Purpose of the Study. To assess the test-retest reliability, construct validity and determine the cut-off scoret of BACKonLINE™ for people with LBP. Background. Appropriate treatment for Low back pain (LBP) is vital, however patients can wait for 14–24 weeks on NHS Physiotherapy lists. Many factors contribute to LBP and initially can be due to peripheral tissue damage. However, persistent LBP is associated with amplification in pain processing in the central nervous system (central sensitisation-CS). CS often results in poorer outcomes and often requires longer management making timely assessment and appropriate management crucial. An online self-assessment and self-management tool (BACKonLINE™) for discerning between characteristics of predominantly centrally (CD) or peripherally (PD) driven LBP was developed using a Delphi study. Method. Same subject, test-retest reliability and construct validity study (two sessions). Sample of 35 volunteers with LBP. In session 1, participants completed BACKonLINE™ and validated questionnaires (Oswestry Disability Index, StartBack, Tampa scale for Kinesiophobia, Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale Short Form 20). Participants repeated the process one week later. BACKonLINE's Cut-off score was determined by plotting results against StartBack using ROC curve analysis. Results. BACKonLINE™ showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.913; 95%CI=0.832–0.956). When assessing construct validity, the aforementioned questionnaires demonstrated moderate correlation with BACKonLINE™ (Pearson's r range= 0.42–0.67, p-value<0.005). ROC analysis determined that scores higher than 42 in BACKonLINE™ indicate CD LBP while scores ≤42 indicate PD LBP. Conclusion. The study shows that BACKonLINE™ has excellent test-retest reliability, and good construct validity within a LBP population. However, further studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted before the implementation of BACKonLINE™. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Civil Service Commission, Kuwait

Purpose and background. There is lacking evidence about the prognostic role of anxiety as prognostic in acute low back pain patients. The objective of this study was to determine whether patients with acute low back pain (ALBP) are at risk to develop chronic low back pain (CLBP) and pain-related disability after 12 weeks due to high anxiety levels. Methods and results. An observational multi-centre study was conducted in primary physiotherapy care with measurements at baseline and at 12 weeks including known prognostic factors and psychological candidate predictors for CLBP. Two hundred and four participants completed both assessments of which 51 and 54 were classified as having less than 50% decrease in pain and pain-related disability, respectively. For pain, the final model contained higher pain intensity, longer pain duration, depression symptoms, and state anxiety with explained variance 0.30, sensitivity 0.74, specificity 0.82, Likelihood Ratio 4.1 (95% CI 2.0 to 6.1) and Area Under the Curve 0.78 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85). For pain-related disability, trait anxiety, depression symptoms, and state anxiety contributed independently to the prediction with the model's explained variance of 0.19, sensitivity 0.78, specificity 0.78, Likelihood Ratio 3.0 (95% CI 2.0 to 4.5), and Area Under the Curve 0.73 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.81). Conclusion. State anxiety in patients with ALBP is an independent predictor of CLBP at 12 weeks after baseline in primary physiotherapy care and should be measured, in addition to known prognostic factors and depression symptoms, in order to intervene and potentially decrease duration of complaints. No conflict of interest. No funding obtained