0.95–0.99, p=0.027), implicating that the risk for MUA decreased by approximately 3% for each additional degree of flexion. Gender, BMI, cardiovascular comorbidity, the presence of rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, previous knee injury, and the type of implant did not significantly affect the risk for MUA. In univariate analysis, patients requiring MUA had significantly lower knee flexion at discharge than control patients (78° vs. 61°, p<0.001). Interpretation. We conclude that the presence of COLD, impaired preoperative knee flexion, and younger age increase the risk for needing MUA after primary TKA. The finding that COLD increases the risk for MUA is novel: It is known that patients with COLD have higher systemic levels of inflammatory mediators, and we are tempted to speculate that postoperative arthrofibrosis could be a result of enhanced systemic inflammatory activity. In our hands, the choice of implant and comorbidities other than COLD were not associated with an increased risk for MUA

Background. Improving quality and efficiency is a priority in health policy. Several studies have shown a correlation between high hospital volume and improved results of surgery. In Norway, orthopaedic surgeons operate a relatively low number of total knee replacements compared with other countries. The number of total knee replacements has, however, increased significantly over the past 10 years. Some studies have also shown an association between surgeon volume and outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Purpose. We wanted to study a possible correlation between prosthesis survival and surgery volume of TKA, both with respect to hospital volume and surgeon volume. Materials and Methods. To examine the annual surgery volume per hospital we used registry data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) for cemented TKA without patella component from 1994–2009. A questionnaire regarding surgeon volume in 2000 and 2009 was sent to all 58 operating hospitals in Norway, as this is not registered in the NAR. We received responses from 29 hospitals. Surgeon volume was defined by the percentage of surgeons at the hospital who operated 1–10 TKA over a year. Cox regression (without adjustment) was used to estimate proportions without revision and relative differences (RR). Analyses were also done for a subset of commonly used prostheses (AGC, LCS, LCS Complete, Duracon, NexGen, Profix), and for the prosthesis LCS and Profix separately. Results. Median annual hospital volume increased from 19 knees in 1995 to 83 in 2009. Prosthesis survival at 10 years was 92.5% (95% CI: 91.6–93.4) with 1–24 operations annually and 95.3% (93.7–96.8) with 100–149 operations. We found a lower risk of revision for hospitals with 25–49 (RR = 0.86, p = 0.06), 50–99 (RR = 0.81, p = 0.01, 100–149 (RR = 0.59, p<0.001 and 150 or more (RR = 0.48, p <.001) operations per year, compared to the hospitals with 1–24 operations. The analyses for subgroups of prosthesis brands provided similar results, except for the Profix prosthesis where there was no difference between hospital volumes. In 2000, 47% of the Norwegian hospitals had two thirds of the surgeons operating 1–10 TKA annually, but this was reduced to 24% in 2009. High annual surgeon volume gave the best results in our analyses. Conclusion. There has been an increase in the number of TKAs over time, in Norway as in other countries. Surgeon volume has also increased over time. Previously a high number of surgeons performed a low number of total knee arthroplasties, but this has been significantly reduced over the last 10 years. Survival curves from the NAR show a gradual improvement over time regarding the results of TKA. Our study indicated better results for TKA both at higher hospital volume and surgeon volume. Further analyses should investigate whether other factors may have an influence on this result

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe variation in hip fracture treatment in Norway expressed as adherence to international and national evidence-based treatment guidelines, to study factors influencing deviation from guidelines, and to analyze consequences of non-adherence.

In the time since Letournel popularised the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures, more than 25 years ago, there have been many changes within the field, related to patients, surgical technique, implants and post-operative care. However, the long-term outcomes appear largely unchanged. Does this represent stasis or have the advances been mitigated by other negative factors? In this article we have attempted to document the recent changes within the surgery of patients with a fracture involving the acetabulum, outline contemporary management, and identify the major problem areas where further research is most needed.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1125–31

Using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, 8639 cemented and 2477 uncemented primary hemiarthroplasties for displaced fractures of the femoral neck in patients aged > 70 years were included in a prospective observational study. A total of 218 re-operations were performed after cemented and 128 after uncemented procedures. Survival of the hemiarthroplasties was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard rate ratios (HRR) for revision were calculated using Cox regression analyses. At five years the implant survival was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97 to 97) for cemented and 91% (95% CI 87 to 94) for uncemented hemiarthroplasties. Uncemented hemiarthroplasties had a 2.1 times increased risk of revision compared with cemented prostheses (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.6, p < 0.001). The increased risk was mainly caused by revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (HRR = 17), aseptic loosening (HRR = 17), haematoma formation (HRR = 5.3), superficial infection (HRR = 4.6) and dislocation (HRR = 1.8). More intra-operative complications, including intra-operative death, were reported for the cemented hemiarthroplasties. However, in a time-dependent analysis, the HRR for re-operation in both groups increased as follow-up increased.

This study showed that the risk for revision was higher for uncemented than for cemented hemiarthroplasties.

Our aim in this pilot study was to evaluate the fixation of, the bone remodelling around, and the clinical outcome after surgery of a new, uncemented, fully hydroxyapatite-coated, collared and tapered femoral component, designed specifically for elderly patients with a fracture of the femoral neck.

We enrolled 50 patients, of at least 70 years of age, with an acute displaced fracture of the femoral neck in this prospective single-series study. They received a total hip replacement using the new component and were followed up regularly for two years.

Fixation was evaluated by radiostereometric analysis and bone remodelling by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Hip function and the health-related quality of life were assessed using the Harris hip score and the EuroQol-5D.

Up to six weeks post-operatively there was a mean subsidence of 0.2 mm (−2.1 to +0.5) and a retroversion of a mean of 1.2° (−8.2° to +1.5°). No component migrated after three months. The patients had a continuous loss of peri-prosthetic bone which amounted to a mean of 16% (−49% to +10%) at two years. The mean Harris hip score was 82 (51 to 100) after two years.

The two-year results from this pilot study indicate that this new, uncemented femoral component can be used for elderly patients with osteoporotic fractures of the femoral neck.