BACKGROUND. High-dose antibiotic cement spacers are commonly used to treat prosthetic joint infections following knee arthroplasties. Several clinical studies have shown a high success rate with antibiotic cement spacers, however there is little data on the systemic complications of high-dose antibiotic spacers, particularly acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aims to determine the incidence of AKI and identify risk factors predisposing patients undergoing staged revision arthroplasty with antibiotic cement spacers. METHODS. A single-institution, retrospective review was used to collect and analyze clinical and demographic data for patients who underwent staged revision total knee arthroplasty with placement of an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer from 2006 to 2016. A search was made through specific procedure (DRG) and diagnostic (CD) codes. Baseline descriptive data were collected for all patients including age, sex, medical comorbidities, type and quantity of antibiotics used in the cement spacer, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin (Hg), BMI, smoking status, peak creatinine levels, and random vancomycin levels. Acute kidney injury was defined as a more than 50% rise in serum creatinine from a preoperative baseline within 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS. A total of 54 staged revision TKA surgeries performed by 5 different surgeons between 2006 and 2016. The total incidence of AKI was 31% (n=17). There was a significant positive association between change in creatinine level and use of oral/intravenous antibiotics (p=0.03, Spearman's rho=0.33) and a significant positive association between AKI and the use of tobramycin cement (p=0.01, Spearman's rho=0.38). Factors that were not significantly associated with AKI include presence of preexisting hypertension (p = 0.26), hyperlipidemia (p = 0.83), coronary artery disease (p = 0.86), chronic kidney disease (p=0.56), and smoking status (p=.35). There was a trend towards increased risk of AKI in patients with diabetes mellitus (p= 0.12), however this was not significant. CONCLUSION. In single staged revision knee arthroplasty there is a significant association between acute kidney injury and type of oral/intravenous antibiotic used in the treatment. Both the use of intravenous vancomycin and tobramycin cement are independently associated with higher rates of AKI. Preexisting medical comorbidities are not independent risk factors for development of AKI. Serum creatinine and measurement of serum aminoglycoside and vancomycin levels should be performed after placement of an aminoglycoside-containing antibiotic cement spacer in a staged revision arthroplasty

Introduction. Objective was to assess clinical results of treatment of Infected Non Union (INU) of long bones, using Antibiotic Cement Impregnated Nail (ACIN), a single or two staged approach, Stage 1 - Debridement, eradication of infection, primary stabilization with (ACIN). 2nd Stage - Definitive stabilization and early rehabilitation. Methods. 185 cases of infected non-union of long bones from Jan 2002 to Jan 2009 were treated in this hospital. 46 females and 139 males, age varied from 17–65 years (Avg. 40). Tibia was the commonest bone to be affected, followed by femur & humerus. The control of infection was by debridement, antibiotic cement impregnated K-nail (ACIN) insertion with or without Ilizarov ring fixator application, second stage treatment by definitive internal fixation and bone grafting was done if required. Average duration of follow up, was 26 months (14–58 months). Main outcome measurements were assessment of bone healing, functional outcome, healing time and complications. Results. Out of the 185 cases treated in our institute 174 (93.7%) patients achieved union at an average of 8 months. 2 limbs with non union tibia fractures were amputed on demand by patients, 2 limbs developed severe edema, 7 patients did not achieve union, inspite of repeated procedures. Infection was controlled early especially in Type 1 non unions. 5 patients had persistent infection though mild inspite of 2 or 3 surgeries of exploration and curettage. Discussion and conclusion. The two staged procedure described gives satisfactory results. Antibiotic and cement impregnated nails and beads achieve good infection control without any complications and reduce the healing time. Ilizarov fixator helps in stabilization, compression, deformity correction at the same time and plays a significant role in the path to union. Fixator should be removed as early as possible to avoid restriction of movements

INTRO. Two-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI may make use of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer (ACS), as successful long- term prevention of reinfection have been reported using this technique.[i] However, there is little data on systemic complications of high-dose antibiotic spacers. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is of clinical significance, as the drugs most commonly utilized, vancomycin and aminoglycosides, can be nephrotoxic. We intended to determine the incidence of AKI in patients that underwent staged revision arthroplasty with an ACS, as well as to identify potential predisposing risk factors for the disease. METHODS. Local databases of six different orthopaedic surgeons were retrospectively reviewed for insertion of either a static or articulating antibiotic cement spacer by from 2007–2017. Dose of antibiotic powder implanted, as well as IV antibiotic used, was collected from operative records. Demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative and postoperative creatinine and hemoglobin values were recorded from the EHR. AKI was defined by a more than 50% rise in serum creatinine from preoperative baseline to at least 1.4 mg/dL, as described by Menge et al.[ii] Variables were analyzed for the primary outcome of AKI within the same hospital stay as insertion of the ACS. Categorical variables were analyzed with Chi-Square test, and continuous variables with univariate logistic regression. RESULTS. 75 patients (39 M, 36 F) receiving an ACS were identified, with a mean age of 70.0 (SD=10.6) and a mean BMI of 31.3 (SD=7.3). Incidence of in-hospital AKI was 13.3%. Patients reached AKI at a mean 6.7 days (SD=4.5), during a median length of stay of 13.5 days (IQR=21.8). No significant correlation was found between AKI and the variables of age (p=.430), BMI (p=.569) or gender (p=.181). AKI was also not associated with increased dose of vancomycin (p=.416), tobramycin (p=.440), or gentamycin (p=.846) within the cement spacer, or the comorbidities of hypertension (p=.094), diabetes (p=.146), coronary artery disease (p=1.00) and renal disease (p=.521). However, decreased baseline hemoglobin showed significantly increased risk for AKI (OR=1.67, p =.049), and increased creatinine showed a trend (OR=2.9, p=.059). Percentage of hemoglobin decrease (preoperative to postoperative) did not increase odds for AKI (p=.700). CONCLUSION. The incidence of acute kidney injury in patients that receive antibiotic cement spacers is relatively high when compared to the data reported in primary TKA. ii,[iii]. Our results suggest that patient related risk factors, such as low preoperative hemoglobin, may be involved in the etiology of AKI in this population. Therefore, it may be clinically appropriate to monitor anemic patients for AKI when implanting an ACS

Antibiotic bone cement as a form of prophylaxis against deep infection for total hip joint replacements is widely used; however its efficacy has not been proven. This study aims to determine if the use of prophylactic antibiotic cement for primary total hip joint replacements in New Zealand reduces the risk of deep infection requiring revision. Data from January 1999 to December 2007 were recovered from the New Zealand National Joint Registry. Proportional hazards regression analysis was used to study the relative revision risks or failure rates between those THJR which utilised antibiotic bone cement and those using plain bone cement. Of the 32,646 hips included in the study 1376 were revised. The overall use of antibiotic and plain cement through this time period is relatively equal, with 18,863 (54.7%) receiving ABC compared to 16,295 (46.3%) hips receiving plain cement. The presence of antibiotics in bone cement was not found to affect whether the hip went on to get revised for deep infection (p =0.16). Nor was the type of operating theatre (p=0.13), the use of space suits (p=0.97), and the operative time (p=0.55). Younger age was found to be the most significant indicator for the need for revision for infection (p value 0.00014). The induction of antibiotic resistance and the significant additional costs associated with antibiotic bone cement cannot be denied. While the literature supports the prophylactic use of antibiotic bone cement for patients at high risk of infection, the routine use in patients who have a low risk of infection may not be justified

Aim. The incidence of fractured neck of femur (FNOF) is increasing yearly. Many of these patients undergo hip hemiarthroplasty. High dose dual-antibiotic cement (HDDAC) has been shown to reduce rates of deep surgical site infection (SSI) when compared to the current standard low dose single-antibiotic cement (LDSAC) in a quasi-randomised controlled trial. Some concerns exist regarding the use of HDDAC and the development of resistance. We reviewed cases of infection in LDSAC and HDDAC bone cement with regard to causative organism and resistance profile. Method. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all hemiarthroplasties within our trust from April 2008 to December 2014. We identified all patients in this time period who acquired a deep SSI from the trust SSI surveillance database. The infecting organisms and susceptibility patterns were collated for each cement. Results. We identified 1941 hemiarthroplasties. There were 36 deep surgical site infections representing an infection rate of 3.1% in LDSAC patients and 1.2% in HDDAC patients. A wider variety of organisms were seen in the LDSAC compared to HDDAC. Staphylococcus epidermidis accounted for the majority of infections in both LDSAC and HDDAC patients. Infection with Corynebacterium species and Staphylococcus aureus was eliminated completely in HDDAC. There was minimal change in the proportion of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. A change in resistance was not demonstrated amongst infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. In Gram-positive bacteria, resistance to a number of antibiotics increased using HDDAC compared to LDSAC, most notably to clindamycin and gentamicin within the coagulase negative staphylococci. However, levels of resistance remained low to teicoplanin, vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and rifampicin. Conclusions. A lower infection rate was seen in HDDAC. Direct comparison demonstrated changes in resistance profiles caused by Gram-positive organisms. 24,000 patients undergo hip hemiarthroplasty annually. Extrapolating our results to this cohort would demonstrate 744 infections in LDSAC and 288 infections in HDDAC. Of these, resistance to both clindamycin and gentamicin would be seen in 180 patients with LDSAC and 177 patients with HDDAC. Overall, this review supports the continued use of HDDAC in FNOF patients. High dose dual antibiotic cement = Copal G+C, Heraeus Medical, UK. Low dose single antibiotic cement = Palacos R+G, Heraeus Medical, UK

Despite the prophylactic use of antibiotics and hygienic strategies, surgical site infection following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is still a severe and unsolved complication. Since antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) was introduced by Buchholz in the 1970s, the use of ALBC has been increasingly used for the prevention and treatment of periprosthetic infection (PPI). However, the routine use of ALBC during primary TJA remains controversial. Recent clinical studies have found that ALBC is effective in reducing the risk of PJI following primary TJA. Although ALBC having the advantage of reducing the risk of PJI, the main disadvantages are the possible development of toxicity, antibiotic resistance, allergic reaction, and possible reduction of the mechanical properties of bone cement. Nevertheless, a recent published article demonstrated, that the use of high dose dual-antibiotic impregnated cement reduce significantly the rate of surgical site infections compared to standard low dose single ALBC in the setting of a hip fracture treating with hemiarthroplasty. Furthermore, Sanz-Ruiz et al. presented that the use of ALBC in TJA has favorable cost-efficiency profile. In this context, reasons why surgeons should use antibiotic-loaded bone cement during primary TJA are demonstrated.

Periprosthetic infection after total joint replacement is a catastrophic complication. Current rates of infection have been decreasing and in most centers now are in the range of 0.1–1%. Peri-operative intravenous antibiotic therapy is used routinely in total hip arthroplasty patients at this time. With rates this low and mixed evidence that antibiotics in bone cement for routine total hip replacement are beneficial at reducing joint infection, routine use of this practice seems unnecessary and has potential disadvantages. Cost of antibiotics being added to cement on a routine basis will increase the cost of the arthroplasty $300–$500. Although small addition of bone cement also has a negative effect on the mechanical properties of the cement. The major disadvantage remains the danger of resistant bacterial strains from excessive use of antibiotics particularly vancomycin resistant organisms when it is used routinely. Although rare with the aminoglycosides, allergic reactions may occur if cephalosporins are used as prophylaxis. Use of antibiotics in bone cement should be considered in high risk patients for infection undergoing total hip replacement but not routinely because of cost, emergence of resistant organism and possible allergic reaction.

Aim. Studies have shown that retention of antibiotic cement spacer in selected elderly patients with low functional demand represents a viable option for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) treatment. 1,2. . The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy in infection treating among modular taylored preformed and hand-made antibiotic spacers. Our hypothesis is that modular tailored preformed spacer provides a better rate of infection resolution, better radiological and functional outcomes compared to hand-made spacers. Materials and methods. We identified 48 patients treated with antibiotic cement spacer for shoulder chronic infection between 2015 and 2021 in our institution; (13 hand-made spacers and 35 modular tailored preformed spacers). We collected data about comorbidities, associated microorganism, infection resolution, clinical and radiographic evaluation. Results. The mean age at surgery was 63.2 years, (45.8% female − 54.2% male), mean BMI 28.3. The mean time of infection diagnosis after first surgery was 30 months; (31.2% infection after ORIF in proximal humeral fractures, 68.8% PJI after shoulder arthroplasty). The main pathogens were Propionibacterium Acnes (37.5%), Staphylococcus Epidermidis (29.2%), Staphylococcus Aureus (16.7%), negative intraoperative coltures (14.6%), Enterococcus (4.17%), Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (4.17%). The mean time of antibiotic spacer retention was 18 months: 23 patients (47.9%) underwent second stage surgery for prosthesis implantation; 2 removed the spacer because of spacer dislocation, 2 died during follow up; while 21 patients still hold the antibiotic spacer (17 patients in treatment with prefabricated spacers and 4 with self-constructed spacer). The mean value for clinical assessment for patients with modular tailored preformed spacer were: Constant Score 34 – QuickDASH 40 – SST 33 – ASES Score 66 – VAS 2. Patients treated with hand-made spacer registered the following scores: Constant Score 20 – QuickDASH 51 – SST 25 – ASES Score 38 – VAS 6. Two patients presented fracture of the spacer (one hand-made spacer and one tailored preformed). Conclusions. According to our data patients treated with modular tailored preformed antibiotic spacer show better functional outcomes. Patients are more likely to retain the spacer as a permanent implant, avoiding the risks of a second stage surgery in those low-demanding patients, achieving a reasonable satisfying quality of shoulder motion without pain

Fracture related infection, in particular chronic osteomyelitis, requires complex management plans. Meta analyses and systematic reviews have not found a gold standard of treatment for this disease. In 2017 an alternative treatment protocol was undertaken in our institution; whereby staged surgery with the use of cheaply manufactured tailored antibiotic cement rods was used in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis, secondary to traumatic long bone fractures. Short term outcomes for this protocol demonstrated a 75.7% microbiological resolution to a negative culture and a good clinical outcome of 84.2% overall was demonstrated in terms of sinus resolution, skin changes, pain and function. Our aim now was to assess the long term outcomes of this treatment strategy. A cross-sectional study of patients who had previously undergone the set treatment protocol was performed. Patient satisfaction, effects on activities of daily living, return to work and clinical improvement at 5 years following the intervention were assessed using a patient questionnaire and the validated AAOS lower limb score. The average AAOS lower limb score was 88 which was en par to other similar studies. 80% of patients had returned to some form of work. Ongoing mild pain was a persistent problem for 50% of the patients however 98% of the patients were overall satisfied with the treatment satisfaction at 5 years. Only 1 patient required further treatment. 8 patients could not be located for follow up. Chronic osteomyelitis remains a complex disease to treat. This treatment protocol demonstrates favourable microbiological, serological and clinical short term outcomes and favourable patient satisfaction and functional long term outcomes at 5 years. Our study highlights antibiotic targeted cement rods as a feasible treatment option in managing chronic osteomyelitis

The rate of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is approximately 1%. As the number of THAs performed each year continue to increase (550,000 by 2030), a corresponding increase in the number of hip PJI cases is likely to occur. A chronic deep infection may be treated by either chronic suppression, irrigation and debridement, single-stage exchange, or two-stage exchange. In the United States, the gold standard for chronic PJI continues to be a two-stage exchange. The benefit of an antibiotic impregnated cement is that they produce higher local concentrations of antibiotics than systemic intravenous administration. Hip spacers may be either static or articulating. Static spacers are reserved for cases of massive acetabular bone loss in which an articulating spacer is not feasible. A static spacer consists of a block of antibiotic cement in the native acetabulum and antibiotic coated rod in the femoral canal. Limb shortening, loss of soft tissue planes, and disuse osteopenia and muscle atrophy are all limitations of static spacers. In contrast, articulating spacers fulfill the goals of the interim construct during two-stage exchange which is to enhance eradication of the infecting organism through drug elution, to maintain limb length, to facilitate exposure during revision surgery, and to improve functional mobilization. Articulating spacers may be divided into three general categories based on method of spacer creation: Handmade custom spacers, prefabricated spacers, custom molded spacers (hemiarthroplasty molds and molded stem with cemented all-polyethylene cup). Handmade custom spacers are usually created with K-wire or rush rods coated with antibiotic cement. Handmade spacers are relatively simple to make, they are economical, and the amount and type of antibiotics incorporated can be customised for the infecting organism. Commercially available hemiarthroplasty spacers can be either prefabricated (Spacer G, Exactech, Gainesville. FL) or made intraoperatively (Stage One, Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) are available in several head and stem sizes. The advantage of prefabricated spacers is that they do not require additional time to mold in the operating room. The downside of prefabricated spacers is that the antibiotic concentration and type is predetermined. A custom molded stem with cemented all-polyethylene cup can be made with off the shelf implants or used as part of a commercially available spacer (PROSTALAC, DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN). A common antibiotic/cement combination includes Tobramycin (3.6 g/40 g of cement) and vancomycin (1.5 g/40 g of cement). In all of these spacer constructs, the principles of using a high-elution cement mixed without a vacuum and with high doses of heat stable antibiotics are consistent. Tobramycin works synergistically to improve Vancomycin elution properties and is usually added in higher doses. Overall infection eradication is similar between all categories of spacers and range between 90–97%. Complications after placement of an articulating spacer are often specific to the type of spacer used. Handmade spaces that have K-wires for support are at risk for spacer cement fracture. Spacer dislocation is also a common complication in up to 15% of cases with all types of spacers. In addition, periprosthetic fractures can occur postoperatively in up to 10% of patients. Overall, despite this complication profile, articulating antibiotic spacers have excellent rates of infection eradication and offer improved mobilization in the interim two stage period and reduce operative time, complexity, and morbidity during reimplantation

Introduction. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious problem and requires great effort and cost for its treatment. Treatment options may vary from resection arthroplasty, retention of prosthesis with debridement, one stage revision and two stage revision with handmade antibiotic impregnated cement spacer or with prefabricated antibiotic loaded cement spacer. Two stage revision remains the gold standard for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). This study was aimed to find the efficacy and cost effectiveness of handmade antibiotic impregnated articulating cement spacer over commercially available prefabricated antibiotic loaded cement spacer for the treatment of deep PJI of hip prosthesis and to evaluate its functional outcome. Material and methods. A total of 23 PJI patients were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. In the two stages of revision, the first stage consisted of thorough debridement, implant removal and implantation of handmade articulating antibiotic impregnated cement spacer. The second stage surgery consisted of removal of cement spacer, thorough debridement and implantation of new prosthesis. All patients were followed for a period of 24 months. Results. A total of 23 patients (15 males and 8 females) underwent two stage revision arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic joint infection. The mean age of the patient was 57 years. The handmade antibiotic impregnated cement spacer was retained for 16– 20 weeks. Common organism observed was coagulase negative staphylococci followed by Staphylococcus aureus. After an average follow up of 2 years, 20 patients with PJI remained clinically free of infection. In 2 patients there was recurrence of infection. Conclusion. We conclude that two stage revision by hand made cement spacer is successful in eradication of infection with satisfactory functional outcome. Furthermore, these handmade cement spacer are cost effective and their efficacy may be comparable to commercially available prefabricated spacer

Multiple studies have established an inverse relationship between ambient theatre temperatures and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement setting times. It is also known that allowing cement to equilibrate to ambient theatre temperatures restores expected setting characteristics. One overlooked entity is the transport and storage conditions of cement. This is important in tropical regions, where extreme temperature and humidity may cause rapid cement setting times, resulting in potentially significant intra-operative complications. This study investigated the relationship between extreme transport and storage conditions of Antibiotic Simplex cement (Stryker), and the effect on setting times at Cairns Hospital, Far North Queensland, Australia. Fifty units of cement were divided evenly into a control arm and four experimental arms. The experimental arms were designed to mimic potential transport and storage conditions. They included seven days of storage in a medication fridge, on the hospital loading dock, in a cane shed, and in a Toyota Landcruiser parked outdoors during January 2022. Humidity and temperature readings were recorded. The samples in each group were evenly distributed to equilibrate to theatre conditions for 1 hour and 24 hours. Setting time was recorded when a no. 15 scalpel blade was unable to mark the surface. All three ‘hot’ exposures setting times were significantly faster for both 1 hour (ρ=0.001) and 24 hours (ρ=0.024) equilibration times. The difference in setting times for the ‘cold’ exposure was not significant for either equilibration times (ρ=1). To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating cement setting times in tropical climates. Further studies are required to address the effect of these conditions on biomechanical strength of PMMA cement. We conclude that extreme heat and humidity during transport and storage have a statistically significant effect on cement setting times

Aim. The duration of systemic antibiotic therapy following first-stage surgery is contentious. Our Institution's philosophy is to perform an aggressive debridement, use high concentration targeted antibiotics through cement beads and systemic prophylactic antibiotics alone. In the presence of significant soft tissue infection or microbiological diagnostic uncertainty; systemic antibiotics may be prescribed for 5 days whilst awaiting tissue culture results. The aim of this study was to assess the success of our philosophy in the management of PJI of the hip using our two-stage protocol. Method. A retrospective review of our Institution's prospectively-collected database was performed to identify those patients who were planned to undergo a two-stage hip revision procedure for PJI. All patients had a confirmed diagnosis of PJI as per the major criteria of MSIS 2013, a minimum 5-years follow up and were assessed at the time of review using the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool (2018). They were then grouped into “successful” or “unsuccessful” (suppressive antibiotics, further revision for infection, death within 1 year). Results. 299 intended two-stage hip revisions in 289 patients (6 repeat ipsilateral two-stage, 4 bilateral two-stage) met our inclusion criteria. 258 (86%) patients proceeded to 2. nd. stage surgery. Median follow up was 10.7 years. 91% success rate was observed for those patients who underwent reimplantation; dropping to 86% when including the patients who did not proceed to second stage surgery. The median duration of post-operative systemic antibiotics following first stage surgery was 5 days (IQR 5–9). No significant difference in outcome was observed in patients who received either; < / = 48 hours (86%; n=70) compared to > 48 hours antibiotics (86%; n=229; p=0.96) or </= 5 days of antibiotics (88%; n=202) compared to > 5 days antibiotics (82%; p=0.38). A significant majority had gram-positive (88%) infection with 30% being polymicrobial. Greater success rates were observed for gram-positive PJI (87%); than for gram-negative PJI (84%) and mixed Gram infection (72%; p=0.098). Conclusion. Aggressive surgical debridement with high concentration, targeted local antibiotic delivery at time of first stage hip surgery, without prolonged systemic antibiotics, provides a high rate of success, responsible antibiotic stewardship and reduced hospital costs

Aim. Aim was to compare revision rates when using single versus dual antibiotic loaded cement (ABLC) in hip fracture arthroplasty and aseptic revision hip or knee arthroplasty using data from the Dutch national joint registry (LROI). Methods. All primary cemented (hemi-)arthroplasties for acute hip fractures and cemented aseptic hip or knee revision arthroplasties, were incorporated in 3 datasets. All registered implants between 2007 and 2018 were included (minimum 2 years follow-up). Primary end-point was subsequent revision rates for infection and for any reason in the single and dual ABLC groups. Cumulative crude incidence of revision was calculated using competing risk analysis. Results. A total of 22,308 hip fracture arthroplasties, 2,529 hip revision and 7,124 knee revision arthroplasties were registered and analyzed in the study period. The majority of hip fracture patients (97.1%) was treated with single ABLC. For hip and knee revision arthroplasties dual ABLC was used in 33.8% and 25.7%. The revision rate for infection in the fracture arthroplasty group was not different between groups (0.5% versus 0.8%, p=0.27). The re-revision rate following hip or knee revision based on single versus dual ABLC was not different between groups (3.2% versus 2.8%, p=0.82 for hip revision and 1.8% versus 2.5%, p=0.36 for knee revision). In addition, the re-revision rate for any reason was not different in all three datasets. The crude cumulative revision and re-revision rates for any reason based on single ABLC versus dual ABLC showed no differences in all three datasets. The crude cumulative 7-year re-revision rate for any reason following revision THA with Gentamicin ABLC use was 11.8%, with Gentamicin + Clindamycin ABLC use 13.1% and with Erythromycin + Colistin ABLC use 14.8% (ns). The crude cumulative 9-year re-revision rate for any reason following revision TKA with Gentamicin ABLC use was 17.7% and with Gentamicin + Clindamycin ABLC use 16.5% (ns). Conclusions. In conclusion, we could not show a difference in revision rate for hip fracture arthroplasty or re-revision rates for revision hip- or knee arthroplasty with the use of dual ABLC compared to single ABLC bone cement, with 7and 9 year follow up. The low percentage of dual ABLC in hip fracture arthroplasties in our registry do not enable us to make a reliable estimation of the added value in this patient category. The results of this study do not confirm the potential benefit of dual ABLC use in revision cases

Septic complications of long bone fracture are still a significant clinical problem. Although inflammatory process after intramedullary nailing is a rare complication, its treatment is complex. The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of the treatment of septic complications of the long bone union with use of Reamer–Irrigator–Aspirator (RIA) technique and intramedullary antibiotic-coated PMMA nailing. An analysis of the effectiveness of treatment of 49 patients with septic non-union of long bones (12 femur, 37 tibia), in which the RIA method was applied with antibiotic cement impregnated intramedullary nailing. Treatment consisted of reaming of long bone canal using the RIA technique and the intramedullary cement coated nail with the targeted antibiotic. Treatment required second stage with nail exchange and PMMA removal after 6 weeks to prevent the resitant strains selection. In a group of patients treated with use of above-mentioned method the remission of inflammatory process was achieved in all cases. 32 (67%) patients developed bone union, 24 patients with tibial and 8 patients with femoral septic bone union disorders. The average duration of bone union obtainment with intramedullary nailing was 37 weeks. The most common inconveniences that occurred during treatment was prolonged wound discharge and pain. Inflammatory complications of fractures in our material involved extensive injuries, usually high-energetic. Stabilization with intramedullary locked nail coated with antibiotic cement after debridement with RIA method is a convincing treatment. An essential element of biological bone union is to provide a good cover of the bone tissue with a soft tissue envelope and sequestrectomy. The success of the treatment of infected pseudoarthrosis may be obtained under condition of: radical removal of inflammation tissue, convincing biomechanical dynamized stabilization and antibiotic therapy

Aim. This study aimed to identify risk factors for development of deep periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients following surgical treatment of neck of femur fracture. Method. This study identified a consecutive series of 2,822 (2,052 female, 73%) patients who underwent either hemiarthroplasty (n=1,825, 65%) or fixation (DHS) (n=997, 35%) for fractured neck of femur performed between January 2009 and June 2015 at our institution. Full patient demographics, co-morbidity and peri-operative complication data were determined. The majority of patients were either ASA 2 (n=663, 23%) or ASA 3 (n=1,521, 54%), mean age = 81.3 years (SD 10.3). All patients were followed up post-operatively by a dedicated surgical site infection (SSI) monitoring team in order to identify patients who developed a PJI within 1 year. A stepwise multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify patient and surgical factors associated with increased risk of infection. Predictors with a p-value of <0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. Results. Thirty-nine (39) cases of deep periprosthetic infection were identified (hemiarthroplasty n=35, DHS n=4) representing an overall deep infection rate of 1.4% (hemiarthroplasty 1.9%, DHS 0.4%). The most common infecting pathogen was a pure growth of coagulase negative Staphylococcus (n=9, 23%) followed by a pure growth of Staphylococcus aureus (n=7, 18%). An increased risk of PJI was observed in patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty compared to those treated by fixation (odds ratio (OR) 6.50, 95%CI 2.26 – 18.7, p=0.001). Of patient factors, only blood transfusion within 30 days (OR 3.51, 95%CI 1.72 – 7.13, p=0.001) and the presence or development of pressure sores on or during admission (OR 2.99, 95%CI 1.24 – 7.19, p=0.015) were significantly associated with an increased risk of development of PJI. Use of high-dose dual antibiotic cement (gentamicin and clindamycin) was associated with a two-fold reduction in the risk of PJI (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.20 – 0.76, p=0.005) vs standard dose gentamicin antibiotic cement. Conclusions. This study found: 1) a deep infection rate similar to that reported earlier from large number studies from the UK, 2) a six-fold higher deep infection rate in hemiarthroplasties, compared to internal fixations, and 3) a three-fold higher infection rate in patients who suffer concomitant pressure sores or receive a blood transfusion up to 30 days post-operatively

The burden of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to rise and the management of this dreaded complication continues to pose challenges to the orthopaedic community. Dr Buchholz from the Endo Klinik has been credited for reporting the initial observation that addition of antibiotic to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement lead to better ability to deliver higher concentrations of antibiotic to the joint milieu and avoid administration of high doses of systemic antibiotics with potential for systemic toxicity. Addition of antibiotics to PMMA cement has continued to be an important aspect of managing patients with chronic PJI. The rationale for this practice is that higher doses of local antibiotics can be reached without placing the patients at risk of systemic toxicity. Whether a one-stage or a two-stage exchange arthroplasty is being performed, antibiotics that can withstand the exothermic reaction of PMMA and are able to elude from cement are added at various doses to the PMMA for later delivery. Although this practice continues to be almost universal, there are a few unknowns. First of all, a recent study raised a valid question regarding this practice. Though intuitively logical, addition of antibiotics to PMMA spacers has not been scrutinised by any level 1 study and hence one is not able to prove that this practice does indeed accomplish its intended objectives of reducing recurrence or persistence of infection. Orthopaedic community is advised to seek avenues to generate this much-needed evidence. The other main unknown is how much, and in some instances which antibiotic, needs to be added to the PMMA cement. Some authorities have declared that antibiotics can be added at high doses, with an average total dose of 10.5 g of vancomycin (range, 3–16 g) and 12.5 g of gentamicin (range, 3.6–19.2 g) in one study, to PMMA cement without the fear of systemic toxicity. In recent years, renal toxicity and other systemic adverse effects have been attributed to addition of high doses of antibiotics to cement. I have personally witnessed such adverse reactions in a few patients. Although initially I was inclined to “blame” the concurrent administration of systemic antibiotics for the renal toxicity that patients developed following insertion of spacer, selective nephrotoxicity (i.e. reaction to aminoglycoside that was only present in the spacer and not systemically administered) and resolution of the nephrotoxicity upon removal of antibiotic spacer, convinced me that our nephrology colleagues have a valid reason to be concerned about addition of high doses of antibiotics to PMMA spacers. What has become clear is that high viscosity cements containing MA-MMA copolymers have been shown to have better antibiotic elution profiles than other PMMA formulations. So when fashioning a spacer in the operating room the surgeon needs to be aware of the differences in elution profile of antibiotics from PMMA and individualise the dose of antibiotics being added to spacer based on the type and viscosity of cement being used and the renal status of the patient. Thus, systemic toxicity caused by addition of antibiotics to cement spacer appears to be a real issue in some circumstances and this needs to be born in mind when managing patients with PJI. There are numerous other issues related to the use of antibiotic cement spacers. In the hip, the lack of adequate offset and limited portfolio of products result in laxity in the soft tissue and subsequent dislocation of the hip. In addition, the dose and type of antibiotic in the premanufactured spacers, at least in the US, are inadequate to lead to a substantial delivery of antibiotics in the local tissues. Because of these issues, I prefer to fabricate “customised” spacers for each patient that I operate on

The infected TKA is one of the most challenging complications of knee surgery, but spacers can make them easier to treat. An articulating spacer allows weight bearing and range of motion of the knee during rehabilitation. This spacer is made using antibiotic-impregnated bone cement applied to the tibial and femoral implants. For our purpose, 4.8g powdered tobramycin is mixed with 2gm vancomycin and one batch of antibiotic. Cement is applied early to the components, but applied late to the femur, tibia, and patella to allow molding to the defects and bone without solid adherence to bone. Patients have tailored intravenous antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks for treatment of various gram-positive and gram-negative organisms. At 10–12 weeks patients are revised to a cemented revision total knee arthroplasty using standard cementing techniques. From our experience, range of motion before reimplantation was 5 – 90 degrees. Follow-up averaged 73 months for fifty patients with 90% good to excellent results; 10% had a recurrence of infections. Use of an articulating spacer achieves soft tissue compliance, allows for ease of re-operation, reduced postoperative pain, improved function, and eradicates infection equal to standards reported in the literature

Background. Infection is one of the most severe comlications of the total arthroplasty. We sometimes encounter cases, which are very hard to finish repeated recurrence. Usage of steroids, immunosuppressants, and biologics would possibly effect to the incidence of the prosthetic infection and to the result of its treatment. Biologics have drastically decreased the number of the total arthoplasic patients, on the other hand, we must be more careful about the infectious conditions. For the infection two stage revision surgery; first removal and antibiotics cement spacer insertion then reimplantation later; is often chosen but sometimes one time antibiotics cement spacer cannot stop the infection and requires multi times spacer insertion. In those cases the dead spaces, poor blood supply and tight skin could be the cause of the recurrence. For these cases we had been performing musclo-cutaneal flap and successfully finish the infection. Objectives. Our objectives are to review infection cases treated with musclo-cutaneal flap and compare with treatment without it. Methods: Since 2004 to 2013, 6 infection cases were treated. Our standard policy is 2-staged revision. In the first surgery, the prosthesis was removed and cement spacer was inserted. If no evidence of the remained infection was found reimplantation would be done in the second surgery. Otherwise debridement and cement spacer were repeated. In 3 cases, the infection could be finished without musclo-cutaneal flap but in 3 cases musclo-cutaneal flap was finally done then the infection was finished. The clinical courses were reviewed. Results. Case 1. After right hip revision, fistula formation was occurred. Later, enterococcus fecalis was detected. Six times cement spacer insertion was performed. But fistula was remained. Musclo-cutaneal flap of sartorius muscle was performed. No fistula was seen after that. Case 2. Fistula was appeared 3 years after hip replacement. The culture was negative. New prosthesis insertion was done after one time spacer treatment then the infection was controlled. Case 3. Six weeks after primary hip replacement, fistula was appeared. MRSA was found. Three times antibiotic spacer insertions were done then re-implantation was successfully done. Case 4. Three weeks after total knee replacement, the wound became lose and MRSA was found. The wound was communicated with the joint and the patient had general weakness, so musclo-cutaneal flap was done in one time. No recurrence was seen. Case 5. Two weeks after total hip replacement, MRSA superficial infection was found. Wound washing and both injection and oral antibiotics were used. Case 6. This patient was sent from a certain hospital after 3 times open debridement. MRSA was still positive. One time antibiotics spacer was done, and then revision with musculo-cutaneal flap of lateral vastus muscle was performed. No recurrence is seen so far. In all flap cases, infection was finished in our case. On the other hand, the surgical invasion was much bigger. So we can take musculo cutaneal flap into consideration to overcome the recurent infection

Aim. The purpose of this study was to report on outcomes after stabilization of large skeletal defects following radical debridement of hip or knee infections and staged reimplantation using segmental antibiotic mega-spacers. Method. From 1998–2018, 39 patients (18 male, 21 female) were treated for musculoskeletal infections at the hip (14) or knee (25). Patients were treated for infection after a procedure related to oncology (20), arthroplasty (16), or trauma (3). Following debridement, defects were stabilized with antibiotic impregnated PMMA and intramedullary nails. All patients underwent a standardized protocol: 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics followed by 6 weeks of oral antibiotics guided by intraoperative cultures. After a 6-week holiday of antibiotics, repeat intraoperative cultures and inflammatory markers were analysed for infection resolution. Success was defined by reimplantation without additional infection-related complications or requirement of suppressive antibiotics at latest follow-up. Results. Mean age was 50.5±19.4 years. Mean defect size was 20.4cm. Mean time from surgery until infection was 34.5 months, with 74% of patients presenting with infection greater than one year after their most recent surgery. Mean follow-up was 110±68 months. Most common organisms of infection were Staphylococcus Epidermidis (11) and Staphylococcus Aureus (10). Mean defect size was significantly different among oncology (28±8 cm), trauma (19±5 cm) and arthroplasty (12±6 cm) patients (p<0.0001), though outcomes were comparable. Two patients with antibiotic spacers have not underwent attempted reimplantation – one patient with clinical and laboratory signs of resolved infection; one patient with recent spacer placement. One patient died of oncologic disease shortly after spacer placement. These three patients were excluded from outcomes analysis. Twenty-nine (81%) patients were successfully re-implanted with a segmental endoprosthesis. Eight patients required an additional procedure prior to infection resolution, including additional antibiotic spacer and debridement due to sustained inflammatory markers and clinical signs of infection (5), antibiotic spacer exchange due to mechanical failure (2), and polyethylene exchange 9 months after reimplantation (1). Two patients have remained on chronic suppressive antibiotics, but have retained their limb, prosthesis, and pain-free function. Four (11%) patients ultimately required an amputation for infection control (3 above knee amputations; 1 hip disarticulation). Conclusions. Following radical debridement for infection, staged management of large segmental defects at the hip and knee with antibiotic cement and temporary intramedullary stabilization results in an 81% success-rate of limb salvage with infection control